The Latest: Hegseth praises US attack on Iran but offers few details on the strikes' impact
President Donald Trump has insisted the U.S. strikes delivered a 'devastating' attack and that questioning his assessment of the strike was not only unpatriotic but also makes the pilots who dropped the bombs 'very upset.'
Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the U.S. strikes is difficult only days after they took place.
Here's the latest:
US economy shrank 0.5% between January and March, worse than earlier estimates had revealed
That's according to the Commerce Department in an unexpected downgrade from its previous estimate and came as President Trump's trade wars disrupted business.
First-quarter growth sank under a surge of imports as companies in the United States rushed to bring in foreign goods before Trump could impose tariffs on them. The Commerce Department previously estimated the economy fell 0.2% in the first quarter. Economists had forecast no change in the department's third and final estimate.
The January-March drop in gross domestic product — the nation's output of goods and services — reversed a 2.4% increase in the last three months of 2024 and marked the first time in three years that the economy contracted. Imports expanded 37.9%, fastest since 2020, and pushed GDP down by nearly 4.7 percentage points.
▶ Read more about the U.S. economy
The Pentagon news conference has ended
The Pentagon briefing included a detailed narrative about military tactics and hardware. However, it was short on information about how much the attack setback the Iranian nuclear program.
It's unclear how quickly Iran could repair the damage or rebuild its capabilities elsewhere. There have also been questions about whether Iran was able to move its enriched uranium before the U.S. strikes.
Hegseth said he didn't think that happened.
'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be — moved or otherwise,' he said.
Hegseth targets 'biased leaks to biased publications'
Military officials have said it will take time to fully understand the impact of U.S. strikes on Iran, and there was little in the way of new information about their damage.
But Hegseth said they decided to hold Thursday morning's news conference because 'there was a great deal of irresponsible reporting' based on a preliminary intelligence assessment. He criticized 'biased leaks to biased publications.'
'If you want to know what's going on at Fordo, you better go there and get a big shovel,' he said.
Military official describes Iranian missile attack on US base
The top U.S. military official recounted in detail the Iranian missile attacks on a U.S. military base in Qatar.
The description from Gen. Dan Caine, the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, appeared aimed at shifting the conversation from questions about political leadership and overall strategy to heroic narratives about individual U.S. service members.
He said roughly 44 American service members responsible for defending the entire base were present as rounds of Patriot missiles were launched. Caine says Qatar joined in the successful American defense of what he called the largest single Patriot engagement in U.S. military history.
Hegseth minimizes intelligence assessment
The defense secretary minimized the importance of a preliminary intelligence assessment that concluded U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities had damaged but not permanently destroyed them.
Hegseth scolded the media for 'breathlessly' focusing on an assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency even though the DIA is part of the Defense Department.
He said the assessment was preliminary and had not been coordinated with other agencies in the intelligence community. He said other intelligence assessments have been more bullish in their assessments on damage of the sites.
Trump tunes in
The president seems to be monitoring the Pentagon news conference, posting about it on social media. 'Watch it!' he wrote.
He also baselessly suggested that media outlets that reported on the intelligence assessment 'will be firing the reporters who made up the FAKE stories.'
Trump has been fixated on coverage of the U.S. strikes, which could determine how American voters view his decision to get involved in the latest war in the Middle East.
Hegseth berates the media
The news conference began with Hegseth, a former Fox News host, criticizing the media for 'hunting for scandals all the time.'
He accused reporters of failing to acknowledge 'historic moments' like improved military recruiting and increased spending on European defense by U.S. allies on the continent.
He then shifted to attacking the 'fake news' for reporting on a preliminary assessment about the impact of recent U.S. strikes on Iran.
Pentagon briefing begins to defend Trump on Iran strikes
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine assembled this morning to push the president's claims that the recent U.S. attack 'obliterated' Iranian nuclear facilities.
A preliminary assessment, produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, said American bombs and missiles caused a setback of only a few months. Trump has rejected this conclusion, lashing out at the news media for reporting on it and marshaling his administration to support his version of events.
Turkey's president wants to host peace talks with Russia, Ukraine and the US
Recep Tayyip Erdogan made the comments late Wednesday on a flight back from the NATO summit, where he met with Trump.
'Our ultimate goal is to host a leaders-level meeting in our country and to build the peace that we long for,' Erdogan said, according to a transcript of his comments made available on Thursday.
He also quoted Trump as expressing willingness to participate in peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in Turkey, if Russian President Vladimir Putin also agrees to attend.
