
Blake Lively's legal battle with Justin Baldoni is upended as he makes surprising legal move
The theater of battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni just narrowed with the announcement that he will not be amending the claims in his $400 million defamation lawsuit.
The lawsuit that Baldoni, 41, filed against the 37-year-old actress, her husband Ryan Reynolds and her publicist was dismissed by a judge earlier this month, but Baldoni was left with the option to amend some of the complaints in the lawsuit to refile it.
But on Tuesday, his attorney Bryan Freedman announced that Baldoni would not be amending any of his complaints in the tossed-out lawsuit.
In statement to DailyMail.com, Freedman said: 'The Court's decision on the motion to dismiss has no effect whatsoever on the truth that there was no harassment nor any smear campaign, and it does not in any way affect our vigorous defense against Ms. Lively's claims.
'Discovery is proceeding and we are confident that we will prevail against these factually baseless accusations,' he continued. 'Instead of revising the existing claims, our clients will be pursuing additional legal options that are available to us.'
Despite her initial legal win when Baldoni's lawsuit was dismissed, Lively hasn't been letting up on her own lawsuit, and she recently sent out a bevy of new subpoenas.
A spokesperson for Lively also responded to the news that Baldoni was stepping back from his failed attempt to countersue her in a statement to DailyMail.com.
'The Court dismissed the frivolous $400 million Baldoni–Wayfarer lawsuit in its entirety,' they said.
'In the days that followed, Baldoni's lawyer said the judge's decision to dismiss their case was not a big deal as they promised to amend and refile it. As per usual, that was not true,' her spokesperson continued. 'The Court's dismissal of Baldoni's sham lawsuit was a total victory after all.'
Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Baldoni's lawsuit two weeks ago, but he left the Jane The Virgin star a second opportunity to amend the suit by June 23.
However, the judge ruled that he could only amend the allegations 'relevant to the claims of tortious interference with contract and breach of implied covenant.'
The 132-page opinion broke down why the allegations in Baldoni's lawsuit were without merit, including the accusation that Lively, her husband and her publicist Leslie Sloane engaged in 'civil extortion.'
'The Wayfarer Parties cannot recover for Lively's alleged actions to steal creative control of the film from Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties. Regardless of the propriety of these actions, they do not constitute civil extortion under California law,' the judge says. 'California courts have recognized claim for civil extortion in situations where a plaintiff gives a defendant money or property under threat and seeks to have it returned.
'However, the Wayfarer Parties have not adequately alleged that Lively's threats were wrongful extortion rather than legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions. Additionally, the Wayfarer Parties have not shown that some of Lively's allegedly extortionate acts damaged them.'
When summarizing the extortion claim, the judge wrote: 'Lively, Sloane, and Reynolds have the better of the argument.'
The judge also denied requests from Reynolds, Sloane and Vision PR for an award of attorney's fees and costs, in addition to a request from Lively for an award of attorney's fees, treble damages and punitive damages.
The above motions were denied without prejudice in accordance with the ruling.
Wayfarer Studios was founded by Baldoni and billionaire businessman Steve Sarowitz in 2019.
A statement obtained at the time by DailyMail.com from Blake Lively's attorneys read: 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times.
'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it.
'We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.'
In a statement obtained by DailyMail.com, a spokesperson for The New York Times said of the dismissal: 'We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit against The New York Times for what it was: a meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting.
'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism. We will continue to stand up in court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work comes under attack.'
Liman also weighed in on the demands Lively sought on the set of It Ends With Us in order to prevent further discomfort on the set, with his opinion stating: 'Even if they turn out to be unneeded, an employee can insist on protections at workplace for sexual harassment without being accused of extortion. If an employer accedes, it cannot later claim to be a victim of the employee's wrongful threats.'
Additionally, Liman said of the allegation that Lively threatened to not promote the film unless her cut was released, among other requests: 'There also is no allegation that Lively had a contractual obligation to promote the film; if not, there is no basis to assume that the value that she conveyed in terms of her willingness to promote represented anything other than a fair trade for the Wayfarer Parties' willingness to use her cut.'
The court said that although statements made by Reynolds and Sloan were 'extraneous' or outside of the complaint, Baldoni failed to allege facts that they were made with actual malice, or that Reynolds and Sloane either knew their statements were false or acted in reckless disregard of their veracity.
Another party that can breathe a sigh of relief after Baldoni's lawsuit was thrown out is Marvel Entertainment, LLC.
Baldoni had subpoenaed the studio to get it to preserve any documents related to the Deadpool & Wolverine character Nicepool, which his legal team claimed was designed 'to mock, harass, ridicule, intimidate or bully' Baldoni.
