logo
Ride Review: Verge TS Pro 'Hubless' Electric motorcycle

Ride Review: Verge TS Pro 'Hubless' Electric motorcycle

Forbes01-07-2025
Is that back wheel missing some parts? Nope, the Verge motorcycles utilize a chainless, beltless, ... More shaftless drive system based around a large electric motor built into the back wheel itself.
OK, perhaps a wee bit of clarification is needed: No, the distinctive machines from electric motorcycle maker Verge are not exactly powered by Homer Simpson's favorite snack food. But technically, they are powered by a type of donut: a large round 'hubless' electromagnetic motor that makes up the rear wheel and contributes to the Verge models' signature look (below). Appropriately—and with a much-needed wink at often overly pretentious names for 'branded' technology—the motor is called… the Donut Motor. And it's expected to show up on more motorcycles soon. More on that in a bit.
Four small arms hold the motor, which is mated to a carbon fiber rim to cut unsprung weight. The ... More inside part of the hub does not rotate; the wheel and tire rotate around it.
Recently, while on assignment for another publication that took me to the Los Angeles area, I had the opportunity to ride a Euro-spec Verge TS Pro on the relatively placid streets near Beverly Hills very early in the morning. Verge is still working to homologate its bikes for the U.S., with sales expected to start later this year through a still-expanding dealership network. Verge states they are currently selling the bikes in Estonia, Finland, France, the UK, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Monaco. The company is based in Estonia, where the bikes are also made.
The Verge team recently set a Guinness World Record for the farthest distance traveled on a single charge on an electric motorcycle using the TS Pro. Although they didn't quite reach the 200-mile mark, they secured the record with enough charge remaining to surpass that distance. Take a look:
Verge TS Pro Tech Overview
While smaller, lighter 'city plus' urban-focused electric motos seem to be the current trend, the 245kg/540-pound Verge TS electric motorcycles are very much not a member of that category. The Verge machines prioritize speed, power, and even more speed. The bikes feature substantial battery packs: a 20.2 kWh battery in the $29,990 TS Pro model I was riding, or a larger 21.8 kWh pack in the $44,900 TS Ultra trim. Verge is also offering a glossy 'seasonal' version of the Pro called the California Edition for a $1,000 premium. All that energy powers that unusual hubless 17-inch rear Donut Motor, which delivers 102 kW/137 horsepower and an incredible 1,000 Nm/737 pound-feet of torque when set to maximum output in Beast ride mode on the Pro and California. On the Ultra, those numbers rise to 202 horsepower and a staggering 885 pound-feet of torque.
Thankfully, the bikes are equipped with traction controls to prevent riders from losing control during hard acceleration, along with multiple riding modes. Range mode maximizes ride time, while Zen mode strikes a balance between the wilder Beast mode and the relatively docile Range setting. A Custom setting allows riders to adjust the level of danger and finesse as desired. Verge claims a range of over 200 miles on a full charge in Range mode with what I suspect is a very well-behaved throttle hand while sticking to city streets.
Vital statistics, including speed, are displayed on a small monochrome LCD located beneath the lip of the small bug screen atop the handlebars. Since there's no need for gasoline, the Verge's vented 'tank' houses the vital electrical and charging components, while a large touchscreen occupies the top section. Tapping an RFID card to the tank brings the machine to life. Verge has developed a robust UI and operating software called Starmatter, which features an 'Advanced Machine Vision System' on the top-spec Ultra, but I did not ride that model. With Starmatter, riders can poke around under the digital hood, so to speak, to adjust regenerative braking and several other metrics. A small button on the right bar pod activates the bikes from Parking mode, and another changes the ride mode.
Dual 320mm Brembo disc brakes with ABS slow the 17-inch front wheel, while a huge, custom-design 380mm rim-mounted rear rotor is required out back due to the lack of a hub. The giant rotor also gives the back of the bike even more of a sci-fi vibe in conjunction with three large-gauge cables feeding power to the rear motor. Suspension is adjustable both front and rear, with the Ultra featuring Öhlins equipment.
