logo
Singapore Stocks Suffered a Bloodbath Last Friday: How Should Investors React?

Singapore Stocks Suffered a Bloodbath Last Friday: How Should Investors React?

Yahoo06-04-2025
The Straits Times Index (SGX: ^STI), or STI, had been performing reasonably well this year until President Trump announced sweeping tariffs.
As the US market plunged for two days in a row, the S&P 500 Index suffered a correction while the technology-heavy NASDAQ Composite Index plunged into a bear market.
The STI was not spared, either, as it fell nearly 3% in its biggest one-day drop since the pandemic.
Investors are naturally worried about the effects of these tariffs as they reverberate across the globe.
How should investors react to this news? Should you sell all your stocks?
The three local banks bore the brunt of the sell-off.
DBS Group (SGX: D05) tumbled nearly 4.9% to S$43.30 while United Overseas Bank (SGX: U11) fell 3.9% to S$35.46.
OCBC Ltd (SGX: O39) saw its share price slide 2.8% to S$16.62.
Shipbuilders, which are highly exposed to global trade, also slumped in tandem with the bellwether blue-chip index's decline.
Nam Cheong (SGX: 1MZ), a marine group specialising in the construction of offshore support vessels, saw its share price plunge 8.4% to S$0.53.
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (SGX: BS6) slid 4% to S$2.17 while Seatrium (SGX: 5E2) fell 3% to S$1.94.
Although semiconductors were spared from the tariffs for now, analysts believe that the sector could be subject to another round of tariffs for specific products.
AEM Holdings (SGX: AWX) tumbled 3.1% to S$1.24 while UMS Integration (SGX: 558) saw its share price decline 2.8% to S$1.03.
Fast-growing companies such as iFAST Corporation (SGX: AIY) were not spared from the carnage.
The fintech saw its share price fall 4.1% to S$6.93 as investors fret over the pace of inflows following the comprehensive tariff announcement.
With the US market suffering a second day of selling as China announced retaliatory tariffs of 34% on all US imports, Singapore could be in for another bout of selling when the markets open on Monday.
The latest, and thus far most comprehensive, salvo from Trump seeks to upend years of free trade.
It's still early days as countries reel from the impact of these punishing tariffs.
Supply chains will be impacted and companies need time to assess the impact of these additional taxes.
These tariffs are sure to increase the cost of production and distribution and cause significant disruption to many businesses' plans.
There is also significant uncertainty as to how each country will respond to these tariffs, which are set to take effect on 9 April.
Larger economies may choose to retaliate the slam the US with its own set of tariffs while smaller nations may choose to negotiate and broker a different arrangement.
Trump says he is 'open to negotiations', signalling that these tariffs are not final and could be used as a bargaining tool for the US to gain the upper hand.
No one knows what the next move will be for the notoriously unpredictable Trump, but investors are fearing a worst-case scenario where a widening trade war may trigger a global recession.
In situations like these, it's recommended that investors keep a level head and continue to monitor and assess the developments.
While fear and panic are natural emotions that you will experience in the face of growing uncertainty, the last thing you want to do is to sell all your stocks.
Remember to check your investment thesis as to why you purchased these stocks in the first place.
Companies with strong brands, sturdy business models and pricing power should eventually rise above these tariffs and stand tall above their competition.
Yes, there will be a lot of short-term pain as companies react and adjust to the new reality of a possible trade war.
But what you, as an investor, should do is carefully monitor companies' commentaries to see how they are coping with the tariffs and the strategies they intend to use to mitigate their impact.
Stock markets go through various types of crises regularly.
There was the global financial crisis back in 2008-2009 which was triggered by sub-prime mortgages.
More recently, the pandemic also triggered a bear market as uncertainty reigned in 2020 over whether the COVID-19 virus could decimate the population.
Throughout these crises, the market plunged and then recovered as strong companies continued to soldier on.
Trump's tariffs are turning out to be a different type of crisis.
As investors, you should keep calm, assess the situation, and continue to monitor the companies within your portfolio.
With patience and tenacity, you can get through this crisis, just like how the previous ones were eventually resolved.
First-time investors: We've finally released our beginner's guide to investing. Read it in an afternoon, follow the principles, pick an investing style and buy your first SGX stocks within the next few hours! Click here to download it for free.
Follow us on Facebook and Telegram for the latest investing news and analyses!
Disclosure: Royston Yang owns shares of DBS Group and iFAST Corporation.
The post Singapore Stocks Suffered a Bloodbath Last Friday: How Should Investors React? appeared first on The Smart Investor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's sudden shifts make his policies baffling to countries trying to negotiate lower tariffs