But after throwing out Baldoni's lawsuit, Liman agreed to Marvel's request to 'quash the subpoena issued to Marvel from [Baldoni's] Wayfarer Parties and for a protective order prohibiting the disclosure of Marvel's confidential documents.'
Baldoni's team had send a letter requesting documents be retained to Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige and Bob Iger, CEO of its parent company Walt Disney, on January 7.
The legal battle between Lively and Baldoni officially erupted last year after rumors of tension between the two, with the actress accusing her co-star of sexual harassment and a retaliatory smear campaign, allegations Baldoni denied.
In her lawsuit, Lively named a number of Baldoni's collaborators, including his company Wayfarer Studios, the studio's CEO and financial backer, and PR personnel Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.
'I hope that my legal action helps pull back the curtain on these sinister retaliatory tactics to harm people who speak up about misconduct and helps protect others who may be targeted,' Lively told The New York Times the day after she filed the complaint.
Baldoni has denied the allegations brought about by Lively, while Lively, Reynolds and Sloane have denied the accusations made in litigation by Baldoni.
Baldoni's team has released a website which includes private communications such as text messages that were included in court filings detailing his interactions with the Hollywood power couple over the making of the romantic drama.
He claimed in court filings they made efforts to usurp and undermine his input as the director of It Ends with Us.
Baldoni's team previously said that the communications shared in court filings on the website makes things clear about the motives of both parties.
The website, which is live online at thelawsuitinfo.com, comes amid a spate of high-profile litigation between the collaborators on the film, which was a hit at the box office last August.
Lively filed an 80-page civil rights complaint with the California Civil Rights Department against Baldoni on December 20, before officially filing a federal lawsuit on December 31.
In her lawsuit, the Gossip Girl alum accused Baldoni of sexually harassing her in multiple ways — including body shaming her — and orchestrating a smear campaign against her to damage her reputation.
Baldoni told the court the trio had concocted 'false accusations of sexual harassment' against him.
Baldoni and his reps have said in response to the lawsuit that Lively twisted the meaning of text messages and mislead the public about their interactions while making the motion picture.
On June 3, DailyMail.com revealed Lively, 37, dropped a claim of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress against Baldoni.
Baldoni subsequently sued the newspaper for $250 million in a defamation claim over a December 21 story titled '"We Can Bury Anyone": Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine ;' the newspaper has denied the allegations.
Since Lively's complaint was filed, Baldoni has faced a number of professional consequences, including a lawsuit from a former publicist ; and being dropped by the agency WME , which also reps Lively and Reynolds.
WME has denied claims that Lively and Reynolds leaned on them to release Baldoni from their client roster, according to Variety.
It Ends with Us, which also starred Jenny Slate, Hasan Minhaj, Brandon Sklenar and Kevin McKidd, arrived in theaters August 9 and was a hit with audiences. The film, adapted from the 2016 Colleen Hoover novel, earned $148 million in domestic box office, and $350 million globally, according to Box Office Mojo.
Lively broke out with the 2005 movie The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants opposite Amber Tamblyn, Alexis Bledel and America Ferrera. That led to her high-profile role on the TV show Gossip Girl, which she starred on from 2007-2012, playing lead character Serena van der Woodsen.
She has also appeared in movies such as 2010's The Town, 2016's The Shallows, 2018's A Simple Favor and 2020's The Rhythm Section.
