
Democratic Congress member demands investigation after staffer handcuffed by DHS
Democratic Congress member demands investigation after staffer handcuffed by DHS The incident, which occurred on May 28, began after the staffer saw federal agents detaining migrants outside a courtroom.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
First 'self deportation' flight leaves with group of migrants
The first Department of Homeland Security 'self deportation' flight left with a group of 64 migrants.
'She was obviously traumatized. Now the fact is that this was totally unacceptable, the tactics were totally unacceptable, and they needed a warrant,' Nadler told CNN.
Nadler claimed that one of the officers pushed his aide and she pushed back, and was then shackled.
WASHINGTON - Rep. Jerrold Nadler is demanding a congressional investigation after an aide at his Manhattan office was handcuffed and detained by Department of Homeland Security officers.
The incident, which occurred on May 28, began after the staffer saw federal agents detaining migrants outside a courtroom located in the same building as the New York Democrat's office, according to The New York Times.
Robert Gottheim, Nadler's chief of staff, told The New York Times in an interview that staff members had invited immigration rights advocates who witnessed the detentions to the office.
Nadler alleged in a CNN interview on June 2 that the officers had "barged" into his office because the officers were "upset" that his staff members watched them detain immigrants.
"And they were upset that my staff invited some of the observers up to my office. They then came up to the office and demanded entrance. One of my staff members said, you can't come in here, you need a warrant. They said, 'No, we don't need a warrant,' which is incorrect," Nadler said.
Nadler further claimed that one of the officers pushed his aide and she pushed back, and was then shackled. Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin alleged in a statement that the aide "became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office."
In a video shared by Gothamist, a New York City-focused news website that first reported the incident, an officer with the Federal Protective Service, part of the Department of Homeland Security, can be seen handcuffing an apparently distressed staffer. Another officer had confronted a second Nadler aide, who asked for a warrant.
'You're harboring rioters in the office,' the officer claimed, according to the video.
Nadler wrote in a statement after the incident that no arrests were made and that he was 'alarmed by the aggressive and heavy-handed tactics' used by the Department of Homeland Security.
'She was obviously traumatized. Now the fact is that this was totally unacceptable, the tactics were totally unacceptable, and they needed a warrant,' Nadler told CNN. "And my office is a congressional office. It's a completely separate branch of government. A co-equal branch of government with the executive for which they work. And they had no right to come in."
McLaughlin said in a statement the officers were conducting a security check after hearing reports that protesters were allegedly present in Nadler's office.
"Based on earlier incidents in a nearby facility, FPS officers were concerned about the safety of the federal employees in the office and went to the location to ensure the safety and wellbeing of those present," she said.
Nadler said he is writing a letter to Rep. Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanding an investigation of the incident.
USA TODAY reached out to the House Judiciary Committee for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Chinese history repeating itself in the US?
Scholars and commentators in both the US and China are drawing comparisons between the early months of President Donald Trump's second term and communist dictator Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution. But some believe the way of Mao is unlikely to take root in America. CNN's Kristie Lu Stout explores the similarities and differences between the two leaders.


Fox News
44 minutes ago
- Fox News
New York Post editorial slams Zohran Mamdani's plan as 'taxing Whites more,' calls it 'pure racism'
Print Close By Marc Tamasco Published June 28, 2025 The New York Post's editorial board published a scathing piece on New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plan to "tax Whites more" on Friday, calling the proposed tax scheme "pure racism." The Post editorial argued that Mamdani's plan to shift the city's tax burden to "richer and Whiter" neighborhoods shows "where his priorities really are," and slammed the democratic socialist for looking to "punish" White people. A housing policy document posted to Mamdani's official website states that if he were elected, his administration would "shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and Whiter neighborhoods." The document can be found here. MAMDANI'S PRIMARY WIN EXPOSES DEMOCRAT DIVIDE AS TOP LEADERS WITHHOLD ENDORSEMENTS "How will he do this? Well, once elected, he would 'push… assessment percentages down for everyone,' which, like most of what Mamdani proposes, is highly unlikely," the board ribbed. The editorial board claimed that "King Mamdani" would then "adjust rates up" — based on the racial demographics of the neighborhood. Mamdani's official website states that the plan would "effectively lower tax payments for homeowners in neighborhoods like Jamaica and Brownsville while raising the amount paid in the most expensive Brooklyn brownstones." "So what percentage of paleness classifies a neighborhood as White?" The Post editorial questioned. "A plurality? Fifty percent?" The newspaper pointed out the absurdity of using racial demographics as a determining factor in the city's tax code by noting that neighborhoods like Williamsburg, which is 57% White, would be taxed at a higher rate than somewhere like Astoria, where Mamdani lives, which is 48% White. BROADCAST BIAS: NETWORKS SHIELD NYC SOCIALIST MAMDANI FROM 'EXTREME' LABEL THEY APPLY TO CONSERVATIVES The editorial continued to pick apart the mayoral candidate's alleged race-based tax proposal, questioning if he plans on going door-to-door to ensure that "those nefarious Caucasians" pay their "White tax." "Mamdani could have proposed property tax fixes that focused exclusively on valuation, but that's not what his campaign is really about," The Post editorial asserted. "It's about identity politics and a 'hierarchy of oppression.'" According to The New York Times, Mamdani outperformed his opponents in both "higher-income neighborhoods" and in areas with "more White residents." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP The Post editorial left the mayoral hopeful with this concluding message: "Sorry, Zohran — we need a mayor for all New Yorkers." Mamdani's press team did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Print Close URL


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
CNN's Scott Jennings rips liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan for nationwide injunction hypocrisy: ‘Some of these folks really are hacks'
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. Conservative CNN pundit Scott Jennings ripped liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kegan as a partisan hack for opposing the elimination of nationwide injunctions – despite wanting to end the practice when President Biden was in power. Jennings called out Kagan – one of three dissenters in Friday's historic Supreme Court ruling that prevents district court judges from interfering with a president's agenda – for previously and publicly slamming the widespread abuse of nationwide injunctions during a Democratic presidency. 'I was trying to sort out my feelings on this matter, and I came up with a quote from a very smart lawyer, and I just want to quote it, because I think she was right when she said it,' the political commentator quipped on CNN's 'Saturday Morning Table for Five.' Advertisement 3 Scott Jennings on CNN discussing a Supreme Court decision. mediaite ''It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks.' Justice Elena Kagan in 2022 said that, of course, when we had a democratic president. Now she voted against the decision on Friday. 'Just goes to show you that some of these folks really are hacks.' The lefty justice made the comment at a Northwestern University law school talk three years ago. Advertisement 3 CNN's 'Table for Five' panel discussion. mediaite Does anyone remember Justice Kagan being against nationwide injunctions when we had a DEMOCRAT President? Pepperidge Farms remembers. — Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) June 28, 2025 Kagan told the audience that 'It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.' Advertisement Jennings called the 6-3 ruling a 'great day' for Trump after host Abby Phillips remarked how nationwide injunctions have 'been sort of the bane of existence' for both Democratic and Republican presidents. 3 President Trump at a White House press conference. / MEGA 'I'm glad they went ahead and fixed it because it's not right that one of these individual district court judges can act like a king or a monarch and stop the elected president from acting,' Jennings added. Advertisement President Trump has been slapped with at least 25 national injunctions on everything from spending reforms to education policy and deportation policies in the first five months of his second term in the White House. Kagan's liberal peers, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, also voted along ideological lines to reject the high court decision.