time18 minutes ago

Trump's sudden shifts make his policies baffling to countries trying to negotiate lower tariffs

WASHINGTON -- In the past week, President Donald Trump has managed to make his erratic trade policies even more baffling to countries desperate to negotiate an escape from his wrath. Doubling down on his trade wars, Trump is threatening to raise taxes on many goods from Canada, hike his universal tariff on imports from around the world and punish Brazil for prosecuting his friend, the country's former president. On Saturday, Trump announced more tariffs still, this time on two of the United States' biggest trade partners: the European Union and Mexico, at 30% each. Former U.S. trade negotiator Wendy Cutler said that Trump's recent moves 'underscore the growing unpredictability, incoherence and assertiveness'' of his trade policies. 'It's hard for trading partners to know where they stand with Trump on any given day and what more may be coming their way when least expected,'' said Cutler, now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. On Thursday, the president escalated a conflict he started with America's second-biggest trading partner and longstanding ally, raising the tariff -- effectively a tax — on many Canadian imports to 35% effective Aug. 1. The sudden announcement, revealed in a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, came despite Carney's push to reach a trade deal with the United States by July 21. And it followed a big concession by Canada: On June 29, it had agreed to drop a digital services tax that Trump considered unfair to U.S. tech giants. Canada is far from the only target. In an interview Thursday with NBC News Trump suggested that he plans to raise his 'baseline'' tariff on most imports from an already-high 10% to as much as 20%. Trump sees the baseline tariffs as a way to finance the budget-busting tax cuts in the "One Big Beautiful Bill'' he signed into law July 4. Those tariff threats came after his extraordinary decision Wednesday to impose a 50% import tax on Brazil mainly because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for trying to overturn his electoral defeat in 2022. In his letter to current Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Trump also incorrectly claimed that Brazilian trade barriers had caused 'unsustainable Trade Deficits against the United States.'' In fact, U.S. exports to Brazil have exceeded imports for 18 straight years, including a $29 billion surplus last year. For some, Trump's action against Brazil indicates he's trying to exert influence over more than trade. 'Trump seems to view tariffs as an instrument to influence not just other countries' trade and economic policies but even their domestic legal and political matters," said Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University. Trump's faith in the economic superpowers of tariffs is unshaken even though they so far have proven largely ineffective in bullying other countries to cut deals. On April 2, Trump announced the 10% baseline tariffs and larger 'reciprocal'' tariffs – up to 50% -- on dozens of countries with which the United States runs trade deficits. But responding to a rout in global financial markets, he quickly suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate. The administration promised '90 deals in 90 days'' but got only two – with the United Kingdom and Vietnam -- before the deadline ran out Wednesday. Rather than reinstituting the reciprocal tariffs, Trump sent letters to 23 countries saying he'll impose levies ranging from 20% on the Philippines to the 50% on Brazil Aug. 1 if they couldn't reach an agreement. Chad Bown, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, was not surprised that Trump needed more time to press U.S. trading partners to do more to open their markets to U.S. exports — though another three weeks is unlikely to be enough time to reach substantive agreements. 'For each of these countries, they have their own domestic challenges about what they can and can't offer,'' he said. 'There's a reason why that market access hasn't been granted before ... they have domestic political constituencies that argue to keep protection in place. And those just aren't problems that can easily be solved in a matter of weeks.'' Malaysia, for instance, has 'specific red lines'' it will not cross, Trade Minister Zafrul Aziz said Wednesday, including U.S. demands involving government contracts, halal certification, medical standards and a digital tax. But Malaysia has pledged to buy 30 Boeing planes and offered other concessions involving semiconductors and technology. 'It has to be fair,' he said. 'If the deal does not benefit Malaysia, we should not have a deal.'' Still, the United States' $30 trillion economy and free-spending consumers give Trump considerable leverage, especially over countries that depend on trade. 'These countries need the United States,'' said Matthew Goodman, director of the Council on Foreign Relations' Center for Geoeconomic Studies. "They need our market.'' Thailand, facing the threat of a 36% Trump tariff Aug. 1, is continuing to push for a deal and has offered to open its market to more U.S. farm, energy and industrial products. Trump said Vietnam gave U.S. companies duty-free access to its market while agreeing to a 20% U.S. tariff on its exports — though details of the deal have not been released. 'The Vietnam deal was fantastic,'' Stephen Miran, chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, crowed last Sunday on ABC News' 'This Week with George Stephanopoulos.'' 'It's extremely one-sided.'' Other countries 'can't afford to walk away,'' said Goodman, former director for international economics on the National Security Council. 'But they're going to be increasingly unhappy and resistant to the most over-the-top requests.'' Sometimes there's a backlash against U.S. bullying. Carney's Liberal party, for example, won a come-from-behind election victory in April because he stood up to Trump's pressure. And countries are beginning to look for alternatives to economic reliance on the United States. Canada is negotiating a trade pact with Southeast Asian countries, some of which are also moving closer to China. Foreign governments might also simply hope to outlast Trump, who has shown a willingness to declare victory after signing 'framework'' agreements such as one with China that leave the toughest issues for future negotiations. 'For Trump, the squeeze is more important than the juice,' said William Reinsch, a former U.S. trade official now at the Center of Strategic and International Studies. 'What's important to him is winning – the public, visible appearance of winning. And what he wins is less important. 'So the trick for these countries becomes: 'How do we let him win in a way that allows us to make the least damaging concessions?''

