Anti-immigration policies 'cutting jobs at Scottish universities'
It comes after Dundee University, which relies on income from foreign students, announced it was cutting 300 jobs as it attempts to tackle a financial crisis which will also rely on it seeking increased public funding.
The Sunday National understands that Dundee recruits overseas students from countries like Nigeria, where the ability to bring over family members is highly attractive.
For students from places like the US, this has less of an impact.
(Image: NQ)
The Tories changed immigration rules in 2024 by shutting off routes to the UK for the dependents of international students unless they are studying for a PhD. It was part of a wider crackdown on immigration which also made it harder for health and social care workers to bring over family.
Labour have maintained the rules, despite calls for a reprieve in light of the impact they are having on universities.
Research from the House of Commons library showed that the Migration Advisory Committee had advised the UK Government early last year that clamping down on students bringing their families to live with them would 'mechanically reduce the number of graduate visas'.
It also highlighted that the most recent data, published in February 2025, showed that student visa applications had dropped by 13% last year while there was an 84% fall in applications from the dependents of students.
SNP MP Stephen Gethins, a former St Andrews University academic, said Labour's tough stance on immigration meant Scottish universities were paying the price.
He said: 'Higher education in Scotland has been impacted disastrously by the decisions that are taken at Westminster, decisions that have led to the hostile environment, Brexit and other areas which act as a counterweight to the internationalisation agenda that has been pursued by our universities in recent years that has put them in positions of excellence in terms of research and in terms of teaching.
'What we know from Dundee and the acting principal has highlighted, for example, the detrimental impact that this is having on jobs, and in some of our institutions in Scotland.
'In Dundee, for example, the drop in postgraduate students coming along has had a very significant impact on the institution and a significant on their income. That's something that should concern us all.'
(Image: Newsquest)
Scotland's status as a home of 'world-leading' universities was at risk, unless the UK Government changed course, Gethins (above) warned.
He said: 'Having institutions that are internationally competitive is why our higher education sector, our universities are world-leading. There's no other word for it, they are world-leading.
'And if we want to remain world-leading, we must tackle, we must challenge Westminster on some of its damaging policies that are having a material impact right now on some of these institutions.'
A Dundee University spokesperson said: "The changes to visa regulations have undoubtedly impacted on international student recruitment across the higher education sector in the UK.
"The downturn in international recruitment has been one of the significant factors in the financial challenges facing the university. We are working intensively with partners around the world to bring students to Dundee.'
Scottish Higher Education Minister Graeme Dey said: "International students are welcome in Scotland and they make an important contribution to our campuses and local communities.
'We recognise the issues raised by the sector around a decline in international student numbers and damaging UK migration policies which is why we have proposed a Scottish Graduate Visa. This would act as a bridge between the existing Graduate Visa and a Skilled Workers Visa, allowing us to attract international students and retain international graduates from Scottish institutions.'
The UK Government was approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
9 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Labour announces major pension review – what it means for your money
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE government will launch a new commission to ensure workers have enough money in retirement. Labour will bring back the Pensions Commission amid fears today's workers face a greater risk of poverty in retirement than their parents. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has launched the commission amid fears people are not saving enough for retirement Credit: PA It comes as experts have warned that people looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said 45% of working-age adults were putting nothing into their pensions. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said she was turning to the Pensions Commission, to 'tackle the barriers that stop too many saving in the first place'. The previous commission recommended automatically enrolling people in workplace pensions, which has seen the number of eligible employees saving rise from 55% in 2012 to 88%. While the introduction of automatic enrolment increased the numbers saving, saving levels have often remained low. Around 1-in-2 workers in the private sector only save around the minimum contribution level, which is 8% or less of earnings. DWP analysis suggested 15 million people were undersaving for retirement, with the self-employed, low paid and some ethnic minorities particularly affected. Around three million self-employed people are said to be saving nothing for their retirement. Meanwhile, only a quarter of people on low pay in the private sector and the same proportion from Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds are saving. Women face a significant gender pensions gap too. Research found those approaching retirement are in line to receive barely half the income that men can expect. The commission will be led by Baroness Jeannie Drake, a member of the previous commission, and report in 2027 with proposals that stretch beyond the next election. Kendall's decision to revive the Pensions Commission has been broadly welcomed by the pensions industry. Pete Maddern, managing director for Retirement at Canada Life said: "There are many complex behavioural, social, and financial barriers that prevent people from adequately preparing for later life, and this needs to be understood