
Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" Awaits Final Vote: How It Will Impact Indians
US President Donald Trump's signature tax-and-spending legislation-- " One Big, Beautiful Bill"-- is lined up for final vote over the coming hours in the House of Representatives, the lower chamber of the American Congress. The mega bill, which could define Trump's second term in the White House, has faced an uneasy passage so far.
Several members of Trump's own Republican Party have sided with opposition Democrats to criticise the bill for a number of reasons, including the impact on US national debt and healthcare.
Trump's sprawling legislation-- which is expected to slash social welfare programs and add an eye-watering $3 trillion to the national debt--was originally approved by the House in May. But it returned to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp after squeezing through the Senate on Tuesday by a solitary vote following several revisions.
How The New Version Of The Bill Benefits India
Among the revisions in the proposed legislation was a significant dilution of the provision on tax remittances to other countries, including India. In a massive relief for thousands of non-resident Indians (NRIs) and Indian professionals working in the US, who send money back home, the updated draft of the bill released on June 27 showed that the tax rate on remittances was slashed to 1 per cent, down from the 5 per cent proposed originally. The tax rate was brought down to 3.5 per cent in the House version of the bill earlier.
The rule will apply to all US residents who aren't US citizens-including Green Card holders, people on temporary visas such as H-1B or H-2A and foreign students. The reduction in tax on all international money transfers will benefit nearly 45 lakh Indians living in the US, including nearly 32 lakh persons of Indian Origin. It will apply to all remittances made via cash, money orders, or cashier's checks.
"There is hereby imposed on any remittance transfer a tax equal to 1 per cent of the amount of such transfer...The tax imposed by this section with respect to any remittance transfer shall be paid by the sender with respect to such transfer," the updated draft of the bill states.
The new draft also said that the bill will exempt remittances made from "an account held in or by a financial institution" and those "funded with a debit card or a credit card issued in the United States".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mayer set to challenge Ben Sulayem for FIA presidency
Mohammed Ben Sulayem will face a challenge to his bid for re-election as president of the FIA, motorsport's world governing body, after a rival candidate emerged on Thursday. The BBC reported American Tim Mayer, a former Formula One steward and son of former McLaren principal Teddy Mayer, would announce on Friday he was standing against the Emirati. A press conference was called at a venue outside the Silverstone circuit ahead of British Grand Prix practice. Mayer, 59, told the BBC last November that he had been fired via text message by an assistant to Ben Sulayem. Ben Sulayem, an Emirati, is scheduled to attend the race which marks the midpoint in the Formula One season. He has already announced he is seeking a second term. The FIA is the governing body for F1, the world rally championship and Formula E among other series.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
RBI's change in project finance rules may sow the seeds of a future crisis
Given that the project does not generate any revenue at this stage, loan repayment generally starts after the construction is over and the project has begun operations Prasanna Tantri Listen to This Article The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI's) recent project financing guidelines have led to much cheer in the stock markets. One highlight is that the provisioning requirement on project finance is now 1 per cent, instead of 5 per cent proposed in the discussion paper issued earlier. Many lenders feared that a blanket requirement of 5 per cent, provisioning would absorb all capital and slow down lending. Thus, the RBI has avoided a short-term slowdown in economic activity. However, are these guidelines net positive from a long-term point of view, or are some tweaks necessary, given our experience of the Indian


India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
Only said she's busy: Karnataka BJP legislator denies insulting Chief Secretary
Karnataka BJP MLC N Ravi Kumar on Thursday denied making any derogatory remarks against the state's Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh, a day after Congress workers lodged a police complaint against him over his comments during a protest at Vidhana a statement, Ravi Kumar said he was shocked to see visuals and reports in the media claiming he insulted the Chief Secretary. 'I have not made any derogatory statements against the Honourable Chief Secretary of the Government. The reports being spread about me are completely baseless, misleading, malicious, and defamatory,' he workers had approached the Vidhana Soudha police, alleging that Ravi Kumar made a derogatory remark during a BJP protest over the eviction of Dalit families in Kadugodi. During a BJP protest at the Vidhana Soudha, he was heard saying,'The Chief Secretary works at night for the state government and all day for the Chief Minister' with a Kumar, however, claimed he was in Hyderabad for the past three days for official work and never made any such statement. 'On June 30, 2025, we staged a protest in front of the Gandhi statue to oppose the Forest Department's eviction of Dalit families in Kadugodi.'He asserted that during the protest, he neither spoke against the Chief Secretary nor addressed the media, insisting there was no question of him making any defamatory statement.'I tried to meet the Chief Minister and the Chief Secretary, but they were unavailable. I only said the Chief Secretary is busy with government work,' he to the remarks, the IAS officers' association met Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and demanded action against the BJP MLC.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Karnataka