Soundhound AI: SOUN Stock To $20?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN) witnessed an incredible increase in 2024, rising from $2 to $24—a twelvefold surge. Although the stock has retracted in early 2025, currently down around 55% from its 52-week peak of $25, several factors could propel it back to its former highs, indicating a possible doubling from today's levels.
SoundHound's financial path illustrates clear acceleration. The company has shown significant revenue growth in recent years, with a three-year average growth rate of 69%. Even more impressively, Soundhound's revenues have doubled in the past 12 months, increasing from $51 million to $102 million. This accelerated growth is highlighted by its latest quarterly revenues, which jumped by 151.2% year-over-year to $29 million, up from $12 million.
Looking forward, management anticipates 2025 revenue between $157 million and $177 million, representing nearly 100% year-over-year growth. This updated guidance reflects robust confidence in the demand for voice AI solutions across various sectors. SoundHound's consistent capability to surpass and adjust guidance showcases its operational execution during this pivotal growth period. Additionally, if you are looking for upside with less volatility than investing in solitary stocks, the Trefis High-Quality portfolio offers an alternative—having outperformed the S&P 500 and produced returns exceeding 91% since its inception. Also, take a look at – UnitedHealth: Buy Or Sell UNH Stock At $325?
Key Growth Drivers
SoundHound's prospective growth relies on its strategic positioning and recent advancements in significant markets.
The automotive industry represents SoundHound's largest opportunity. The company has established important partnerships with major manufacturers, which include Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, Kia, and various Stellantis brands like DS Automobiles, Peugeot, Opel, and Vauxhall.
In 2025, SoundHound considerably broadened its automotive footprint with a wider deployment of its Chat AI to other Stellantis brands, including Alfa Romeo and Citroën, in various European markets. In February 2025, SoundHound launched 'Brand Personalities,' enabling car manufacturers to personalize their voice assistants' personas. A significant partnership with Tencent Intelligent Mobility was revealed in April 2025, incorporating SoundHound's AI into Tencent's cloud solutions for global automotive brands. This expansion coincides with the rapidly growing automotive voice AI market, as manufacturers aim to enhance user experiences.
Furthermore, research from June 2025 indicated a potential annual opportunity of $35 billion for automakers through in-car voice commerce, which allows features such as ordering food and other services directly from the vehicle. As the automotive voice AI sector grows quickly and manufacturers seek to stand out through improved user experiences, SoundHound's proven integration capabilities position it to seize a considerable market share.
SoundHound's partnership with NVIDIA emphasizes its dedication to state-of-the-art development. This collaboration concentrates on edge solutions that facilitate improved Voice Generative AI experiences directly within vehicles, potentially lowering latency and enhancing user satisfaction. These technological partnerships validate SoundHound's strategy and provide access to advanced computing resources essential for next-generation voice AI applications.
SoundHound's acquisition of Amelia in August 2024 greatly augmented its enterprise presence. Amelia contributes established customer service contracts across finance, insurance, retail, and healthcare sectors, supplying immediate revenue diversification and access to numerous enterprise brands. The integration has already produced results: Amelia AI agents have handled over 100,000 customer calls for Apivia Courtage, resulting in nearly a 20% reduction in inbound inquiries. This illustrates the technology's real-world effectiveness and revenue potential.
Path to Doubling: The Upside Scenario
For SOUN shares to double from current levels, the company would need to achieve:
Currently priced at $11, SOUN has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 40x based on its trailing twelve-month revenue. If SoundHound's revenues were to triple from $85 million in 2024 to an estimated $250 million in 2027, the P/S multiple would decline to 16x if the stock price remained stable, correct? But that's what Soundhound's investors hope will not occur!
Rather than the P/S ratio decreasing to 16x, a more modest contraction, perhaps to around 30x, seems more likely if revenues grow significantly. While a 30x revenue multiple may appear steep, certain leading AI sectors, especially those viewed as 'transformative,' can command considerably higher valuations. At 30 times price-to-sales, SOUN's stock price could reach about $20, representing nearly a 2x increase from current levels. The reasoning is straightforward: as revenues expand drastically, even with some multiple compression, the absolute stock price should rise significantly.
