
Green party members elect new leader: who are the candidates?
Green party
members gather for the last hustings to elect a new leader before polls open on Friday. We've come down to speak with the candidates before they make their case to members in Hoxton Hall, East London on Wednesday evening.
Most commentators seem to think the insurgent candidate Zack Polanski will win: a gay, Jewish, London Assembly member from Manchester who is standing on an eco-populist platform, promising to out-Farage Nigel Farage.
He certainly had an air of confidence in his prospects when he sat down with me to discuss his vision for the future, claiming in these uncertain times people are looking for bold leadership. He wants to appeal to those on the progressive left who feel Labour has turned its back on them, saying the Greens under his leadership would be their new political home.
Naturally his challengers, the current co-leader Adrian Ramsay and his new running mate Ellie Chowns, disagree they should be so narrow. They think the party should continue to attract a broader base, pointing to the fact that the party had a
record number of Green MPs
elected last year, as well as currently holding over 800 council seats.
Narrow appeal
They say taking the party in a new direction that would narrow its appeal to mainly the progressive left would be a mistake, especially with competition from the recent creation of
Jeremy Corbyn's new party
.
It's personal to them: they both won rural seats off the Conservatives last year, quadrupling the number of Green MPs to a record high of four. Victory in Tory seats for the first time ever. The fear from their supporters is not only is the success of the party at stake if they change course from their broader appeal, but perhaps their seats too.
I put to Chowns that it was perhaps the unique anti-Tory sentiment at the last election that led to their victory, as opposed to a masterplan from the Greens.
'Yes, of course there were particular circumstances. Yes, of course… individual factors of candidates and local circumstances do influence elections as well as the national picture. We can't predict what that's going to be like in four years' time, but what we can do is make sure that we are the strongest possible electoral force.'
On whether you could be a credible political leader without being an MP, Chowns said: 'I do think it would be a shame and a mistake not to take that opportunity, because it's not only that Westminster is the centre of the political debate, you know, on a day to day basis.'
But Polanski, perhaps unsurprisingly, disagreed: 'I don't think it matters either way… I think actually what people in this country want is someone who can cut through.'
The emergence of a new party from Jeremy Corbyn was frustrating at first for Polanski, but he now finds it exciting.
Curious
'Whilst I believe the Green Party should and will stand on its own merits and our own policy, I think it would be madness to not at least be curious about what they're offering, whether that's a coalition or an alliance.' He did rule out working with Labour under Keir Starmer, though.
Ellie Chowns agreed to an extent 'cooperation is in the DNA of the Greens' and didn't rule out joining forces with Corbyn or Labour, especially if it meant staving off a rise for Reform, but argued the party in its current form has a much broader appeal than the former Labour leader.
But it's an unlikely political leader that has most driven both candidates: Nigel Farage. For Chowns, it spurred her decision to go into politics aged 40. Polanski isn't a fan either, but does concede the Reform leader has been incredibly successful in driving political change, and wants to be the Left's answer to him.
He is pitching to be an Eco-populist leader – representing 'the 99% versus the 1%. The 1% are those corporations that are destroying our environment, our communities and our democracy'.
Populism
Chowns is less keen to associate her co-leadership campaign with the term: 'I'm a little bit nervous of the word populism. I'm more focused on popularity for the Green Party. And I think there is a distinction. You know, populism can be associated with simplifying language, with, you know, one kind of grey leader type approach to politics. And I think that what the Green Party has shown through recent years of our success is that we've achieved popularity by reaching out to that widest possible range of people.'
The debate has been bruising at times – especially when Adrian Ramsey struggled to say he liked his deputy turned political rival Zack Polanski – something Polanski told me had been 'really crap' to hear.
'I think on a human level, it's horrible to hear someone not be able to say they like you… Has [the debate] been bruising? Yes. But I'm really pleased it has been because we've been having a proper debate about proper issues that really matter.'
Ultimately, there isn't much difference in the two sides' offerings. Both accept it mainly boils down to style over substance and who they are trying to appeal to. Whichever candidate emerges at the helm of the Greens will have a defining influence on the shape of any future left-wing alliance.
Watch more here:
Green party sets out aim to counter 'Labour's message of doom and gloom'
Which issues helped the Green Party gain the most seats in their history?
