1,920 bottles of illicit cough syrup seized; two held
'Based on confidential information, we raided a premises and arrested Ashpak Mohammad Hasan Momin and Abdulraja Aliraja Siddiqui for hoarding a banned medicinal product with the intent to distribute for intoxicating purposes,' police stated in a release.
The laboratory analysis of seized bottles of ONREX cough syrup confirmed that it contains Codeine Phosphate and Triprolidine Hydrochloride, both regulated substances under the NDPS Act.
The seized consignment was intended for illegal distribution and abuse, police said.
Codeine, a key ingredient in many prescription cough syrups, is known for its narcotic properties and is frequently misused as a recreational drug, particularly among youth.
Further investigation is underway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Consumers win cases, but justice delayed
Hyderabad: For many consumers in Hyderabad, winning a case at a consumer commission no longer guarantees justice. Despite securing favourable verdicts, many are left waiting years to receive compensation. Increasingly, they're being forced to file Execution Applications (EAs), a step that was meant to be rare but has now become routine just to get the commission's orders enforced. Even then, the wait continues. Consumers complain of bureaucratic delays, indifferent companies, and a system with few teeth to ensure compliance. As a result, many end up spending more time and money trying to enforce the verdict than they did pursuing the case. Shreyansh K, a resident of LB Nagar who filed an EA many years ago, said, "I filed my complaint in 2014, and in 2019, the commission awarded me Rs 2 lakh. But even after filing multiple EAs, I haven't received a single rupee till now." You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad A senior official from one of the city's consumer commissions admitted that EA filings have surged in recent years. "Getting a favourable judgment is tough. Getting it implemented is even tougher. Each of the four commissions in Hyderabad has over 250 to 300 pending execution applications," the official said. Many advocates attribute the crisis to poor enforcement mechanisms. "Consumer commissions can pass binding orders, but can't ensure compliance. Many firms delay payments or appeal to higher forums just to stall execution," said TV Rajeshwar Rao, president of the Hyderabad District Consumer Fora Advocates Association. "Without the help of enforcement agencies like the police, warrants and compensation orders are often ignored. And when the opposite party disappears, there's little that can be done," he added. As the backlog grows, consumer trust in the system is beginning to erode. What was supposed to be a quick and effective dispute redressal forum is increasingly seen as another stop in a long, uncertain legal journey. What's an Execution Application? When the party at fault does not comply with a consumer commission's order within 30-45 days, the complainant can file an Execution Application under Section 27A of Consumer Protection Act. It seeks enforcement through legal means. The EA remains pending until proof of compliance is submitted by the opposite party. A LONG WAIT FOR SOME… Bank ignores order in FD case Mohammed Zareena, a resident of Madhapur, approached the district consumer commission-III after her bank deducted money from a five-year fixed deposit to settle her husband's credit card dues. Last year, the commission ruled in her favour and ordered the bank to refund Rs 1.7 lakh and pay Rs 50,000 as compensation. The bank ignored the ruling. Zareena filed an EA, but it's still pending, with no recovery in sight. Dealer leaves buyer in limbo Mandala Laxminarayana, a resident of Secunderabad, bought a second-hand car for Rs 5.7 lakh in 2020, only to find later that it had an unpaid loan of Rs 4.1 lakh and the ownership wasn't transferred. The district consumer redressal commission-II ruled in his favour, ordering a refund with interest and Rs 1 lakh compensation. He filed an EA in 2021, but over three years later, the matter is still unresolved. He's left with a car he can't sell or use legally. Buyer waits 5 yrs for compliance In 2019, Vardharaju R, a resident of Saidabad, received the wrong sofa, a smaller blue version instead of the white XL he ordered. The district consumer redressal commission-II ruled in his favour and ordered the seller to replace it and pay Rs 50,000 in compensation. When the firm didn't comply, he filed an EA in 2020. Five years on, the sofa hasn't been replaced and the compensation hasn't arrived.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anil Ambani faces look out circular
New Delhi: A look out circular (LOC) has been issued against Reliance Group chairman and managing director Anil Ambani , close on the heels of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) summoning the businessman for questioning on August 5 in connection with an alleged Rs 17,000 crore loan fraud case. The ED sent a request to the authority concerned to issue an LOC against Ambani, soon after summoning him at its headquarters in the capital, said people familiar with the matter. 'The request for opening an LOC was sent minutes after summons was issued to Anil Ambani on Thursday. This was done to ensure that he does not leave the country,' a senior official told ET on condition of anonymity. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Product Management Project Management Technology Public Policy Digital Marketing Data Science CXO Finance healthcare Management Operations Management Degree MBA others Healthcare Data Analytics Cybersecurity Leadership Others PGDM Data Science Design Thinking MCA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details An LOC is issued to prevent people, such as those involved in legal proceedings, from leaving the country and evading the law. It is issued by the Bureau of Immigration, which falls under the Ministry of Home Affairs. ET was the first to report on Friday that the ED had summoned Ambani for questioning in connection with its investigation into the alleged loan fraud case. In a related development, ED Friday carried out searches against Biswal Tradelink Pvt Ltd. Biswal Tradelink is an Odisha-based company that allegedly ran a 'fake' bank guarantee issuance racket for business groups, including providing an alleged Rs 68 crore assurance for a Reliance Group company, said people in the know. They said Reliance Nu Bess Ltd allegedly submitted a fake bank guarantee of Rs 68.2 crore to Solar Energy Corp of India (SECI). 