Prior to It Ends with Us, Baldoni was best known for playing the role of Rafael Solano on the TV show Jane the Virgin from 2014–2019. He also has directed films including 2019's Five Feet Apart and 2020's Clouds, and penned the 2021 book Man Enough, which tackled misconceptions of contemporary masculinity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Farewell, Anna Wintour – the Queen of editors with a nuclear-force superpower
Farewell, Anna Wintour: sphinx-faced, super-enduring doyenne of global fashion. The news that the editor-in-chief of US Vogue has stepped down after 37 years marks the end of an era, but I don't mean her reign over couture and catwalk. What her bow marks is the golden age of magazines, when editors were celebrated as celebs in their own right and whose names were synonymous with their product. Mark Boxer at Tatler, Graydon Carter's Vanity Fair, Nick Logan at The Face, Bill Buford heading Granta, Alan Coren at Punch and Tina Brown presiding over Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and the Daily Beast. But 'Nuclear Wintour' outsaw all of them, while the only famed editor still at his desk and outdoing Wintour by two years and still counting is my first boss, Ian Hislop, Private Eye 's Lord Gnome. Magazines shaped my life after my publican parents turned their saloon bar into a comfy sitting room with sofas, log fires and piles of glossies. As my mother put it, 'There's Country Life for the life you want, Hello! to gawp at other people's lives and Private Eye for the truth behind the lives.' Each copy was grey from being thumbed by riveted customers. By 1991, when the cousin of one of our regulars sent me off for an interview with Hislop at the Eye 's Soho offices, I was quivering with nerves at the prospect of meeting a demi-god. But even then, I didn't quite grasp how infinitesimally lucky I was to enter magazine journalism at a time of editorial giants, wide readerships, big ad revenue and significant sway. It was an age when editors decided who was a star in the making – or fading. Front covers rather than TikTok anointed and cemented talent, while media bigwigs, rock stars and actors hung out together at the then newly-founded Groucho Club, feeding on each other's influence. The idea of a 'chief content creator' wasn't even a twinkle in a Californian tech bro's eye – he was still at kindergarten. All the lesser hacks relied on editors and their lavish expense accounts to lubricate the fun. Michael VerMeulen, the American editor of British GQ – where I landed my second job – negotiated an expense account of £40,000 on top of his salary and used to sweep his entire staff out for Groucho jollies. Vermeulen with his flamboyant lingo of 'big swinging dicks' (any man he admired) and 'doesn't blow the wind up my skirt' (a lacklustre features pitch) made such great copy that the Guardian sent a journalist to report on what it was like to work in his orbit. I have long cherished the memory of him telling me that when a girlfriend congratulated him on his sexual performance, he instantly replied, 'Don't tell me, tell your friends!' His death, one August bank holiday weekend after an excess of cocaine, was front-page news, and all of Mag Land mourned. Even back then, Anna Wintour rose above it all like a phoenix born of ice, who would never be glimpsed in civilian settings. A good friend went off to work at US Vogue and reported back that the maestra had her own work lavatory, forbidden to all others, so worker bees couldn't bear witness to her doing something as human as going to the loo. (This was apparently even the case at her Met Gala balls, where even Hollywood superstars couldn't share her personal facilities.) During my brief stint at Conde Nast, before I was fired for sleeping with the deputy editor – reader, I married him – rumours of impending visits from Wintour took on the aspect of Elizabeth I descending on an earl's country estate to test his coffers and loyalty. Even that friend who went to the Vogue took on some of her boss's grandiosity. When I bumped into her at an intimate London book launch, I was startled to find she affected not to know me, a phase that happily passed. There was real power in the corridors of glossies back then, and this could distort personalities even more than the charlie so many meeja folk snorted. An actress or model who couldn't land a Vogue cover was denied the super-stamp of being in fashion, and so it was for men who couldn't make a splash on GQ or Esquire 's hoardings. Pamela Anderson may have equalled Princess Diana for sheer fame in the 1990s, but Wintour would not yield her the ultimate accolade of a cover: the sex tape that leaked of Anderson and drummer Tommy Lee deemed her trashy beyond redemption. But in 2023, Anderson had a radical image overhaul, ditching the bombshell slap and going makeup-free to Paris Fashion Week, and every event since. It was intellectual, interesting – and it's got her on the list for the last two Met Galas. This year, Anderson went a step further, with a severe bob and sculpted dress that gave her a faint whiff of catwalk Rosa Klebb. She'd have probably worn a straitjacket if it gained her admission to fashion's front row. Because that, in the end, was Anna Wintour's nuclear-force superpower: the quiet devastation of a 'No'. She was not just an editor, she was the ultimate bouncer with Prada gloves.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Jake Paul vs Julio Cesar Chavez Jr EXACT fight time – when are the ring-walks for blockbuster bout?