Up front, dual LED projection headlights, positioned above and below an EU marker light, give the Verge a somewhat robotic countenance. An LED taillight is neatly integrated out back, and my EU-spec bike had tiny, tiny but very bright LED turn signals that will be replaced with large, less attractive DOT-spec signals when the bikes arrive stateside. Also, the Euro-spec bikes feature handlebar-activated brakes front and rear, while the U.S. versions will have a standard-style foot pedal for the rear brake. As on most electric motorcycles, there is just one forward 'gear' and no clutch or gearshift. Verge tells me that they will add reverse capability in a future firmware update.
What's It Like To Ride The Verge TS Pro?
Yours truly on the streets of Los Angeles on the Verge TS Pro.
Tap an NFC card to a spot on the faux tank and the Verge TS Pro comes to life, but in Park mode for safety. A button next to the throttle arms the drivetrain, and after that, it's as simple as twist and go, like most electric motorcycle. Other controls and such are in the usual places and operate like normal although I missed the turn signal button and hit the nearby horn button for a few unwanted beeps.
I started out in Range mode, and even in this most conservative of ride modes, the Verge TS Pro is almost violently quick off the line. Verge claims a zero to 60 of 3.5 seconds in Beast Mode, but that figure doesn't feel too far off from the full-crank launch in Range Mode.
Once underway, I expected the long, low Verge TS Pro to have the handling characteristics of a long, low cruiser, and indeed, the TS Pro even includes a second set of pegs (but no controls) in a more forward 'cruiser' position for relaxed riding, along with the pegs amidships. EU-spec machines like I rode have dual handbrakes (like a scooter), U.S. market versions will likely have a standard front brake and foot-controlled rear brake.
Despite the long wheelbase and wide rear tire, the TS Pro turns easily and tracks well. Weight is ... More apparent, however.
In the early morning light, myself and JJ from Verge (formerly of Lucid Motors) rode along curving, twisting streets through Beverly Hills, and to my surprise, the Verge TS Pro had very neutral handling, with the steering falling in just a tiny bit at slower speeds, but far less than I anticipated seeing how the rear tire is a massive 240-section meat that looks like it was lifted off some big-inch V-Twin brawler.
But above walking speed, the TS Pro felt planted, stable and cornered with unexpected grace - and speed. And there is speed to spare. We scouted out a long stretch of straight, traffic-free roadway and once stopped, I dialed up Beast mode on the display, then girded for the launch. The Verge did just that - launch - with a high-pitched howl from the rear motor as the TS Pro moved through 60 mph in a literal blink and kept on accelerating, a whine rising from the rear hub as the speedometer digits climbed ever higher.
As the TS Pro closed in on triple digits, I spotted the familiar silhouette of a law enforcement SUV parked on the side of the road ahead, complete with light bar. I laid into the brakes which scrubbed off speed quickly but I had been far in excess of the speed limit. Again, it was very early in the morning on a weekend with no moving traffic, but still, I was clearly on the wrong side of the law. However, as I went by, still on the brakes, I noticed it was a private 'security' vehicle and unoccupied. Greatly relieved, we concluded acceleration testing and quickly headed back to base.
Observations
The Ultra Pro adds a bump-stop seat pad. With nearly 900 pound-feet of torque, riders will need it.
As I noted earlier, I had been watching the development of the Verge machines from a distance, especially since they have essentially been Euro-only offerings until now. It was a great experience to get a bit of seat time on this unusual electric motorcycle - it certainly impresses, both in terms of its sci-fi style and bonkers performance capabilities. And to think I wasn't riding the top-spec Ultra version. My own sportbike, the formidable Honda Super Blackbird, seems almost quaint in comparison to the TS Pro. When riders talk about 'eyeball flattening acceleration,' this is what they are referring to. Coupled with the quiet delivery of so much power, the Verge TS Pro has that undeniable 'hand of God' feeling when you twist the throttle - even in Zen mode. Time and space suddenly compress and what was down the road is now coming up fast. It's an amazing experience to ride.
