
Horrendous images are tipping point for outrage over Gaza
Keir Starmer described the suffering as 'unspeakable and indefensible'; but it is 'unspeakable' only in the sense that he has chosen not to speak about it (and tried to prevent others doing so). And, by finding excuses for [[Israel]] – by declaring it had the right to switch off water and electricity, for example – he has himself defended it. Wilful ignorance is a form of complicity, but the Prime Minister has done worse than this: he has been an apologist for war crimes.
Read more Dani Garavelli:
For all his apparent disgust at the plight of malnourished babies, Starmer was last week focused on another bug bear: takeaway delivery drivers. In a dog-whistle tweet, he pledged to hand over the addresses of asylum seeker hotels – already lightning rods for racist attacks – so the likes of Deliveroo and Just Eat can make sure they don't pay their low wages to anyone who has fled here from other countries.
Asylum seekers are not here illegally (whatever the subtext of the policy might be). It is just that, under our laws, they are not allowed to earn a living. Still, unlike a crackdown on Israel, it's likely to raise a smile on the Reform crowd's faces. No wonder some of Starmer's own party are embarrassed to be associated with him.
Others have raised their voices, of course: charities, human rights organisations, the tens of thousands who have taken to the streets with their placards, powerless in the face of establishment apathy, but desperate to do their bit.
The UK government has demonised those protesters, portraying them as violent anti-Semites in an attempt to shut them down. Even as the Express newspaper — the right-wing Express, for God's sake — was publishing a splash headline that read: The Suffering of Little Muhammad Clinging to Life Shames Us All, police officers were arresting pensioners under the Terrorism Act for carrying placards and, in one case, a copy of Private Eye magazine.
This they justified by alleging those protesters were supporting Palestine Action, an organisation which has been proscribed for trying to draw attention to the very humanitarian catastrophe Starmer has deemed 'unspeakable'.
No Western leader has done enough. They have tutted at outrageous statements from the likes of former Knesset member Moshe Feiglin, who said 'every child in Gaza is the enemy', they have called for a ceasefire and issued joint condemnatory statements. But they have failed to follow through on threats of concrete action, or at least they have failed to do so to any degree likely to have an impact.
Earlier this month, EU ministers declined to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement and visa-free travel, or to block imports from Israeli settlements. After the Labour Party came to power last year, it suspended 30 out of 350 arms export licences, but exempted parts for the F-35 fighter jet, used extensively in Israeli air strikes on Gaza. It suspended talks to upgrade its free trade agreement with Israel, but it has yet to impose any direct sanctions.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy does appear to want more; but he is running up against the intractability of his leader, who is refusing to commit to the most basic act of solidarity: the recognition of a Palestinian state. Across the Channel, Emmanuel Macron has been pushing the G7 leaders to make a joint declaration. In the absence of support, he has decided to go it alone, and has promised to formalise his decision at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Keir Starmer has shown more interest in going after protesters. (Image: James Manning) Starmer, on the other hand, says that, while Palestinians have an unalienable right to statehood, a formal recognition must be made 'at the right time'. Half a million people in Gaza are considered to be facing catastrophe while a further one million fall into the 'emergency risk' category. The US has just withdrawn from ceasefire talks in Qatar. So when will the right time be, Keir? When the last Palestinian is dead?
The Labour government has been out of touch with public opinion on Gaza for a long time. Now, it appears to be out of touch with its own backbenchers and Westminster at large. Early last week, 60 cross party MPs and peers called for a full embargo on arms exports to Israel and for the government to be more transparent about the licences it grants for military exports. And on Thursday 100, led by the chair of the International Development Committee Sarah Champion, demanded Starmer formally recognise Palestine. Perhaps the Prime Minister will buckle under the pressure. Perhaps something substantial will come out of his emergency phone call with France and Germany.
It does feel as if the world has woken up to what is happening. In the short-term, we need to build on that momentum; to ensure something is actually done.
But in the long-term there must be a reckoning in a way there was not in the wake of Iraq. It has been clear for so long what Israel's endgame is, and that they would stop at nothing to achieve it. Yet western governments allowed it to act with impunity, and, sure enough, here is Gaza, tipping into an abyss.
Read more:
In 2016, I travelled to Srebrenica courtesy of a charity that exists to ensure we do not forget what happens when the world turns a blind eye to genocide.
At Potočari cemetery there are 7,000 white pillars like upended chalk pieces: one for each Muslim whose body has been recovered from mass graves in Bosnia Herzegovina (although another 7,000 are still missing, and the remains of 2,000 others lie unidentified in mortuaries). Under a simple pavilion, survivors tell how they fled the safe haven when the UN failed to protect them; how – captured on the roadside – they were loaded into lorries, then taken in batches into barns to be shot.
More than 60,000 have died in Gaza since October 7, 2023. The UN, Amnesty and Médecins Sans Frontières have all declared it a genocide. And yet some people are still quibbling over the word.
