How would the Trump administration denaturalize immigrant citizens?
The next step in the Trump administration's deportation campaign is here. The Department of Justice will prioritize stripping citizenship from naturalized Americans it says have violated the law, a process known as denaturalization.
Denaturalization gives the White House "another tool to police immigrants' free speech rights," said Axios. The administration has already used the deportation process to target immigrant students who criticized Israel's war on Gaza, including green-card holder Mahmoud Khalil. The Justice Department guidance says denaturalization proceedings will be focused on "terrorists," as well as people convicted of "war crimes," "extrajudicial killings" and "human rights abuses."
The denaturalization program is an attempt to "protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals and terrorists," said The Heritage Foundation's Hans von Spakovsky. But immigration experts "expressed serious concerns about the effort's constitutionality," said NPR. The Justice Department will pursue denaturalization in civil courts, which require a lower burden of proof for the government to win. They also do not require that defendants be furnished with an attorney. The Trump administration is "trying to create a second class of U.S. citizens" with fewer rights, said Sameera Hafiz, the policy director of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.
"Aggressive" denaturalization is at odds with "constitutional principles of citizenship," Cassandra Burke Robertson and Irina D. Manta, law professors at Case Western University and Hofstra Law School, respectively, said at MSNBC. There is an unsavory history: "Denaturalization was relatively rare" for most of American history but "spiked during the Red Scare era." The Supreme Court in the 1960s limited denaturalization to those who had "illegally procured" citizenship through fraud or failing to meet naturalization requirements. Going beyond that represents the sort of "arbitrary governmental authority the Constitution was designed to prevent."
Pursuing denaturalization in civil courts lets the Trump administration paint potential deportees as "criminal" while "avoiding the safeguards of an actual criminal court," said Rafia Zakaria at The Nation. There is no statute of limitation on civil denaturalizations, allowing Justice Department lawyers to "target U.S. citizens who were naturalized decades earlier." But there is more than citizenship at stake: The threat of denaturalization will allow the Trump administration to tamp down on dissent from migrant citizens "who know that they could either face deportation or massive debt" from attorneys' fees. Either way, the "Trump administration wins."
Republicans already have a political target for denaturalization: Uganda-born Zohran Mamdani, the New York City mayoral candidate. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has called on the Justice Department to strip Mamdani of citizenship, said Semafor. Mamdani's membership in the Democratic Socialists of America "would have disqualified him" from citizenship because it is a "communist organization," Ogles said. If those claims are "true, it's something that should be investigated," said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Mamdani was defiant in response. New York is "my home," he said on X. "And I'm proud to be a citizen, which means standing up for our Constitution."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
Can Mamdani's Message Play Outside New York? It Already Has.
In the glow of Zohran Mamdani's convincing win in the Democratic mayoral primary in New York City, a common narrative has emerged to explain his ascendence. He was a master of social media; he was charming, attractive and well spoken; he and his team simply outworked everyone. But the emphasis on Mr. Mamdani's style overlooks the substance of his progressive message and how the city's voters came to embrace it, much as voters did in Boston in 2021 and in Chicago two years later. Those elections, along with recent polling on issues like rent control, wealth taxes and the burden of child care, suggest that many voters, particularly those in large Democratic-leaning cities, have become more receptive to progressive agendas. Mr. Mamdani, a state assemblyman and democratic socialist, adhered to a simple message in his primary campaign. New York, he said, was in the throes of an affordability crisis, and he had three main proposals to help: make city buses free, expand free child care and freeze the rent for stabilized apartments. The financial burden of paying for these policies, he suggested, would largely fall on wealthy taxpayers and businesses — a stance that has put Mr. Mamdani at odds with many mainstream Democrats, including Gov. Kathy Hochul. But the size of his victory has forced some in his party to grapple with his ascension and whether to adopt some of his messaging in next year's critical midterm elections. 'People are hungry for government to work and to get things done that matter and that will make a difference in their lives,' said Mayor Michelle Wu of Boston, who in 2021 became the city's youngest mayor in a century by pushing a similar slate of proposals. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
San Francisco report details traffic patterns after closure of Upper Great Highway
San Francisco transportation officials released their first report on traffic patterns in the outer Sunset since the controversial closure of the Upper Great Highway. That closure led to the opening of the city's newest park, Sunset Dunes. The SFMTA has been monitoring traffic closely before and after voters approved the closure in March. The data shows some roads are more congested, while other parts saw less traffic. Using traffic data from key streets across the Outer Sunset, the SFMTA said minor traffic shifts were largely aligned with traffic projections. Nick Lanham and his kids are loving the new park. "I don't feel like traffic has gotten much worse. There's a little bit more in the morning and evening, but mostly maybe two cars deep at the stop sign, but it's not bad at all," Lanham said. SFMTA data shows traffic on the Upper Great Highway between Fulton and Lincoln has dropped by 30%. But opponents of the closure point to the increased traffic in other parts of the district. The report said Chain of Lakes Drive has about 2,000 more vehicles per day than pre-closure. Lower Great Highway has about 700 more vehicles per day. The SFTMTA said that means about one additional vehicle per minute at peak hour, compared with pre-pandemic traffic. "The SFMTA may find there's a hundred less cars on Sunset Boulevard. But what they're not capturing are the thousands of people who are driving circuitous routes to try and navigate through their daily lives and choosing not to do things because it's too complicated to get there. That's a common experience and that's real," said Richmond District resident Richard Corriea. Those pushing for the recall of District 4 Board of Supervisors Joel Engardio, who supported Proposition K and the opening of the park, aren't giving up the fight. "We're not anti-park, anti-bicyclists at all. This is about excluded from the process and excluded in district 4 by their representative," said Corriea. For supporters of the park, like Lucas Lux, the President of Friends of Sunset Dunes, the data backs up what he's been seeing on the streets. "When the park first opened, you could feel and see a little bit of a traffic change, but as people adjusted to new route using Sunset Boulevard, which the data shows people are doing, residential streets are pretty much as they were before and that's the way it feels to me as well," said Lux. SFMTA said other roadways remain below pre-pandemic traffic and that Sunset Boulevard remains at 90% of pre-pandemic traffic volumes. Lincoln Way east of Chain of Lakes was not impacted by the closure of the Upper Great Highway and remains 7% below pre-pandemic traffic volumes.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Iran Forcing Out Afghans En Masse After Israel Spying Claims
After the Taliban retook power in Afghanistan in 2021, Nawida fled with her family to neighboring Iran. The lawyer had helped send members of the Islamist group to jail, and feared being arrested — or killed — for her work. More than three years later, she is again in hiding — this time in a Tehran suburb with her siblings and eight-year-old son. Iran has embarked on a massive deportation drive of the country's 3 million-plus population of Afghan refugees, some of whom authorities say aided Israel's airstrikes on the country last month.
