Russia claims British Council is part of an espionage operation
This week, the FSB said it had found teachers at top universities in four Russian regions who had worked with the British Council, a UK-based cultural and educational organization.
Russia's war in Ukraine is still ongoing more than three years after President Vladimir Putin sent troops into the country. Even though there have been some signs of improving ties between Moscow and Washington, Russian officials now view Britain as their "number one enemy."
The British Council, which promotes cultural exchange and education, was told in 2018 to stop all work in Russia. In response to the latest accusations, the Council said it was disappointed by Russia's "ban on all collaboration" and strongly denied any involvement in spying. British intelligence has not responded to the claims.
The FSB, which replaced the old Soviet KGB and remains an influential organization in Russia, said the British Council was helping British spies try to weaken Russian identity and build a worldwide network of influence.
The FSB said: "We found teachers from top Russian universities who worked with the British side in ways that harmed Russia's security."
Fifteen Russian citizens have been officially warned for cooperating with the British Council, according to the FSB. The agency urged Russia's allies to ban the British Council and warned the public to avoid contact with it.
The British Council replied: "On 5 June, the Russian Government announced a ban on all collaboration with the British Council. We are disappointed by this development. While political situations can change, we believe it's important to keep communication going between people and institutions around the world."
Founded in 1934 and originally known as the British Committee for Relations with Other Countries, the British Council was created to spread Britain's influence through culture, especially during the rise of fascism and communism.
In response to the FSB's claim that the Council is part of a spying operation, the British Council said: "These allegations are false. We work to support peace and prosperity between the UK and other countries through arts and culture, education, and English language teaching."
Meanwhile, Russian opposition groups, most of whom now live abroad, continue to accuse President Putin of becoming more authoritarian as Russia's conflict with the West over Ukraine drags on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
What Russia wants in order to end its war in Ukraine
As peace negotiations drag on, Russia continues to pound Ukraine with missiles and drones. CBC's Terence McKenna examines what it would take for Vladimir Putin to call off his war and why U.S. pressure doesn't seem to be working.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Ukraine says it struck a Russian air base as Russia sent hundreds of drones into Ukraine
LONDON (AP) — Ukraine said it struck a Russian air base on Saturday, while Russia continued to pound Ukraine with hundreds of drones overnight as part of a stepped-up bombing campaign that has dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the more than 3-year-old war. Ukraine's military General Staff said that Ukrainian forces had struck the Borisoglebsk air base in Russia's Voronezh region, describing it as the home base of Russia's Su-34, Su-35S and Su-30SM fighter jets.
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Welfare plan clears parliament, but Starmer's authority hit
LONDON, U.K.: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won a vote in Parliament this week to move ahead with changes to the country's welfare system. However, the win came at a high political cost. He faced the largest rebellion from his own Labor Party since becoming prime minister. A total of 49 Labor members of Parliament voted against the welfare reforms. This shows that many in his party are unhappy and that Starmer is losing some control. Even though he has a large majority in Parliament, he was forced to backtrack on key parts of the plan. Starmer had promised that his substantial majority would bring stability after years of political chaos under the Conservative government. But the problems surrounding this welfare bill show how difficult it is to pass unpopular policies. The government initially wanted to save about £5 billion a year by tightening the rules for who can receive disability and sickness benefits. These changes were meant to help reduce the growing cost of the welfare system, which the government says is not sustainable. The cost of these benefits is expected to reach over £100 billion by 2030, more than the defence budget. However, after pressure from within his party, the government made significant changes to the plan. One big change was that the new rules would only apply to future applicants, not people already getting the benefits. This could reduce the savings to around £2 billion a year. Some Labor MPs were very critical. Paula Barker said the way the plans were handled was "the most unedifying spectacle" she had ever seen. Others said the prime minister was right to listen to the criticism. Henry Tufnell said Starmer showed he was open to feedback by making changes. Ministers and party officials worked hard in the hours before the vote to convince unsure MPs to support the plan. Just two hours before the vote, the government made another concession, agreeing to delay changes to a key benefit until a full review was finished. Disability and human rights groups also opposed the reforms. Nearly 90 of them urged MPs to vote against the bill. After the vote, opposition parties said the government had lost control and only won by watering down its original plan. They also warned that the government may now have to raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere in the next budget. Though Starmer is not in immediate danger of losing power, polls show his popularity is falling. Polling expert John Curtice recently said Starmer is now the most unpopular elected prime minister in modern British history.