Perhaps, in 25 years' time, a charity will take journalists and politicians to a graveyard on the strip. Perhaps people like me will force themselves to confront the ranks of the dead, in the stupid, misguided belief that simply bearing witness will help prevent such an atrocity from ever happening again.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Gazans 'starving to death' horror toll rises overnight as eight more die from hunger
Death toll of starving Palestinians in Gaza rises over weekend even as aid air-drops of food and water land on the Strip and the military announces 'safe zones across the enclave - Starmer to talk to Trump about crisis At least eight Palestinians have starved to death in the past 24 hours in Gaza as well as 22 people killed this morning and 63 slaughtered on Sunday, according to local officials. Israeli strikes have continued this morning and overnight, killing 38 on Sunday whilst they were seeking aid and the horror toll for those starved to death since war began is now 135. The number of people who have died from hunger includes 87 children, according to local health officials. The Israeli military Sunday began limited pauses in fighting in three populated areas of Gaza for ten hours a day, as concerns grow over surging hunger across the Strip. Israeli troops said the "tactical pause" from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. in Gaza City, Deir al-Balah and Muwasi, all with large populations, would increase humanitarian aid. United Nations humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher welcomed Israel's decision to support a "one-week scale-up of aid" and said "some movement restrictions appear to have been eased." But he said action needs to be sustained, vast and fast. sraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said: "Whichever path we choose, we will have to continue to allow the entry of minimal humanitarian supplies.' Images of emaciated children have fanned criticism of Israel, including by allies who call for the war's end. srael has restricted aid to Gaza because it says Hamas siphons it off to bolster its rule. Much of the population, squeezed into ever-smaller patches of land, now relies on aid. As the military had warned, combat operations continued otherwise. Health officials in Gaza s aid Israeli strikes killed Palestinians from late Saturday into Sunday. Local Sabreen Hassona said: "I came to get flour for my children because they have not tasted flour for more than a week, and thank God, God provided me with a kilo of rice with difficulty.' But Samira Yahya said in Zawaida in central Gaza, said: "We saw the planes, but we didn't see what they dropped," "They said trucks would pass, but we didn't see the trucks." Israel's military said 28 aid packages containing food were airdropped, and said it would put in place secure routes for aid delivery. The U.N. World Food Program said it had enough food in, or on its way, to feed all of Gaza for nearly three months. It has said nearly half a million people were enduring famine-like conditions. Antoine Renard, WFP's country director for the occupied Palestinian territories, said around 80 WFP trucks entered Gaza, while another over 130 trucks arrived via Jordan, Ashdod and Egypt. He said other aid was moving through the Kerem Shalom and Zikim crossings. He stressed it was not enough to counter the "current starvation." Dr. Muneer al-Boursh, Gaza Health Ministry's director-general, called for a flood of medical supplies to treat child malnutrition. He said: "This truce will mean nothing if it doesn't turn into a real opportunity to save lives. "Every delay is measured by another funeral." Ceasefire efforts appeared to be in doubt. Israel and the U.S. recalled negotiating teams from Qatar on Thursday, blaming Hamas, and Israel said it was considering "alternative options." Israel says it is prepared to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and goes into exile, something the group has refused. Khalil al-Hayya, head of Hamas' negotiating delegation, said the group had displayed "maximum flexibility." Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Merdawi said Israel's change of approach on the humanitarian crisis amounted to an acknowledgment of Palestinians starving in Gaza. After ending the latest ceasefire in March, Israel cut off the entry of food, medicine, fuel and other supplies to Gaza for two monthsto pressure Hamas to release hostages. Fifty of them remain in Gaza, over half of them believed to be dead. Under international pressure, Israel slightly eased the blockade in May. Since then, the average of 69 trucks a day has been far below the 500 to 600 trucks the U.N. says are needed. The U.N. says it has been unable to distribute much aid because hungry crowds and gangs take most of it from trucks. In an attempt to divert aid delivery from U.N. control, Israel has backed the U.S.-registered Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which in May opened four distribution centers. Mercy Corps' vice president of global policy and advocacy, Kate Phillips-Barrasso, said: "Gaza is not a remote island. The infrastructure and resources exist to prevent starvation; we just need safe, sustained access," Israel's military said two soldiers were killed in Gaza, bringing the total to 898 since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack that sparked the war. Hamas killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in that attack, and took 251 hostages. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 59,700 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. British PM Starmer is expected to raise the prospect of reviving ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas and the future of tariffs on British steel as he meets Donald Trump in Scotland. More West Bank homes have been demolished west of Ramallah and tunnels are constructed to join up settler homes. There are close to 700,000 settlers in the Palestinian region. Locals report an increase in settler attacks.