and addressed before it's too late." "The reality is that people are living longer – and while this is something to be celebrated, it also means retirement income needs to stretch further than ever before." Meanwhile, AgeUK's Caroline Abrahams said the commission needed to address the state pension, which provides the bulk of retirement income for most pensioners. She said: 'If we're to avoid future generations of pensioners experiencing financial hardship, we need reforms that enable more people to build a decent standard of living, and we need them sooner rather than later to maximise the numbers who can be helped.' LABOUR PENSION REFORM The Government is currently planning some of the biggest pension reforms in decades. The Chancellor announced the first part of the Pensions Investment Review in July 2024 to significantly reform the pension system. The second phase will focus on developing a future-proof plan to give every worker an adequate income in retirement. The first phase explored new ways to boost investment, increase saver returns and tackle waste in the pensions system. In response to the issues raised in the review, the Government published the Pension Schemes Bill in June. The bill is currently making its way through Parliament and will help savers to combine small pension pots and help those receiving poor returns. The second part of the review will focus on improving outcomes for "future generations of pension savers". Under the current auto-enrolment rules, workers must pay at least 8% of qualifying earnings into their workplace pension every year. At least 3% of this comes from employers' contributions. A single person now needs £13,400 a year for a minimal retirement, or £21,600 if they are in a couple, according to Pensions UK. Previous governments have been nervous to increase the minimum amount you need to pay into your pension for fear that workers may opt out of their pension scheme altogether. Olly Cheng, Financial Planning Director at Rathbones, said: "There is a growing sense that more must be done to ensure that future generations of retirees not only survive, but thrive in retirement." Meanwhile, raising the amount employers need to contribute would pile further pressure onto businesses, which are already having to shoulder huge rises in the minimum wage and increase in national insurance. The pensions minister, Torsten Bell, has already ruled out forcing workers to pay more into their pensions in this Parliament. What are the different types of pensions? WE round-up the main types of pension and how they differ: Personal pension or self-invested personal pension (SIPP) - This is probably the most flexible type of pension as you can choose your own provider and how much you invest. - This is probably the most flexible type of pension as you can choose your own provider and how much you invest. Workplace pension - The Government has made it compulsory for employers to automatically enrol you in your workplace pension unless you opt out. These so-called defined contribution (DC) pensions are usually chosen by your employer and you won't be able to change it. Minimum contributions are 8%, with employees paying 5% (1% in tax relief) and employers contributing 3%. - The Government has made it compulsory for employers to automatically enrol you in your workplace pension unless you opt out. These so-called defined contribution (DC) pensions are usually chosen by your employer and you won't be able to change it. Minimum contributions are 8%, with employees paying 5% (1% in tax relief) and employers contributing 3%. Final salary pension - This is also a workplace pension but here, what you get in retirement is decided based on your salary, and you'll be paid a set amount each year upon retiring. It's often referred to as a gold-plated pension or a defined benefit (DB) pension. But they're not typically offered by employers anymore. - This is also a workplace pension but here, what you get in retirement is decided based on your salary, and you'll be paid a set amount each year upon retiring. It's often referred to as a gold-plated pension or a defined benefit (DB) pension. But they're not typically offered by employers anymore. New state pension - This is what the state pays to those who reach state pension age after April 6 2016. The maximum payout is £203.85 a week and you'll need 35 years of National Insurance contributions to get this. You also need at least ten years' worth to qualify for anything at all. - This is what the state pays to those who reach state pension age after April 6 2016. The maximum payout is £203.85 a week and you'll need 35 years of National Insurance contributions to get this. You also need at least ten years' worth to qualify for anything at all. Basic state pension - If you reach the state pension age on or before April 2016, you'll get the basic state pension. The full amount is £156.20 per week and you'll need 30 years of National Insurance contributions to get this. If you have the basic state pension you may also get a top-up from what's known as the additional or second state pension. Those who have built up National Insurance contributions under both the basic and new state pensions will get a combination of both schemes. What do the changes mean for your money? Currently, most workers in the UK are automatically enrolled into their workplace pension scheme. These are usually defined contribution (DC) schemes, which give you a retirement income based on how much you pay into the pot. The other type of pensions in the UK are "defined benefit" schemes, where workers receive a guaranteed income in retirement based on their years of service. The review will aim to make sure workers paying into a DC scheme are saving enough money for retirement. The review will also consider the role of the state pension in retirement income. This means changes will not be implemented until 2029 at the earliest. The Chancellor will appoint two commissions to lead the review into pensions adequacy and will look at auto-enrolment rates alongside the state pension. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Daily Mirror
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Millions not saving enough for retirement as pension shake-up review launched
