Atomic Kitten's Natasha Hamilton had skin cancer in 2024
The 42-year-old singer had a Basal-cell carcinoma removed from her back after an itchy red mole was spotted following a holiday, and Natasha has now described the health scare as a "massive wake-up call".
The 'Whole Again' hitmaker - who thinks the skin cancer stemmed from her days of using sunbeds in the 90s - told Scott McGlynn on 'Celebrity Skin Talk': "I actually had skin cancer last year. I had a Basal-cell carcinoma removed from my back, and it was a massive wake-up call for me. It was like, 'Oh.'
"I have burnt my back so much over the years, and I used sunbeds when I was younger, you know, back in the 90s, it was like everyone used a sunbed before you went on your night out on a Saturday, and the repercussions of that is now I have to be super vigilant in the sun, like I need to have my high factors on, I can't be burning. I have to check my skin religiously for changes in like moles and freckles.
"And, you know, there have been things since then that have come up, and I've had to go and have a look, you know, the microscope on and keeping an eye on a few things.
"So, like a massive wake-up call, and I'm just a big advocate now - get your SPF on! Protect your skin!"
Natasha's health scare has made her realise she's "not invincible".
The singer - who is now cancer-free - said: "I'm fine, honestly. It was found, it was cut away and, yeah, we move on. But it was a, kind of, 'Oh, I'm not invincible moment.'
"These things do happen to you sometimes, and you've just got to look after yourself."
Natasha now fears for "young girls and boys" who use sunbeds, and she's actually calling for them to be banned in the UK.
The pop star said: "Even though it's 18 or over, you're still a kid. You still don't understand the consequences.
"So, yeah, I would call for them to be banned, but that's probably not a popular opinion - but it's mine!"
Follow Scott McGlynn on Instagram - @scottmcglynnofficial - to watch his 'Celebrity Skin Talk' show.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
19 hours ago
- West Australian
Survivors call for more assistance with cancer costs
A young breast cancer survivor is calling for diagnostic tests to be made free because she fears high living costs could deter others seeking early examinations due to the expense. Despite significant improvements to treatments and survival rates, breast cancer remains the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. In Australia, 58 people receive the same news mum-of-two Aimee Glen did each day. Age is the greatest risk factor and screening is offered to women over 40. However young women should also be aware of their risk, particularly if they have a family history of the disease. Ms Glen was just 31 when she first noticed a lump in her breast and was soon after diagnosed with stage two ER/PR breast cancer. She had no family history but a reminder from the Instagram account Support Your Girls prompted her to do a self-check. She then booked in to see her GP who referred her for an ultrasound at the Geelong breast clinic which was followed by multiple diagnostic tests. "It was all very quick from when I was tested to when I started treatment," Ms Glen tells AAP. "I had 16 rounds of chemotherapy known as 'the red devil' which is very hard-hitting treatment but breast cancer responds well to it." Following this, she decided to undergo a double mastectomy and has recently finished three weeks of daily radiotherapy. "The entire cancer treatment was incredibly expensive but those initial diagnostic tests were a financial stressor which is very difficult for people," she says. So far Ms Glen has spent $1442 and been left $787 out of pocket after Medicare rebates. In the meantime, she has started a petition to make ultrasounds and mammograms free for diagnostic purposes, which has gained nearly 14,000 signatures in two weeks. "There are options to go through the public system but people often have to wait months to get in and sometimes it's not an option if you do have an aggressive cancer," she says. "The petition is gaining a lot of traction, which makes me realise it has affected a lot of women and men, because breast cancer doesn't discriminate and affects a lot of people." So Brave is a charity supporting Australians facing breast cancer and its founder, Rachelle Panitz, fears young women are putting off diagnostic scans due to out-of-pocket cost. They can also have trouble accessing a diagnosis in the first place because the cancer is generally thought to affect older women, she adds. "An initial diagnosis can cost up to $3000 when you factor in all the scans and tests," Ms Panitz says. "Young women are borrowing money from their parents; they may be in the workforce but don't have that spare income." Ms Panitz has met with federal politicians about making access to diagnosis easier and more affordable. "People put (the scans) off and that can lead to worse outcomes. These kinds of considerations are not new but they are exacerbated by the cost of living," she explains. Australia's BreastScreen program is free for women over 40 and women over 50 are invited for a mammogram every two years. There is no evidence to support routinely screening women under 40, unless they are at high risk of developing breast cancer due to genetic mutations, National Breast Cancer Foundation chair in cancer prevention Nehmat Houssami says. "A key message for women, including younger women, but relevant to all women even if they have recently screened, is if you notice a change in your breast ... then please see your family doctor and talk to them about being referred for testing," she says. Changes can include a lump in the breast or a change in the skin. "Medicare covers some of the cost of these tests but unless the service bulk bills there will be out-of-pocket expenses," Professor Houssami says. "So it is possible that some women may not be accessing tests due to out-of-pocket costs." According to the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, federal, state and territory governments recently undertook a BreastScreen funding review, with the final report now being considered. "The review was a collaborative initiative aimed at enhancing the BreastScreen Australia program and was completed in mid-2025," a spokesperson says. "The latest evidence on breast cancer screening age range and screening technologies were considered as part of the review."
