Truth about UK nuclear veterans 'covered up', says Andy Burnham
Watch - Newsnight: Britain's Nuclear Test Survivors
Veterans, along with many others who were exposed, are preparing to launch civil legal action against the MoD to gain access to their own medical records.They say their records are being illegally withheld, and harm was done to them and their families by the MoD's failure to keep, maintain and release them.Survivors allege they have suffered cancers of the liver, bone, bowel, skin and brain, as well as leukaemia, heart disease, stillbirths and generational birth defects as a result of exposure to the nuclear tests.John Morris, 87, worked as a laundry operator "washing contaminated clothing" on Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean in the 1950s, and said he witnessed tests of three atomic bombs and one hydrogen bomb."If you've seen the film 'Oppenheimer', I sat 20 miles from a nuclear explosion that was a thousand times greater than that explosion," he told Newsnight."People have reckoned it was like sitting in the centre of the sun," he said. "With a pair of trousers on, a shirt and sunglasses."Mr Morris believes the bomb tests caused him to develop pernicious anaemia - an autoimmune condition - and cancer; and caused his first-born son Steven to tragically die in his cot due to birth defects at four months old.John and his wife Betty were initially questioned on suspicion of Steven's murder, before being released without charge. It took John 50 years and a Freedom of Information Act request to produce the coroner's report which suggested their son's lungs may not have formed properly."The MoD had the audacity to turn round and say they looked after us to the best of their ability," he said."I'm sorry MoD, you've an awful lot to answer for."
From 1952 and for the following 15 years, about 39,000 British and Commonwealth servicemen and scientists witnessed 45 atomic and hydrogen bombs, and hundreds of radioactive experiments, in the Australian Outback and Pacific atolls.As well as the military personnel, the tests also allegedly put at risk their children and indigenous communities."This is a criminal cover-up on an industrial scale and only Parliament can overturn it," said Mr Bunham, who has campaigned on the issue before.He told BBC Newsnight's special programme: "Why has this one got the firmest of lids on it? I think it is because it goes to the heart of the British state."
Steve Purse, whose father David Purse took part in radioactive experiments in 1963, was born with a number of severe disabilities including a form of short stature, as well as curvature of the spine, a respiratory condition and hydrocephalus - a build-up of fluid in the brain.Mr Purse said his father would describe how contaminated sand would blow "everywhere", including into bedding, clothing and food, following the tests in Maralinga in South Australia."Along come I, a few years later, and in my mind it doesn't take a genius to make a link there and say there has to be something in it."My condition has never actually been diagnosed - doctors can't diagnose me so there's something genetically different there. There's something wrong."
His son, aged four, has a condition which results in his teeth crumbling. "One dentist said he's seen this before in the children who were in the fallout clouds of Chernobyl," said Mr Purse.Another veteran, Brian Unthank, who was stationed on Christmas Island, said he lost all his teeth and his first wife suffered 13 miscarriages and their children have suffered various health issues.Mr Unthank said he was never issued any protective clothing during the two hydrogen bomb tests he witnessed. He has had treatment for 92 instances of skin cancers, including another treatment this week.
In May 2021, the National Radiological Protection Board said it had carried out three large studies of nuclear test veterans and found no valid evidence to link participation in these tests to ill health.The independent studies, commissioned by the MoD, said overall, test participants "had similar overall levels of aggregated mortality and cancer incidence" to the control group.It said records indicate that "relatively few test participants received any measurable radiation dose as a result of the tests".Veteran's blood and urine samples taken from them as young men at the Cold War weapons trials have been reclassified as "scientific data" and placed out of reach at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, an MoD agency.The government said the database where those records are held – known as Merlin – "has not been declassified" and "contains information ranging from unclassified to Top Secret, with the majority being unclassified"."Plans are under way to release unclassified records at the National Archives with the appropriate privacy redactions, while classified records are being reviewed for potential publication with necessary security redactions," the MoD said in a statement.