Verge is also looking beyond the motorcycles and is offering the Donut Motors to other makers for motorcycles and other types of vehicles as well. That said, the Verge machines still face the same issues as other full-size, full power electric motorcycles in the U.S. market; weight, battery storage capacity, recharging issues and a high price. Undoubtedly, the Verge machines are a premium offering with style and performance to match their price. And really, for the performance and exclusivity of the TS Pro, a tick under $30,000 seems fairly reasonable, especially considering many upper-end gas powered motorcycles easily clear that number.
But the Verge bikes, being all-electric, still must contend with charging times far longer than a gas stop and the still relative unavailability of public chargers in the U.S. compared to gas stations (and Euro infrastructure). We are still in the early-adopter years of electric motorcycles, but if buyers are looking for a standout electric bike with a strong sense of style and almost incomprehensible performance capabilities, the Verge TS Pro delivers.
CEO Interview: Tuomo Lehtimäki
As a bonus, I talked with Verge CEO Tuomo Lehtimäki about the issues around electric motorcycles, the development of the Verge machines, and Verge's business model. The interview has been lightly edited for brevity.
FORBES.COM: Considering the myriad and considerable financial challenges seen in the full-size electric motorcycle market, why undertake this endeavor? What is Verge doing differently from other leading electric motorcycle makers that will (hopefully) bring long-term success?
Tuomo Lehtimäki: Our competitors are scaling up models that aren't financially sustainable. They're selling bikes at a loss and hoping to fix the numbers later. We've done it the other way around: we focused first on building winning technology, then made sure it could be profitable. After that we started scaling the business.
Even in the early days, before the product even existed, we designed the business model: the main point was to have in-house development, in-house manufacturing, direct-to-consumer sales, and our own service network. That gives us enough control of the value chain to be competitive in the long run. Because of that vertical integration, we're in a position to grow sustainably, no matter what the market throws at us.
What are the advantages of the Donut motor tech over the current motor tech that is common in Zero models, LiveWire, etc.?
When it comes to powertrains, the holy grail is simplicity: having just one moving part. There are no chains, no belts, no gears. There's just one moving part. This brings many advantages:
What are the main technical challenges in producing the donut motor?
The biggest challenge has been that everything about the motor is new - not just the motor itself, but how it's manufactured. We had to not only invent the motor, but also invent the production methods ourselves to make this work at scale.
That's why we've built everything in-house: R&D, testing, validation, and manufacturing. Full vertical integration. It lets us move fast, try things, learn quickly, and refine the product continuously. That speed and control has been both our biggest challenge and our biggest strength.
Any time you put a "motor' in a wheel, it adds a lot of unsprung weight, which can negatively affect handling and punish suspension. What is Verge doing to offset that issue?
That's exactly the point we've worked to solve. Our goal was to prove you can integrate the entire powertrain into the wheel - and still deliver great handling.
After six years of development, we've brought that challenge down to a level we're happy with. We've been continuously reducing weight and can now offset the issues related to this kind of powertrain with premium suspension components. We've also developed the bike's dynamics and handling working closely together with our partners at Öhlins and Wilbers. Every choice we've made - like having a carbon fiber rim - reflects how seriously we take performance and ride quality.
Where did the idea or inspiration for the motor technology come from?
From day one, we believed that fewer parts make for better technology. The holy grail of powertrains is having just one moving part. And that's what we set out to build.
Our first prototype showed that it was not only possible, but practical. As we kept developing it, the more benefits we started seeing. That's when we realized we're not just building a motor for one motorcycle - we're building a drivetrain that can power anything from a scooter to a full-on race bike.
What kind of service (if any) does the motor and the motorcycle require?
The motor doesn't need any servicing over its lifetime. With less moving parts and no oils or liquids the bike requires minimal maintenance.
