
John Robson: Land Acknowledgements: Either Give the Land Back or Stop Saying It's Stolen
In response to Donald Trump's various insults, threats, and tariffs, we have apparently never been prouder to be Canadian. Why, I flew a 'God Save The King' flag on the Victoria Day long weekend and nobody threw a rock. Unless you count the Governor General, presenting the 'Award of Merit' to various police persons on behalf of the King,
Just not in a good way, because it's untrue, malicious, and hypocritical. Also pervasive in the public sector as the revolt of the elites continues. Hence, some meddlesome government body 'sits on the traditional lands of the Haudenosaunee & Anishinabek peoples, and we want to thank the Indigenous people for their continued care and protection of All of Our Relations on this shared land.'
It's nonsense, from the fiction of pre-contact Eden to their exercising ongoing stewardship of our private property to the 'All of Our Relations' nonsense about, presumably, Brother Beaver, Sister Sumac, and Mother-In-Law Mosquito. And the 'Haudenosaunee,' a.k.a. Iroquois Confederacy, hated and feared by their neighbours at the time of European contact, sharing with the 'Anishinabek'
If you think truth matters, and if not, God save us, British rule put an end to chronic low-scale warfare, complete with torture, enslavement, and cannibalism, and bestowed peace, order, and good government. It was highly imperfect, including bigoted denial of the right to vote. But to portray Sir John A. Macdonald as genocidal and the Mohawks as pacifists cannot lead us anywhere but into darkness.
The effort is malicious. Humans are flawed, in infuriating ways, and no institutions can entirely erase original sin. But the appropriate response is a difficult combination of humility and resolve, accepting that the most infuriatingly flawed person we ever have to deal with is ourself. Political, social, and intellectual radicalism does the opposite, crusading against
Related Stories
5/12/2025
5/6/2025
As G.K. Chesterton wrote, 'all feeble spirits naturally live in the future, because it is featureless; it is a soft job… It requires real courage to face the past… full of facts which cannot be got over; of men certainly wiser than we and of things done which we could not do.' But people who preen about unceded land aren't just claiming if they'd been there in 1867, or 1667, they'd dramatically have outperformed the clods who did stumble onto the historical stage. They're pretending they did, so brilliantly that aboriginals still own the land we're sitting on, sneering at them.
Which brings me to the issue of hypocrisy. Every time I sit with clenched teeth through one of these land acknowledgements, and by the way, I have discovered that I am far from alone, I want to leap up and shout, 'If you think your building belongs to someone else, what's your plan for immediately giving it back?'
If you went up to some aboriginal and said, 'Hey, buddy, here's your stolen bicycle,' he or she would certainly, and rightly, anticipate your handing it over at once. To pedal smugly off, leaving them on foot instead, would evoke outrage. But how else can one describe the monotonous, sanctimonious insistence that Ottawa, Victoria, and indeed all of Canada belong to them but can't have it nyah nyah?
If you really think it's theirs, you have a binding obligation to return it. And in ye badde olde days, a key function of police officers was to locate, seize, and restore stolen property. Nowadays, the GG droned, 'As police officers, or as leaders and supporters of those in uniform, you must fulfill many roles – from social worker to first responder, and from conflict mediator to expert communicator.' But never mind, 'Daddy is a cop, son. He arrests bad men.'
Today, once you strap on the badge, pistol, pepper spray, truncheon, handcuffs, and scary vest, 'You support your communities through the toughest times – whether it's helping accident victims, assisting families in crisis, comforting those affected by violence, or addressing issues related to drug use and mental health.' Which arguably includes providing counselling and support to aboriginals dismayed that we're openly saying it's their land, then not giving it back because 'Our society is diverse and constantly evolving,' especially when it comes to conceptions of truth and honour.
