I refuse to buy my kid new school shoes so colour them in with a Sharpie to last instead – trolls call me a cheapskate
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A MOTHER has revealed that she is refusing to buy her child new school shoes for the rest of term as she has come up with a handy hack to keep her current pair looking fresh.
Samantha Potts, a savvy woman from the UK, explained that rather than constantly splashing the cash each term on new school shoes, she simply uses a Sharpie pen to colour in where the material has peeled off.
2
A savvy mum has shared that rather than buying her daughter new school shoes, she instead colours them in with a Sharpie
Credit: Tiktok/@samanthapotts05
2
But Samantha Potts was met with harsh criticism from many, with users even calling her a "cheapskate" for her actions
Credit: Tiktok/@samanthapotts05
But Samantha's quick and easy trick has been met with a barrage of nasty abuse, with mean trolls accusing her of being a 'cheapskate'.
Not only this, but other parents voiced their concern that Samantha's idea could set her young daughter, who is in primary school, up for "ridicule and bullying'.
Posting online, Samantha gave her followers a close-up look at her daughter's black shoes, with half of the gloss peeled off.
But with Samantha 'fed up of buying shoes', she got a permanent marker to give the tired footwear a freshen up for the last term.
Alongside her short clip, Samantha said: 'When it's the last term of the year at school and your kid has decided to peel off her shoes - you are now stood here colouring it in with a permanent marker because you don't want to buy any more shoes.'
Samantha then asked: 'The question is, do I pull this bit off so it's the whole front of one shoe? Do I keep it on? Who knows?'
Following this, she asked her followers: 'What will look better? I feel like at this stage it can't get any worse.'
Showing off her daughter's coloured-in patent shoes, Samantha recognised: 'I know they look bad.'
The TikTok clip, which was posted under the username @samanthapotts05 just 15 hours ago, has clearly left many open-mouthed, as it has quickly amassed 221,800 views.
Not only this, but it's also amassed 3,324 likes, 735 comments and 296 shares.
But trolls were stunned by Samantha's purse-friendly idea and many eagerly raced to the comments to voice their opinions.
One person said: 'Shoe Zone £10. Go buy some cheapskate.'
You can't let her walk around like that for six weeks, please buy her some shoes
TikTok user
Another added: 'Never would I send my kid to school in shoes like that, regardless of it being last term or not.'
A third commented: 'Asda do school shoes for £6, that works out at £1 a week!'
One mother fumed: 'You can't let her walk around like that for six weeks, please buy her some shoes.'
EXTRA HELP WITH SCHOOL UNIFORM COSTS
IF you can't get targeted help from your council, you might have some other options available to you.
In some areas, you can talk directly to your school, which might be able to offer you clothing.
Or, you might be able to get cheap garments from low-budget shops or charity stores.
Some charities offer help to families in need too.
But bear in mind charities often have a limited amount of money to give and usually have specific criteria which must be met in order to get a grant.
Charity Turn2Us has a free grants search tool on its website which you can use to find out what help is available to you.
Meanwhile, you can always try approaching your nearest Citizens' Advice branch.
If you don't know where your nearest Citizens' Advice branch is, you can find out by visiting www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/contact-us/nearby/.
If you're not eligible for a school uniform grant you might be able to get help through the Household Support Fund.
Whilst another slammed: 'Or just buy your kids new shoes! Would you go out like that? No.. so why make your child?'
At the same time, another fuming user wrote: 'I'll buy new shoes. This is not on. I get it times are hard but there has to be a pot for this stuff.
'I wouldn't dream of sending a child to school in those. Knowing how mean children can be, you're opening your child up to ridicule and bullying.'
She is only in Year 1, most days her dresses are covered in pen or paint or her lunch from the day and she couldn't care less so I don't think a little permanent marker on her shoes is gonna bother her
Samantha Potts
But in response to the haters, Samantha later responded: 'Wow, didn't expect this to blow up as much as it did.
