UN chief urges aid surge in world of ‘climate chaos, raging conflicts'
Dozens of world leaders and more than 4,000 representatives from businesses, civil society and financial institutions are gathering in the city of Seville for the June 30-July 3 conference to seek fresh impetus for the crisis-hit aid sector.
But the United States is snubbing the biggest such talks in a decade, underlining the erosion of international cooperation on combating hunger, disease and climate change.
Guterres told delegates at the opening of the conference that two-thirds of United Nations sustainable development goals set for 2030 were 'lagging' and more than $4.0 trillion of annual investment would be needed to achieve them.
US President Donald Trump's gutting of his country's development agency, USAID, is the standout example.
But Germany, Britain and France are also making cuts while they boost spending in areas such as defence.
International charity Oxfam says the cuts to development aid are the largest since 1960.
More than 800 million people live on less than $3.0 a day, according to the World Bank, with rising extreme poverty affecting sub-Saharan Africa in particular.
Disruption to global trade from Trump's tariffs and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have dealt further blows to the diplomatic cohesion necessary for concentrating efforts on helping countries escape poverty.
The crisis meant children going unvaccinated, girls dropping out of school and families suffering hunger, said Guterres.
He urged the international community to 'change course' and 'repair and rev up the engine of development to accelerate investment' in 'a world shaken by inequalities, climate chaos and raging conflicts'.
A blistering heatwave that is scorching southern Europe welcomed the delegates to the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, an example of the extreme weather that scientists say human-driven climate change is fuelling.
Kenya's William Ruto, Senegalese President Bassirou Diomaye Faye, Ecuador's Daniel Noboa, Angolan leader Joao Lourenco and Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan were among prominent Global South leaders in Seville. Among the key topics up for discussion is reforming international finance to help poorer countries shrug off a growing debt burden that inhibits their capacity to achieve progress in health and education.
The total external debt of the group of least developed countries has more than tripled in 15 years, according to UN data.
Critics have singled out US-based bulwarks of the post-World War II international financial system, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, for reform to improve their representation of the Global South.
Painstaking talks in New York in June produced a common declaration to be adopted in Seville that only went ahead after the United States walked out.
The document reaffirms commitment to the UN development goals such as eliminating poverty and hunger, promoting gender equality, reforming tax systems and international financial institutions.
The text also calls on development banks to triple their lending capacity, urges lenders to ensure predictable finance for essential social spending and for more cooperation against tax evasion.
Coalitions of countries will seek to spearhead initiatives in addition to the so-called 'Seville Commitment', which is not legally binding.
But campaigners have criticised the text for lacking ambition and have rung alarm bells about rising global inequality. Hundreds of demonstrators braved the sizzling heat in Seville on Sunday to demand change in international tax, debt and aid policies. 'Global South countries will never be able to decide how they want to do development if they are bound to the new colonial debt,' protester Ilan Henzler, 28, told AFP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The Hague vindication
Listen to article Pakistan's lawfare stance on water for arbitration has got a shot in the arm. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague stood behind the lower riparian state, and categorically pronounced that it has the due and legitimate authority to 'adjudicate' in any dispute between the two countries over the Indus Water Treaty (1960). It went a step ahead to rule that Pakistan's concerns on India holding the treaty in 'abeyance' and the threats of "weaponising water" are "not hypothetical", and go on to actively undermine the treaty obligations. This is the second endorsement to come from the international fora after the World Bank that attributed Delhi's unilateral withdrawal from the commitment as unlawful. The legal perspective emerged as the PCA was deliberating the Pakistan-India dispute over Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects, whose final decision is due in summer this year. The court seized the opportunity to announce a supplemental award on June 27, 2025, wherein the PCA held high its discretion to adjudicate that went on to reinforce Islamabad's stance that the IWT is fully operational and cannot be set aside by India through unilateral declarations. The Foreign Office was quick to call on Delhi to see reason in global legal decorum and immediately restore water supply to Pakistan. Nonetheless, the Hindutva-led dispensation's adamant attitude to reject the PCA testimony, and continue with its illegal action must instantly drive retribution. Islamabad's case was preeminent and all the three of its points laid down before the PCA were upheld by the jurists. They pertained to weaponisation of water politics by India; and included: interruption of water supply used for downstream irrigation through the filling of reservoirs; the opening of dam gates to release stored water in excessive volumes in a manner that causes flooding downstream; and the rapid, mass release of sediment impacting rivers, land, infrastructure and people living downstream. This nod from PCA must serve as an awakening call for India, and the least option it has is to submit to the will of International Law and uphold its stature as a responsible state.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pivoting between geopolitics and geo-economics
