Congress must reject cuts that would escalate national homelessness crisis
Advertisement
In Rhode Island, these cuts could end funding for
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
If Congress passes the president's budget and cuts funding for permanent supportive housing, Rhode Island's homelessness crisis will escalate further into a Category Five emergency.
Hospitals will become bottlenecks, unable to discharge unhoused patients who have nowhere safe to go. Emergency shelters — already operating at capacity — will be overwhelmed, pushing more people back onto the streets. Police and first responders will be forced to manage health and behavioral crises that stem not from criminal activity, but from untreated illness and housing instability.
Advertisement
The proposed budget would also cause further harm to the nation's safety nets by putting an arbitrary two-year cap on social services for so-called abled-bodied adults and shifting the financial burden to state and local governments that are already stretched thin. The Big Beautiful Bill would gut Community Development Block Grants, end the HOME Investment Partnership Program, and paralyze dozens of other health and social service grants that protect people from falling into homelessness in the first place.
Put most simply, the president's proposed budget will create chaos across the nation's housing systems. It would abandon evidence-based approaches in favor of a fragmented, underfunded system with overcrowded shelters and dwindling options for permanent housing.
Permanent supportive housing has proven time and again to be a cost-effective solution to homelessness. It reduces emergency room visits, hospital stays, and shelter use — while restoring dignity, stability, and hope. It is one of the smartest investments we can make.
Ending homelessness has never been a partisan endeavor. If we allow it to become one, the devastating fiscal and societal consequences of a prolonged crisis will not discriminate between red and blue states or urban and rural communities.
If Congress approves the president's cuts to
Michelle Wilcox is president & CEO of Crossroads Rhode Island.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Trump's Cabinet talks Texas flooding, tariffs, Iran attacks
President Trump is meeting with his Cabinet at the White House amid a swirl of activity on trade, foreign policy and more. Trump also talking about the deadly Texas flooding and said he will visit the area on Friday. Likely to come up are the new tariff letters sent out on Monday to several countries. The administration delayed the implementation until Aug. 1, giving Trump and his trade leaders time to make deals. The president and his Cabinet meet at 11 a.m. EDT Tuesday for the first time after Trump's sweeping agenda passed Congress last week, setting up massive reforms in safety net policies, continued tax cuts and more. When will the changes laid out in the legislation take effect? Read more here. Ahead of that meeting, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and several governors will hold a press conference on a new effort to secure the nation's farms from threats. Watch it live here. Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu spends Tuesday in D.C. after meeting Monday evening at the White House. He'll meet with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday morning and a bipartisan group of senators in the afternoon. Catch up on today's other top stories: Follow along for updates on these stories and more.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
DNC chair says Elon Musk's third party 'could be successful' and should be taken seriously
As Elon Musk pledges to form a new political party, the chair of the Democratic National Committee says it's worth taking seriously. "I don't think we should take it lightly or just suspect — as many of these attempts in the past have failed — that it's going to fail," DNC Chair Ken Martin said on a Monday episode of "Endless Urgency," an online show hosted by Democratic operative Mike Nellis. The chair laid out two key reasons why Musk's "America Party" could succeed: resources and frustration with both parties. "You have the richest man in the world, who's going to dump a lot of money and resources trying to stand this up," Martin said. "And my sense of it is that there's definitely frustration in both parties right now with a two-party system, and it could be successful." Musk spent nearly $300 million to elect President Donald Trump and other Republicans in 2024. Martin also said that Musk's nascent efforts to create a new party were indicative of the divisions within Trump's coalition. "It's laying bare that there are deep divisions within this Republican Party," Martin said. "There are the mega-Trumpers, and then there are the sort of conservative traditional Republicans, and then there's the sort of libertarian wing that has also creeped into their party." The tech titan's political alliance with Trump culminated in the launching of DOGE, only to unravel in epic fashion after several months over Musk's objections to the " Big Beautiful Bill." Musk has yet to formally register a new political party, but he wouldn't be the first prominent businessman to try to take on America's two-party system. Trump has dismissed the idea, calling Musk a "train wreck" while saying that the American political system "seems not designed" for third parties. That may be a mistake, according to Martin. "I'm not sure how it will impact the elections in the future, but if Elon Musk is serious about this and he's going to dump in billions of dollars, it's going to have to be taken serious by both parties," the Democratic Party leader said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: 3 risks for Trump from his own tax bill
