logo
My son spoke up on the playground–now it's my turn not to freeze

My son spoke up on the playground–now it's my turn not to freeze

Yahoo10-06-2025
When I came out in the late 90s, my mother warned me that life was going to be harder. Somehow, I don't think she was picturing me, at 48, debating whether it was too late to cancel my eight-year-old son's playdate because I was afraid to tell the boy's parents that I was married to a woman.
Writer Saeed Jones discusses a common misconception about coming out: that it is a one-time event. In reality, it's an act that LGBTQ+ people engage in over and over again. Before coming out, Jones asks, "Is it safe for me to share?"
As a femme-presenting white woman who has lived most of my adult life in New York State, there have only been a handful of times I've felt truly unsafe being out. There was the time a man screamed expletives at my girlfriend and me as we held hands on a New York City sidewalk. There was another time I went apartment hunting with a different girlfriend in a city with no housing discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people. But now it is different.
Or so I assumed.
My son met his friend at a new public school, which, judging from the numerous Trump signs throughout the district, was a lot more conservative than his old, progressive Montessori school. It wasn't just the signs, though. While local conservative friends said they supported Trump for economic reasons and not any social agenda, I'd read some terrifying language in Project 2025 that defined families composed of a married mother and father as "the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society."
Where did my family fit in that?
There was also an anecdote that my son had shared from the early part of the school year. On the playground, he'd heard one kid say, "Whoever moves first is gay." I found a meme on TikTok that explained it. Apparently, straight men played this 'joke' on other adult men. After the challenge was issued, both men froze in place. Neither wanted to be "gay." My jaw dropped when I watched this from the comfort of my living room, surrounded by my Carhart-clad wife, three cats, and Billie Eilish streaming from the speaker. Were gay jokes still a thing?
Before corporate-sponsored pride parades, legalized same-sex marriage, or The L Word, I'd learned from classmates in the 80s that lesbians were mannish, brutish, or too ugly to get a man. Being gay was even worse. It went beyond a description of one's sexual preference to include any behavior that was considered stupid, immature, or uncool.
I, too, might've frozen back then if someone had called me gay. The meme unsettled me at my core. I couldn't stop thinking about it in the days leading up to the playdate. As a mother, I'm used to pushing past my discomfort for my son, so I didn't cancel. Even so, I couldn't shake the feeling as I joined the boy's parents and younger sister in their cozy living room. As Halloween approached, I turned to small talk, starting with a question about the family's plans for trick-or-treating. The wife told me that she didn't care for the holiday.
"The sugar?" I suggested, remembering my son's unhinged exuberance after inhaling a sleeve of Smarties.
"I'm very religious," she said. "And the holiday is anti-Christian."
I nodded solemnly. It wasn't the best time to mention that my son had chosen a red devil costume this year. Or that my wife and I were planning to be witches, inspired by Katherine Hahn and Aubrey Plaza's sapphic relationship in Agatha All Along. Meanwhile, Jones's question continued to linger in my head.
I thought it was safe when I told my mother about my first college girlfriend. It was the late 90s, and I was confused about my sexuality. I hoped she'd help me understand it, as she did with other challenges I'd faced. But rather than reassure me that everything would be fine, my mother was upset. "Your life will be so much harder if you end up with a woman," she warned me.
Then, she ignored my coming out entirely for years.
Left to my imagination, I pictured how her premonition might come to pass. I might become an object of curiosity, like my short-haired high school math teacher, who was rumored to be a lesbian. I might be shunned by family and friends. I would probably never get married or have a family of my own. However, my lived experience exceeded my mother's expectations significantly. Acceptance of same-sex relationships in the U.S. grew in the early 2000s. In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples had the right to marry. My wife and I got hitched and had a child.