Listen to article When Field Marshal Asim Munir walked out of the White House after the recent luncheon with President Trump, it was apparent that the Pak-US relationship was taking another tactical shift. This relationship has seen numerous highs and lows in the past. However, the recent war-like situation between Pakistan and India and President Donald Trump's role in the ceasefire have unfolded events unexpectedly. Lately, Pakistan seems to have navigated its relations well with both the US and China. The country now stands at a crossroads: whether to continue with a familiar path of transactional geopolitics or commit to geo-economics as mentioned in the National Security Policy (2022-2026). Not long ago, Pakistan was almost written off for its strategic importance by the policymakers in Washington, DC, after the fall of Kabul. From being a close ally, Pakistan had overnight become almost insignificant for the Biden administration to give a call back to the Pakistani authorities or even to get a mention in the US's National Security Strategy. So much so that Pakistan had to go through tougher conditions while seeking bailout packages from the IMF and was subject to harsher rhetoric. Nevertheless, the situation has changed significantly after the Indo-Pak military clash of May 2025. On April 22, 2025, a terrorist incident resulted in 26 tourists losing their lives in Pahalgam. Reports also claim that this attack was religiously motivated. Such a tragedy deserves utmost condemnation, and those responsible must be punished for their brutal actions. India's knee-jerk response was that Pakistan was somehow behind this attack, and therefore, the decades-long Indus Water Treaty, which had survived through the worst of the Indo-Pak relations, was suspended. Subsequently, India also launched a series of attacks on several Pakistani cities on the pretext of targeting the terrorist hideouts only. For the next two days, the situation between India and Pakistan remained extremely tense. Both attacked each other's multiple military facilities and neutralised drone incursions, while Pakistan, with the help of Chinese technology, downed multiple Indian fighter jets. Eventually, mediated by the US, both countries reached a ceasefire agreement, but the threat still looms as PM Modi has insisted that Operation Sindoor will continue if there is any other terrorist attack in India. Whether keeping South Asian peace a hostage with such statements is good or bad, one thing is clear: after the ceasefire, Pakistan's profile on the international political front has witnessed a significant rise, something totally against New Delhi's policy of isolating Pakistan internationally. Post-ceasefire, Pakistan's relations with China have reached new highs. For Pakistan, China has emerged as one dependable partner. China, on the other hand, fully supported Pakistan's retaliation against Indian attacks. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reiterated that Pakistan is an "ironclad friend" and vowed to deepen the "all-weather strategic cooperative partnership." It must also be noted that the use of Chinese defence technology appeared as free marketing, since after the ceasefire, China's defense stocks have surged. Presently, what still remains a matter of concern for both is the security of Chinese personnel and investments in CPEC. Pakistan, therefore, must ameliorate threats from sub-nationalist movements. Pakistan's relations with the US have also taken a stark turnabout. President Trump has taken the credit for the ceasefire a number of times, although India, the US's most allied ally in South Asia, has refuted such claims repeatedly. He then offered to mediate for the long-overdue Kashmir issue, again upsetting India. And lately, the US Department of State issued a travel advisory to "exercise increased caution in India due to crime and terrorism." All these developments, along with President Trump's invitation to Field Marshal Asim Munir, have left the Indian side quite disgruntled. Many argue that the lunch meeting was also crucial because of the Israel-Iran conflict, but whatever the reason may be, Pakistan must be in a state of euphoria over these happenings. One must also recall that Pakistan has served as US strategic partner in the past. During the Cold War, Pakistan was an active member of the capitalist camp against communism in South Asia; it played a crucial role against the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan; and it was the US strategic partner during the war on terror. But as denoted appropriately, the Pak-US relationship has remained 'transactional' in nature, and Pakistan has repeatedly complained of being abandoned as soon as US interests change. Following the same pattern, Pakistan was cast off after the fall of Kabul in 2021, too. Hence, it must remain wary in the future as well. Considering the post-ceasefire events, Pakistan may again be lured to find solutions to its internal and external crises in forming strategic partnerships, especially with the US. Previously, Pakistan has leveraged its geographical location for geopolitical gains, but apart from temporary relief, it has only guided towards much deep-rooted problems. The country gravely suffers from growing poverty, economic inequality, policy discontinuity, unemployment, poor education and healthcare facilities, etc. The current situation presents Pakistan with a dilemma: whether it would keep using its strategic advantage for temporary gains or realise the vision of geo-economics that the country's National Security Policy introduced in January 2022. Becoming a melting pot for global economic interests through strengthening regional connectivity and development partnerships will help Pakistan address its structural problems related to non-traditional security aspects. Additionally, it will also ensure that the country has enough resources in the pool to improve its traditional security apparatus. Certainly, now this is more important because Operation Sindoor is not over yet. Pakistan needs to build its economic muscle against India, which is reportedly set to become the fourth-largest economy in the world. It is also arguably correct that the path to geo-economics will be long, and considering the world today, which has almost become a war theater, Pakistan will have additional hindrances when anchoring geographic location for economic benefits. Nonetheless, with the alternate strategy, Pakistan has tried and failed again and again, and not changing the approach will not help address the deep-rooted structural issues the country has been suffering from since its inception in 1947.