Erdogan quoted Trump as saying: 'If Russian President Vladimir Putin comes to Istanbul or Ankara for a solution, I will also come to Istanbul or Ankara.'
Russian and Ukrainian delegations, meeting in Istanbul in late May and in June, agreed to swap thousands of dead and seriously wounded troops but made no progress toward ending the 3-year-old war.
Despite suggestions of a possible leaders' summit, Putin did not attend the talks, sending a low-level delegation instead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon Hosts Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania To Strengthen European Defense
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met Friday with his counterparts from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania at the Pentagon to discuss European defense spending and security challenges. The meeting comes as Baltic nations prepare to dramatically increase military budgets amid ongoing regional tensions. Hegseth praised Estonian Minister Hanno Pevkur, Latvian Minister Andris Sprūds, and Lithuanian Minister Dovilė Šakalienė for committing to allocate 5% of their respective countries' GDPs to defense by 2026. The spending target represents one of the highest defense investment rates among NATO allies. According to Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell, the Secretary 'appreciated the Baltic states' clear-eyed view of the European security environment.' Hegseth emphasized that European nations must take 'primary responsibility for Europe's conventional defense.' The defense leaders also explored ways to strengthen their nations' defense manufacturing capabilities. Building industrial capacity has become increasingly critical as allies seek to replenish weapons stockpiles and modernize military equipment. The Baltic states have emerged as some of NATO's most committed members in terms of defense spending. Their proximity to Russia has driven aggressive military modernization efforts in recent years. The Pentagon readout noted Hegseth's push for allies to convert higher spending into 'combat credible capabilities.' This reflects broader U.S. concerns about ensuring defense dollars translate into meaningful military readiness rather than bureaucratic overhead. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Makes Boeing's Doomsday Plane Different From Air Force One?
As the iconic Boeing 747 is on its final flight path to obsolescence, there are only a few airlines still flying them. Yet oddly enough, a handful of old 747s remain some of the most important aircraft in the country. There are modified versions of the aircraft used for both Air Force One and the so-called "Doomsday Plane" that's designed to be sort of a flying Pentagon in case of nuclear war. How old are these aircraft? The two planes serving as Air Force One have been transporting U.S. presidents around the world since the 20th century, with President George H.W. Bush taking his first flights in both in 1990. With aircraft that old, it's no wonder former Pizza Hut spokesperson Donald Trump is desperate to fly on a new Air Force One. And the Doomsday editions have been around even longer. Needless to say, it's hard to get parts for these out-of-production planes, which makes it hard to service them in a timely manner, and although they're still considered safe, they've served well past their expected life cycles. Boeing had contracted for new Air Force One planes under the Obama administration, but delays in the program and problems with other Boeing aircraft seem to have left that project up in the air. Which means the old Air Force One and Doomsday Planes are still up in the air, playing two very different roles. Read more: These Movies And TV Shows Have The Best Car Casting A Quick Look At Air Force One The two jets that serve as Air Force One started life as Boeing 747-200B airliners; the Air Force uses the designation VC-25A for the planes after they've been modified for presidential use. Technically, "Air Force One" is the radio call sign for a plane only when the president is on board; otherwise, they go by their tail numbers: 28000 and 29000. Now, Air Force One does have some (classified) defense systems, including some that hide the jet engines' heat signature from missiles, as well as other countermeasures meant to misdirect the missiles' flight. Its communications capabilities have been beefed up, too. But Air Force One is really about providing a place where the president can relax and/or do business while in the air. For starters, it can hold up to 71 passengers with an executive suite for the commander in chief, complete with its own shower. You'll also find a main conference room, smaller meeting rooms, and a medical suite (staffed by a flight surgeon and registered nurse). If folks get hungry, Air Force One has two galleys that can prepare 100 meals at a time. For the long haul, there are enough ingredients on board for 2,000 meals, and the aircraft can refuel while in flight. Escape pods? Those are only for movies so far, but maybe one will be added to Trump's so-called "free" plane from Qatar. A Quick Look At The Doomsday Plane First off, the Air Force doesn't officially refer to the E-4B -- another militarized version of the 747-200 -- as "Doomsday" anything. It's the Night Watch or, when it's on duty, the National Airborne Operations Center; its mission is to essentially act as the country's military command center in case the ground-based ones are destroyed in a nuclear war, zombie apocalypse, or other calamity. There are actually four of these planes now in service, all of which became operational in 1974. Due to the nature of their role, the exact details of the Night Watch aircraft are classified, of course, but there are a few general overviews out there. Based out of Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, the E-4Bs can fit up to 111 people, and one is on duty around the clock. Inside, the main deck is split into different stations with vague names like command center, conference room, communications room, etc. The E-4Bs also have their share of fancy defensive countermeasures. Perhaps the key difference is that the Nightwatch — unlike Air Force One — is shielded from thermal radiation and electromagnetic pulses (EMPs). That's good news considering how eager AI is to launch nukes when global trouble starts. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Renovating Trump's 'Free' Qatari Jet Is Going Great, Just Don't Ask About The Mysterious $934 Million Transfer No One Wants To Talk About