Over the years, I became comfortable coming out to family members, friends, coworkers, accountants, and online forms. Now, coming out usually means I blithely share with a new acquaintance that I have a wife.
But I felt none of that casual confidence during the playdate. Instead, there was a dryness in my mouth. Something about this heteronormative, anti-Halloween, Game of Life-looking family in this hyper-charged political climate made me sure I knew the answer to Jones's question.
Was it safe to share? No, definitely not.
That's why I didn't reveal that my wife had been making pita bread daily when the husband complimented his wife's bread-making skills. Or, when the wife shared her aversion to ultra-processed foods, I didn't mention that my wife felt the same way. Then I slipped up. The husband teased his wife for obsessively reading labels in the supermarket. This time, I found myself agreeing out loud: "My wife does that, too." Immediately, I realized my error. I tried to cover it up by reciting some facts my wife had told me about carrageenan while hoping—no, praying—that my confession might go unnoticed.
But it was too late. The proverbial (telltale lesbian) cat was out of the bag.
Often in life, the things we think will be big deals turn out to be small deals. This was no exception. The husband immediately asked about my wife. To my surprise, he was welcoming and kind. Before we left, he even suggested getting the boys together again. I was relieved that the parents didn't turn out to be monsters, but I reflected on my own performance during the car ride home. I didn't want my son to get the message he had to hide. Hiding part of myself from the outside world didn't alleviate my suffering. It just turned the pain inward.
After that conversation with my mother, I stopped dating women for a time and began seeking out men instead. It took me a long time to become comfortable with my sexuality and permit myself to be me. If I learned anything from my own coming out, it's that you can't protect people from being who they are. In my son's case, his story is already written: His parents are two women. Even if I don't blab it to a bunch of strangers, it will still be true. But beyond my personal story, the interaction made me realize another vital reason for coming out.
It reminds others that people like me and families like mine exist.
I've also found that coming out can be a path to connection—something critical in this time of political divisiveness. My experience with coming out to strangers is that my sharing often engenders a greater openness on their part. They might mention that they have a gay sibling or a close friend who's gay. In one instance, a seemingly straight person revealed a same-sex relationship in their own past.
While Trump is eroding the rights of LGBTQ+ people with sweeping executive orders, state lawmakers are urging the Supreme Court to overturn the federal right to same-sex marriage. Meanwhile, others in power are staying silent. I'm thinking about my own ability to fight for the rights of LGBTQ+ people. I often feel defeated. Rights can be abstract, especially if your own aren't at stake. But one thing I do have is this small act: the power to tell another person face-to-face that I exist.
And if I lose my nerve, I need only think of my son.
Recently, he told me that someone challenged him on the playground with the "whoever moves first is gay" meme. I tensed up, imagining him freezing in a sea of boys, but he told me that he talked back to the boy in a matter-of-fact voice. "You shouldn't say that. It's not nice to people who are gay."
My son didn't freeze. Next time, I won't either.
Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. Visit out.com/submit to learn more about submission guidelines. We welcome your thoughts and feedback on any of our stories. Email us at voices@equalpride.com. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists and editors, and do not directly represent the views of Out or our parent company, equalpride.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on gerrymandered congressional map
Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on gerrymandered congressional map