President Trump notched a big win when the Republican-controlled Congress passed his 'big, beautiful' tax bill on July 3, right on Trump's own deadline. Trump muscled Republican detractors into line and demonstrated dominance of his own party that most presidents can only envy. The new tax law gives Trump several bragging points. It fulfills campaign promises, such as eliminating the income tax on tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. It averts a 'tax cliff' that would have occurred if temporary individual tax cuts enacted in 2017 expired on schedule at the end of this year. There will be no standoff this year over raising the US borrowing limit, since the law boosted the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. Businesses now have more certainty about tax rates and a few other factors for the foreseeable future. Read more: What is the US debt ceiling, and how does it impact you? But the bill is still a risky gambit for Trump. There's a lot that could go wrong, even in the short term leading up to the 2026 midterm elections. Here are three of the biggest risks for Trump: The bill's critics turn out to be right about the economic damage it causes. The tax bill will add at least $4 trillion to the national debt during the next decade, on top of $22 trillion in added debt that is coming from plain old deficit spending. There has to be a breaking point, and when we hit it, the mimimum effect will be higher interest rates than we'd otherwise have. We may have arrived there already, and it could get a lot worse. Financial markets could malfunction, causing sharp stock market sell-offs and unpredictable knock-on shocks. Democratic economists Laura Tyson and Lenny Mendonca wrote recently that 'Trump has wrecked the US economy.' They argue that Trump's tax bill is 'horrendous legislation' that will make the poor poorer, revoke health insurance for millions, and take food aid from several million needy Americans. 'A good economy that Trump turned bad is about to get a lot worse,' they said. Not everybody thinks the sky is falling. Economists in general think the economy will grow more slowly this year and next than it did in 2024. That isn't a recession call. But slower growth means fewer jobs, weaker income growth, and less prosperity. Some Americans who feel like the Trump tax cuts are doing nothing for them will start to think that Trump's critics are right. And there will be no shortage of critics eager to persuade them. The Trump healthcare cuts hit home. To reduce the budgetary cost of the tax cuts in the Trump bill, Congress cut healthcare benefits by $1 trillion over the next decade — the biggest rollback in federal health benefits ever. Most of the cutbacks come from Medicaid, the healthcare program for the poor. There are also reductions in subsidies for people buying insurance through Obamacare. Overall, the number of uninsured Americans could rise by 16 million by anybody notice? Oh yes, they will. Republicans are already worried about voters losing coverage in their states and districts. Rural hospitals in swing states such as Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Michigan are in danger of closing for lack of funding. White House economist Kevin Hassett addressed these concerns recently by saying 'the best way to get insurance is to get a job,' even though only 54% of companies offer healthcare benefits and just 54% of workers are covered by an employer plan. There are many gaps in the employer coverage system, including exemptions for small firms and part-time workers, plus coverage that's too expensive for some workers to afford. Democrats are already running ads in 35 congressional districts blaming the Republican bill for jeopardizing rural healthcare. The availability of healthcare has faded as a top campaign issue in recent years as more people have gotten coverage and the uninsured rate has declined. But Republican cutbacks could make it an issue again, and 'get a job' is a pretty lousy pitch to voters who can't afford healthcare. The bill becomes a blame magnet. Most voters will never know all the details of what's in the Trump tax cut bill. They will know that it made some pretty big changes affecting incomes and healthcare. So when people notice those types of changes in their own lives, many will conclude Trump's tax bill is the cause. Joe Biden had this problem with the $2 trillion stimulus bill he signed just a few months into his presidential term. That went over fine until inflation started spiking a year or so later. The Biden bill was just one of four COVID-era stimulus bills that pumped roughly $6 trillion into the economy. Trump signed the first three, yet voters blamed Biden for overstimulating and single-handedly causing inflation. Biden's mistake, in retrospect, was giving voters a fat legislative target to blame for everything that went wrong later in his presidency. The Trump tax bill could end up as the same sort of albatross for Republicans. The bill is already unpopular, with opinion running nearly 2 to 1 against. That's a worse start than Trump's 2017 tax cut law, which was mildly unpopular when Congress passed it. The problem with that bill was that many Americans felt it favored businesses and the wealthy too much. The 2025 version is even more skewed because of the healthcare cuts, which will disproportionately affect lower earners. Republicans thought voters would love their 2017 tax law and reward them at the polls. They guessed wrong. Democrats enjoyed a wave election in the 2018 midterm elections and retook control of the House of Representatives. Will it be different this time around? Trump seems unworried. Yet he just signed a bill with many provisions Americans don't want, and one way or another, there will be consequences. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