In December, Defence Secretary John Healey told MPs in December that "nothing is being withheld", and that officials would carry out a "detailed dig" amid concerns from surviving nuclear test veterans.Last May, then-defence minister Andrew Murrison said: "I would like to make clear that the Ministry of Defence, including its agencies and arm's length bodies, does not withhold any personal data or medical records from nuclear test veterans."Susie Boniface, investigative journalist, told Newsnight: "The veterans have always said to me the exact same thing, any time I've ever interviewed any of them, which is that the MoD policy is 'to delay, deny, until they die'."She said veterans are missing health records and she believed "the main departmental archives that hold medical records have at some point been sanitised by a government official of some sort who's come along, taken this stuff out".In a statement to Newsnight, the MoD said it was "deeply grateful to all those who participated in the UK nuclear testing programme and recognises their immense contribution to national security"."Ministers have directed teams across the Ministry of Defence and Atomic Weapons Establishment to thoroughly examine what information exists regarding medical testing of nuclear test veterans."We'll provide an update on this work in the summer.Campaigners have long called on the government to investigate, compensate and commemorate alleged victims from the UK and Commonwealth.Some other countries have compensated nuclear test veterans. The US - which did far more tests than the UK - offered lump sum compensation of up to $75,000 (£55,000) to people who were on-site for nuclear weapons tests.In May, a group of veterans made a criminal complaint to the Metropolitan Police about the MoD, saying they were "devastated at the way veterans are being denied justice".They claim the department's actions amount to potential misconduct in public office with a cover-up of radiation experiments - a claim the MoD denies.A statement from the Met to Newsnight said: "A report was submitted to the Met Police on Wednesday, 7 May relating to non-recent allegations against a public body."The report is currently being assessed to determine the most appropriate course of action. We have not launched any investigation at this stage."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Half of black women in UK who raise concerns during labour did not receive suitable help, study finds
Almost half of pregnant black women raised concerns to healthcare professionals during labour, with half saying that their concerns were also not properly addressed, according to the largest report of its kind. Black women in the UK are up to four times more likely to die during childbirth compared with their white counterparts, and are also more likely to experience serious birth complications and perinatal mental health illnesses. Five X More, an organisation dedicated to improving black maternal health outcomes, confirmed these findings through a study of the maternity experiences of more than 1,000 black and mixed-race people who were pregnant between July 2021 and March 2025. The report found that more than half (54%) of respondents experienced challenges with healthcare professionals, and that just under a quarter (23%) of black women did not receive pain relief when they requested it. And of these women, 40% said they were given no explanation as to why that was the case. Furthermore, 45% of respondents raised concerns during their labour and of these, under half (49%) said their concerns were not properly addressed. Tinuke Awe and Clotilde Abe, the co-founders of Five X More, said that the report shows that the maternity system is failing black women, and that it is also a 'call to action' to address these disparities. 'Black women deserve better care and communication. The statistics around black women dying in and around pregnancy and having adverse outcomes have been around for decades now. Black women deserve to be treated with dignity at every stage of their maternity journey and the burden cannot keep falling on them to make the system work,' they said. 'While we're still seeing the same issues we raised years ago, such as systemic failings, being ignored in pain, and poor understanding of conditions affecting black women, new themes are also emerging like the emotional toll of self-advocacy and the impact of not having consistent or trusted care.' The research also found that only six in 10 respondents rated their antenatal care as good or high quality, while almost a third (28%) reported experiencing discrimination, and only a fifth had been informed on how to make a complaint. One respondent who, after having had an emergency C-section, said she had to constantly call the nurses to give her pain relief, said: 'I was in excruciating pain and also was sick for 13 hours and received more support from other mothers and their partners on their ward than from the midwives … I was treated really poorly.' The health and social care committee is in the middle of an inquiry into black maternal health and, earlier this month, the health secretary announced the launch of a national maternity investigation. Paulette Hamilton, the MP for Birmingham Erdington and chair of the all-party parliamentary group on black health, said the findings were 'deeply troubling', but 'sadly not surprising'. 'Black women continue to face systemic inequalities in maternity care, from discrimination and unmet pain relief to dismissed concerns. These shocking figures expose a healthcare system that too often fails black mothers and puts lives at risk,' Hamilton said. 'We urgently need better training, greater accountability and culturally competent care. No woman should ever feel unheard or unsafe when bringing life into the world.' The Department of Health and Social Care said: 'These findings are unacceptable. No woman should go unheard, dismissed or discriminated against while going through maternity care. 'Ending these inexcusable inequalities will be a key area of focus in the upcoming national maternity and neonatal investigation, which will help deliver safe and compassionate maternity care for all women, no matter who they are.'.