'Just to clear a few things up - she's got 31 days left. Nine of those are PE so she will be in trainers.
'Why would I teach my kid that intentionally ruining something gets rewarded? It's wasteful and the structural integrity of the shoes are still there, if they were broken I'd replace them.
'She is only in Year 1, most days her dresses are covered in pen or paint or her lunch from the day and she couldn't care less so I don't think a little permanent marker on her shoes is gonna bother her.'
Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
The 1% Club stumps viewers with tricky question but some insist it's 'easy'
Viewers of the ITV game show The 1% Club were left baffled by a recent question that it's claimed 99% of people can't answer correctly - but some insisted it was 'too easy' This quiz question shared in a recent episode of the ITV game show The 1% club is said to be so difficult that a whopping 99% of people can't answer it correctly. Do you think you've got what it takes to solve it? Hosted by Lee Mack, The 1% Club sees contestants answer a series of questions which get increasingly harder as the game goes on. They begin with brainteasers that 90% of people are expected to get right, and slowly drop down the percentages until they arrive at the fiendishly difficult 1% question, which must be answered correctly in order to win the jackpot. A clip from a recent episode of the show was shared on TikTok and showed contestants attempting to solve the final question - a tricky puzzle that is aimed at the top 1% of the population. The question was: "If you remove all the underlined letters from the sentence below, what word can be spelt if you rearrange all of the remaining letters? "ONE S ELL I N G FR ES H SAL MO N." Contestants on the show only have 30 seconds to lock in their answer, and they cannot make notes, such as writing down what letters are left after removing the underlined ones. If you want to really consider yourself brainy enough to solve the 1% question, then you'll need to do the working out entirely in your head too - though we wouldn't blame you for using a pen and paper! Are you struggling to work out the answer? Let us give you a hint: the four-word sentence is another clue in itself. Think carefully about what "one selling fresh salmon" might mean, and you'll arrive at the answer. Don't scroll down any further before you've come to a conclusion on what you think the answer might be. We're about to tell you the solution, so check if you were right down below. Answer If you remove all the underlined letters, you're left with: "ONESIGFRHM." That doesn't mean anything as it is, but you should be able to work out the anagram now. If you keep the initial clue, "one selling fresh salmon", in mind as you look at the letters, you should arrive at one solution: Fishmonger. Commenters on the TikTok video were divided on the question. While some admitted it was "impossible" for them to solve, others argued it was "so easy", especially for a question deemed too tough for 99% of people. One person said: "This is impossible." Another added: "Couldn't figure it out, went to the comments for the answer. Didn't even see the four words staring me in the face as a clue." However, someone else stated: "It's easy if you read the clue in the sentence." There were also several people in the comments who didn't quite understand what they were supposed to be doing. Some were slightly incorrect by entering "fisherman" as the answer, while others missed the mark completely, suggesting answers such as "freshing", "aloneness", and "reformings".
