
South Africa solar power: Pay-as-you-go system helps save lives
That price tag means that this option is far out of the reach of most South Africans. Those scraping by cannot take advantage of the country's sunshine and invest in clean, reliable energy.But Mr Moodley was able to turn to a pay-as-you-go scheme that has kept the lights on and the medical equipment working.His electricity bill has dropped by $80 a week - savings he hopes to use to expand what he has and eventually go completely off-grid.The system he uses comes from Wetility, a local start-up founded in 2019For domestic users, the most basic package costs $60 a month - and crucially no prohibitive up-front payment - making solar power more accessible.The company says it identified a gap in the market - affordable solar solutions tailored to small businesses and low-income households."South Africa has traditionally had high electricity access - but access means nothing if the power isn't reliable or affordable," says Vincent Maposa, the company's founder and a former energy analyst."We had to develop products that are both fit-for-purpose and financially accessible."While solar power is not new in South Africa, Wetility's business model includes a mobile-phone style monthly payment plan, allowing customers to spread out the cost.
For years, load-shedding has been used as a last-ditch attempt to keep the national grid from total collapse, following decades of mismanagement at state utility Eskom.While blackouts have eased for some urban centres, poorer communities and business people continue to suffer forced cuts as aging infrastructure struggles to meet the growing demand.For some in the townships worries about theft and practicality have also deterred people from getting solar equipment, but Wetility has also designed lightweight, flexible panels that can be fitted on the fragile rooftops common in many of these areas."We came up with a thin-film panel that sticks onto the roof. If someone tries to peel it off, it tears and becomes valueless. That was important for areas where theft is a concern," says Mr Maposa."In terms of efficiency, they perform about as well as traditional panels."The energy unit, including an inverter, which converts the power generated by the panels into useable electricity, and a battery that works when the sun is not shining, is secured in a large steel box weighing about 300kg that bolts onto a wall.The team says this reduces the risk of theft and avoids drawing attention in high-crime areas.
Shopkeeper Julius Koobetseng recently made the switch to solar that may have saved his small grocery store.In a grey beanie hat and thick blue jacket to ward off the cold in the southern Hemisphere winter, he stacks cans of drink in a brightly lit fridge remembering how the frequent power cuts nearly wrecked his livelihood."Meat would go off, dairy would spoil. Sometimes we'd be without power for four days," the 43-year-old says.But since March, his shop in Krugersdorp, west of Johannesburg, has been using the pay-as-you-go solar power system to keep the lights and fridges on.Some small business owners have turned to back-up diesel generators but Mr Koobetseng, who has had his shop for the past 13 years, was drawn to the more environmentally friendly option."Power cuts have badly affected small businesses. I know many in this area that had to shut down because they couldn't keep up with the uncertainty," he says."We live month-to-month, depending on what the business brings in. If you can't guarantee power, how do you even plan for the future?"Now he does not worry when the power goes out which has been "a huge relief".It costs his business $250 a month but Mr Koobetseng's business has picked up thanks to the reliable power."People know my shop stays open even when the power's out. Some just come to charge their appliances, but while they're here, they buy things too," he says with a smile.For him, the benefit is not about lowering his electricity bills. It is the consistency."Solar gave me back control. I can plan my day knowing I'll have power."
