White House restricts WSJ access to Trump over Epstein story
The move comes after Trump on Friday sued the WSJ and its media magnate owner Rupert Murdoch for at least $10 billion over the allegation in the article, which Trump denies.
The Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case has threatened to split the Republican's far-right Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, with some of his supporters calling for a full release of the so-called "Epstein Files."
The punishment of the Wall Street Journal marks at least the second time the Trump administration has moved to exclude a major news outlet from the press pool over its reporting, having barred Associated Press journalists from multiple key events since February.
"As the appeals court confirmed, The Wall Street Journal or any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces," said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
"Due to The Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board (Air Force One)."
Trump departs this weekend for Scotland, where he owns two golf resorts and will meet with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Earlier this month, the US Department of Justice, under Trump-appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi, said there was no evidence suggesting disgraced financier Epstein had kept a "client list" or was blackmailing powerful figures before his death in 2019.
In its story on Thursday, the WSJ reported that Trump had written a suggestive birthday letter to Epstein in 2003, illustrated with a naked woman and alluding to a shared "secret."
Epstein, a longtime friend of Trump and multiple other high-profile men, was found hanging dead in a New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges that he sexually exploited dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida.
The case sparked conspiracy theories, especially among Trump's far-right voters, about an alleged international cabal of wealthy pedophiles.
Epstein's death -- declared a suicide -- before he could face trial supercharged that narrative.
Since returning to power in January, Trump has moved to increase control over the press covering the White House.
In February, the Oval Office stripped the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) of its nearly century-old authority to oversee which outlets have access to certain restricted presidential events, with Trump saying that he was now "calling the shots" on media access.
In a statement, the WHCA president urged the White House to "restore" the Journal to the pool.
"This attempt by the White House to punish a media outlet whose coverage it does not like is deeply troubling, and it defies the First Amendment," said WHCA President Weijia Jiang.
"Government retaliation against news outlets based on the content of their reporting should concern all who value free speech and an independent media."
aha/ksb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Three key issues for the Pension Commission
A revival of the Pension Commission has long been touted as the solution to many of the challenges the retirement market faces. The last commission is credited with getting Britain saving into a pension through auto-enrolment – the bar has been set high and there is a lot to do. The Department for Work and Pensions has noted that 45% of working age people are not saving into a pension at all, so at the top of the agenda will sit issues such as whether auto-enrolment contributions need to rise – as well as how to get groups such as the self-employed to save more for retirement. These will prove tricky to tackle so the new commission has its work cut out. 1. Boosting pension contributions The issue of how, when and if to boost auto-enrolment minimums has long been on the table. However, it's not as simple as hiking rates across the board – the issue of pension adequacy means different things to different people. We don't want to be in a position where lower earners see their contributions hiked to the extent that they struggle in the here and now. Similarly, we don't want higher earners to save at minimum levels and receive a nasty shock when they get to retirement and realise their pension will not sustain the lifestyle they have been used to. Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) has analysed what people should be aiming for, using the HL Savings and Resilience Barometer. The most sensible approach is to use the living pension as a minimum income underpin – and layer target replacement rates over this, which could state, for example, that someone might aim for an income of two-thirds of their pre-retirement earnings. State pension and minimum auto-enrolment contributions should be set at a level that helps lower earners hit their target replacement rate and higher earners would be encouraged to contribute over and above these minimums to hit theirs. This analysis shows that the lowest earners are already reaching a decent replacement rate in retirement: middle to higher earners are the ones who need to save more to maintain their lifestyles. Here, the commission will need to assess what needs to be done to incentivise people to contribute more than these minimums where needed to build their retirement resilience. Engaging people with their savings will be the key to driving higher rates. Read more: How much money do you need to retire? As we run into the budget, any discussion around reform of pension tax relief needs to be treated with care. Tinkering with these incentives could lead to people putting less away for their future which could cost the state more in the long run. Stability in pensions tax is essential if people are going to be confident that the money they put away today, will be there for them decades into the future. 2. Self-employed The issue of the self-employed has been a huge issue: they aren't covered by auto-enrolment so don't benefit from an employer contribution and many are hesitant to lock money away until at least the age of 55 due to volatile earnings. HL has long championed the use of the lifetime ISA (LISA) for this group. The 25% government bonus acts in the same way as basic rate tax relief and any income can be taken tax free. There is also the ability to access money early from a LISA if needed, subject to a 25% exit charge. However, the 25% charge not only removes the effect of the government bonus but also a chunk of people's savings. Read more: How to make pension pots tax-efficient Reducing the charge to 20% would mitigate this and make the LISA even more attractive. Allowing people to open a LISA beyond the age of 40 will also help those who become self-employed later in life. We estimate that more than 1.2 million households with a basic rate tax paying self-employed earner could benefit from the proposed changes. 