Is the U.S. certification timeline of Q4 still on schedule? What will US pricing look like, especially considering possible tariffs?
Yes, we're still on track to complete certification in Q4 this year. As for pricing: anyone who has placed a reservation in the past or places their order now will keep the current price. And we are not planning to change prices unless tariffs shift significantly. We're monitoring the situation carefully, but we're not rushing to make any changes.
Thank you for reading. Subscribing to Forbes.com allows you to leave comments and supports contributors like myself. You can also follow me on Facebook and LinkedIn.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GM breaks EV range record with elaborate 2026 Silverado EV drive test
GM breaks EV range record with elaborate 2026 Silverado EV drive test

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GM breaks EV range record with elaborate 2026 Silverado EV drive test

Range anxiety is one of the leading reasons consumers cite for avoiding electric vehicles, and a big purchase reason for customers of the Silverado EV, which advertises a range of 400-plus miles over its various trims. To address that concern and to amuse its engineers, General Motors put its electric truck to the test last week and smashed a distance record in the process. Under meticulous parameters — including restricting the use of air conditioning in the July heat — the 2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Work Truck set a new world record for electric vehicle range, traveling 1,059.2 miles on a single charge, more than double the truck's EPA-estimated range of 493 miles. Lucid Motors held the previous record for electric vehicle range, with 749 miles earlier this summer. GM and other automakers are limited to what they can advertise about their vehicles' ranges outside of the EPA test cycle conducted at the National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory in Ann Arbor. Stephanie Brinley, associate director of Auto Intelligence at S&P Global Mobility, said those tests are meant to create a level playing field among automakers to compare how vehicle ranges perform under the same set of conditions. 'It's very rarely precise on what you get in the real world, but automakers are only able to advertise what number comes out of that test cycle,' Brinley said. The Silverado EV test allowed GM to demonstrate in a one-off case that there's more potential in the battery pack than a consumer may expect. The Silverado EV reached the record after months of preparation and planning. First, the vehicle was optimized, but only in a way that customers could replicate at home, according to GM spokeswoman Catherine Scales. According to the company those optimizations included: Maintaining an average speed of 20-25 mph when safe to do so and avoiding hard braking or quick acceleration. Conducting most of the test with the driver alone in the vehicle. The windshield wiper blades were set to the 'lowest acceptable' position to reduce drag. The Silverado's tires were inflated to their highest acceptable pressure for lower rolling resistance except for the spare, which was removed to lighten the load. The wheel alignment 'was optimized.' An accessory tonneau cover was added to streamline airflow around the truck bed. Climate control was off. Another factor that helped the vehicle's battery life was performing the test in summer, which GM said provided the 'optimum ambient temperature for battery efficiency.' The test was conducted over the course of one week on public roads near GM's Milford Proving Ground and on Belle Isle. Forty GM engineers volunteered to drive the vehicle. GM sold 5,439 Silverado EVs in the first six months of 2025, up 67% over last year but still falling drastically short of its gasoline-powered predecessor. GM sold 289,251 across all Silverado types, including medium and light-duty versions. Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Reach her at jcharniga@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: GM breaks EV range record with elaborate 2026 Silverado EV drive test

Ultimate off-road toy? Defender Octa vs Nomad and Mach-E Rally
Ultimate off-road toy? Defender Octa vs Nomad and Mach-E Rally

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ultimate off-road toy? Defender Octa vs Nomad and Mach-E Rally

