Cafe owner protests Punakaiki parking charges
Grant Parrett told a meeting of the West Coast Tai o Poutini Conservation Board on Tuesday that parking charges created a de facto entry fee to (Paparoa) National Park, which was unlawful.
Conservation Minister Tama Potaka has asked for a trial of paid parking to boost revenue.
Doc is aiming to launch a pilot programme in October at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and White Horse Hill at Aoraki Mt Cook in Canterbury.
Project manager John Dore told the board that Doc had serious budget pressures, including a 30% shortfall in funding for its visitor network and a huge deficit in the amount available for biodiversity.
'For protection of all endangered species we have a budget of $300 million - but a need of $2.3 billion," Mr Dore said.
Climate events in the last few years had added $90 million in costs, he added.
Paid parking was a tool used internationally in nature parks and would help manage overcrowding at busy sites, he told the board.
But Mr Parrett said the move would turn public conservation land into a Wilsons-style parking lot and urged the board to oppose it.
'However you label it, it's a National Park entry fee; it contravenes the National Parks Act and it diminishes DOC's social license to operate.'
There were no free parks at Punakaiki because they had been removed to make room for the new Visitor Centre development and people would have no option but to pay to walk around the Pancake Rocks, Mr Parrett said.
Unlike Franz Josef or Aoraki Mt Cook, Punakaiki was not a tourist destination but a stop-off attraction for people driving the scenic Coast Road, and for most of the year there was no congestion or capacity problem in the carpark, he said.
'Parking fees will disadvantage local people who call in for a coffee or to stretch their legs, and we don't want this,' he said.
While Doc owned the land, taxpayers had funded the $45 million Dolomite Point Visitor Centre development and the building was gifted by the last government to manawhenua, NgatiWaewae, who now leased office space back to the department.
The public has paid for this development and costs should be kept low, he said.
"I am surprised that the iwi has supported the paid parking trial … unless they stand to benefit from it," Mr Parrett said.
If people had to pay for parking they might be less likely to pay for Ngati Waewae's interactive visitor experience inside, he suggested.
Ngati Waewae's representative on the Conservation Board, Francois Tumahai, objected.
'I disagree with everything you've said. The cost of the building was not $45 million and we're not getting a cent from the project. In the early days we suggested we might provide (parking) wardens … that's it.'
Mr Parrett suggested it would be good if the iwi put out a statement to that effect in the interests of transparency.
The iwi leader responded: 'You're the one causing all the grief - you put it out."
Board chair Dr Mike Legge closed off the discussion and thanked Mr Parrett for his contribution to the public forum.
The Dolomite Point Visitor Centre, funded by the Provincial Growth Fund, was budgeted to cost $26 million but the project - including the new carparks - received a funding boost of $15 million in 2023 and cost a total of $40.9 million.
The paid parking trial, including charging technology and upgrades to carparks at the three sites, is being funded by $3.8 million from the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy.
Doc plans to release its pricing strategy early next month and hold public drop-in sessions at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and Aoraki in mid-August.
Submissions close on August 26 for Punakaiki, and September 30 for Aoraki.
• The National Parks Act 1980 gives the public freedom of entry and access to the parks "so that they may receive in full measure the inspiration, enjoyment, recreation and other benefits that may be derived from mountains, forest, sounds, seacoasts, lakes, rivers and other natural features.'
By Lois Williams, Local Democracy Reporter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Windbag: Why the Taxpayers' Union endorsed this Green Party policy
They say politics makes strange bedfellows, and there are few stranger pairings than this. Wellington is the remnant of a failed startup. The New Zealand Company, which established the city, was a for-profit enterprise with a clear business model: sell land to wealthy people, and use the proceeds to bring working-class people to New Zealand for free. In theory, the mix of capital and labour would work in perfect harmony: founding businesses, working the land, and creating a functioning economy that would improve everyone's property values. So what went wrong? There are many factors, but one of the most important was absentee landlords. Many investors stayed in London, hoping the value of their land would increase due to the work of others, while contributing nothing themselves. The New Zealand Company brought more labourers than could be employed by independent businesses, so it had to provide them with work, which eventually drove the company to bankruptcy. From the very beginning of British-style property ownership in Aotearoa, land banking has been one of our biggest problems, dragging down productivity and hindering the growth of our cities. It's still the case today. There are empty lots and surface car parks in the centre city, underdeveloped sections in city-fringe neighbourhoods, and a single family owns almost all of Wellington's remaining greenfield land. The Wellington Green Party is targeting this issue with a policy to change the rates system to be based on land value rather than the current combination of the capital value of buildings and land. Several other councils have already adopted land value rates, including Nelson, New Plymouth, Napier and Whangarei. The Greens found an unlikely ally in their campaign last week when the policy was endorsed by the Taxpayers' Union – which even the Taxpayers' Union seemed surprised by. 'The Greens are right on this one,' executive director Jordan Williams said in a statement. 