Biden's team debated making him take a cognitive test months before dropping out of 2024 race: book
A new book revealed that former President Joe Biden's team chose not to have the president take a cognitive test in February 2024, over concerns that taking the test itself would raise more questions about his age, The New York Times reported Sunday.
Authors Tyler Pager, a reporter for The New York Times, Josh Dawsey, a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Isaac Arnsdorf, a reporter for the Washington Post, wrote the book, titled, '2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,' which is set to be released in July.
Advertisement
The book, one of several about the tumultuous 2024 presidential election, details that Biden's top aides debated having him complete a cognitive test to quell concerns about his age.
The aides were reportedly confident Biden would pass the test.
'At the same time, Mr. Biden's longtime doctor, Kevin O'Connor, had told aides he would not take the 81-year-old president's political standing into consideration when treating him,' the Times reported, citing the book.
The debate over whether the president should take the test occurred in February 2024, several months before the June debate against President Donald Trump, and just a couple of weeks before Biden's White House physical exam, the Times reported.
Advertisement
It was the same month that Special Counsel Robert Hur's report about the former president's mishandling of classified documents was released.
According to a new book, aides to former President Biden decided not to have him complete a cognitive test in February 2024.
Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images
The special counsel described Biden as 'a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.'
The NYT report also described a conversation from the new book between former Biden chief of staff Ron Klain and former Obama aide and frequent CNN guest, David Axelrod.
Advertisement
Klain, according to NYT, called Axelrod following a Times report from June 2022 that quoted Axelrod saying, 'The stark reality is the president would be closer to 90 than 80 at the end of a second term, and that would be a major issue.'
'That comment prompted an angry call to Mr. Axelrod from Ron Klain, then Mr. Biden's chief of staff, according to the book. Mr. Klain wanted to know why Mr. Axelrod was fueling doubts about a Democratic president who was on track to begin a re-election campaign,' the NYT reported.
'There's no Obama out there, Axe,' Klain said during the call, according to the Times. 'Who's going to do it if he doesn't do it?'
Advertisement
Another new book about the 2024 campaign revealed that Klain said Biden was 'fatigued, befuddled and disengaged' before his debate with Trump in June. Klain helped Biden prepare for the debate after exiting his White House role.
'At his first meeting with Biden in Aspen Lodge, the president's cabin,' author Chris Whipple wrote, Klain 'was startled. He'd never seen him so exhausted and out of it. Biden was unaware of what was happening in his own campaign. Halfway through the session, the president excused himself and went off to sit by the pool.'
Biden's former chief of staff Ron Klain said that the president was 'fatigued, befuddled and disengaged' before the infamous July debate, according to another book.
EPA/Al Drago / POOL
Whipple's book, 'Uncharted: How Trump Beat Biden, Harris, and the Odds in the Wildest Campaign in History,' was released in April.
A representative for Biden did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama
The Senate on Saturday cleared a key procedural hurdle to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," bringing the massive spending legislation one step closer to passage after weeks of painstaking negotiations. The Senate vote delivered a boost for Republican Majority Leader John Thune's bid to get the bill to Trump's desk by July 4. But it was not without drama. The vote on the motion to proceed was open for hours on Saturday night, and only passed after three Republican holdouts gave in and voted yes. The hours of uncertainty underscored the tricky path forward for the massive package. The procedural vote tees up a final vote on the megabill in the Senate likely sometime Sunday or Monday. Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are forcing the 940-page bill to be read out loud once it heads to full debate on the Senate floor Sunday. "We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it," Schumer wrote Saturday on X. While the package cannot officially pass the upper chamber until the final vote, the procedural vote was considered a big test for Thune. The vote comes after weeks of turmoil and tension over the massive package that exposed bitter policy disputes and emboldened some firm Republican holdouts. The sweeping domestic policy package will also have to be passed again in the House, which just narrowly passed its own version of the bill last month. Some House Republicans have already expressed opposition to key elements of the Senate version of the bill — most notably deep cuts to Medicaid — likely foreshadowing a close vote in the lower chamber. Both Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson hold narrow majorities in their respective chambers, meaning they can only afford to lose the support of a small number of Republican lawmakers to pass the package in a party-line vote. Meanwhile, Trump continues to urge lawmakers to get the package passed before Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the White House said in a statement of administration policy on Saturday. This is breaking news. Check back for updates.
Politico
33 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate Republicans put megabill on track for likely Monday passage
Senate Republicans on Saturday took a crucial step toward passing their sweeping domestic policy bill, voting 51-49 to start debate on the legislation. Two GOP senators — Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — joined Democrats to oppose advancing the cornerstone of President Donald Trump's second-term agenda. But several others came around after hours of last-ditch negotiations to keep the bill moving forward. The vote came after a daylong scramble by GOP leaders to win over several Republican senators who were viewed as undecided or had vowed to block debate over their opposition to pieces of the bill — including an extended negotiating session that unfolded withvarious senatorswhile the vote was underway. Now the chamber is on track to pass the bill sometime Monday. Democrats are forcing Senate clerks to first read the legislation out loud, which is expected to happen overnight, before a maximum 20 hours of debate plus a marathon series of amendment votes.
The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
G7 agrees to exclude US from corporate minimum tax
The Group of Seven (G7) said Saturday that it will allow American companies to be excluded from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries, creating instead a 'side-by-side' agreement where regular American tax rules would apply. In 2021, nearly 140 countries agreed to tax multinational companies at a minimum rate of 15 percent, regardless of where they were headquartered, in a deal aimed at preventing conglomerates from seeking out tax havens. The Biden administration was then a proponent of the deal, as it was in line with its plans to raise the corporate tax rate. The Friday move by the G7 is nonbinding and still requires approval from the OECD, the intergovernmental organization that established the 2021 agreement. But the G7 members, which include the world's largest economies, dominate the OECD. The G7 statement is a major win for the Trump administration, which has pushed for the United States to be exempted from the tax agreement. The 'big, beautiful bill' now making its way through the Senate initially included a 'revenge tax' that would have imposed a levy of up to 20 percent on investments from countries with economic policies deemed to be unfair to American businesses, a broad definition that could have included the OECD deal. The language was pulled Thursday after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said progress with the G7 had been made, a move celebrated by congressional Republicans. 'We applaud President Trump and his team for protecting the interests of American workers and businesses after years of congressional Republicans sounding the alarm on the Biden Administration's unilateral global tax surrender under Pillar 2,' wrote Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Ind.) and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), the chairs of each chamber's tax policy committee.