The Green party's £160bn spending plans explained

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage under pressure to distance himself from 'racist' Ant Middleton rant
Ant Middleton - who has been close with Nigel Farage and posed with him ahead of Donald Trump's inauguration in Washington - said first, second and third generation immigrants should be banned from top government jobs Pressure is mounting on Nigel Farage to distance himself from TV hardman Ant Middleton after he was accused of "overt racism". The former soldier sparked an outcry after claiming that first, second and third generation immigrants should be barred from "top tier government positions". Middleton - who gave a speech at last year's Reform conference and has been linked with a mayoral run for the party - was pictured smiling with Mr Farage and treasurer Nick Candy in Washington DC ahead of Donald Trump's inauguration in January. The ex-SAS: Who Dares Wins host has said he will stand to be London mayor - and claimed to be "very much aligned" with Reform. Mr Farage now faces calls to clarify if he condones the remarks by Middleton or cut ties with him. It comes after a Nigel Farage watchdog probe was revealed to centres on a mysterious fishing boat. In an outburst on Twitter /X, the former Special Forces commando wrote: "Our Capital City of our Christian country needs to be run by a native Brit with generational Christian values, principles and morals coursing through their veins from which our very society was built, thrived and was forged upon." By Middleton's criteria, Winston Churchill, whose mother was born in Brooklyn, Boris Johnson and King Charles would not qualify for high office. Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty responded on Twitter: "This level of overt racism shows who he really is once he lets the mask slip." He told The Mirror: 'After his starring role as a leading speaker at the Reform party conference last year, Ant Middleton's campaign to be the Mayor of London is increasingly being characterised with dangerous rhetoric that stokes division. "Given his prison sentence for assaulting a police officer and ban from being a company director over £1m in unpaid taxes he shouldn't even pass Reform's vetting process. With Nigel Farage claiming to be tough on crime he should clarify whether he supports the views of his likely candidate to be mayor of our capital; a man who doesn't even live in the country, let alone London.' A Labour Party spokeswoman said: 'These racist comments are completely unacceptable and have no place in our politics or our society. Nigel Farage has shared appearances at Reform UK events with Ant Middleton, but is yet to distance himself from these remarks or clarify whether he condones them. "Farage must urgently confirm that Reform UK will immediately cut all ties with Middleton.' Dubai-based Middleton, who was jailed in 2013 for wounding a male police officer and assaulting a female PC, vowed that if he becomes Mayor he will "prioritise the indigenous people" above all. In June he claimed rumours that Mr Farage was looking elsewhere for a candidate were "incorrect". He said: "We are still very much aligned and no such drifting away has happened. "However I have always voiced an option to run independently which may have been a cause of certain rumours!" He was loudly applauded at Reform's conference in Birmingham last September, when he was presented as an expert in security. Middleton told the audience: 'We are at a very, very important and crucial stage before it teeters into civil unrest, which we want to avoid at all costs, but it's coming. We're on that edge where violence has hit the streets, we've all seen it, I don't need to mention what it is, we've all seen it.' And voicing his support for the party he said: "I know enough about modern day politics to realise that it's not working here in the UK. Hence, the solution is in the title Reform." Last year Mr Farage posted a photo of himself alongside Middleton, who he described as "the big man". And he was snapped alongside Mr Farage and billionaire property tycoon Mr Candy with the White House in the background in January. The TV host was a controversial figure long before his appearance at the event in Birmingham. He was dropped by Channel 4 in March 2021 after tweeting about the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. He moved to Dubai, telling GB News last year that people in the UK are "just stuck in a rut". In 2012 he body-slammed PC Christopher Brooksbank outside a nightclub and assaulted PC Katherine Alison. He was given a 14-month jail sentence the following year. He told The Mirror in 2015: "I was shocked by how I acted. I'm very ashamed of it, hence why I've put it behind me." And he said he had written to both officers to apologise. But he now claims he "never laid a finger on a woman". In March Middleton was banned from being a company director after his firm Sway and Starting failed to pay over £1million in tax. The Insolvency Service said he and wife Emilie were "taking millions of pounds out of" the company when they should have been paying tax. Sway and Starting, which provided media representation services, went into liquidation in 2022. At the time it owed £300,000 in VAT and £800,000 in corporation tax.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How Leftists seized control of Britain's doctors' union