It won't do. If we want to be a country we can and should be proud of, then either give the land back or stop saying it's stolen.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Total Mental Collapse': Trump Ripped After 'Insane' New Ramble In Europe
President Donald Trump spent part of his weekend in Scotland reviving his old grievances against wind power, even claiming at one point that it was 'killing' Americans. During a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump abruptly detoured from immigration to wind turbines. 'And the other thing I say to Europe: We will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States,' Trump said. 'They're killing us.' He added: 'They're killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains ― and I'm not talking about airplanes. I'm talking about beautiful plains, beautiful areas in the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place. It's a horrible thing. It's the most expensive form of energy. It's no good. They're made in China, almost all of them.' He complained that wind turbines 'rust and rot in eight years,' and then can't be 'buried' because they will harm the soil. 'The whole thing is a con job,' he said. 'It's very expensive. And in all fairness, Germany tried it and wind doesn't work.' Much of what the president said was wildly inaccurate: Germany gets more than a quarter of its energy from wind, turbines last about 30 years (not eight) according to the U.S Department of Energy, it's not the most expensive form of energy, and they're not 'almost all' made in China. Several users asked Grok, the AI tool within X, to fact-check Trump's claims on wind power. Here's a typical response: Trump, who has frequently attacked renewable energy, has a special hatred of wind power that likely began some two decades ago, when an offshore wind farm was proposed near the land that would become his golf resort in Scotland. He sued to block it, lost, and has complained about wind and other forms of renewable energy since. He mentioned that on Sunday as well. 'Today I'm playing the best course I think in the world, Turnberry ― even though I own it ― it's probably the best course in the world, right?' he said. 'And I look over the horizon and I see nine windmills... I said, 'Isn't that a shame? What a shame.'' Trump has previously taken his anti-wind stance to absurd extremes, such as in 2019, when he falsely claimed wind turbines cause cancer. 'The wind, the wind, it sounds so wonderful,' he said last year. 'The wind, the wind, the wind is, the wind is bullshit, I'll tell you.' Trump's critics called him out for his latest out-of-the-blue tirade against wind energy:

28 minutes ago
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal
HONG KONG -- A Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal said Monday it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, a move that could please Beijing but bring more U.S. scrutiny to the geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison Holdings' initial plan to sell port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes U.S. investment firm BlackRock Inc. pleased President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the critical shipping lane's operations in Panama. However, they apparently angered Beijing and drew a review from Chinese anti-monopoly authorities. A Beijing-backed newspaper posted scathing commentaries about the deal, with one describing it as a betrayal of all Chinese. Beijing's offices overseeing Hong Kong affairs have reposted some of these commentaries, widely seen as an indication of Chinese leaders' stance. A Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. After months of uncertainty brought by tensions between Washington and Beijing, Hutchison said in a statement that the exclusive negotiations period with the consortium has expired. However, it added 'the Group remains in discussions with members of the consortium with a view to inviting major strategic investor from the PRC to join as a significant member of the consortium,' referring to the People's Republic of China. It said they needed to change the membership of the consortium and the structure of the transaction for the deal to be able to pass reviews by 'all relevant authorities." The awkward position Hutchison found itself in for months highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing's expectations of national loyalty, especially when relations between China and the United States are strained. Hong Kong has overhauled its electoral system to ensure the city is run by 'patriots.' CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing. It announced March 4 that it would sell all its shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium that also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping Company. In May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor. Its parent company is led by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li's. The initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the canal. That agreement also required approval from Panama's government.


Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Europeans, Not Trump, Ended Up Chickening Out
Donald Trump's world tour of arm-twisting on trade has landed its latest deal: A 15% baseline tariff on European Union goods, lowered from the recently threatened 30%, in return for an apparent smorgasbord of continental investments into the US and huge purchases of energy and military equipment. Japan sealed a similar deal last week while pushing back on some extravagant Trumpian claims. 'It was the best we could get,' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said. Many will agree with her. The US is the EU's biggest trade partner and a dominant defense and technology supplier – a spiral of tit-for-tat tariffs is something Europeans simply can't afford, as LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE boss Bernard Arnault said last week. Sealing the deal before the Aug. 1 deadline at a level big companies say they find 'manageable' is market positive, lifting the tariff fog and avoiding a worst-case scenario drag on euro zone gross domestic product of 1.2%, according to Barclays Plc. From German autos to French aerospace, transatlantic trade is looking a little less stuck.