Trump Announces 30% Tariff on E.U. and Mexico, Citing Threat
Trump Announces 30% Tariff on E.U. and Mexico, Citing Threat

Time​ Magazine

time26 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump Announces 30% Tariff on E.U. and Mexico, Citing Threat

President Donald Trump has announced a 30% tariff for both the European Union (E.U.) and Mexico, with the charges set to come into effect on Aug. 1. Trump shared the news on Saturday via his Truth Social platform, as he continued posting letters sent from the U.S. to other countries lining out trade deals and tariffs. In the letters to the E.U. and Mexico, delivered on Friday, Trump referred to the countries' respective trade deficits with the U.S. as a 'major threat' to national Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump made reference to the initial tariffs he placed on the neighboring country upon his return to the White House, when he said Mexico was largely responsible for the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. He acknowledged that Mexico has since 'been helping' to secure the border, but said its actions are 'not enough.' 'Mexico has still not stopped the cartels, who are trying to turn all of North America into a narco-trafficking playground. Obviously I cannot let that happen,' Trump said. 'Starting 1 August, we will charge Mexico a tariff of 30% on Mexican products sent into the United States, separate from all sectoral tariffs.' As he has stipulated elsewhere, Trump added that 'there will be no tariff' if Mexico opts to build and manufacture products within the United States instead. He went on to say that if Mexico successfully challenges the cartels and stops 'the flow of fentanyl' into the U.S., then an adjustment to the tariffs will be considered. In what has become somewhat of a hallmark of these trade negotiation letters, Trump signed off with the statement: 'You will never be disappointed with the United States of America.' Read More: Trump Blows Past His Own Tariff Deadline and Sends Warning Letters to More Countries Addressing the tariffs in a statement shared on its official government website on Saturday, Mexico said its delegates had told U.S. officials a day prior that the new tariff rate would amount to 'unfair treatment' of which Mexico did not agree to. Meanwhile, in his letter to the E.U., Trump delivered the same promise of a 30% tariff, citing that the U.S. has one of 'its largest trade deficits' with the bloc. Trump has long taken issue with the E.U. In 2018, during his first term in the White House, when asked about tariffs, Trump said that 'nobody treats us much worse than the European Union' and argued the bloc was 'formed' to 'take advantage of' the U.S. In this new letter, Trump said the relationship between the U.S. and the E.U. 'has been, unfortunately, far from reciprocal.' When delivering his levy of a 30% tariff on E.U. products sent into the United States, separate from all sectoral tariffs, Trump issued a warning that 'goods transshipped to evade a higher tariff will be subject to that higher tariff.' Trump also issued a stark warning against any retaliatory measures.'The E.U. will allow complete, open-market access to the United States, with no tariff being charged to us, in an attempt to reduce the large trade deficit,' Trump said. 'If, for any reason, you decide to raise your tariffs and retaliate, then whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 30% that we charge.' Trump went on to say that the tariffs 'may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country.' President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has responded to the announcement. 'A 30% tariff on E.U. exports would hurt businesses, consumers, and patients on both sides of the Atlantic,' she said via social media. 