The emergence of the dual-purpose, loose-surface-specialist, off-road performance car is one of the better reasons for enthusiastic drivers like us to be cheerful. From the Porsche 911 Dakar and Lamborghini Huracán Sterrato right the way through to the Ford Ranger Raptor and Bowler Bulldog, we've had quite a constant and varied supply of these lovably rogue and madcap mud-pluggers over the past 10 years of car industry history. And now, if you want to go fast and have fun on gravel and mud as well as on the road in 2025, you can do so in all kinds of different ways. Take, for example, the three fast off-roaders we have gathered at the Sweet Lamb Motorsport Complex in Wales for what should be a fantastic day of testing. They are, respectively, appealingly little, usably mid-sized and unapologetically large. Hobbyist, daily driver and indomitable do-it-all. We've got rear-engined rear-wheel drive, all-electric four-wheel drive and V8-engined, proper mechanical four-wheel drive on offer, to suit whatever your requirement. These cars are about as different from each other as anything you're likely to see sharing space in an Autocar comparison test. But all should be great fun on what is ostensibly a gravel rally stage that's ours for the day. At just 715kg, the Ariel Nomad 2 is the kind of flyweight thrill-seeker most would stick on a trailer to transport and use. One towed by something like the 2510kg Land Rover Defender Octa, quite possibly. Could the tow car actually be as much fun as what's towed? Could it get close? Let's see. At 2343kg, meanwhile, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally isn't far behind the range-topping Defender on kerb weight, although it comfortably beats it for torque-to-weight ratio and claimed on-asphalt 0-62mph sprinting – not least because it's electric. On wheel travel, any-surface traction and towing capacity? Not so much. Sweet Lamb's dark side So, we have spaceframe construction and motorsport-grade long-travel passive suspension here, up against just about the cleverest and most versatile interlinked active air suspension that a global car manufacturer can come up with. The niche-industry Nomad probably cost less to develop, from clean sheet to finished product, than JLR spent on the Octa's 6D Dynamics interlinked hydraulic damper system alone. Meanwhile, the Mach-E Rally is, on the face of it, just a £2250 option on an existing performance EV. Some retuned dampers, longer coil springs, white-faced alloy wheels, underbody protection panels and Michelin CrossClimate 2 all-season tyres. How serious could that be? Answers to all those questions and more will follow shortly after the nice man in the pick-up truck opens the gate on the steep, rutted and, in places, adversely cambered gravel playground. The bad news for the Defender, and to an extent the Mach-E, is that it's fairly narrow, perhaps twice the width of a Nomad as an average but at points an even tighter squeeze. The surface is sun-baked gravel and dirt, with plumes of drifting dust eddying up from it behind you as you drive, which the spring sunshine hits and beams through like rising flame. It's a 'loose' surface in quite unforgiving terms. The stones across it range in size from smaller than marbles to larger than cigarette packets – and, as stones do, they pile up on the outside of corners, making the grip ebb away just where you need it to come to your aid. There are, in places, channels, holes and gullies to drop wheels into on the inside of those same corners – and not all of them will help you. There's a tight hairpin bend with ruts deep enough to throw you offline and a roughly sheep-sized rock to stop you taking a wide line on entry. There are a couple of faster downhill, off-camber bends that will be unforgiving if you're too quick going in (and, sooner or later in cars like these, you're sure to be). There are sheer drops looming just beyond the margins of the 'road' in places. And there's a jump. Of course there is. It's going to be something of a leveller, this place. Commitment will be needed to get very far into fourth gear even on the quickest stretches, so I'm not sure how much use 626bhp will be to the Land Rover, or even 480bhp to the Ford. Accessible torque should go a long way, though, but only if it's matched by proper gravel traction and stopping power. Cars of many parts The Defender Octa is the kind of big, heavy car that can take some serious punishment. You arrive in it at a place like Sweet Lamb, with its tracks, fields, streams and climbs in every direction, with not a flicker of unease. That's partly because your journey has already been so remarkably pleasant. The Octa takes to on-road motorway and A-road miles with very little compromise whatsoever to its rolling refinement associated with its beefed-up running gear – and big-hitting overtaking pace when you need it. But it's also because this car's sheer rough-stuff capability is exceptional. We've had a dry winter, so it happens that the ford you have to cross to gain access to The Mile Loop is at a low level on the day of our test, and all three cars can cross it easily. But if it had been 18in deeper? The Defender – with its 1000mm wading depth – would simply