NC Sheriffs' Association Legislative Day 2025
According to a press statement, 'Legislative Day gives sheriffs the opportunity to meet with their legislators one-on-one to discuss public safety issues they are facing in their counties.'
Sheriffs and their command staff travel to the General Assembly to meet with legislators to discuss various topics, including:
Increasing recruitment and retention of law enforcement officers
Increasing punishments for fentanyl-related drug crimes
Tougher penalties for the sale of unregulated hemp products to children; and
Making it unlawful for scammers to impersonate government officials on telephone calls.
'As sheriffs, it is important for us to maintain relationships with our legislators in theGeneral Assembly,' commented North Carolina Sheriffs' Association PresidentSheriff Mike Roberson of Chatham County. 'We all look forward to the opportunityto speak to our legislators face-to-face to tell them about the real issues we areseeing in our communities and hearing about from our constituents.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Texas Democrats know they're fighting a losing cause. At least they're fighting.
This move by Democrats is performative at best. But it's one of the only things they've done to counteract President Trump's complete takeover of the government. Democrats in Texas are trying to represent the will of their constituents. To do so, they had to leave the state. On Aug. 4, the Texas Legislature was scheduled to vote on congressional redistricting that would turn five districts favoring Democrats to favor Republicans. To prevent the vote from happening, Democratic state legislators fled Texas, ensuring that the General Assembly would not have a quorum and thus making the vote impossible. 'We come here today with absolute moral clarity that this is absolutely the right thing to do to protect the people of the state of Texas,' state Rep. Gene Wu, the leader of the House Democratic Caucus, said at an Aug. 3 press conference in Chicago. Other legislators traveled to Albany, N.Y., and Boston. On one hand, this move by the Democrats is performative at best. Eventually, they will have to go back to Texas, and the new maps will be voted on. This doesn't mean it's a bad thing, though. It's one of the only things Democrats have done to counteract President Donald Trump's complete takeover of the government. Texas Democrats are pushing back on Republican antics This did not come out of nowhere – Trump specifically asked Republicans in the state to redraw the congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterms to give their party an advantage through gerrymandering in the state's cities, which would give Democrats even less representation than they currently have. Gov. Greg Abbott had to call a special session to approve the maps. At the press conference, Wu pointed out that this decision is happening against the backdrop of historic flooding in central Texas in July that killed 135 people, including more than 35 children. Instead of focusing on disaster relief, Republicans are choosing to address the congressional maps. Republicans in Texas should be focused on helping their communities, not bending to the whims of the president. At the very least, redrawing districts could wait until after flooding has been addressed. While it was bold of Democrats to leave at such a perilous time, it's clear they're doing so because they feel it's the only option. Opinion: Republicans are afraid of Mamdani in New York. That's a good thing. Democrats know this is all for show. At least they're taking a stand. The Democrats are certainly getting the attention of their fellow Texas politicians. Abbott is so upset, he's threatening to remove the lawmakers from office if they do not return to the state to vote on the new maps. He also said the Democrats possibly committed felonies by fundraising for the $500 a day fines they're facing. 'Come and take it,' the Democrats replied. Opinion: What if I told you there's a Democrat who can still get the Republican vote? Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is also running for U.S. Senate, said he believes the runaway legislators should be 'found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' Dustin Burrows, a Republican and the Texas Speaker of the House, has said he's prepared to issue civil arrest warrants for the missing Democrats. Trump has not weighed in on the Democratic play, seeing as he's too busy firing the commissioner of Labor Statistics and weighing in on Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad. Ultimately, this act of protest will have to come to an end. Democrats will have to head back to Austin and vote on these maps, whether they like it or not. But at least they're doing something to sound the alarm on the president's meddling and Republican acquiescence. People have been souring on the Democrats as of late. A poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that most Democrats see their party as 'weak' or 'ineffective.' It doesn't help that Democratic leadership is nowhere to be found nationwide. If anything, this act of protest will put attention back on the party and serve as a starting point for a stronger presence in predominantly red states ahead of the midterms. They're finally fighting back, even in a very red state like Texas. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Can GOP shock Dems in Aug. 5 special election to succeed Ruggerio in RI Senate?