Sunday Post
8 minutes ago
- Sunday Post
Medics and charities back survivors' plea for ban on sunbeds
Get a weekly round-up of stories from The Sunday Post: Thank you for signing up to our Sunday Post newsletter. Something went wrong - please try again later. Sign Up Doctors, cancer patients and charities are calling for a ban on sunbeds because of their link to potentially fatal skin cancer. They are appealing to the Scottish and UK Governments to follow Australia, Brazil, and now Ireland, in moving to outlaw them in a bid to tackle rising numbers of patients with malignant melanoma. The medics and medical charities cite the burden skin cancer places on patients and the NHS. The plea for a ban follows recent moves by the Irish government to investigate ways of banning commercial sunbeds. The country's health authorities say they are swayed by the fair Celtic complexion being more susceptible to skin cancer from UV rays, and the growing health costs of treating patients with the malignancy. © Shutterstock / RomanRuzicka Cancer Research UK say cases of the most serious skin cancer, malignant melanoma, have soared by a third in the past decade across all age groups including young adults. The cancer is triggered by UV radiation damage to the DNA in skin cells. Last year a UK-wide survey by charity Melanoma Focus found that 28% of adults say they use sunbeds. In Scotland, based on a small sample, the figure was 24%. One of the most alarming findings of the survey was that across the UK, 43% of 18 to 25-year-olds use sunbeds. The charity also found that 34% of UK 16 and 17-year-olds are using sunbeds, despite a legal ban for under-18s. The charity says that around 100 deaths a year are linked to sunbed use across the UK. In hospital dermatology cancer clinics, Scottish skin specialists report regularly seeing patients with stage four melanomas, many of whom say they have used sunbeds. Some of the patients are still in their 20s, said speciality dermatologist Dr Amy Perkins of Forth Valley Health Board. 'I see them at clinic shocked and distressed by the diagnosis of a serious cancer and the surgery and treatment to have to undergo to survive,' she said. 'They struggle to accept that what they thought was essentially cosmetic treatment has increased their risk of melanoma.' Cancer Research reports that people who start using sunbeds before the age of 35 are 87% more likely to develop melanoma. 'People who had ever used a sunbed were 20% more likely to subsequently develop melanoma, compared to people who had never used one,' it adds. Dr John Ferguson, from St Andrews, works as a consultant dermatologist at Guy's & St Thomas' hospital in London. He points to the British Photodermatology Group (BPG) call for a complete ban on commercial sunbeds in the UK to reduce skin cancer and eye disease. Sunbeds also increase the risk of eye cancers, especially in those starting sunbed use before 20, research reports. Dr Ferguson, a BPG committee member, said: 'The evidence linking sunbed use to melanoma is considerable and presents a heavy toll on patients and health care cost. 'Telling a patient they have stage four melanoma is one of the most difficult tasks I have as a dermatologist. 'It is time we banned sunbeds because of the considerable risk to skin cancer.' Its statement calling for a ban says: 'Early sunbed use is associated with the highest increase in skin cancer risk. 'Sunbed use is addictive and associated with smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and other unhealthy behaviours.' Some 16 years have passed since the World Health Organisation's cancer research arm, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified ultraviolet light emitted from tanning beds as carcinogenic. Charity SKCIN has joined the call for a ban, denouncing current sunbed regulation which limits use to over-18s. 'Sunbed regulations are outdated, ineffective and not being adhered to – with an alarming percentage of under-18s regularly using them,' it says. 'Underage usage is rapidly increasing and fuelled by tanning trends and misinformation, influencing millions of children on social media daily. 'With melanoma rising faster than any other cancer in Britain and one of the biggest lethal malignancies in the 15-34 age group.' So what would the savings be to the NHS in skin cancer treatment? Manchester University scientists say that even at a conservative estimate, a ban along with a public information campaign, would prevent over 200 deaths among 18-year-olds in England alone. More importantly, over 1,000 young people would be spared melanoma and 200 lives would be saved. Gilly Perkins, general manager of The Sunbed Association, said: 'It is chronic over-exposure to the UV light that may increase the risk of skin cancers, mainly non-melanoma skin cancers. For melanoma, intermittent sun exposure and sunburn increase the risk. A sunbed session taken in a professional salon is a controlled, regular dose of UV without burning.' She added: 'UV exposure carries risk if abused – whether from a sunbed, beach holiday, or a garden lounger. But professional tanning salons operate under strict safety regulations designed to minimise those risks. We promote moderation, non-burning exposure, staff training, customer screening and education.' She argued UV exposure benefits cardiovascular health, and modern sunbeds are safer than older ones. 'For many sunbed users, it's not about ignoring risk – it's about managing it.' The Scottish Government said: 'We continue to monitor the effect of sunbed use and advise anyone using them to consider the risks of doing so.' 