'They apparently used related party Biswal Tradelink for this arrangement. The purpose was a tender for setting up a 1,000 MW/2,000 MWh standalone battery energy system in India issued by the SECI,' said one of the persons, who did not wish to be identified. According to people in the know, ED is likely to apprehend one of the directors of Biswal Tradelink soon, making its first arrest in the case. The ED has alleged that the founder directors of Biswal Tradelink were previously directors of the Reliance Group. It has further alleged that a forged bank guarantee along with a forged endorsement letter of State Bank of India (SBI) was submitted to SECI. 'The ED is in possession of the alleged forged email. Instead of 'sbi', the email address had 's-bi'. The SBI email ID given was sbi.17313@ the person said. According to the ED, a first information report (FIR) had been registered by the Delhi Police at the behest of Reliance Nu Bess against Biswal Tradelink. In its complaint, according to the ED, Reliance Nu Bess alleged that SECI floated a tender for which bank guarantee was required. If the bank guarantee were to be furnished by any foreign branch of a bank, it had to be confirmed by the Indian branch or SBI through a secure messaging platform, akin to SWIFT. As per the ED, Reliance Nu Bess further alleged in its complaint, 'M/s Biswal Tradelink contacted Reliance NUBESS limited and offered to provide bank guarantee for a fee. Subsequently, SECI found that the bank guarantee was fabricated as also the confirmation from SBI.' The ED has alleged that Reliance Nu Bess wrongly claimed that it was cheated. 'Documentary evidence reveals that apparently the two parties (Reliance Nu Bess and Biswal Tradelink) acted in collusion. The directors of Biswal Tradelink were found to be previous directors of Reliance group,' a senior official told ET. A statement issued by Reliance Group on Friday said, 'The company and its subsidiaries acted bonafidely and have been a victim of fraud, forgery and cheating conspiracy. The company has made due disclosure on this to the stock exchanges on November 7, 2024.' It further said that 'a criminal complaint in this regard has already been lodged with the Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police against the third party on October 16, 2024' and that the 'due process of law will follow'. The alleged money laundering case being investigated by the ED stems from a November 2024 FIR of the Delhi Police Economic Offences Wing.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
High court upholds summons to Kangana Rananut in ‘Rs 100' tweet defamation case
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday dismissed a petition filed by actor-turned-MP Kangana Ranaut challenging her summoning by a Punjab court in a defamation case, making it clear that the magistrate has duly applied mind to the material on record while summoning her. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya, in a detailed 15-page order, said, "There are specific allegations against the petitioner who is a celebrity, that false and defamatory imputations by her in the retweet have dented the respondent's (Mahender Kaur) reputation and lowered her in her own estimation, as also in the eyes of others. Therefore, filing of the complaint to vindicate her rights cannot be termed mala fide." Ranaut is accused of defaming 73-year-old Mohinder Kaur, a farmer activist, through a tweet during the height of the farmers' protests against the now scrapped farm laws in 2020. Ranaut allegedly misidentified Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame and implied that such women could be hired to participate in protests for Rs 100. "Such remark, prima facie proves that the intent of the accused was to paint the complainant as a person of dubious integrity who is protesting without any cause and just for financial gains," the high court observed. Ranaut's counsel had contended that the trial court misconstrued provisions of Section 202 of CrPC and argued that she had only re-tweeted content by 'Adhivakta Gautam Yadav', who was not arrayed as an accused. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like She grew up to be America's sweetheart... can YOU guess? Watch More Undo The counsel pleaded that the retweet was made in good faith, without intent to harm Kaur's reputation, and in the absence of mens rea, the magistrate should not have proceeded. The order was passed on Feb 22, 2022. Senior advocate G K Mann, representing the complainant, argued that there was no dispute that Ranaut herself made the defamatory on the face of it retweet, which contains serious allegations against Kaur's character. Mann also said that Ranaut had shown no remorse or tendered any apology, suggesting intentional harm. The bench concluded that the summoning order was passed after due application of mind to the facts and preliminary evidence. The court also noted that it was not the petitioner's case that the retweet was not made by her. Regarding the complaint being filed solely against Ranaut, the judge observed, "Still further, because the respondent has filed a complaint only against the petitioner and not against the person to whom the original tweet has been attributed, in itself cannot be a ground to contend that the complaint is mala fide." 'Extra responsibility' on celebrities "As she (Kangana) holds a position of influence over the masses, she has extra responsibility on her shoulders to verify the truthfulness of the remarks made by her. It is evident from the evidence led by the complainant that the accused (Kangana) made the impugned defamatory remark without going into the truthfulness... She even failed to tender any apology to the complainant after knowing the truth." Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya Complaint was filed in 2021 The defamation complaint was filed on Jan 4, 2021, by Mohinder Kaur of Fatehgarh Jandia village in Bathinda. Kaur initiated the case in Bathinda court against Ranaut for her tweet (which was later deleted) that identified Kaur as Bilkis Bano of Shaheen Bagh fame and claimed such women could be hired for protests for Rs 100. Kaur had provided evidence asserting that Ranaut's words had damaged her image. The farmer stated that her family, owning 12 acres of land, found the accusation of protesting for a mere Rs 100 intolerable. MSID:: 123044276 413 |
