Pope Leo XIV sets out papal vision, calls AI a defining challenge for humanity
Speaking before the College of Cardinals at the New Synod Hall, the first American pontiff said the Catholic Church must respond to the ethical dilemmas posed by AI and a new phase of industrial development with renewed dedication to human dignity, justice, and labor protections.
"In our own day, the church offers everyone the treasury of its social teaching in response to another industrial revolution and to developments in the field of artificial intelligence that pose new challenges," Leo said, drawing a parallel to Pope Leo XIII's 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, which addressed labor rights during the rise of industrial capitalism.
Leo XIV — born Robert Prevost — was elected Thursday as the 267th pope in one of the swiftest conclaves in modern history.
The Chicago-born Augustinian missionary was chosen on the fourth ballot, a result attributed to his quiet influence in smaller conclave sessions and widespread respect from cardinals across linguistic and cultural lines.
A vocal supporter of the Second Vatican Council reforms, Leo pledged to build a church that listens more to the faithful, embraces 'popular piety,' and upholds the missionary spirit emphasized in Pope Francis' 2013 apostolic exhortation The Joy of the Gospel, which he cited as a foundational document for his papacy.
In a symbolic move, Leo has retained both the motto and coat of arms from his time as bishop of Chiclayo, Peru.
The Vatican confirmed the new pope's continued focus on artificial intelligence, a concern also voiced by Francis in his final years.
Francis had warned of the dangers of unchecked technological power, calling for an international treaty to ensure AI remains human-centered and does not replace moral judgment with algorithms.
The Vatican press office noted that Leo will prioritize ethical regulation of AI and explore the Church's role in shaping technology's impact on society, especially as it relates to labor, privacy, and social inequality.
Leo's election follows a period of mourning after Francis' passing, with whom he shared close ties. Francis had brought Prevost to Rome in 2023 to oversee bishop appointments worldwide, a sign of trust that many cardinals saw as a testament to his leadership capacity.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican's secretary of state and a widely regarded papal contender, expressed support for the new pontiff in a published message Saturday, praising Leo's balanced leadership, diplomatic calm, and pastoral sensitivity. — Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
9 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump says US agrees trade deal with Japan
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says the US has agreed to a "massive" trade deal with Japan, one of the country's largest trading partners. Japan has agreed to invest $550bn (£407bn) in the US while its goods sold to America would be taxed at 15% when they reach the country - below the 25% tariff Trump had threatened. Trump said on social media that Japan would open its economy to US goods, including cars, trucks, rice and certain agricultural products. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba welcomed the announcement, saying it was "the lowest figure to date among countries with trade surpluses with the US". "I just signed the largest trade deal in history, I think maybe the largest deal in history with Japan," Trump touted at a White House event on Tuesday evening. "They had their top people here, and we worked on it long and hard. And it's a great deal for everybody. I always say it has to be great for everybody. It's a great deal," he said on Wednesday the agreement would mean US tariffs on vehicles and parts would be cut to 15% from 25%.However, the tax is above the 10% Trump levied on Japan and other countries when he suspended higher so-called reciprocal tariffs between April and said: "We were the first in the world to reduce tariffs on cars and auto parts without any quantity restrictions."UK cars sent to the US are taxed at a lower 10% rate when they reach American shores but this is limited to 100,000 vehicle added: "The agreement does not include any reduction of tariffs on the Japanese side."The BBC has contacted the White House and Japan's embassy in Washington for more details of the trade its main tariff rate down to 15% is Japan's "best compromise at this stage", Shigeto Nagai from research firm Oxford Economics told BBC planned investment in the US by Japan included in the announcement "will be a huge boost to restore the US, fitting in with Trump's story of reviving US manufacturing with more jobs," he a letter sent to Japan this month, Trump threatened a 25% tariff on the country's exports to the US if there wasn't a new trade deal struck before 1 August, just above the rate he announced during his so-called Liberation Day on 2 April tariffs plan, which included duties on many US trading partners across the globe, were paused for 90 days following worldwide market turmoil. It allowed Tokyo's trade representatives time to negotiate with their counterparts in benchmark share index, the Nikkei 225, was more than 3% higher on Wednesday in Tokyo, with strong gains for shares in motor industry giants - including Toyota, Nissan and apparent deal comes as Ishiba is under pressure to step down after his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost its majority in the country's upper house in elections over the LDP had already lost its majority in Japan's more powerful lower house last year. — BBC
Leaders
