College calls for new facilities due to disrepair
Jerseys only further and higher education college has written a letter to the States of Jersey to request new facilities.
The letter from Jo Terry-Marchant, principal at Highlands College and University College Jersey, said the current college estate was "outdated, inflexible, and no longer fit for purpose in many areas."
It added due to limited capacity in workshop areas it wasn't able to meet the demands of 14 to 16-year-olds from local schools.
It said a "new, modern campus is a strategic necessity".
The letter added the existing site presented additional barriers as the facilities were not fully compliant in relation to disability access.
This affected learners who needed opportunities from Life Skills (students with complex needs) and inclusion programmes.
More news stories for Jersey
Listen to the latest news for Jersey
The letter stated in order to support the development of the workforce it must move beyond "reactive repairs" and "incremental fixes."
It said: "A new, modern campus is a strategic necessity, being central to the education eco-system, delivering a sustainable, future-ready education system that can support industry needs, social mobility, and the Island's long-term economic resilience."
It understood that the maintenance requirements would wipe out most of the Jersey Property Holdings (JPH) maintenance budget for it's wider portfolio and the pressure on the public purse.
It said unless a study into a partial rebuild, "focusing on modern workshops is conducted, we will be constrained in our ability to meet government aspirations without capital investment."
Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
One-off funding for college courses to continue
College sees big rise in students
Students 'relieved' after receiving exam results
Highlands College
Government of Jersey
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer
KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) one of the best stocks in a . An iconic financial building in the background, with silhouettes of busy bankers walking past in the foreground. Recently, on June 24, 2025, Assura Group, based in the UK, rejected KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR)'s final bid of $2.3 billion in favor of a competitive offer of $2.4 billion from Primary Health Properties (PHP). The decision materialized after months of competitive bidding, eventually leading to the Assura board's decision to take up PHP's offer, considering it more favorable for shareholders. KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) was ultimately outbid, despite having previously secured a tentative agreement. This represents a significant setback for KKR in its efforts to acquire Assura. This decision is a reflection of the company's strategic ambition as well as industry competition. Regardless of the setback, analysts remain positive about KKR's fundamentals, given 12 'Buy' ratings and a consensus price target suggesting over 16% upside. The company is focused on targeted acquisitions and growth-inducing investments as a private equity and real estate investment firm, leading to a strong position in a growth stock portfolio. While we acknowledge the potential of KKR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 10 Best Marketing Stocks to Buy Right Now and 10 Best Cybersecurity Stocks to Invest in Under $20. Disclosure: None
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Young Aussie with $50,000 HECS debt reveals degree she regrets: 'Not worth it'
A young Aussie with more than $50,000 in HECS debt has shared why she regrets going to university as her debt continues to inch up. The government has promised to cut HECS and HELP debts by 20 per cent and while it's welcome relief for millions, many will still be left with significant amounts owing. Pascal Zoghbi graduated with a Bachelor of Business majoring in enterprise and innovation marketing in 2023. The 22-year-old Perth woman told Yahoo Finance she was shocked after checking her HECS debt recently and finding it had ballooned to $50,801 following last month's indexation. Zoghbi's HECS debt was around $48,000 after she graduated, and she was under the impression her debt was on its way down thanks to several years of compulsory work repayments. RELATED Aussie with $60,000 HECS debt reveals why he isn't paying it off faster with extra payments Days left for millions of Aussies to claim ATO $20,000 tax benefit ATO reveals 10 highest paying jobs in Australia 'Because I knew I was paying it off, I genuinely thought it would be at least under $50,000,' she said. 'The fact that I saw it back to $50,000, if not more, that was shocking. I was like, 'Are you serious?', literally everything that I have [paid] is just now back again.' While Zoghbi said she was looking forward to the upcoming 20 per cent reduction to HECS debts, she still has $40,000 left to repay.'I'm still $40,000 in debt for a degree that is not worth being $40,000 in debt for. It used to be free, which baffles me,' she said. 'As a marketing degree, you cannot get enough money coming in in any job that's going to be able to financially set you up to pay your HECS debt.' The skyrocketing cost of university degrees means it is also taking more time for students to pay off their degrees. Analysis by the Australia Institute found the average time it takes a student to pay off their HECS-HELP debt has jumped from 7.3 years in 2006 to 9.9 years. This is based on debts that have already been repaid. Zoghbi said she doesn't even want to think about how long it will take her to pay off her HECS debt. 'I don't want to know. I'd probably cry,' she said. Zoghbi now wishes she didn't go to university and is worried about how it could impact her ability to get a home loan in the future. 'It's not worth the debt at all,' she said. 'I do not implement anything that I've learned at uni in my marketing job right now.' Zoghbi said she knows many people working in marketing who don't have degrees and instead have experience. 'It's all about experience at the end of the day, it's not about your degree at all,' she said. 'If you get experience and you do a lot of networking, you could definitely get something in the field you want.' Indeed research released earlier this year found that 67 per cent of job seekers and 55 per cent of employers thought on-the-job experience was more attractive than university degrees. Indeed career expert Sally McKibbin said this highlighted a 'pivotal shift in the hiring landscape'. 'Employers are increasingly of the view that on-the-job experience has the potential to speak louder than a formal qualification,' she said. 'Higher education is of course still incredibly valuable and also valued, but Australia's job market is evolving and therefore so too is our approach to hiring.' Zoghbi has called on universities to reassess their courses and make sure people actually get value out of them. The government has promised to cut 20 per cent off all student loan debts, wiping around $16 billion in debt for around three million Australians. This has not yet been legislated, but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said it would be the 'first piece of legislation' introduced into the new parliament when it returned on July 22. The reduction will be backdated to June 1, before indexation was applied this year. This year, debts rose by 3.2 per cent due to indexation. Someone with the average HECS debt of $27,600 would see around $5,520 cut from their outstanding loan. The government also planned to reduce the amount Australians with debt had to repay per year and raise the threshold when people needed to start repaying. This has also not been legislated yet, but would increase the minimum repayment threshold from $54,435 to $67,000 from July 1, and calculate compulsory repayments on the income above the new threshold instead of the total annual income. It comes after the government changed the way HECS is indexed, with it now tied to the lower of either the Consumer Price Index or Wage Price Index.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