Perth Now
19 hours ago
- Perth Now
Survivors call for more assistance with cancer costs
A young breast cancer survivor is calling for diagnostic tests to be made free because she fears high living costs could deter others seeking early examinations due to the expense. Despite significant improvements to treatments and survival rates, breast cancer remains the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. In Australia, 58 people receive the same news mum-of-two Aimee Glen did each day. Age is the greatest risk factor and screening is offered to women over 40. However young women should also be aware of their risk, particularly if they have a family history of the disease. Ms Glen was just 31 when she first noticed a lump in her breast and was soon after diagnosed with stage two ER/PR breast cancer. She had no family history but a reminder from the Instagram account Support Your Girls prompted her to do a self-check. She then booked in to see her GP who referred her for an ultrasound at the Geelong breast clinic which was followed by multiple diagnostic tests. "It was all very quick from when I was tested to when I started treatment," Ms Glen tells AAP. "I had 16 rounds of chemotherapy known as 'the red devil' which is very hard-hitting treatment but breast cancer responds well to it." Following this, she decided to undergo a double mastectomy and has recently finished three weeks of daily radiotherapy. "The entire cancer treatment was incredibly expensive but those initial diagnostic tests were a financial stressor which is very difficult for people," she says. So far Ms Glen has spent $1442 and been left $787 out of pocket after Medicare rebates. In the meantime, she has started a petition to make ultrasounds and mammograms free for diagnostic purposes, which has gained nearly 14,000 signatures in two weeks. "There are options to go through the public system but people often have to wait months to get in and sometimes it's not an option if you do have an aggressive cancer," she says. "The petition is gaining a lot of traction, which makes me realise it has affected a lot of women and men, because breast cancer doesn't discriminate and affects a lot of people." So Brave is a charity supporting Australians facing breast cancer and its founder, Rachelle Panitz, fears young women are putting off diagnostic scans due to out-of-pocket cost. They can also have trouble accessing a diagnosis in the first place because the cancer is generally thought to affect older women, she adds. "An initial diagnosis can cost up to $3000 when you factor in all the scans and tests," Ms Panitz says. "Young women are borrowing money from their parents; they may be in the workforce but don't have that spare income." Ms Panitz has met with federal politicians about making access to diagnosis easier and more affordable. "People put (the scans) off and that can lead to worse outcomes. These kinds of considerations are not new but they are exacerbated by the cost of living," she explains. Australia's BreastScreen program is free for women over 40 and women over 50 are invited for a mammogram every two years. There is no evidence to support routinely screening women under 40, unless they are at high risk of developing breast cancer due to genetic mutations, National Breast Cancer Foundation chair in cancer prevention Nehmat Houssami says. "A key message for women, including younger women, but relevant to all women even if they have recently screened, is if you notice a change in your breast ... then please see your family doctor and talk to them about being referred for testing," she says. Changes can include a lump in the breast or a change in the skin. "Medicare covers some of the cost of these tests but unless the service bulk bills there will be out-of-pocket expenses," Professor Houssami says. "So it is possible that some women may not be accessing tests due to out-of-pocket costs." According to the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, federal, state and territory governments recently undertook a BreastScreen funding review, with the final report now being considered. "The review was a collaborative initiative aimed at enhancing the BreastScreen Australia program and was completed in mid-2025," a spokesperson says. "The latest evidence on breast cancer screening age range and screening technologies were considered as part of the review."
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Inside celebrity chef Pete Evans' rapid downfall
Pete Evans has opened up about the downfall of his celebrity chef status that played out in the media following his decision to turn to the paleo diet. The 52-year-old chef and former My Kitchen Rules judge told American doctor Will Cole about how he went from being 'celebrated and adored' to being hated by Australia. Evans said the hate started after he discovered and began advocating the paleo diet — also known as the caveman diet, based on the idea of eating foods that were available to hunter-gatherers during the Paleolithic era. 'Up until that time, I was celebrated, adored by the Australian media and public until I started talking about paleo, ancestral diets', he told Dr Cole on his podcast The Art of Being Well. 'I was attacked straight away. It was bizarre, I was like, why is this so challenging, triggering, why is this happening, because I started sharing anecdotal stories of people improving their health who had adopted this way of life. The Melbourne-born chef said he was labelled by the media and health experts as 'crazy and dangerous'. 'Dietitians would say this is completely unfounded, dangerous, he's not a doctor, he's just a chef, even though the information I was sharing was from doctors,' he said. If you'd like to view this content, please adjust your . To find out more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Guide. The controversial wellness advocate said Australians had been 'brainwashed' by dietitians promoting dietary guidelines on the 'morning news'. As a result, he has to settle for getting his message and way of life out to the public through podcasting. Evans was aware his beliefs would be 'rejected', but didn't want to force it on people. Evans also set the record straight on the fact he is 'not opposed to modern technology in medicine at all'. The prominent sceptic of COVID-19 vaccines and masks was dropped from his hosting role on the popular Seven reality cooking show in May 2020 over his outspoken views. Evans and his wife Nicola have embraced an ancestral diet. Credit: Instagram In November that year, he was engulfed in further controversy after posting a cartoon on Instagram featuring a nazi 'black sun' symbol. He lost 15 business partnerships as a result of the post. Evans continues to spark debate over his non-traditional lifestyle of a mainly carnivorous diet, experience with plant medicines and using psychedelics as a way of therapy. Before COVID-19, a pandemic he called a hoax and questioned the effects of masks and social distancing, Evans filmed his documentary, The Magic Pill, which sees doctors, farmers and chefs weigh in on the ketogenic diet and its potential to eradicate illness. The Australian Medical Association at the time campaigned for it to be removed from Netflix for spreading 'dangerous' messaging about health. Evans is currently on holiday in the US and will next visit Salt Lake City.