Risks to Consider
While the potential for upside is enticing, SoundHound's ability to achieve 2x growth encounters several key risks:
The Verdict
While short-term volatility might endure, SoundHound's strategic positioning in high-growth voice AI sectors, combined with accelerating revenue momentum and expanding partnerships, offers a persuasive case for significant upside potential over the next 2–3 years. However, investors should approach with a clear awareness of the risks. Elevated valuations, competitive challenges, and the stock's track record of heightened volatility during market downturns are genuine concerns that could affect returns. Now, we implement a risk assessment framework while constructing the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio which, consisting of 30 stocks, has a history of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the past four years. Why is that? As a collective, HQ Portfolio stocks have yielded better returns with reduced risk compared to the benchmark index; it's been less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Europe Is Playing Catch-Up in the Race for Critical Minerals
A once-niche corner of the commodities market has become a new frontier in global power politics. To make everything from electric vehicles and wind turbines to next-generation weapons systems, modern economies now depend on a growing roster of buried ingredients: cobalt, lithium, rare earths and other so-called critical minerals. Governments are responding in kind. In April, the U.S. signed a landmark deal with Ukraine, granting U.S. firms access to the country's mineral reserves in exchange for defense and reconstruction support. It was a transactional agreement and a revealing one: A war-forged security partnership now hinges on minerals as bargaining chips, in a world where raw materials increasingly double as strategic currency. Elsewhere, Gulf states are making inroads across Africa, while China—already the commanding force in global mineral supply chains—continues to tighten its grip. Now the European Union is sprinting to catch up. Over the past two years, Brussels has signed a flurry of raw materials partnerships, including with Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Namibia. Robert Besseling, CEO and founder of Pangea-Risk, notes that the EU 'has its own definition of what makes some minerals critical, and that's different from how China, the U.S. and smaller players like Russia see what is critical for their domestic economies.' As a major steel producer, for instance, the EU's list of critical minerals includes coking coal, along with materials like silicon, helium, boron and gallium, which aren't priorities for most other powers. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. But where demand for minerals overlap, the competition is fierce. And whether it's aluminum and bauxite in Guinea, graphite in Mozambique, lithium in Zimbabwe, nickel in South Africa, and copper and cobalt in the DRC and Zambia, Besseling says, the central arena of that competition is in Africa. Meanwhile, in the name of 'de-risking,' the EU also wants to wean itself off foreign dependence by building what it calls more resilient supply chains, which is shorthand for reducing reliance on a single supplier, more local or allied-country processing and greater control over each stage of production. That won't be easy, however. Take lithium and rare earths, for instance: The EU imports nearly all of its supplies of both—and in the case of rare earths, half come directly from China, which controls 90 percent of global processing. 'China is way ahead in terms of investment, but also in terms of actual ownership and operations of mines,' says Besseling. That reach, he adds, spans the entire production process. When it comes to electric vehicles, or EVs, for example, Chinese companies dominate the supply chain for the minerals that go into their batteries on the mining side. But they also dominate 'the processing side and the manufacturing of EVs,' he adds. 'The whole value chain is essentially dominated by China.' It wasn't always this lopsided. During the 2003-2011 commodity supercycle, when metal prices surged, Western mining giants such as BHP, Rio Tinto and Glencore aggressively expanded into Africa and Latin America, pouring billions into what are known as frontier projects in the sector due to their greater risk. But as copper and cobalt prices fell, the calculus for risky overseas ventures shifted. Investors demanded caution, and companies began retreating. At the same time, the wealthy member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development doubled down on the so-called Gentlemen's Agreement, a long-standing pact discouraging the use of subsidies to boost national champions. The idea was to hedge against a race to the bottom in state-backed financing, meaning no cheap loans to help mining firms compete abroad. The problem is that Chinese lenders have opted for a different approach that isn't based on the West's liberal market-based model, says Brooke Escobar, who directs a team at AidData specializing in financial tracking. In a report released in January, Escobar and her co-authors detailed how, over the past two decades, China has built a financing model that's fast, scalable and tough for Western countries to match. A Chinese state-owned enterprise might enter a country to co-develop a copper or cobalt mine, for instance, backed by a loan from one of Beijing's policy banks or state-owned commercial lenders. 