3. State pension age The Pension Commission will look at whether state pension age should increase. Again, it's not an easy decision – we've seen increases in life expectancy slow down in recent years. There's also the issue of healthy life expectancy to consider. This currently hovers in the early 60s, so the reality is that many people cannot keep working into their late 60s. Read more: How your health can affect your pension Any decision to increase state pension age further needs to take into account what needs to happen to help people remain in the workforce for longer, so they don't fall down the income gap between leaving work and taking their state pension. It's also an opportunity for the government to assess the long-term position of the triple lock. Speculation continues to swirl as to whether the triple lock's days are numbered, but the cost of maintaining it will need to be balanced against the role it plays in helping workers, particularly those who are lower paid, to meet their target retirement income. Read more: This under-claimed benefit could help boost your pension How far will your pension go as retirement costs soar? Should people keep working until later in life?Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine and Russia set for fresh peace talks, Zelensky says
Russia and Ukraine will hold a new round of peace talks in Istanbul on Wednesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said. "Today, I discussed with (Ukrainian Security Council chief) Rustem Umerov the preparations for a prisoner exchange and another meeting in Turkey with the Russian side," Zelensky said in his daily address on Monday. "Umerov reported that the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday." Zelensky proposed fresh talks at the weekend, days after US President Donald Trump threatened Russia with "severe" sanctions if there was no ceasefire between Moscow and Kyiv within 50 days. Washington has also pledged new weapons for the Ukrainian military, after Russia intensified attacks. Moscow has not commented on the peace talks yet. Russia's RIA news agency, quoting a source, said the talks would take place over two days, Thursday and Friday. A Turkish government spokesperson said Wednesday's talks would take place in Istanbul, the same venue where previous negotiations in May and June failed to work towards a ceasefire, the Agence France-Presse news agency reported. This week's talks will be yet another attempt to bring an end to the war that has been going on for more than three years, and will come after Trump expressed frustration with Vladimir Putin. The US president told the BBC he was "disappointed" but "not done" with the Russian leader. I'm 'disappointed but not done' with Putin, Trump tells BBC Ukrainians unimpressed by Trump's 50-day ultimatum to Putin The Istanbul talks could focus on further prisoner exchanges and a possible meeting between Zelensky and Putin, a senior Ukrainian official told AFP. Moscow, however, has downplayed the likelihood of reaching any concrete outcome anytime soon. Commenting on the prospects for a breakthrough, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Monday that the two sides were "diametrically opposed" and "a lot of diplomatic work lies ahead". Russia has intensified its drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities in recent weeks, causing record civilian casualties. It launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbour in 2022. Trump threatens Russia with tariffs while unveiling Ukraine weapons plan Russia's intensifying drone war is spreading fear and eroding Ukrainian morale Why did Putin's Russia invade Ukraine?
UPI
12 minutes ago
- UPI
Coalition sues Trump admin. for freezing billions in education funds
A coalition on Monday sued the Department of Education, under Secretary Linda McMahon, for freezing billions in education funding. File Photo by Al Drago/UPI | License Photo July 22 (UPI) -- A coalition of school districts, teachers' unions, nonprofits and parents has filed a lawsuit accusing the Trump administration of illegally withholding nearly $7 billion in Congress-approved education funding. In the lawsuit filed Monday, the coalition asks a U.S. District Court in Rhode Island to compel the Department of Education and the White House Office of Management and Budget to release the funding, which supports low-income students, teacher training, English learners, immigrant students and after-school programs. According to the lawsuit, the Department of Education is required to disburse Elementary and Secondary Education Act funds on July 1. But on June 30, states were informed that the department would not be disbursing nearly $7 billion in ESEA funds and that a new policy had been adopted requiring a review to first be conducted to ensure the money is spent "in accordance with the president's priorities," the lawsuit states, citing the letter. The Trump administration provided the states with neither a timeline nor assurances that the funds would be released, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit comes as the Trump administration has been dismantling the Department of Education, in line with President Donald Trump's March executive order seeking to shutter the department and return its authorities to the states. Last week, the conservative-leaning Supreme Court approved Trump's mass firings at the department. At the same time, 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration over its freezing of billions of dollars in education funds. American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten described the Trump administration's freeze on Monday as throwing a "monkey wrench" at millions of U.S. educators. "These are long-term, school-based programs, already passed by Congress and signed into law by the president," she said in a statement. "Since day one, the Trump administration has attacked public education, undermining opportunity in America. Now it is trying to lawlessly defund education unilaterally through rampant government overreach. It's not only morally repugnant: the administration lacks the legal right to sacrifice kids' futures at the alter of ideology." Among the plaintiffs are Alaska's largest school district, Anchorage School District; Cincinnati Public Schools and Fairbanks North Star Borough, among others.