have had the fun all to itself, and the Nomad might have ended up somewhere a lot farther downstream in the Wye Valley. Getting to where you want to be in order to enjoy yourself in fairly remote places like this, and carrying with you what you will need when you get there, is a significant part of the equation when assessing how much fun these cars can provide in the broadest of senses. And on all of that stuff, the Defender has a mighty head start when you stop to think about it. Are usability and capability – or, rather, the want of them – significant hurdles for the electric Ford? In some ways, I'd say so – but not all. The Mach-E GT wasn't the most efficient EV you could spend £70,000 on before Ford jacked up the ride height by 20mm and fitted those all-season tyres to it. As the Rally, it will do a little over 210 miles as a touring electric range, which meant it arrived at our Welsh rallying idyll with about 75% battery capacity showing, with the nearest rapid charger a good 25 miles away. Focuses the mind, that. I won't be ruining the verdict, however, to tell you that the Mach-E survives a fairly long day's off-road use, with a couple of leadfoots taking plenty of entertainment from it, and leaves at the end with more than enough range remaining to guarantee its onward progression. As a very basic test of the primary usability of an EV made with this sort of driving in mind, I reckon that's valid: and the Mach-E Rally passes it. But, at all points, we keep a wary eye on that range meter, in a way we simply don't need to with the fossil-fuelled alternatives, and perhaps have just a little less outright fun as a result. On a more normal day, of course, the Mach-E Rally is still a car you could get all manner of profitable, zero-emissions use out of. It's practical but not huge; fast, alternative and interesting to drive but not a six-figure buying prospect. Suited to the school run, supermarket shop, office commute and football practice. It has five doors, five usable seats and Ford-typical real-world appeal baked right in. Need we point out that the Nomad, er, doesn't? I doubt it, because it's the kind of car you take giant helpings of enjoyment from on the more limited occasions you have to drive it, not the other way around. The one with the green frame that Ariel brought to Sweet Lamb for us has Perspex side protection to stop the breeze billowing up your trouser legs so much, as well as a canvas roof as rain protection. You expect to finish driving it by removing so much dust from your various facial orifices, but it actually shelters you from all that fairly well. Hit a water splash in it at pace, though, and… you get wet. But generally, it doesn't throw enough dirt into the cockpit to make you wish you had packed ski goggles or to make it a mission to clean up afterwards. The Nomad may be the kind of car you would only really ever seek to have fun in, but what fun it is. You can have one with a rally-style hydraulic handbrake fitted if you want (as our test car has), in addition to the optional winch, roof-mounted headlights and gorgeous Öhlins TTX suspension – and, trust me, you should. Crunch time Onto the gravel we go, then. In descending order, 534lb ft of torque per tonne in the Ariel plays 271lb ft in the Ford and only 235lb ft in the Octa. Even there, you can start to see the enormous difference that the Nomad's lightness makes. But the proper all-terrain tyres of the Nomad and Octa will have an impact, too, versus the more road-intended rubber of the Mach-E, while peak torque at revs isn't the same thing as accessible torque right under your big toe, right at the wheel where you need it most. Is your idea of a fun gravel driving experience something pointy, drifty and responsive, which rotates freely as you turn it in and 'gas it up'? Whose cornering attitude can be adjusted with power as quickly and easily as a flick of your ankle and roll of your wrists? S omething that powers away from 50mph corners with a real surge of urgency and a carefree wiggle of its hips? Well, you might be surprised just how well the Mach-E Rally fits the bill. Being electric might actually make it more fun than it would otherwise be here. It's lively and responsive to the controls at speeds that don't make you fear for what's waiting on the other side of the grass verge. The bigger, more stable, more under-control-feeling Octa isn't quite so lively. That's partly a function of grip and partly of size. It has loads of grip on gravel, its Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac all-terrain tyres chewing through the surface scree and making it ready to pull bigger speeds than the confines of this circuit really allow something of its sheer size. It feels a bit like a monster truck on a Race of Champions stadium