21 hours ago
- Leaders
Trump Withdraws US from UNESCO Amid Clash over Ideological Priorities
President Donald Trump announced the US will withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), citing the organization's anti-American and anti-Israel bias, along with its woke agenda. The decision follows a 90-day review initiated in February, focusing on anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment within UNESCO. Concerns Over DEI Policies Administration officials expressed concerns about UNESCO's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly stated that the organization's pro-Palestinian and pro-China stance influenced the decision, emphasizing that Trump prioritizes American interests in international organizations. UNESCO's recent initiatives raised alarms, as the 2023 'anti-racism toolkit' urged member states to adopt anti-racist policies. Additionally, the 2024 'Transforming MEN'talities' initiative aimed to reshape perceptions of gender issues in India, which also included a report on using video games to promote gender equality. Anti-Israel Actions UNESCO has faced criticism for its anti-Israel actions, including designating Jewish holy sites as 'Palestinian World Heritage' sites, with the organization frequently describing Palestine as 'occupied' by Israel while failing to condemn Hamas's actions in Gaza. Moreover, China, the second-largest funder of UNESCO, has leveraged its influence to promote its interests. The Chinese Communist Party has faced scrutiny for downplaying the role of minorities, such as Uyghur Muslims, in its history. Trump previously withdrew the US from UNESCO in 2017, citing similar concerns. The US first left the organization in 1983 under President Reagan, who criticized its politicization and hostility toward free societies. President Biden rejoined UNESCO in 2023, arguing that American presence was essential to counter China's influence, with his administration also pledging to repay over $600 million in dues since 2011. Short link :
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Harvard Is Hoping Court Rules Trump Administration's $2.6b Research Cuts Were Illegal
Harvard University will appear in federal court Monday to make the case that the Trump administration illegally cut $2.6 billion from the storied college – a pivotal moment in its battle against the federal government. If US District Judge Allison Burroughs decides in the university's favor, the ruling would reverse a series of funding freezes that later became outright cuts as the Trump administration escalated its fight with the nation's oldest and wealthiest university. Such a ruling, if it stands, would revive Harvard's sprawling scientific and medical research operation and hundreds of projects that lost federal money. 'This case involves the Government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decision-making at Harvard,' the university said in its complaint. 'All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: Allow the Government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions.' A second lawsuit over the cuts, filed by the American Association of University Professors and its Harvard faculty chapter, has been consolidated with the university's. Harvard's lawsuit accuses President Donald Trump's administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands in an April 11 letter from a federal antisemitism task force. The letter demanded sweeping changes related to campus protests, academics, and admissions. For example, the letter told Harvard to audit the viewpoints of students and faculty and admit more students or hire new professors if the campus was found to lack diverse points of view. The letter was meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment on campus. Harvard President Alan Garber pledged to fight antisemitism but said no government should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue. The same day Harvard rejected the demands, Trump officials moved to freeze $2.2 billion in research grants. Education Secretary Linda McMahon declared in May that Harvard would no longer be eligible for new grants, and weeks later, the administration began canceling contracts with Harvard. As Harvard fought the funding freeze in court, individual agencies began sending letters announcing that the frozen research grants were being terminated. They cited a clause that allows grants to be scrapped if they no longer align with government policies. Harvard, which has the nation's largest endowment at $53 billion, has moved to self-fund some of its research but warned it can't absorb the full cost of the federal cuts. In court filings, the school said the government fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism. The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the April demand letter was sent. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel contracts for policy reasons. 'It is the policy of the United States under the Trump Administration not to fund institutions that fail to adequately address antisemitism in their programs,' it said in court documents. The research funding is only one front in Harvard's fight with the federal government. The Trump administration also has sought to prevent the school from hosting foreign students, and Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. Finally, last month, the Trump administration formally issued a finding that the school tolerated antisemitism – a step that eventually could jeopardize all of Harvard's federal funding, including federal student loans or grants. The penalty is typically referred to as a 'death sentence.'