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall will resurrect the Pensions Commission, which was set up under ex-PM Tony Blair's Labour government, to tackle the retirement crisis Liz Kendall will today warn millions of people are not saving enough for retirement as she launches a review to shake-up the pensions system. The Work and Pensions Secretary will resurrect the Pensions Commission, which was set up under ex-PM Tony Blair's Labour government. The Department for Work and Pensions said the new Commission, which will report back in 2027, will be tasked with combating the retirement crisis. An analysis shows that people looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners. Around 15million people - four in 10 - are undersaving for retirement while an estimated three million self-employed people are not saving into a pension. And the analysis shows a stark gender pensions gap, with a woman currently approaching retirement expected to receive a private pension income worth £5,000 less than a man. The previous Pensions Commission recommended automatically enrolling people in workplace pensions. It has seen the number of eligible employees saving rise from 55% in 2012 to 88%. Writing in The Mirror today, Ms Kendall says: "Unless we act, there is a real risk that tomorrow's pensioners are set to be poorer than today's. Put simply, too many people are not saving enough for retirement. And often it is through no fault of their own." Ms Kendall is also expected to launch a review of the state pension age today (MON), which the DWP said she is legally obliged to do. It is not expected to report back until 2029 meaning there are unlikely to be any changes in the current Parliament. Chancellor Rachel Reeves added: "We're making pensions work for Britain. The Pension Schemes Bill and the creation of pension megafunds mean an average earner could get a £29,000 boost to their pension pots. "Now we are going further to ensure that people can look forward to a comfortable retirement.' Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), said: "Far too many people won't have enough pension for a decent retirement, and too many - especially women, BME (black and minority ethnic) and disabled workers and the self-employed - are shut out of the workplace pension system altogether. "That's why this Pensions Commission - which will bring together unions, employers and independent experts - is a vital step forward."
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ministers are under pressure to ditch 'two-tier' plans for a new definition of Islamophobia
Ministers are under pressure to ditch 'two-tier' plans for a new definition of Islamophobia after an official report raised concerns about free speech. The study ordered by the Commission for Countering Extremism found that the public do not believe Islam needs further protection – with many saying the law has already gone too far in limiting discussion. More than a third of voters said they self-censor their language when discussing Islam for fear of potential repercussions. The report found that the public is broadly happy with the protections given to most religions. But 39 per cent of people said Islam enjoys too much protection in law, compared with just 18 per cent who think it needs more. 'Islam is the only religion asked about where a larger proportion of the public think it is protected too much,' the report stated. The findings came as a consultation closed yesterday on government plans for a new definition of Islamophobia, championed by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, which critics have warned could create a blasphemy law 'by the back door'. MPs last night said the plan could create a 'two-tier' system in which people would be barred from criticising Islam in the way they can with other religions. In opposition, Labour signed up to a definition of Islamophobia which suggests the term 'Asian grooming gangs ' is racist. Ministers established a 'working group' in February to create a new definition. Critics fear it will reach similar conclusions and warn it would have a 'chilling effect' on free speech if adopted. Tory MP Nick Timothy, who has been encouraging people to respond to the 'rigged' consultation, said the study underlined public concerns about the issue. The former Downing Street chief of staff said: 'The research shows what everyone already knows. The threat of violence, self-censorship and our new de facto blasphemy laws mean our freedom of speech is need a government prepared to stand up before the mob, not surrender to it.' Fellow Tory Richard Holden, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Freedom of Speech, accused ministers of pandering to hardline campaigners on the issue because of the electoral threat posed to Labour by pro-Gaza independents. He said: 'No one should be subjected to bigotry or hatred and individuals are rightly protected already under the law from we should never do, though, is allow Labour to single out a religion from challenge and debate as they try and win votes from certain communities. 'Angela Rayner and Sir Keir Starmer must not be allowed to create a two-tier system in which Islam gets special protection while those who raise safeguarding concerns, speak plainly or make factual observations find themselves targeted, punished and ostracised.' The Commission for Countering Extremism was set up in 2018 to provide expert advice to the Home Office on tackling extremism in society. The study ordered by the Commission for Countering Extremism found that the public do not believe Islam needs further protection – with many saying the law has already gone too far in limiting discussion The body commissioned pollsters Ipsos to conduct the survey on public attitudes towards free speech. It was published last week. No10 has insisted it is committed to free speech and will not adopt a policy that prevents legitimate criticism of Islam. A spokesman for the Prime Minister said: 'Any working group proposal must be compatible with the unchanging right of citizens to exercise freedom of speech and expression. But we also need to take a step back. 'Levels of Islamophobia are at a record high and the work to develop a definition of anti-Muslim hatred or Islamophobia is aimed at improving understanding of unacceptable treatment and prejudice against Muslim communities.'