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Adam Curtis can see your future
Adam Curtis used to make TikToks but doesn't want to talk about them. 'I did quite a lot of TikTok, privately,' he says, 'just under another name. They're probably out there somewhere…' His head rests in his hand and his elbow on the chair next to him, the two of us among pink flowers at the kitchen table in the Soho townhouse where he works. He looks at me and repeats: 'They're private.' For 30 years Curtis has been making documentaries for the BBC about how Britain became a sad place, or, in his own words: 'What happened after the Cold War, mixed in with a deeper sense of… I think melancholy. A sense we were once powerful.' Shifty is his new film. Outwardly the five episodes chart the breakdown of society's collective structures from Margaret Thatcher to Tony Blair. Really they are Curtis's attempt at tracing the origins of a strange emotion that he says has become general in Britain, a feeling that 'there is a big thing going on behind the surface'. 'I think there's something new going on inside people's heads and no one has got the language to describe it,' he tells me. It is this emotion, Curtis believes, that caused 'Leave' to win the Brexit referendum and explains Reform's popularity. He is describing a sort of revolutionary feeling, I think. If you go back and watch previous Curtis documentaries, flick between them, do an Adam Curtis to Adam Curtis, you realise that they mash together quite neatly, and that his work has a single ambition: to hold this anxious spirit to the sun, twirl it around in his hand and observe it from different angles. So Shifty is an origin story. Curtis says that during the 1980s and 1990s we privatised and financed our way into nasty self-centredness. People felt unmoored and politicians became unable to hold communities together. Curtis leaves it to the viewer to draw the easy line to today's politics. In one of the final scenes in the series, Peter Mandelson visits the Millennium Dome, which is then under construction. 'It's marvellous, absolutely marvellous,' he tells Tony Blair on a phone call. 'You'll think it's incredible, believe me. There's a zone with lots of emblems of Britain in it. I suddenly saw a photograph of a plate of toad-in-the-hole. I loved toad-in-the-hole when I was little!' The Blair government, and every government since, keeps giving us more toad-in-the-hole. Curtis's films are always about the past because he, like the politicians he describes, is unable to define the present. 'There are certain aspects of modern power that you cannot illustrate,' he says. 'And they make me cry, sometimes literally. I'm scrabbling for shots. I'll tell you what they are. They're computers. They govern our lives, but nothing happens. And that expands to things like HR because that's just men and women in glass offices doing keystrokes which will govern your life and destroy your life or whatever. But there's nothing there. Finance. I've gone mad sometimes looking for shots. The normal solution for a television journalist is to have a reporter gazing at a screen with the glow on their face musing to themselves. And I would not do that. You have to find another way.' 'This really gets me,' he continues. 'I feel like so much of the modern world is just not being recorded, got at.' I ask if he really cries about it. 'Out of frustration, yeah. Just like… 'Oh for fuck's sake! How do I illustrate this?' I can't do another shot of a server farm. I just can't.' Curtis says that as 'modern power' has become unillustratable, so has 'the self'. He says that in the BBC archive footage, somewhere in 1997 or 1998, people start to speak and carry themselves in unnatural ways when they know they are in front of a camera. This is before social media and reality television. He can't explain it. We also, obviously, spend a decreasing amount of time interacting with the physical world. 'Isn't that fascinating?' Curtis says. 'In the age where people are exposing themselves more and more and more and more, it's… [he's referring to 'the self'] not there.' I am aware that all of this talk of emotions and feelings and stories and the self sounds mysterious and perhaps overthought, but something in it is true when it comes from Curtis. 'You know that's not right, you know it from yourself,' he will say in conversation. Curtis used to narrate his documentaries, but doesn't anymore. His voice actually got deeper with every new series, until it vanished completely in his 2022 film Russia 1985-1999: TraumaZone, which is about the end of the Soviet Union. In his films and in person Curtis does not make arguments, he summons moods. He also refuses to use the word 'vibe'. A still from TraumaZone (Adam Curtis / BBC) 'Dominic Cummings got in touch with me after my Russia thing,' Curtis says. 'He was in Russia during that time. I just found him very funny. I like his snark, and I like the fact that he realises that the bubble is not good. I respect him for that.' I ask whether politicians have asked him to help them portray their vision of the country to the population. He says he has been contacted by politicians, and that they 'are always after something', but that 'no one has ever asked me to help them.' People speculate about Curtis's own politics, and he makes it very clear to me that he is not a liberal. 'Never trust a liberal,' he says. 