Los Angeles Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on gerrymandered congressional map

Democrats in the Texas House left the state Sunday in a last-resort bid to block new congressional maps sought by President Trump that would give Republicans a better chance of preserving their narrow U.S. House majority in the 2026 midterm elections. The dramatic revolt came before the GOP-controlled House was set to vote Monday on the proposed maps, which would give Republicans five more winnable congressional seats. In response to Texas' rare mid-decade political gerrymander, Democratic governors in other states have floated the possibility of redrawing their own maps in retaliation, but their options are limited. Many of the Texas Democrats were bound for Illinois and a welcoming from Gov. JB Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, who in recent weeks has offered them support. It was unclear how long they were prepared to stay out of Texas or whether the maneuver would succeed. Four years ago, House Democrats left Texas for 38 days in protest of new voting restrictions that still wound up passing once the holdout ended. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' Rep. Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement. Lawmakers can't pass bills in the 150-member Texas House without at least two-thirds of them present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the Republican-majority chamber, and at least 51 were leaving the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. In addition to the Illinois group, five lawmakers headed to New York and another group went to Boston, Rush Nisenson said. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would meet as planned Monday afternoon. 'If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table,' he posted on X. Republican Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, said on X that Democrats who 'try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' A refusal by Texas lawmakers to show up is a civil violation of legislative rules. The Texas Supreme Court held in 2021 that House leaders had the authority to 'physically compel the attendance' of missing members, but no Democrats were forcibly brought back to the state after warrants were served that year. Two years later, Republicans pushed through new rules that allow daily fines of $500 for lawmakers who don't show up for work. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment Sunday. The quorum break will also delay votes on flood relief and new warning systems in response to last month's catastrophic floods in Texas that killed at least 136 people. Democrats had called for votes on the flooding response before taking up redistricting and have criticized Republicans for not doing so. Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned U.S. House map that would create five GOP-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. Pritzker, who has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term, had been in quiet talks with Texas Democrats for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Last week, the governor hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Party Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Now, with many Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the gerrymandered map proposal, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and Trump. The Republican president is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House two years into his presidency, and he hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them. Cappelletti and DeMillo write for the Associated Press. AP writer Nadia Lathan in Austin, Texas, contributed to this report.

YouTube Experiments With New Display of Collaborators on Clips
YouTube Experiments With New Display of Collaborators on Clips

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

YouTube Experiments With New Display of Collaborators on Clips

This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. YouTube's testing a new option that will enable creators to add collaborators to the video title display, in order to help showcase a broader range of creators across its clips. As explained by YouTube: 'We're starting to test a feature that allows creators to add collaborators to a video. Adding collaborators allows content to be recommended to each of the creators' audiences. We're starting this test with a small group of creators at first, but we'll keep you posted on our plans to expand it to more creators.' As you can see in this example from the latest video posted by MrBeast, the new option will display collaborators on a video both via their channel avatars, which will be stacked alongside each other, and within the creator listing beneath the title. Tap on the '…and 3 more' tag and you'll get a full title listing of the channels that have collaborated on the clip. The option is similar to the collaborative tools available on Instagram or TikTok, providing a simple way to showcase a partner profile within the video description. Which could be a valuable connector and promotional tool, providing a more direct link through to collaborating channels, which could see more traffic headed their way, especially if they collaborate with a bigger channel. It's worth noting, however, that YouTube has been encouraging creator collaborations for years, with its YouTube Academy training resource including a whole segment on collaborating with others, and how to do so effectively. So collaborations, in themselves, are not new, but YouTube's looking for a better way to highlight these partnerships within the content itself, so that creators get equal share of the benefits from their shared clips. And it's a logical, simple way to do this, which people are already used to in other apps. As such, this seems very likely to be expanded to all YouTube channels in the near future. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Video: What's in the U.S.-South Korea Trade Deal?
Video: What's in the U.S.-South Korea Trade Deal?

Wall Street Journal

time42 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Video: What's in the U.S.-South Korea Trade Deal?

A 15% headline tariff on South Korean goods. The deal removes uncertainty for Seoul, and tariffs are the same or lower than those on major trading peers, said President Lee Jae Myung. Plus the same rate for cars. Autos from the likes of Hyundai face a 15% tariff—similar to the levies on Japanese and EU vehicles—and down from a proposed 25%, according to a senior Seoul official. Duty-free treatment for the U.S. President Trump said U.S. exports to South Korea 'will not be charged a tariff.' A $350 billion U.S. investment commitment. South Korea has pledged some $200 billion of funding for chips, nuclear power, batteries and biotech, and $150 billion for shipbuilding, the Seoul official said. Trump said investments would be 'owned and controlled' by the U.S. Status quo for rice and beef. Seoul won't open its market further to U.S. rice or beef—moves that would have sparked significant backlash inside South Korea. Safeguards for semiconductors and pharma. Trump has threatened extra tariffs on these industries, but South Korea has received 'most-favored nation' treatment, the official said. This means South Korea won't face higher tariffs than other countries on those products.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store