'We will continue working towards an agreement by August 1. At the same time, we are ready to safeguard E.U. interests on the basis of proportionate countermeasures.' The negotiations between the E.U. and the U.S. have been rocky, to say the least, since Trump's return to the White House. In May, Trump accused the E.U. of stalling trade talks. "Our discussions with them are going nowhere," he said, threatening to place a "straight 50% tariff" on the E.U. starting June 1. After a phone call with the president of the European Commission, Trump reneged and agreed to go back to the July 9 deadline. (Trump started sending out his trade agreements and letters on July 9, his initial tariffs-related deadline, but the White House has said the higher tariffs will not go into effect until August 1.) Read More: Trump Threatens Extra 10% Tariff for Countries 'Aligning' Themselves With 'Anti-American' BRICS Policies Over the past four days, Trump has announced a slew of higher levies against countries, including a 35% tariff for Canada and a 25% tax on goods imported from South Korea and Japan. Trump unveiled his initial 'reciprocal' tariffs on April 2, setting a 10% base charge for most countries, with some receiving additional higher rates. Amid recession fears and concern from world leaders, Trump granted a 90-day extension for most countries, delaying the start date for all but the 10% levy, to allow time for negotiations. Meanwhile, as the recently-announced August 1 start date looms, leaders within the E.U. are avidly watching the trade negotiations take place. 'We trust in the goodwill of all stakeholders to reach a fair agreement that can strengthen the West as a whole, given that—particularly in the current scenario—it would make no sense to trigger a trade war between the two sides of the Atlantic,' read a statement from Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's office on Saturday, following Trump's announcement of the 30% tariff.

Trump Cites Flow of Fentanyl to Justify New Tariffs on Mexico
Trump Cites Flow of Fentanyl to Justify New Tariffs on Mexico

New York Times

time26 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Cites Flow of Fentanyl to Justify New Tariffs on Mexico

Mexican officials have been negotiating for months in hopes of reaching a trade deal with Washington that would not devastate the country's export-driven economy, but President Trump upended those talks on Saturday when he threatened to impose a 30 percent tariff on Mexican imports, potentially igniting a trade war with one of America's largest trading partners. In a letter to Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, Mr. Trump said that Mexico was not doing enough to curb the flow of fentanyl into the United States and cited that as the reason for the tariffs. Mr. Trump added that Mexican companies were welcome to manufacture their products in the United States to avoid the tariffs. The tariffs are set to take effect on Aug. 1 and are similar to the levies that the United States is imposing on imports from Canada and the European Union, which Mr. Trump said separately on Saturday would also face 30 percent duties. The tariffs come despite the fact that Mr. Trump brokered a trade deal with Mexico and Canada during his first term that was intended to stabilize economic relations between the United States and its neighbors. Mr. Trump also warned Mexico not to retaliate with higher tariffs of its own. He said that whatever additional tariffs Mexico might impose would be added to the 30 percent rate he announced. The president added that drugs were not the only issue of concern to the United States and pointed to other Mexican policies that contributed to 'unsustainable' trade deficits. 'The Trade Deficit is a major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security!' Mr. Trump wrote in the letter. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store