'The one thing the patrician liberals can't examine is themselves. They really cannot do it. I find it absolutely astonishing. After Brexit, they didn't examine their role in it. They did not examine any role they might have played.' Curtis says his views on politics are born out of north Kent, where he comes from. 'It's… What's the word… Independent,' he says. 'That's the polite way of putting it.' Can you explain that a little more, I ask. 'No,' he replies. Fair enough. 'I challenge anyone to say what my politics are,' he says later, 'because quite frankly I haven't got any. I'm a completely modern creature, like you I'm sure, and a lot of my friends. I react to events as they come along. You are aware that power is unequal and you shouldn't cry about that fact.' 'We might be living through a revolution, but we don't know it' We go to the study where Curtis edits. There is some Lana Del Rey merch, two monitors and a mess of hard-drives. (The townhouse is not his, by the way. It is owned by a bohemian lady. She lets him work here.) 'Every now and then, I wonder whether it's going to crash,' he says, nodding at the mess. 'Well, I mean, it does crash… But it's going to properly crash. And then I'm fucked.' He says that the hard part of his job is coming up with 'the idea and the stories'. It took him about nine months to come up with the introduction to Bitter Lake, which is the best sequence of any of his films, and ten minutes to make it. Curtis finds editing is easy and satisfying, and does it late at night. 'There's a whole tradition, and it goes so deep, of editors, probably because they're not really in control and they want their bit of control, they go: 'We've got to cut a frame off… here'. I know that no one notices that. What they really notice is whether it's drawing them in, whether they're going along with you for the ride.' Because he edits his documentaries himself, he costs the BBC very little. Shifty cost £17,500 to make. Curtis's next documentary might be about America, he says, but it could also be about 'living in a society where a lot of things look normal but actually behind them they're not.' We are currently, he says, 'in a sort of cosplay of everything. And behind it, there's this seething mass.' 'We might be living through a revolution, but we don't know it because it's happening already inside millions of people's heads. It'll suddenly burst through to us: 'OH MY FUCK!''
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Check your rare coins for penny design worth eye-watering £200k
There's a possibility your coin stash is worth an absolute fortune – but only if you own this unique penny. One avid collector shared more information on his TikTok Your coin collection is about to make you richer. It's no secret certain rare coins are worth more than others. There's often change which could make you a lot of money, especially if you take it to auction or flog it on eBay. Now did you know there's a penny estimated to be worth £200,000? Over on TikTok, one avid collector revealed the "intriguing" coin which could be lingering in your pocket. The @coincollectingwizard boasts a mega 294,000 followers where he shares the most unique designs to look out for. Just previously, he mentioned the valuable change that could make you rich. And just a few days ago, he shared the £200,000 coin from 1952 which is the "rarest proof penny of the entire series of copper and bronze pennies". In the video, which scooped 500 likes and dozens of comments, he said: "This penny is estimated to sell for £200,000 at auction, do you have one? This is a UK penny from 1952, this intriguing proof coin is the rarest proof penny of the entire series of copper and bronze pennies." He continued: "The existence of this unique 1952 proof penny was not known publicly until its initial appearance at numismatic auction in October of 1997, some 45 years after it was struck. The British numismatic world was astonished to see this coin appear and in proof quality as this was not known to exist. "The 1952 proof penny remains an enigma as the only unique proof striking of a pre-decimal penny of the 20th century. It is perhaps understandable that George VI in 1952 proof penny remains a unique piece as the King died very early that year passing away on the February 6. It will go up for auction and is estimated to reach £200,000 if not more." Since it was posted on social media, it garnered a lot of attention from collectors who claimed to own the same coin. Others described the design as "nice", while others asked for advice on how to flog the coin. According to experts, the 1952 penny is a unique and highly valuable coin. Although no ordinary circulation pennies were struck in that year, a single proof penny was made. But it was not known to the public until 1997, where it appeared at auction. And today, this coin is dubbed the "numismatic unicorn". It's popular among collection due to its unique status and the fact it was struck during a period of royal transition – when King George VI died and Queen Elizabeth II ascended to the throne. It features a profile of King George VI on one side with the words "GEORGIVS VI D: G: BR: OMN: REX FIDEI DEF". Meanwhile, on the reverse the words "ONE PENNY 1952" is written with Britannia seated. Just last year, the same coin turned heads among collectors where it was also worth the same price tag. Think you have one of these coins in your wallet? Leave us a comment below!