'But it's concessional lending,' Escobar points out, 'so it's cheaper than what those companies could get on the market otherwise.' Moreover, that financing often covers the costs of developing not just the mine itself, but also roads, power plants and export terminals. And it usually comes in stages, with several loans supporting the project through development and operation. Meanwhile, in addition to securing equity in the mine, the Chinese firm signs a long-term offtake agreement—a contract to buy a set share of the mine's output—typically with a buyer in mainland China. This combination of ownership abroad and guaranteed supply for domestic processors is central to China's strategy. And it has paid off. Between 2000 and 2021, China committed nearly $57 billion in state-backed financing for these mineral projects across 19 low- and middle-income countries, according to AidData's report. As a result, it now holds sway over every stage of the supply chain for many of the critical minerals that will fuel the green energy transition. Chinese companies control 25 percent of global lithium mining capacity and 80 percent of cobalt production in the DRC, which supplies over half the world's cobalt. China also handles around 90 percent of global rare earths processing, over two-thirds of cobalt and lithium refining, and more than half of the global material exports that go into batteries. In short, China has developed a playbook that sidesteps market hesitations, tolerates political risk and prioritizes long-term strategic gains. And the West has struggled to adapt. 'It's not necessarily that the Chinese companies have this exclusive edge,' says Tiffany Wognaih, an Africa-focused political risk and strategy adviser at the J.S. Held global consulting firm. 'Rather, they have been the players that have shown a willingness to enter the market.' They've also shown greater staying power compared to Western companies that did enter frontier markets. Wognaih points to the U.S. mining giant Freeport-McMoRan, which began investing heavily in the mid-2000s in two major copper and cobalt sites in Congo: the Tenke Fungurume mine and the Kisanfu exploration project. But in 2016, under financial strain, 'they put the asset up for sale,' Wognaih says. 'And China took it.' Escobar also cites Freeport-McMoRan's exit from Congo, but as a case of Western governments failing to act. Both U.S. officials and representatives of the company appealed for help from Washington to retain control of the project. 'But no one stepped in,' she says, in part due to a lack of political will. But she adds that, having built their finance systems around strict rules on market neutrality, OECD countries 'don't have the mechanism to say, 'We're going to extend you this cheap finance that will provide you the liquidity that you need to make it through.'' Without that state backing, Western financiers are left to rely on risk-reward calculations, and that limits the options. 'Tier-one projects will get financed,' Andor Lips, a financing and raw materials expert at the Dutch Geological Survey, says, referring to quality projects that are ready to come to market. But there are only a handful of them, and lower-tier projects are riskier, starting with the risk of exploring a concession and not finding exploitable reserves. 'There are also market risks, price, environment, delays,' he adds. 'It's all in the mix.' That's bad news for the EU. For now, the mineral partnerships it has signed are largely symbolic: nonbinding and dependent on private investment. But as Lips—who has contributed to work by the European Commission as an external expert—notes, 'the EU is not a country, so the legal push to encourage investments is limited: You cannot provide tax incentives, you cannot provide additional capital, where normally a country can do that.' There are EU financial tools at private firms' disposal, including the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and initiatives like the Global Gateway. But navigating them is complex. Figuring out which funds can be used where, and how overlapping mandates interact, is 'a bit of an intellectual exercise,' Lips says, adding that even functionaries within the European Commission are often operating based on fragmented information. Worse, the EU is up against the clock, as the race for critical minerals is getting more crowded. Gulf countries are deploying cash and state backing to strike minerals deals across Africa, with Turkey, India and others following suit. Many are copying China's playbook: bundled deals, state-backed financing and minimal red tape. The U.S., under President Donald Trump, has loosened enforcement of anti-corruption rules to give companies more leeway in risky environments and is partnering with Gulf allies to share investment risk. The EU, by contrast, remains bound by high environmental, social and governance, or ESG, standards, as well as a fractured bureaucracy and few tools to compete. Indeed, Europe's lag is partly structural: Market-first models simply aren't built to compete with the speed and coordination of state-led rivals like China. But it's difficult to reflect on the past few decades without also recognizing a stunning lapse in political foresight. As China doubled down on access to critical minerals, Western countries pulled back, even as it was already clear these minerals would come to hold tremendous geopolitical weight. Now, catching up may mean setting aside market orthodoxy in favor of security priorities. The urgency is real: After Beijing imposed new export controls on rare earths this spring, automakers in Europe and the U.S. warned they were just weeks away from halting production lines. But even if Europe secures more raw materials, full independence from China remains out of reach. 