circuit. The Mach-E's all-season Michelins get to about 50mph, by contrast, and then start to skate around on the top layer of stones, their tread blocks failing to clear the rubble they're bombarded with, and allowing the chassis' naturally more expressive tendencies to start to become a liability. So driving the Ford on gravel is a kind of quick-quick-slow progression; you will have a blast, provided you don't go too fast. In the tighter bends, there's nothing the Defender's posh active suspension can really do, by comparison, about the more languid chassis responses of a bigger, taller, heavier car, but the Mach-E feels much lower, keener and more willing to be teased into a positive cornering attitude than the Land Rover, which only really wants to tuck its nose in under trail-braking (although it will certainly do it). Both cars are fun. The Defender is leagues tougher and more capable and would come into its own on a quicker, wider gravel track, I'd wager. But here and now and in a corner of the Powys countryside that seems to suit it peculiarly well, the Ford is actually the more addictive driver's car. And then you get into the Nomad and it's like you're in another place altogether and engaged in an interactive physical act of a different order of magnitude. The Octa ultimately goes perhaps 10-15% further than a regular Defender for entertainment factor but still trades squarely on its assured feel. It can only make so much room to really entertain you without the risk of bursting that safe, silver-lined bubble. The Mach-E goes further still, but its ultimate lack of grip, ground clearance and damping authority would make you fear for it if tougher, quicker surfaces and tests presented. But the Nomad simply yums it all up, lets you feel every little deflection and work for every correction, and puts itself on a different plane of motoring existence in the process. It is enormous, monumental fun. It's a test of nerve to begin with, though, and a huge change of tone. Because suddenly every channel, bump, ridge, rock and camber gets right through to your fingertips and backside. The Defender was filtering them out, mostly, although you didn't know it; the Ford only hinting at them. But the Nomad broadcasts them right into your forearms and shoulders. Lots of physical effort is involved in getting on its level and armfuls of corrective lock require plenty of fast dexterity. But it gives back what you put in and more, with its incredible, oh-so-faithful handling. On 16in wheels and chunkily sidewalled Yokohama all-terrain tyres, it finds plenty of grip and traction on the gravel but still demands a much closer watching brief before you can let all 382lb ft loose through the rear wheels without a bodily reaction. The steering communicates tirelessly, so you know without doubt when you're on a good line and, very clearly, when you're not. Get wide, get lazy, turn in in the wrong gear or fluff your lines with the pedals and you will have plenty to sort out. But drive well and you can take pretty much whatever line and angle through a third-gear, 50mph corner you want to and feel every move the chassis makes. And the most awe-inspiring move is when it takes to the air. The jump on the Mile Loop isn't a desperately quick one, but it is quite steep and severe. You wouldn't risk what damage the Defender's bulk could do to itself by jumping it there; even less the not-as-well-damped, shorter-travel Mach-E. But the Nomad takes it like some magic flying La-Z-Boy armchair. It vaults like a gazelle but, thanks to that Öhlins suspension and its modest weight, comes back down to earth in a more comfortable, matter-of-fact way than you would ever believe possible. And so you line it up again, just to check it wasn't a fluke. The same way you do once you've found the perfect line through that tricky off-camber corner. And you don't stop until you're blowing and grinning in gloriously equal measure. Cars this compelling may not play by the rules, but they're absolutely worth making room, time, occasion and effort for. The Nomad vividly proves that if you really want to have fun off road, committing fully and putting the effort in truly pays off – and it does it in singularly superb fashion. The Result 1st. Ariel Nomad 2 Has neither usability nor capability to worry about and feels superbly, vividly liberated as a result. Fun on the loose like just about nothing else. 2nd. Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally A simple, direct and surprisingly effective way to enjoy yourself on gravel, although it lacks some toughness, stamina and true capability. 3rd. Land Rover Defender Octa Would get you to almost anywhere there is fun to be had and with plenty of entertaining flourish. Needs a big canvas to really impress as a driver's car, though. ]]>