You may also be interested in:
Joy and relief as South Africa manages to keep its lights onThe roots of Eskom's power problemNo power, no pinot - power cuts hit vineyards
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Israel blocking aid from Gaza is creating ‘chaos and death', say 111 humanitarian groups
Humanitarian organizations from around the world are yet again calling for Israel to let humanitarian aid into Gaza in the face of increasing starvation and Israeli military attacks on Palestinians seeking aid. A letter signed by 111 agencies including Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam International, and Amnesty International says that the Israeli government is blocking humanitarian organizations from effectively distributing life-saving aid. 'Just outside Gaza, in warehouses – and even within Gaza itself – tons of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items and fuel sit untouched with humanitarian organisations blocked from accessing or delivering them,' the agencies wrote. 'The Government of Israel's restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death.' The letter comes as attention towards starvation in Gaza and Israeli killing of civilians continues to grow, but the situation on the ground remains largely the same. UN secretary general, António Guterres, described Gaza as a 'horror show' when speaking to the UN Security council. 'Malnourishment is soaring and starvation is knocking on every door in Gaza,' Guterres said. 'And now we are seeing the last gasp of a humanitarian system built on humanitarian principles. That system is being denied the conditions to function. Denied the space to deliver. Denied the safety to save lives.' Aid in Israel is now distributed by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), whose sites have been described as 'death traps' by UN officials. Previous Guardian reporting chronicled the dangers faced by Palestinians seeking aid from GHF sites. UN officials report that the Israeli military has killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to reach food distribution sites since the end of May. Israeli forces killed at least 32 people on Saturday morning that were seeking aid. Israel has killed at least 72 Palestinians in the last 24 hours according to the Gaza health ministry. Israel also attacked World Health Organization facilities in Deir al-Bahah, and canceled the visa of the most senior UN aid official in Gaza. On 21 July, 28 countries including the UK and other Israeli allies, issued a statement calling for an end to the war in Gaza and labeling the Israeli government's 'denial of essential humanitarian assistance' as 'unacceptable'. The statement also spoke against Israeli settler violence in the West Bank, as well as Israeli plans to move Palestinians into a 'humanitarian city'. The statement, while strongly worded, did not threaten sanctions or mention any concrete policy steps that would be taken against the Israeli government if it does not change course. Today's letter from the humanitarian organizations calls for direct action. 'Piecemeal arrangements and symbolic gestures, like airdrops or flawed aid deals, serve as a smokescreen for inaction. They cannot replace states' legal and moral obligations to protect Palestinian civilians and ensure meaningful access at scale,' the letter says. 'States can and must save lives before there are none left to save.' Israel's military said that it 'views the transfer of humanitarian aid into Gaza as a matter of utmost importance', and works to facilitate its entry in coordination with the international community. It has denied accusations it is preventing aid from reaching Gaza and has accused Palestinian group Hamas of stealing food, an allegation Hamas denies.


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
BBC presenter Phil Mercer on being diagnosed with dyslexia at 50
Working as a newsreader and a presenter on the radio means I have had to read out loud quite a lot - it's an essential part of the over the years I'd sometimes struggle with some of the basic stuff like reading the scripts word for word - I'd hit a wall and make really silly mistakes - and it was I had the chance to have a test for dyslexia at the age of 50, after being inspired by a feature we did on Radio Berkshire, it established that, yes, I was was a feeling of relief but also, for anyone struggling like me, a diagnosis can help you better understand back to my school days in the 1980s and early 90s, I would often have to work hard to properly understand things, especially with maths and English. In the end I did very badly at my A-levels, leaving me frustrated with myself and suddenly not really having a life then there wasn't the support or awareness of dyslexia and the impact it could have on a child's education and prospects - things might have turned out differently if there had been. 