'I want to see them banned in Scotland. No one deserves to live like this' © Andrew Cawley Claire Gibson, 40, from Edinburgh, has endured years of cancer surgery and scans for a melanoma skin cancer after occasionally using sunbeds as a teenager. Areas of tissue have been removed from her right arm in doctors' latest attempt to save her. She is adamant that she wants to see the government ban commercial sunbeds to spare others the trauma, treatment and continual worry of cancer. The management and systems accountant at the National Galleries of Scotland, said: 'I wish I had never gone near a sunbed but like many teenagers, I thought I would look better with a tan. 'It is now my dearest wish to see them banned in Scotland and the rest of the UK because no one deserves to live like this. 'It is deeply concerning to know that melanoma is now among the most common cancers in teenagers and young adults.' She is waiting for her latest biopsy results after yet more surgery to remove tissue from a suspicious mole on her right arm. 'My treatment to date has been a wide local incision (removal) to remove any surrounding cells and a sentinel lymph node biopsy to check that the melanoma has not extended further. 'Fortunately, it has not.' She says that she is dismayed when she sees high-street sunbed salons promoting sunbeds as healthy. 'My heart sinks when their adverts describe them as having 'health benefits'. 'I pass one on the way to work and wonder how they can possibly proclaim this when I and others have had malignant melanoma. 'I am trying to survive and hugely grateful for the vigilance of my doctors. 'I want everyone to know that melanoma is a real and serious consequence of using sunbeds. 'People who start using sunbeds before 35 have a 75% increased risk of that serious cancer.' Melanoma victim: No tan is worth dying for It was the death of a young journalist at the age of 26 from melanoma which sparked a national campaign for a ban on sunbeds in Australia. Clare Oliver's slogan, 'No Tan Is Worth Dying For', drove legislation through the Australian Parliament in 2016. She campaigned tirelessly, even on her deathbed in 2007, as she forced the Australian government to ban sunbeds and prevent them from killing anyone else. In her last days, Clare wept as she said: 'Don't follow the fad for a tan – look at me and choose life. I don't want to die at 26.' Her wish to see sunbeds banned was supported by leading Australian and global cancer scientist Professor Craig Sinclair. He says banning sunbeds would reduce deaths and costs to the NHS. 'If Scotland banned sunbeds, it would undoubtedly save lives and significantly reduce health care costs caused by skin cancer,' he said. 'Sunbeds, like tobacco, when used as directed significantly increases the risk of skin cancer.' He also dismissed the argument that sunbed shops would go out of business. 'The Australian experience of banning sunbeds more than a decade ago showed sunbed operators quickly reorientated their businesses to other cosmetic services and consumers moved to safer forms of skin treatments such as fake tanning and spray tans.' Scots GP Dr Michael Mrozinski, now working in the Australian bush, says he has treated skin cancer patients who used sunbeds before the ban. 'I worked in a skin cancer clinic in Melbourne for four years and sun damage from people who tan from the sun and used sunbeds is considerable,' he said. 'A sunbed is just a more concentrated form of UV and I hate having to give a skin cancer diagnosis to people as many don't realise how serious it is.'
The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
My partner saved my life with a kiss – he spotted sign of silent killer after our smooch
A MUM said she was saved from dying from suspected sepsis during childbirth by her partner spotting something was wrong as he kissed her. Kerri-Louise Gilchrist, 33, said Hugh Marshall, 35, noticed she was cold and her lips were blue. 3 3 3 The mum of two said he told medics at Worcester Hospital: 'That's a sign of sepsis.' Kerri was put on an IV drip before the birth of Layla last August. She later lost five pints of blood and required two transfusions. Kerri, from Great Malvern, Worcs, said: 'The nurses didn't notice anything until my partner said to them, you're not actually looking at your patient, her palms and lips are blue - that's a sign of sepsis. 'I'd been like that for a couple of hours at that point. 'Within two minutes of him saying that, I had 11 people in the room. 'You have somebody that's going to stand your ground for you. 'I was in no fit state to argue for myself, I couldn't care for myself. 'I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for Hugh.' Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust said: 'We are sorry if Kerri is unhappy with the care she received.' The signs and symptoms of sepsis to look out for, according to The UK Sepsis Trust What are the symptoms of sepsis? SEPSIS is a life-threatening reaction to an infection that happens when your immune system overreacts and starts to damage your body's own tissues and organs. Symptoms of sepsis in an adult include: Acting confused, slurred speech or not making sense Blue, grey, pale or blotchy skin, lips or tongue – on brown or black skin, this may be easier to see on the palms of the hands or soles of the feet A rash that does not fade when you roll a glass over it, the same as meningitis Difficulty breathing, breathlessness or breathing very fast Symptoms in a child include: Blue, grey, pale or blotchy skin, lips or tongue – on brown or black skin, this may be easier to see on the palms of the hands or soles of the feet A rash that does not fade when you roll a glass over it, the same as meningitis Difficulty breathing (you may notice grunting noises or their stomach sucking under their ribcage), breathlessness or breathing very fast A weak, high-pitched cry that's not like their normal cry Not responding like they normally do, or not interested in feeding or normal activities Being sleepier than normal or having difficulty waking They may not have all these symptoms. If you think you or someone else has symptoms of sepsis, call 999 or go to A&E. Source: NHS