It may feel like it's already been years, but in reality, the news that President Trump decided to accept a "free" Boeing 747 from the nation of Qatar is only a couple of months old. It's no secret that, in order to use the plane as Air Force One, it will require an expensive and thorough renovation. How much are taxpayers actually spending on Trump's "free" plane, though? Well, that's classified, but it also sounds like early estimates of nearly a billion dollars may have actually been pretty accurate, the New York Times reports. Apparently, the Pentagon mysteriously transferred $934 million out of its nuclear missile modernization budget into "an unnamed classified project" that "congressional budget sleuths" believe "almost certainly includes the renovation of" Trump's allegedly free plane. We can't know for sure that money will be used on Trump's plane, and even if it is, they may not use the entire $934 million to renovate the plane, but according to the Times, Air Force officials have previously mentioned using money already allocated for nuclear modernization to turn the Qatari jet into a useable Air Force One. It's also important to remember that the current plan isn't for the U.S. government to keep the plane. Instead, it will supposedly be transferred to Trump's presidential library (which, notably, still doesn't exist) when Trump leaves office. So while work on the plane will reportedly begin soon, it will likely take at least a year, if not two, to get it ready for duty. That leaves very little time for Trump to use it as Air Force One. He is, after all, constitutionally ineligible to serve another term as President, at least if you go based on what the words in the Constitution say. Read more: These Are Your Favorite Factory Exhaust Designs Free For Trump, At Least When he was asked about the ethics of the whole plane thing back in May, Trump said, "I would never be one to turn down that kind of an offer. I mean, I could be a stupid person and say, 'No, we don't want a free, very expensive airplane.'" Which is great, except for the part where the American taxpayers are footing the bill for a plane the federal government won't even get to keep once Trump leaves office. As the Times put it: It is free in the sense that a used car handed over by a neighbor looking to get it out of his driveway is free. In this case, among the many modifications will be hardened communications, antimissile systems and engine capabilities to take the president quickly to safety as one of the older Air Force Ones did on Sept. 11, 2001, when Al Qaeda attacked the United States. And there is the delicate matter of ridding the jet of any hidden electronic listening devices that U.S. officials suspect may be embedded in the walls. Then, of course, it has to be stuffed with the luxuries — and gold trim — with which the 47th president surrounds himself, whether he is in the Oval Office or in the air. The jet's upper deck has a lounge and a communications center, while the main bedroom can be converted into a flying sick bay in a medical emergency. After spending all that money on refitting the Qatari jet for Trump to use as Air Force One for maybe a year or two, the federal government will still have to pay for the two Air Force One planes already on order. You know, since Trump's plan is to take the Qatari jet with him when he leaves office. So every dime spent on this plane is an extra cost to taxpayers to make Trump happy. Officially, We're Still Saving Last month, Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink told Congress not to worry about the cost of the "free" Qatari jet. "I think there has been a number thrown around on the order of $1 billion, but a lot of those costs associated with that are costs that we'd have experienced anyway," Meink told lawmakers. "We will just experience them early. So it wouldn't be anywhere near that. We believe the actual retrofit of that aircraft is probably less than $400 million." That doesn't exactly track, considering we, again, still have to pay for the two other Air Force Ones already on order, and the federal government won't keep the Qatari jet after Trump leaves office. But the Times also cites "engineers and Air Force experts who have been through similar projects" and still don't buy that budget estimate. And when pressed for more details last week, the Air Force said it couldn't discuss the cost of the project because it's classified. As the Times points out, though, "the Air Force is willing to discuss the cost of building a new generation of intercontinental ballistic missiles, but not the cost of renovating the president's aircraft." Curious. As Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat who sits on the Armed Services Committee, told the Times, "The more we learn about this deal, the more disturbing it becomes. The security implications of accepting a private plane from a foreign nation as Air Force One and the resulting ethical concerns a gift of that size creates were already significant." Beyond that, though, Shaheen said they're worried "this administration is diverting funds from the nuclear modernization budget to finance costly renovations to this plane," and that "we're weakening our credibility to fund a vanity project for President Trump." Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