'Taxing land, rather than housing and development on land, creates the right incentive of avoiding land banking or not putting land to its most productive use, such as housing.' Williams went even further than the Greens' policy, calling for local government minister Simon Watts to embrace land value rates nationwide, saying he 'should reach over the aisle and grab this phenomenal policy'. Alex Baker, the Green-ish mayoral candidate who isn't officially endorsed by the Greens, is also campaigning on a switch to land value rates. This story in The Post implies it's suspicious that Baker and the party could have come up with the same idea separately. It's not. Land value taxes are the big current thing in the Yimby movement. Henry George is Sabrina Carpenter for online urbanists. 'The current setting is inefficient,' Baker told The Spinoff. 'It discourages capital investment, business, new houses and intense developments and encourages the accumulation of under-utilised land. I simply want to change to a system that is more efficient. The long-run impact of that is improved housing supply, which will mean rents come down and quality lifts, which will attract more people and bring down rates.' The alliance between Wellington's Greens and the free-market TPU is rare, but it's not the first time it has happened. The TPU was strongly supportive of the zoning reforms in last year's District Plan, which were led by Wellington's progressive councillors. This ability to form cross-partisan consensus is one of the things that has made the Yimby movement so successful. The TPU sees zoning reform as giving more property owners more rights to develop their land, and land value rates as an economic incentive to do so. The Greens see it as a way to improve housing supply, quality and affordability. The motivations might be different, but the outcomes are the same. 'The TPU-Green coalition is exactly where I see myself as a candidate,' Baker said. 'It's a free-market change. A more efficient tax. But it will result in change, which is something that conservatives who don't want the city to grow or improve will always be against. I expect over time the business community will get aligned with me, because no amount of taking a blunt axe to the council will improve outcomes for the city.' The two conservative councillors who have put up their hands for mayor, Ray Chung and Diane Calvert, both oppose a switch to land value rates. Calvert said debating rates reform was 'like moving deck chairs while the ship takes on water. The real problems run deeper and we need to fix those first. Chung told The Post the policy was 'built on a false ideology that anyone who gets ahead should pay more' – which is not an accurate analysis of how land value rates work. The TPU specifically called out Chung in its statement. 'It is sad to see Ray Chung further disgrace himself by coming out against this policy. We'd urge him to reconsider and put policy ahead of partisanship,' Williams said. Andrew Little, who is widely considered the frontrunner in the Wellington mayoral race, said he was open to the idea. 'Land value-based rates is an idea worth considering,' Little told The Spinoff. 'We can also use rates loading to incentivise better land use, and we should do so to make sure Wellington gets proper housing density in key areas.' Baker is claiming Little's soft support as a victory. He doesn't believe Little would be talking about land value rates if it weren't for his and the Greens' policy. Baker said he entered the race after Tory Whanau left because he felt someone needed to drive the debate from the progressive side. 'I wasn't seeing anything from any other candidates that indicated they would turn things around,' he said. Wellington City Council considered a switch to land value rates last year as part of its rates review, but basically decided to put the idea in the too-hard basket. In the short term, that's probably a fair approach. It's looking increasingly inevitable that a Wellington supercity will be back on the table soon. Porirua and Hutt City voters will both vote in non-binding referendums on amalgamation at this year's election, and the region's chief executives seem to be largely united on the idea. It probably doesn't make much sense for Wellington City Council to upend its rating system right now, given the likelihood of such a major restructure in the next few years. But with the possibility of major reform happening soon, this is the perfect time to have the debate.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Cafe Owner Protests Punakaiki Parking Charges
A Punakaiki café owner is urging the Conservation Department to rethink its plan to charge for parking at the famous Pancake Rocks on the West Coast. Grant Parrett told a meeting of the West Coast Tai o Poutini Conservation Board this week (subs: Tuesday 22/7) that parking charges create de facto entry fee to (Paparoa) National Park, which was unlawful. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka has asked for a trial of paid parking to boost revenue. DOC is aiming to launch a pilot programme in October at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and White Horse Hill at Aoraki Mt Cook. Project manager John Dore told the Board that DOC had serious budget pressures including a 30 percent shortfall in funding for its visitor network and a huge deficit in the amount available for biodiversity. 'For protection of all endangered species we have a budget of $300 million - but a need of $2.3 billion," Mr Dore said. Climate events in the last few years had added $90 million in costs, he added. Paid parking was a tool used internationally in nature parks and would help manage overcrowding at busy sites, he told the Board. But Mr Parrett said the move would turn public conservation land into a Wilsons-style parking lot, and urged the Board to oppose it. 