JAKE PAUL is hoping to take another huge boxing scalp when he takes on Mexican mogul Julio Cesar Chavez Jr TONIGHT! The Problem Child hasn't competitively stepped foot in the ring since his controversial points win against legendary heavy-hitter Mike Tyson. 1 Fans feared for 58-year-old Tyson before the fight, and made their voices heard when the decision was followed by unanimous boos around the AT&T Stadium. However, the victory meant that Paul extended his professional boxing career record to 11-1 - only losing a bitter grudge match to Tommy Fury in 2023. And the social media sensation will be determined to build on that when he goes toe-to-toe with Julio Cesar Chavez Jr at the top of a huge Honda Center bill. But for the fans that are only interested in the main event, SunSport can reveal the EXACT time when Paul and Chavez Jr will step into the ring. What time does Jake Paul vs Chavez Jr start and how can I watch it? Ring-walks for the main event is expected to get underway at around 4am BST / 11pm ET meaning that the first bell should go approximately 15 minutes later at 4:15am BST / 11:15pm ET. However, timings could change depending on the length of the undercard bouts. Coverage of the main card will start from 1am BST / 8pm ET. Honda Center in Anaheim, United States is the chosen venue for this huge event and it can host approximately 18,336. The fight will be exclusively shown on DAZN PPV. The pay-per-view costs £24.99 / $59.99 and can be watched on DAZN TV or live streamed on the website / app. Alternatively, SunSport will live blog the full card, including the huge main event. Jake Paul vs Julio Cesar Chavez Jr JAKE PAUL'S controversial boxing career rolls on this weekend with the Problem Child facing boxing royalty in Anaheim, California. Paul will face Julio Cesar Chavez Jr, a highly-decorated former world middleweight champion. The Mexican, 39, has fought just once in the last four years but has the best boxing resume of any fighter to step into a ring with Paul - bar Mike Tyson, who was aged 58 at the time they fought. INFO Everything you need to know about Paul vs Chavez Jr LATEST NEWS & FEATURES Jake Paul buys incredible £29MILLION ranch with 5,700 acres Jake Paul in talks over TWO shock world title fights Chavez Jr is son of boxing great who was arrested on gun charges and robbed by party girls Jake Paul heavyweight days over after getting 'too fat' Who is on the Jake Paul vs Chavez Jr undercard? Jake Paul vs Julio César Chávez Jr. - Cruiserweight Gilberto 'Zurdo' Ramirez vs Yuniel Dorticos - Cruiserweight, for the WBA and WBO titles Holly Holm vs Yolanda Vega - Lightweight Floyd Schofield vs Tevin Farmer - Lightweight Avious Griffin vs Julian Rodriguez - Welterweight Raul 'Cugar' Curiel vs Victor Ezequiel Rodriguez - Welterweight Naomy Valle vs Ashley Felix - Light flyweight Jake Paul's confidence Jake Paul is confident that he will beat Julio Cesar Chavez Jr and believes he could 'whoop' Chavez Jr's legendary father too... at the same time! The Problem Child said: "Put both the Chavezs in there, I'll whoop Sr and Jr in the same night. "Going from Disney Channel to YouTube to world champion in six to seven years? "That's the most relatable and best sports story that any kid can get behind."


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I'm a ‘former fatty' who lost 12 stone WITHOUT jabs – being slim means I don't have to eat in the car to avoid judgement
A SELF-DESCRIBED 'former fatty' has admitted losing 12 stone means she's no longer forced to eat dinner in her car. Krista has lost 170lbs over the past four years, but hasn't resorted to weight loss injections or surgery to do so - instead sticking to a calorie deficit and exercising more. 6 6 6 6 She regularly shares tips and tricks on her social media pages, and recently posted a video in which she shared two ways her life has changed since she transformed her figure. "Now that I am skinny I can go to a restaurant and I can just eat whatever I want," she said. "It's cute if I order a burger and fries and eat a lot of food but when I was fat that was not okay. "God forbid I would have ordered a burger! "I would not have ordered a burger first of all. "I would not have done that just because the judgment around what you're eating, how much you're eating and what you're drinking... they're just like, 'Well of course she ordered a burger, because she's fat, that's why she looks the way she does.' "Or if you try to order a salad or something healthy like grilled chicken it's 'You're not fooling anybody, that's not how you eat - you're 300 pounds!' "You just can't win, so eating in public when you are overweight is mortifying." Things got so bad when Krista was bigger that she'd even resort to eating her restaurant meals in the car. "What I would do is I would eat a couple bites, take my food to go and I would eat it in the car in private," she sighed. I went from 27 lbs in six weeks with Mounjaro after 15 years of trying to lose weight it has completely changed my life "Or I would eat it when I got home, where nobody was judging me." Another thing that's changed dramatically since she lost the weight is that she's now "allowed to be tired". "When you are fat you are not allowed to come around and be like, 'Oh I had such a long day, I just want to go home and sit on the couch'," Krista continued. "The looks you're gonna get, the judgment that you're immediately gonna get, it's disgusting. "But when you're skinny it's okay - it's okay if I had a long day and I want to come home and sit on the couch. "As soon as you are overweight or fat it is not okay because now you're just lazy." Visit our diet, nutrition and weight loss page for the latest updates Krista concluded that the "constant double standard" for those who are skinny and those who are overweight "blows my mind". People in the comments section were quick to agree with Krista, with one writing: "I go to the gym 4 times a week for the past 3 years (I'm fat) and people say 'good for you' 'keep it up'. "My skinny friend goes once in 6 months and someone asked her for advice." "Now I'm pregnant and so much heavier I really appreciate being thin when I'm not pregnant!" a second admitted. "When you're fat, you better be funny, like mandatory, but once you're skinny, if you're the exact same funny it's a cute, surprising, quirky perk," a third sighed. "You're so right!" Krista replied. "I was not funny when I was fat and tried so hard to be, but it's just not my personality!" 6 6