UK Releases Draft Sustainability Reporting Standards, Seeks Input
Long exposure photo from Big Ben in sunrise getty On June 25, the United Kingdom's Department for Business and Trade released a draft of sustainability reporting standards for the UK. The proposal implements guidelines on climate-related risk and greenhouse gas emissions reporting, at a time when other jurisdictions are considering reducing requirements. The consultation period is open until September 17, with the final requirements set to be published by December. The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation, the organization that drafts financial reporting standards used in 168 jurisdictions, began drafting sustainability reporting standards in 2021, through the International Sustainability Standards Board. The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards were released in June 2023. National regulatory agencies were then tasked with amending the standards to comply with national laws. The IFRS Sustainability Standards are divided into two reporting tiers. IFRS S1 establishes sustainability disclosure requirements, while IFRS S2 sets out specific climate-related disclosures to be used along with IFRS S1. Both focus on a company's governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and target, as they relate to either sustainability or climate. The UK initially required sustainability reporting in 2022. Following the release of the IFRS Sustainability Standards, in May 2024, the Department of Business & Trade began the process of converting the standards to work with national law. On June 25, the Department released the 'exposure draft of UK Sustainability Reporting Standards: UK SRS S1 and UK SRS S2." The draft states, 'making the transition to an economy that is climate resilient and sustainable is essential for long-term economic growth. One of the 5 missions of this government is to make the UK a clean energy superpower – delivering clean power by 2030 and accelerating to net zero. This will support growth through the creation of hundreds of thousands of good jobs across the UK and protect our economy from the future price shocks that reliance on fossil fuels creates, while delivering a range of social and health benefits.' The UK is using a phased approach to adopt sustainability reporting requirements, starting with the proposed draft. The second 'focuses on providers of assurance over sustainability- related financial disclosures following the conclusion of the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) recent market study on this theme.' The third 'published by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero – seeks views on the government's manifesto commitment on the theme of transition planning.' The Department of Business & Trade's draft includes six proposed amendments to the ISSB Standards. Amendments 1 - 4 were proposed by UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee, known as TAC in the document. Amendments 5 & 6 were proposed by the UK Sustainability Disclosure Policy and Implementation Committee, known as PIC in the document. The amendments are as follows. Amendment 1 - IFRS S1 included 'transition relief' that allowed companies to delay sustainability reporting during the first year. While the reporting would still take place, it would not be in alignment with the existing financial reporting requirements. The proposal removes that relief. 'The TAC concluded that allowing entities to disclose sustainability-related information at a later time compromises the principle of 'connectivity' with the financial statements and other narrative reporting.' Amendment 2 - In addition to transition relief, IFRS S1 also allowed companies to only report climate-related risks the first year, delaying the broader sustainability reporting until the second year in a 'climate-first' approach. The draft proposal extends that relief to the first two years. In practice, for year 1 companies will be required to report 'climate-related risks and opportunities except Scope 3 emissions.' In year 2, 'all climate-related risks and opportunities including Scope 3 emissions.' In year 3, 'climate-related risks and opportunities, Scope 3 emissions, and wider sustainability-related risks and opportunities.' Amendment 3 - IFRS S2 requires companies to use the Global Industry Classification Standard when reporting 'financed emissions.' There are GHG emissions attributed to 'loans an investments made by an entity.' The proposal allows flexibility in the usage of GICS, changing the language to give companies the option to use the standard of choice. 'The TAC recommended that entities should be able to use any appropriate classification standard – which could be GICS or an alternative standard that they use within existing reporting practices. The use of an existing classification could allow for increased connectivity with existing reporting. A requirement to use GICS, if not already used, could also impose an unnecessary additional cost.' Amendment 4 - The ISSB Standards were effective January 1, 2024. However, the UK did not implement them by that timeline. As a result, the draft removes the effective date, allowing for voluntary usage until required by law or regulation. Amendment 5 - The ISSB Standards require companies to use industry-specific standards for the 'disclosures of financially-material sustainability information' as provided by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. However, the SASB was created in 2011 to draft standards for use with reporting to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result, the choice of language is specific to the SEC. The ISSB is updating those standards, with an anticipated release in July, but for now, the draft takes issue with the use. Further, the draft states 'the detailed content of the SASB materials had not been through the same level of due process as the ISSB Standards. The PIC also observed that the TAC's stakeholder engagement found mixed feedback on the SASB materials, with many UK organisations supporting voluntary (rather than mandatory) use.' To resolve the issues, the proposal changes the standard from 'shall' to 'may', providing flexibility to companies to use the SASB standards if they feel it is the best option. Amendment 6 - Referring back to the transition releif addressed in Amendments 1 & 2, the PIC wants to clarify that relief is tied to the date standards become mandatory, not when companies begin voluntary reporting. 'The PIC agreed that it wanted to facilitate use of the reliefs for any mandatory reporting while avoiding penalising any early voluntary reporters.' The Department provided 20 consultation questions for interested parties to address via an online form. Responses are due by September 17. The draft states that the new UK Sustainability Reporting Standards will be finalized in autumn 2025. Expect to see the final draft in early December.