'However you label it, it's a National Park entry fee; it contravenes the National Parks Act and it diminishes DOC's social license to operate.' There were no free parks at Punakaiki because they had been removed to make room for the new Visitor Centre development and people would have no option but to pay to walk around the Pancake Rocks, Mr Parrett said. Unlike Franz Josef or Aoraki Mt Cook, Punakaiki was not a tourist destination but a stop-off attraction for people driving the scenic Coast Road, and for most of the year there was no congestion or capacity problem in the carpark, he said. 'Parking fees will disadvantage local people who call in for a coffee or to stretch their legs, and we don't want this,' he said. While DOC owned the land, taxpayers had funded the $45 million Dolomite Point Visitor Centre development and the building was gifted by the last Government to manawhenua, NgatiWaewae, who now leased office space back to DOC. The public has paid for this development and costs should be kept low, he said. "I am surprised that the iwi has supported the paid parking trial … unless they stand to benefit from it," Mr Parrett said. If people had to pay for parking they might be less likely to pay for Ngati Waewae's interactive visitor experience inside, he suggested. Ngati Waewae's representative on the Conservation Board, Francois Tumahai, objected. 'I disagree with everything you've said. The cost of the building was not $45 million and we're not getting a cent from the project. In the early days we suggested we might provide (parking) wardens … that's it.' Mr Parrett suggested it would be good if the iwi put out a statement to that effect in the interests of transparency. The iwi leader responded: 'You're the one causing all the grief - you put it out." Board chair Dr Mike Legge closed off the discussion and thanked Mr Parrett for his contribution to the public forum. The Dolomite Point Visitor Centre, funded by the Provincial Growth Fund, was budgeted to cost $26 million but the project – including the new carparks – received a funding boost of $15 million in 2023 and cost a total of $40.9 million. The paid parking trial, including charging technology and upgrades to carparks at the three sites, is being funded by $3.8 million from the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy. DOC plans to release its pricing strategy early next month and hold public drop-in sessions at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and Aoraki in mid August. Submissions close on August 26 for Punakaiki, and September 30 for Aoraki. *The National Parks Act 1980 gives the public freedom of entry and access to the parks "so that they may receive in full measure the inspiration, enjoyment, recreation and other benefits that may be derived from mountains, forest, sounds, seacoasts, lakes, rivers and other natural features.'
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
Cafe owner protests Punakaiki parking charges
DoC is aiming to launch a pilot programme in October at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and White Horse Hill at Aoraki Mt Cook. Project manager John Dore told the Board that DoC had serious budget pressures including a 30% shortfall in funding for its visitor network and a huge deficit in the amount available for biodiversity. 'For protection of all endangered species we have a budget of $300 million but a need of $2.3 billion,' Dore said. Climate events in the last few years had added $90m in costs, he added. Paid parking was a tool used internationally in nature parks and would help manage overcrowding at busy sites, he told the board. But Parrett said the move would turn public conservation land into a Wilsons-style parking lot, and urged the board to oppose it. 'However you label it, it's a National Park entry fee. It contravenes the National Parks Act and it diminishes DoC's social licence to operate.' A business owner says parking fees will disadvantage local people who call in for a coffee. Photo / LDR There were no free parks at Punakaiki because they had been removed to make room for the new Visitor Centre development and people would have no option but to pay to walk around the Pancake Rocks, Parrett said. Unlike Franz Josef or Aoraki Mt Cook, Punakaiki was not a tourist destination but a stop-off attraction for people driving the scenic coast road, and, for most of the year, there was no congestion or capacity problem in the carpark, he said. 'Parking fees will disadvantage local people who call in for a coffee or to stretch their legs, and we don't want this,' he said. While DoC owned the land, taxpayers had funded the $45 million Dolomite Point Visitor Centre development and the building was gifted by the last Government to manawhenua, NgatiWaewae, who now leased office space back to DoC. The public had paid for this development and costs should be kept low, he said. 'I am surprised that the iwi has supported the paid parking trial … unless they stand to benefit from it,' Parrett said. If people had to pay for parking they might be less likely to pay for Ngati Waewae's interactive visitor experience inside, he suggested. Ngati Waewae's representative on the Conservation Board, Francois Tumahai, objected. 'I disagree with everything you've said. The cost of the building was not $45 million and we're not getting a cent from the project. In the early days we suggested we might provide [parking] wardens … that's it.' Parrett suggested it would be good if the iwi put out a statement to that effect in the interests of transparency. The iwi leader responded: 'You're the one causing all the grief - you put it out.' Board chairperson Dr Mike Legge closed off the discussion and thanked Parrett for his contribution to the public forum. The Dolomite Point Visitor Centre, funded by the Provincial Growth Fund, was budgeted to cost $26 million but the project - including the new carparks - received a funding boost of $15m in 2023 and cost a total of $40.9m. The paid parking trial, including charging technology and upgrades to carparks at the three sites, is being funded by $3.8m from the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy. DoC plans to release its pricing strategy early next month and hold public drop-in sessions at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and Aoraki in mid-August. Submissions close on August 26 for Punakaiki and September 30 for Aoraki. - RNZ