The first test of how Rhode Island Republicans' message is playing in the state during the second Trump administration comes Aug. 5 in the special Senate election to replace the late Dominick Ruggerio. The GOP's Alex Asermely takes on Democratic nominee Stefano Famiglietti in the race to represent Senate District 4, covering most of North Providence and a section of northwest Providence. Republicans face an uphill battle in the Senate district, which Democrat Ruggerio represented since 1984 and which has been controlled by his extended family for more than half a century. And Ruggerio hadn't had a general election opponent since two independent candidates were on the ballot in 2012. Famiglietti, with support from the state's Democratic establishment and businesses, outspent Asermely in the campaign by more than three to one, about $32,000 to $9,000. Asermely may benefit from the fact that the district has become somewhat more conservative in recent years, in part due to boundary changes that made it more difficult terrain for Democratic primary challengers. And North Providence is among the suburbs that have tilted red since 2016. Both Asermely, 39, and Famiglietti, 33, are attorneys and residents of North Providence. Famiglietti defeated three other Democrats in the July primary. Asermely was unopposed for the GOP nomination. Where do they stand on the issues? Asemely is running on business friendliness and cutting taxes. Famiglietti's top priority is bringing back more state aid to North Providence. Gun control, a big issue in the recent General Assembly session, has not been a top issue in this race, with both candidates saying they opposed the recently passed ban on sales of assault-style weapons. And, unlike Famiglietti's primary opponents, neither candidate is calling for Mayor Charles Lombardi to step down over allegations that town employees did work on his property. "At this junction, Mayor Lombardi is facing just civil accusations and not any criminal charges," Famiglietti said. "While the accusations are severe and bears watching, we certainly cannot solely allow such accusations to determine guilt or innocence." Asermely said it's a town rather than a State House matter. Truck tolls They do, however, differ on some other big issues. The state budget assumes the truck toll network will relaunch sometime next year and provide $10 million in state revenue, although details remain scant. Is Gov. Dan McKee right to turn the tolls back on? "No, absolutely not, as it is an impediment to commerce," Asermely said. "It is an unfair burden on small businesses that gets passed on to the consumers." Famiglietti: "Yes, I am in favor of turning the truck tolls back on, as it is the most effective way to raise revenue to repair our roads and bridges without directly impacting the taxpayers. With that said, I will never be in favor of tolling passenger vehicles." Hospitals Despite extensive efforts by the state to help shore up financially struggling hospitals, the CharterCare hospitals that included Fatima of North Providence are still searching for investors to help facilitate a turnaround plan. Should the state do whatever it takes to keep them afloat? "The state should use any and all resources to save these facilities," Famiglietti said. "Both facilities are essential to our local health care system as well as our state's health care system. The loss of these facilities would cause an unbearable strain that would adversely affect care in our state." Asermely: "These are private businesses. It is not the duty of the taxpayers to bail them out. The taxpayers contribute enough through private pay, insurance, Medicare, & Medicaid. Under no circumstances should services be cut, as this is a management issue." Washington Bridge The Democratic and Republican candidates also have differing report cards for the Rhode Island Department of Transportation's handling of the westbound Washington Bridge emergency. Famiglietti said while the bridge closure has adversely affected residents, "the steps taken to allow for continued flow of traffic while safeguarding public safety have been prudent. However, we must take care that all of our roads and bridges are monitored and repaired to avoid situations like this in the future." Asermely blasted the pace of the rebuild effort and DOT's answers for how the problem arose.. "No, it has not progressed fast enough and work seems to be sporadic and slow," he said. "Transparency has been a disaster and this should have never happened in the first place." Housing Neither candidate is a fan of state efforts to build more housing by overriding local restrictions on construction or ending mandates for homes to sit on large properties. "There is little available property in Senate District 4," Asermely said. "The use of that property should be defined by the market, not the legislature." Famiglietti: "I do not support allowing more unfettered housing in District 4. My experience on the North Providence Town Council has shown me the negative effects increasing housing density has on our already densely populated community." Pensions Both candidates support restoring cost of living adjustment payments to public-sector retirees that were cut in 2011, but neither supports raising taxes to do it. School lunches Neither candidate supports providing universal free school lunch, as in Massachusetts and Connecticut. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Senate District 4 special election: Where candidates stand on issues Solve the daily Crossword
Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney, Palestinian Authority aligned on conditions for statehood, but ‘it won't happen overnight,' PA diplomat says
OTTAWA — Canada has no specific demands for the Palestinian Authority to meet in order to recognize the State of Palestine at September's UN General Assembly, the PA's most recent top official in Ottawa says, but reforms to achieve statehood are 'not going to happen overnight.' Echoing Prime Minister Mark Carney's remarks Wednesday , Mona Abuamara, the PA's Ambassador to Italy and formerly the chief representative in Canada for the last four years, told the Star in an interview that the conditions laid out by Ottawa to recognize a Palestinian state are in fact the goals of the Palestinian Authority that were communicated to Canada and other nations. Mona Abuamara, the Palestinian Authority's ambassador to Italy and formerly the chief representative in Canada for the last four years. 'It's not that it's asked of us and pushed on us,' Abuamara told the Star Thursday. 'Those are things that we want to have, because we want to build a state that's independent and viable, democratic, and we want to be able to have our people choose their leadership.' 'It wasn't preconditioned recognition. It was mutual agreement on the things that we're on the same page.' In making those comments, Abuamara shed further light on the process leading up to Canada's decision this week to recognize a Palestinian state, but she also laid bare the challenges ahead to actually achieve a viable Palestinian state in the face of Israeli and Hamas resistance. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Carney expressed little doubt Ottawa would follow through in September, saying Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas repeatedly committed to elections in 2026, the exclusion of Hamas and the demilitarization of a future Palestinian state. But Abuamara, who said the Canadians don't expect any results by September, acknowledged following through on those reforms will be an uphill climb, and will require a massive international effort. 'It's not going to happen overnight,' Abuamara said. 'We have Gaza that has been levelled to the ground, and we have a Jerusalem that's occupied. So those things we will need to have been resolved by the international community, so we would be able to have an election in Palestine.' In announcing Canada's plan to recognize a Palestinian state, Carney on Wednesday spoke of how prospects of a negotiated two-state solution have increasingly dimmed amid Israeli settlement expansion and settler violence in the West Bank, the Hamas attacks on Israel and Israel's ensuing invasion of Gaza. Since the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas, which killed more than 1,200 people and captured more than 250 hostages, Israel's military response has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to health officials in Gaza. On top of those conditions, the Palestinian Authority, the main alternative leadership to Hamas, has been rife with allegations of corruption and deep mistrust among Palestinians, dampening its international reputation. But amid little progress on a ceasefire and escalating outrage over the mounting death toll, the mass starvation and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, several nations are attempting to revive momentum for a two-state solution. That's what compelled France and Saudi Arabia to hold a joint UN conference on the topic, and what later led Paris, the U.K., Ottawa and others to announce plans to recognize a Palestinian state led by the PA. The current Israeli government, however, rejects a two-state solution. Declaring 'Israel will not bow to the distorted campaign of international pressure against it,' Iddo Moed, Israel's ambassador to Canada, said Wednesday there is no reason to trust the Palestinian Authority and argued the move will harden Hamas during ceasefire and hostage negotiations, a view shared by the United States. 'President Abbas's latest vision for the future sharply contrasts with the Palestinian Authority's long-standing record; thus, it is hard to see his new-found 'commitments' as more than a thinly veiled strategy to maintain the status quo with the sympathy and support of the international community,' Moed said. 'Canada and its allies should not be under an illusion otherwise.' Thomas Juneau, a University of Ottawa professor who specialized in the Middle East, said that without a change in government in Israel, it's unlikely the conditions for a two-state solution will be met. 'Everybody is careful in talking about that, because ... Canada and other countries don't want to be seen as directly intervening in Israeli affairs,' Juneau said. 'But everybody knows that this current government, given its makeup, is not interested in a two state solution.' Likewise, purging Hamas, which rules Gaza, out of Palestinian society is also a tall order, said Louise Blais, a former Canadian representative to the UN. 'Hamas is an idea, as well,' Blais said. 'And it's going to live on in the people.'