'Coping strategies' Luckily I got to muck around doing radio - hospital radio and then AA Roadwatch travel news before joining the BBC in BBC was great at teaching you the skills you need for journalism. I developed coping strategies - reading scripts many times over, changing breathing techniques, and using a different font that was easier to many things, you get along in life and I think I've done alright, even though I was never tested for or diagnosed as we featured the Adult Dyslexia Centre in Maidenhead, which helps people who have struggled with growing up with the learning difficulty, I was inspired to take the taken the four-hour test with reading and comprehension and cognitive reasoning and recall, I eventually got the certificate confirming a way I'm grateful that its shows I'm not stupid - it's a relief to know there is a diagnosable thing that's gone on here.I think the biggest thing I've learned is that facing a dyslexia diagnosis is not the end of the world and that there are a lot of things that can be of the things I often struggle with is keeping my eyes focused on the words in front of me and not drifting around. My assessor suggested going to a behavioural ophthalmologist, who can work out what's going on and even provide specialist glasses that help control the eyes for anyone having trouble - finding things like job interviews especially tough - and who, like me, has just struggled through, it's worth taking a test. The difficulties I've had all now make sense. What is dyslexia? Dyslexia is a learning difficulty that affects about one in 10 people in the UK, including adults as well as children, according to the British Dyslexia Association (BDA)If someone has dyslexia, they may have difficulties with their reading, writing or spellingIt does not affect intelligence and it is not a disease or an illness - it is a condition that someone is born withGovernment statistics show that 6.3m people in the UK have dyslexia, while one in six adults have the reading level of an 11-year-oldA dyslexia diagnosis is not available via the NHS. It is recognised as a specific learning difficulty and this means it is an educational assessmentA diagnosis can only be made by an educational psychologist who is registered with the Health and Care Professions Council or a specialist teacher with a valid registrationCharities such as the BDA can offer advice for people who want to find out whether they may have dyslexia You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


Times
6 hours ago
- Times
Striking doctors claiming to care about patients? It's a sick joke
The British Medical Association confirmed that a five-day NHS strike would go ahead from Friday VUK VALCIC/SOPA IMAGES/LIGHTROCKET VIA GETTY IMAGES W hen hospital doctors strike they routinely trot out the claim that they are doing it for the patients. Their desire for generous pay awards (to add to pensions that are the envy of the private sector) is billed as almost incidental to their mission to save the National Health Service. Failure to award them a double-digit pay rise, they explain, will result in catastrophe for the health service. And why? Because, says the British Medical Association, the professional body for doctors turned militant trade union, young medics would be 'forced' to hightail it to sunny Australia to line their pockets. They wouldn't be able to help themselves. The activists in the BMA fomenting a new and scarcely believable round of strikes, beginning on Friday with a five-day stoppage, should stop insulting the public's intelligence with this offensive cant, wipe away their crocodile tears and admit that it's all about the cash. The price: thousands of patients will end up in more pain and for longer, or die earlier, because of their grotesque selfishness. The NHS, which these wreckers always claim to revere, will be plunged into chaos again, just as it is recovering from 44 days of strikes in 2023-24. And what is the BMA's latest pay claim? Resident doctors — hospital doctors who are not consultants, previously known as junior doctors — want 29 per cent. Yes, really. That is on top of a 22 per cent rise last year. After the Labour government's capitulation to the BMA in 2024, it is trying to return to relative normality this year with an above-inflation offer of 5.4 per cent, in line with the pay review body recommendation and the most generous offer in the public sector. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is trying to talk sense into the strike leaders, offering the olive branch of reduced student debt. But having shown weakness once Mr Streeting finds himself in the all-too-predictable position of facing an emboldened opponent confident in its power. The good news is that Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, has refused to play the BMA's game and is insisting that routine operations carry on. Tom Dolphin, chair of the BMA council, and Emma Runswick, his deputy, have called for all non-urgent procedures to be cancelled, claiming that doing otherwise would 'put patients at risk'. Their hypocrisy is nauseating: it is the BMA that is placing patients in peril. The BMA's cynicism does not end there. When resident doctors strike it falls to consultants to fill the gaps. These aristocrats of the NHS, enjoying basic salaries up to £140,000, not including private work and overtime, are being advised by the union to charge £313 an hour for strike night cover. This is rampant profiteering. Only 26,800 BMA resident doctors voted to strike out of 53,800. Some 22,000 resident doctors are not in the BMA. So just a third of all resident doctors voted yes to misery. The silent majority should back the NHS. Medical graduates start their professional training on £36,000; by their early thirties they are earning £70,000. From then on it is a staircase to comfort. NHS doctors enjoy a super-perk they prefer not to highlight: generous, index-linked defined benefit pensions resulting in retirement incomes greater than most salaries. The public needs to understand how much it is paying for the retirements of these arrogant, entitled, callous strikers. The BMA is now in danger of overreaching itself, of forfeiting public respect. A 29 per cent pay claim, following a 22 per cent one, is a sick joke.