When racing got real: The nail-biting early days of British touring cars
When racing got real: The nail-biting early days of British touring cars

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

When racing got real: The nail-biting early days of British touring cars

Race fans loved watching familiar motors duke it out The British Touring Car Championship is famed for its thrilling, close-fought action – a spectacle it has been providing for an impressive seven decades. Britain's first proper touring car race occurred in 1952. The British Racing Drivers' Club had previously held a catch-all 'production car race' at its annual International Trophy meeting at Silverstone, but this time it decided to run two separate races for sports cars and touring cars. Autocar's sports editor, John Cooper (not that one), explained: 'No better way of assessing the relative performance capabilities of cars of any sort can be imagined than the straightforward one of racing them one against the other. 'Certain modifications are permitted, partly in the interests of safety and partly to render the task of the car's tuning and preparation somewhat easier than would otherwise be the case, but in all the essential features these cars are the same as those which are described in the catalogues, and which we could buy if they were not in short supply and if we had enough money.' Such racing predictably proved popular with British car makers, and the public loved it too. Hence it became a regular feature at Britain's multi-race club obvious next step was to create a championship, and it was the secretary of the British Racing and Sports Car Club, Ken Gregory, who made it happen. His plan was to run the British Saloon Car Championship on the same ticket as sports car and junior single-seater races. The premise remained as our man had described in 1952, and to balance the varying performance levels, cars would be divided into four classes – meaning a 0.9-litre Austin A35 had the same chance of glory as a 4.0-litre Jensen 541, even though they would never dice with one another on track. Gregory was also a director at Brands Hatch, so the Kent circuit staged a trial run on Boxing Day 1957 – and, this being a success, the host to the first points-scoring BSCC round in early April 1958. Enjoy full access to the complete Autocar archive at the In cold and dry weather, the first saloon race proved 'quite the most interesting of the afternoon', we reported. 'It was won almost as a foregone conclusion by Jack Sears, adding yet another victory to his string of successes with the Austin A105. But in the sub-1200cc class, tremendous battles were going on. For 11 laps, the A35s of George 'Doc' Shepherd and John Sprinzel circled as a pair, inches apart, until finally Sprinzel managed to overtake. 'There was a second race for cars up to 1600cc and over 3500cc. The [Mk1] Jaguar 3.4s, driven by Tommy Sopwith [son of the famous plane designer] and Gawaine Baillie, again took first and second with impressive ease.' Sprinzel and Sopwith won out again at Brands later that month, while Tommy Bridger made himself unpopular, you might assume, by topping the 1200-1600cc class in a German Borgward Isabella, 'making the most of its fine cornering'. Sprinzel made it a hat-trick as the BSCC headed to Mallory Park in Leicestershire in May, while Baillie benefited from Sopwith's car shedding a tyre – and Harold Grace 'had a spectacular escape when he inverted his Riley 1.5 in a ditch'. There was another Sprinzel and Sopwith show at Brands later that month, and again in June, albeit with the Jaguar man 'having to work very hard' to steal the lead from his team-mate on the last lap. Next up was Crystal Palace in Croydon, where for the first time all of the saloon classes shared a circuit. It was Sopwith again, while Shepherd 'went surprisingly fast' to finish sixth in his baby Austin. Three more Brands races would take the series to its conclusion, the first coming on an overcast August bank holiday. 'Staple fare is the sight of a brace or more of 3.4s in the lead, cornering on the door handles. This was no exception.' And nor was the September meet. So you'd assume Sopwith had the title all wrapped up – but, in fact, Sears had been quietly racking up wins for Austin in the class below, and the two not only arrived at the October meet with equal points but ended it level too. The solution? A head-to-head in identical Riley 1.5s, swapping seats between two heats. The crowd were 'amply rewarded for waiting to the end' in torrential rain as Sears prevailed by 1.6sec on aggregate. Sopwith was perhaps vindicated in feeling aggrieved by the system – but, being British, he gave Sears a congratulatory handshake anyway. ]]>

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store