Cork man accused of money-laundering and drug-dealing found with €672k in cash while on bail
39-year-old Gerard Hayes, with an address at College Lawn, College Manor, Cobh, Co Cork, told gardaí as soon as he was stopped on Mespil Road in Dublin that his life savings were in the boot of the car.
Detective Sergeant Eugene McCarthy said Gerard Hayes told them there was €620,000 in the boot of the car. In fact, when gardaí counted it, there was €52,000 more than that.
'He insisted it was all from cash jobs and 'foxers' he had done over the years, and denied any involvement in drugs… The way the money was wrapped and marked bears all the hallmarks of drug-dealing,' Det Sgt McCarthy said at Cork Circuit Criminal Court.
This arrest by Donnybrook gardaí in Dublin occurred on February 20, 2024, within days of being released on bail following his arrest for drug-dealing and money-laundering offences in East Cork.
And he was arrested for a third time — having secured High Court bail in relation to the Dublin charges — soon afterwards, on March 20, 2024.
Detective Garda Dylan Murphy said on this date he was seen driving a Toyota Avensis near Cobh Rugby Club and on being searched, he had €1,400 worth of cocaine in deals concealed in a repurposed spray cannister.
On the first of the three incidents before the court on Tuesday, two hair brushes were found in his possession. While there was a lot of hair tangled in the brushes, it was discovered on closer inspection the brushes had been modified to conceal close to €3,000 worth of cocaine in deals.
This first incident on February 2, 2024, was described by Detective Garda James McCarthy. Gerard Hayes had just driven his Audi A4 from a storage shed he was renting for €5,000 a year at Ballydaniel, Ballymore, in Cobh. €62,800 in cash was found at that premise in Ballymore. All of the cash was in €50 notes. It was found in an office under timber, which was under tarpaulin.
An assortment of ammunition — for which he once had a licence, but did not have at the time — was found on that occasion. Some of the ammunition and related materials were found in the attic of the storage premises.
Also following searches carried out at that time at Ballynacorra River, East Ferry, Midleton, he admitted possession of proceeds of criminal conduct in the form of a boat, including contents and engine, with a value of €86,000.
Between the three incidents, he was interviewed on 17 separate occasions and disclosed nothing of material assistance to the investigations during any of the them.
Ultimately, he made admissions to charges including the possession of cocaine for sale or supply, and possession of large quantities of ammunition and silencers for firearms and the very large amount of cash and property — the proceeds of criminal conduct, which are money-laundering charges.
The most serious charge states that on February 20 2024 on Mespil Road, Dublin 4, he had the proceeds of criminal conduct, namely cash to the value of €672,000.
As well as the Mespil Road money-laundering charge, there was a charge on the same date related to his home in Cobh involving €10,050.
The total value of cash, vehicles, boat and other property that were deemed to be the proceeds of criminal conduct, totalled over €745,000.
Judge Helen Boyle made a forfeiture order to the State of all of this. The Audi A6 being paid for in instalments by the accused was not forfeited to the State.
Jane Hyland, senior counsel, emphasised the value of the pleas of guilty made by the accused in these cases.