'If you get access to processed minerals you still need to create demand for those processed minerals in the EU,' says Poorva Karkare, senior policy analyst at the European Centre for Development Policy Management. 'In order to do that, you need to start producing more batteries, more EVs, more whatever.' And given its dominance across the supply chains for these products, that will mean working with China. Rather than framing the challenge as a zero-sum game, Karkare suggests the EU should bring China into its partnership model. European firms may currently play a small role in extraction, but they excel in surveying and engineering. Even their ESG standards could work to their advantage, as Chinese firms are already turning to European counterparts to meet rising standards demanded by investors, global regulators, African governments and consumers, she notes. If European firms embed themselves deeper into project lifecycles, they could claim more of the value chain and start to build mutual dependence with their Chinese partners. Karkare concedes that EU leaders might balk at a strategy that involves China. 'But China is going to be involved every step of the way, and there's almost no circumventing that,' she says. The conversation in Brussels and Washington these days has shifted to completely decoupling from China. But as Karkare notes, when it comes to critical minerals, that's no longer feasible. Instead, Europe should try to think of ways to reduce that dependence, including by making it mutual. Carl-Johan Karlsson is a freelance journalist covering politics in the U.S. and Europe. You can find him on LinkedIn. The post Europe Is Playing Catch-Up in the Race for Critical Minerals appeared first on World Politics Review.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Investors Need to Take Advantage of These 2 Finance Stocks Now
Two factors often determine stock prices in the long run: earnings and interest rates. Investors can't control the latter, but they can focus on a company's earnings results every quarter. The earnings figure itself is key, but a beat or miss on the bottom line can sometimes be just as, if not more, important. Therefore, investors should consider paying close attention to these earnings surprises, as a big beat can help a stock climb even higher. The Zacks Earnings ESP, or Expected Surprise Prediction, aims to find earnings surprises by focusing on the most recent analyst revisions. The basic premise is that if an analyst reevaluates their earnings estimate ahead of an earnings release, it means they likely have new information that could possibly be more accurate. The core of the ESP model is comparing the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate, where the resulting percentage difference between the two equals the Expected Surprise Prediction. Now that we understand what the ESP is and how beneficial it can be, let's dive into a stock that currently fits the bill. Prologis (PLD) earns a Zacks Rank #3 right now and its Most Accurate Estimate sits at $1.42 a share, just 12 days from its upcoming earnings release on July 16, 2025. PLD has an Earnings ESP figure of +0.71%, which, as explained above, is calculated by taking the percentage difference between the $1.42 Most Accurate Estimate and the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.41. PLD is just one of a large group of Finance stocks with a positive ESP figure. Pebblebrook Hotel (PEB) is another qualifying stock you may want to consider. Pebblebrook Hotel is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock, and is getting ready to report earnings on July 29, 2025. PEB's Most Accurate Estimate sits at $0.61 a share 25 days from its next earnings release. Pebblebrook Hotel's Earnings ESP figure currently stands at +3.10% after taking the percentage difference between its Most Accurate Estimate and its Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.59. PLD and PEB's positive ESP metrics may signal that a positive earnings surprise for both stocks is on the horizon. Use the Zacks Earnings ESP Filter to turn up stocks with the highest probability of positively, or negatively, surprising to buy or sell before they're reported for profitable earnings season trading. Check it out here >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Prologis, Inc. (PLD) : Free Stock Analysis Report Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
China's Rare Earth Origin Story, Explained
Rare earth metals were an afterthought for most world leaders until China temporarily suspended most exports of them a couple of months ago. But for almost half a century, they have received attention from the very top of the Chinese government. During his 27-year rule in China, Mao Zedong focused often on increasing how much iron and steel China produced, but seldom on its quality. The result was high production of weak iron and steel that could not meet the needs of the industry. In the late 1940s, metallurgists in Britain and the United States had developed a fairly low-tech way to improve the quality of ductile iron, which is widely used for pipelines, car parts and other applications. The secret? Add a dash of the rare earth cerium to the metal while it is still molten. It was one of the early industrial uses of rare earths. And unlike most kinds of rare earths, cerium was fairly easy to chemically separate from ore. When Deng Xiaoping emerged as China's paramount leader in 1978, he moved quickly to fix the country's iron and steel industry. Mr. Deng named a top technocrat, Fang Yi, as a vice premier and also as the director of the powerful State Science and Technology Commission. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