The origins of the transformation stretch back to 2020, when a grouping of Corbynite doctors within the union formed the Broad Left coalition. The name stems from a Communist Party strategy to 'capture positions within a union' and take it over. Its logo is a stethoscope arranged to look like a hammer and sickle. By 2022, the coalition seemed to have increasingly joined hands with a larger group of young activist doctors called DoctorsVote – which is mainly dedicated to winning massive pay rises for resident doctors. And in the spring of that year, the two groups combined to seize dozens of seats on the BMA council, the union's foremost decision-making body. In a vote to determine the makeup of the council for the following four years, Broad Left/DoctorsVote candidates secured 26 of the 69 places up for grabs. Since then, their influence has only grown. Indeed, a 2023 Policy Exchange report – 'Professionalism is not relevant' – concluded the union had been 'taken over by young, self-declared 'entryists' in a planned campaign similar to that [orchestrated] in the Labour Party at the time of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership'. 'It is very sad to see what was basically a well-rounded organisation that covered so many issues of importance to a wide range of doctors being hollowed out by the angry activism around residents' pay, Gaza and LGBT issues,' says Mark Pickering of the Christian Medical Fellowship, which counts many BMA members in its ranks. 'It is very similar to the way Momentum took over the Labour Party from the inside. We saw then how people started using democracy to try to dismantle democracy and that's what it seems has happened here. 'You had these two groups come in and they all vote for each other… and that's shifted what happens at the annual meetings, where BMA policy is formed.' As the union has become ever more of a crucible for Left-wing politics, members appalled by the takeover have begun to leave. First out the door have been many Jews, who have been dismayed by the union's response to the war in Gaza. Last month veteran doctor Robert Winston told The Telegraph he had resigned as a member of the BMA after 61 years due to a combination of his disgust with the strikes, the union acting 'highly politically' in recent times and its failure to tackle anti-Semitism among doctors.


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP's handling of Flamingo Land appeal 'risks being unlawful'
Since then, Green MSP Mr Greer, who is involved in the Save Loch Lomond campaign, had his legal advisor send a detailed letter of concern to the Government. Concerns raised include the reappointment of the same official who previously recommended that Flamingo Land's mega-resort be given permission to go ahead. This official will now lead on the recall case and make a new recommendation to Ministers, which Greer's legal advisor Ian Cowan warned risks making the process 'tainted by bias'. READ MORE: Yes to Flamingo Land, no to National Parks: what's the SNP playing at? What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land The Green MSP for the West of Scotland said: 'The public and the experts have said again and again that [[Flamingo Land]]'s destructive application must be rejected. The National Park did the right thing last year when they unanimously said no to this daft mega-resort. And when SNP Ministers were about to overturn that decision and let it go ahead, we forced them into a u-turn. 'But since then the Scottish Government has made some deeply questionable decisions. They refuse to hold any public hearing and have asked the same official who tried to approve the plans to 'mark his own homework' by making recommendation for a fresh decision." Another concern raised in the letter is the apparent contradiction in the dates of specific documents. The document formally reappointing the previous official to prepare a new report for Ministers was published on July 4th, having apparently been signed off by a senior planning official on June 24th. However, the document's properties show that it was created on July 4th, shorty after the publication of a separate document from this official which laid out the new process. The appointment document also did not carry the digital signature of the relevant senior official. Mr Greer added: 'Now they're [the Scottish Government] asking Flamingo Land to draft their own planning conditions on their own terms, against the wishes of the National Park. Is it any wonder that local people get the feeling that the cards are being stacked against them? 'I hope there is a simple explanation for this inconsistency in the date of the official's appointment, because it is hugely concerning. There needs to be full transparency here if the public are to have any confidence in this process. As it stands, the timeline just doesn't add up and that's a massive cause for concern.' The Scottish Government said the development raised issues of "national significance" and so they decided to recall the appeal. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers decided to recall the Lomond Banks appeal as the proposed development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park. As this is a live planning appeal it would not be appropriate to comment further.'