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
China, US owe gratitude to Pakistan for foundation of their relations: Victor Gao
Leading Chinese academic Professor and Vice President of the Center for China and Globalization Victor Gao. Photo: File In a recent webinar organised by the Asian Institute of Eco-civilization Research and Development (AIERD), Vice President of the Center for China and Globalization Prof Victor Gao praised Pakistan for its pivotal role in establishing China-US relations, which he called one of the most significant game-changing events in modern history. Gao highlighted Pakistan's critical mediation role, referring to it as an exemplary model of diplomacy. He emphasised that Pakistan had made an exceptional contribution to humanity by bridging countries from diverse backgrounds, fostering global development and peace. According to him, the strengthening of China-US relations had not only accelerated globalisation but also brought nations closer together, significantly impacting global development. On the topic of China-Pakistan relations, Prof Gao expressed that no country holds more importance for China than Pakistan, emphasising the 'iron-clad' nature of their partnership. He stressed that China's commitment to supporting Pakistan's sovereignty and legitimate interests is unwavering, citing historical examples such as the 1965 and 1971 wars, where China stood alongside Pakistan, as well as during more recent conflicts. 'China will always come forward to help Pakistan safeguard its legitimate interests and sovereignty,' Prof Gao affirmed, underlining that Pakistan holds a special place in China's international relations. He also addressed concerns regarding Pakistan's internal security, stating that the country's enemies would never succeed in destabilising it. He specifically dismissed the notion of an independent Balochistan, stating, 'The dream of independent Balochistan will always remain a dream. Balochistan will never be separated or independent, no matter what the enemies of Pakistan, separatists, or terrorists plan or do.' He concluded his speech by recognising Pakistan's significant role as a geopolitical player since its independence, pointing to its involvement in key historical events. According to Prof Gao, Pakistan's role on the world stage has been instrumental in shaping modern history. AIERD Chairman Zahid Latif Khan reciprocated his sentiments, expressing gratitude for his insightful lecture on the importance of Pakistan-China relations. Khan underscored the need for both countries to strengthen their economic ties, particularly in areas such as financial integration and collaboration between their stock exchanges. He also suggested that Chinese companies operating in Pakistan could benefit from the country's Islamic financing system, including Sukuk Bonds. During the webinar, Gao responded to a question by asserting that Pakistan holds a superiority in the five-dimensional war over India, expressing confidence that India would refrain from further military adventurism. He also addressed the growing field of technology, urging China and Pakistan to enhance their cooperation, particularly in the area of artificial intelligence (AI). He noted China's open AI cooperation policy and encouraged Pakistan to accelerate its efforts to capitalise on this opportunity. 'We should work together to establish a strong foundation in technology and AI, which will shape a promising future for both countries,' Prof Gao added. In closing, AIERD CEO Shakeel Ahmad Ramay, and moderator of the event, thanked Prof Gao and the participants. He concluded the webinar by stating that the China-Pakistan relationship is unique, and that traditional theories cannot fully explain it. Ramay expressed confidence that the two nations would continue working together to create a shared future that would contribute to global prosperity and sustainable peace.