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jeremy Corbyn more popular among younger voters than Keir Starmer, new poll shows
Jeremy Corbyn is far more popular among young voters than Sir Keir Starmer, new polling has indicated, suggesting that Labour's decision to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds could backfire. While both leaders remain deeply unpopular among the public, there is a surge in support for Sir Keir 's predecessor among those aged 18-24, a new poll has shown. The survey comes just days after Mr Corbyn launched his own political party alongside former left-wing Labour MP Zarah Sultana. While Sir Keir's approval ratings are poor across all age groups, new polling conducted by YouGov on the day Mr Corbyn announced his new party showed that the left-wing politician has a rating of plus 18 among 18-24 year-olds. By contrast, Sir Keir has an approval rating of minus 30 among the same group. But among voters overall, the two leaders have a near identical approval rating, with Sir Keir on minus 40 and Mr Corbyn on minus 39. Earlier this month, the government announced it will give the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds, expanding the electorate by 1.6m people at the next election. While there have been accusations from the right that the move was an attempt to shore up its own support, the YouGov polling for The Times suggests the move could serve to split the electorate even further if the results are reflected among 16 and 17 year olds. It comes amid growing concern over the direction of Sir Keir's government from voters on both the left and the right, with the prime minister's approval rating hitting an all time low earlier this month. Sir Keir's support among the public reached new depths of minus 43 after the £5bn welfare U-turn, according to new polling. The survey, first reported by The Sunday Times, also found that just a year after coming to power, seven in 10 voters think Sir Keir's government is at least as chaotic as the Tories' previous term. That includes one in three voters, who believe it is more so. Seeking to capitalise on the discontent with the Labour government, Mr Corbyn promised a 'new kind of political party' when he launched the as yet unnamed project with Ms Sultana on Thursday, claiming that more than 200,000 people have signed up. But dismissing the movement, technology secretary Peter Kyle said that the Islington North MP 'doesn't think about governing, he thinks about posturing'. Asked about the move, Mr Kyle reflected on what he called the 'chaos and instability' of Mr Corbyn's leadership. Speaking on Times Radio, Mr Kyle said: 'He's not a serious politician. He doesn't think about governing, he thinks about posturing. And we see that writ large at the moment, because all the posturing, of course, just puts him at odds with his own supporters, which is why you've got George Galloway saying he won't join it.' When Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana announced their new party, a Labour source said: "The electorate has twice given its verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn led party." The polling, conducted by YouGov for The Times, spoke to 2,013 adults between July 24 and 25.


Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
KEVIN MAGUIRE: 'Keir Starmer must do one thing to make Donald Trump bromance worthwhile'
The Mirror's Kevin Maguire is urging PM Keir Starmer to persuade Donald Trump to 'turn the screw on Benjamin Netanyahu' ahead of their meeting in Scotland today The US both arms and sustains Israel, so if Keir Starmer's bromance with Donald Trump is to be worthwhile, then the PM must persuade him to turn the screw on Benjamin Netanyahu. Britain itself cannot end the horrific starvation and daily slaughter of Gazans, despite MPs on the left as well as the right over-estimating the global clout of a country that is, in fact, a middling power. Starmer got and gets much wrong on this war, from initially refusing to condemn the unlawful blockade of water, power and humanitarian aid to continuing arms sales to Israel. And despite pressure from deputy PM Angela Rayner and much of the Cabinet, he has refused to recognise a Palestinian state. Yet Starmer did end some military supplies, sanctioned the vilest two extremists in Netanyahu's government and resisted Tory calls to oppose international war crimes arrest warrants, including one on PM 'Bibi' Netanyahu. Starmer's growing revulsion over the killings of Palestinians is genuine. But cajoling Trump during his Scottish golf trip to put the squeeze on Netanyahu would be a prize worth securing. He could persuade Trump to help transform an Israeli 'tactical pause' in parts of Gaza into the end of the 22-month war against Hamas, and a cessation of bombing that is most likely to free Israeli hostages. Starmer is able to point to a trade deal lessening the impact of the US President's hostile tariffs as a benefit of sucking up to him. Increased UK military spending is a downside and, oh, how Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky must wish Joe Biden or Kamala Harris were in the White House instead. Urging Trump to lean on Netanyahu wouldn't be easy and a US President who fancied an ethnically cleansed 'Trump Gaza' – two million Palestinians driven from their homes – may retain his own grotesque plans. But for Britain and the PM this is about being on the side of humanity, and that means ending the hunger, ending the killings. Immediately. Next election 'lottery' Having six significant national parties, and seven in Wales and Scotland, is going to turn the next general election into a total lottery. And magic grandpa Jeremy Corbyn's new party threatening to do to Labour what Reform UK did to the Conservatives at the last. Splitting the left-wing vote, as Reform did on the right, could hand victory to Nigel Farage just as Keir Starmer was gifted the keys to No 10 on a historically low 34% share of the vote. Labour, Greens, Lib Dems, Tories, Reform and Corbyn's vehicle, provisionally trading as 'Your Party', fighting it out with Plaid Cymru and the SNP thrown into the mix north and west of the border will test the credibility like never before of a two-party electoral system. Starmer needs to start worrying about his left flank instead of suspending MPs for caring about the disabled and environment. Corbyn is unlikely ever to be Prime Minister but win, say, 5% of Labour's 34% and he would blow up British politics. Revenge would be booting Starmer out of Downing Street and possibly putting Farage in. British politics has never been so volatile. Or unpredictable.