Judge Boyle said there was a lot of evidence to consider and she remanded the accused in custody for sentencing until July 2.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
On call with the Dublin Fire Brigade
Nikita Hand speaks to the media at the High Court after Conor McGregor loses his appeal over the verdict in the civil rape case. Video: Stephen Conneely
Irish Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Debunked: Conor McGregor makes series of misleading claims in court rant
Conor McGregor has made a number of misleading claims - after losing his appeal of a civil finding that he raped Nikita Hand. In a lengthy and rambling post on social media platform X, McGregor sensationally stated that he has no intention of paying the legal fees of James Lawrence - who the High court previously heard he referred to his solicitors and admitted paying his bills. In his post McGregor referred to the November High Court case which he lost and the appeal case which he also lost as a 'shake down,' and insisted he didn't say he was paying Lawrence's fees. 'You are out of your f*cking mind if you think I am paying James Lawrence legal costs, folks. Who said I was paying his fees?'I said I didn't know if I was, when the accusers barrister asked me on the stand, as I didn't. (who is paying his own fees I should have asked him at that time) ???' he posted. However in the High Court case itself McGregor was pressed by trial Judge Alexander Owens if he was paying Lawrence's fees or not. In response to cross examination first from Ms Hand's Counsel McGregor stated that he 'possibly' paid James Lawrence legal fees and referred him to them. 'I'm not 100 per cent. I get staggering legal bills.' The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Judge Owens then stated to McGregor that it was a simple question - did he pay Lawrence's bills or not. McGregor responded by saying: 'I believe I did.' In refusing Lawrence costs at the conclusion of the High Court case in November, Judge Owens said both men were acting in "lockstep" in their defence of the action and it would be inappropriate to award costs to Mr Lawrence even though the jury found he did not rape Ms Hand. The Court of Appeal this week refused to allow Lawrence to be paid his costs as they too found that the money would ultimately end up going to McGregor, who was paying his fees. Nikita Hand speaking to the media after attending the Court of Appeal (Image: Collins Photos) McGregor goes on to claim in his new post that he was 'on the stand in a world of fog being accused of a crime I didn't commit, and that I was actually cleared of criminally and exonerated by every witness present, as well as believed twice over by the public prosecutor, but still up on a stand civilly, in absolute shock.' This statement is also misleading - as McGregor was not in fact 'cleared' or 'exonerated.' Gardai did investigate the alleged rape and sent a file to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). However the DPP decided not to take the case and therefore no criminal charges were levelled against the UFC fighter. This by itself does not mean McGregor was 'cleared' or 'exonerated' of the claims - just that he was not charged or convicted of any criminal offence. However the finding by the civil jury in November that he was liable for assault - whereby the assault in question was the rape that occurred in the Beacon Hotel in Sandyford in 2018, means the fighter can hardly claim he was 'exonerated.' The finding of the jury has also now been upheld by the three Judges of the Court of Appeal. McGregor goes on to make claims about why the criminal case did not go ahead - stating that there was plenty of evidence of CCTV footage which he claimed showed Ms Hand 'partying away, messaging away' and leaving and coming back to the hotel 'not a f*cking laughing, dancing, kissing, biting, play fighting. It's some watch. I was home HOURS and this is all going on,' he wrote. All of the footage was played in full and repeatedly re shown to the jury in the civil trial - with them ultimately siding with Ms Hand who stated she was drunk and not in the right state of mind at the time of the footage. Having been shown this footage and heard arguments from both sides they nonetheless sided with her, that she had been raped in the room by McGregor. McGregor goes on to attack Ms Hand in his post by saying: 'How people sleep at night is beyond me. I'm sure they don't. Not soundly anyway, no way. Impossible. To falsely accuse someone of rape and lose, then attempt to ignore that fact/brush it under the rug is truly heinous on another level!' However Ms Hand did not lose her case - she in fact won it, and had it re affirmed this week by three learned Judges of the Court of Appeal. Mr McGregor can continue to claim he did not rape Ms Hand - and it is a fact that he is not convicted of the criminal offence. He has however been found to have raped Ms Hand and is liable for it, by a civil jury. He now claims he 'welcomes' the new case taken by Ms Hand against him and the suddenly withdrawn proposed witnesses, couple Samantha O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins. Ms Hand is suing McGregor, Ms O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins for damages for 'malicious abuse of the process of the court.' It comes after McGregor's own Counsel announced at the opening of the appeal earlier this month that they would not be called as witnesses - after admitting that the evidence was not sustainable. Now in his new post McGregor is trying to claim that the evidence of Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins ought to have been heard - despite his own legal team arguing it shouldn't. 'I believed their claim, as portions of it was verified through the response affidavit to it,' he claimed. 'Why these two witnesses were not called, i will never know. It was on the very morning of. They were present and very eager to testify,' he claimed. 'It seemed they were pulled out of fear from my appointed team tbh. For what I don't know. These people said they seen something, let us all hear. If it's legit, great, it sounds very legit to me. If it's not, it's on them.' After the evidence was suddenly withdrawn the Judges of the Court of Appeal made the decision to refer the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), after reading submissions from Ms Hand's legal team about the couple. Ms Hand's Counsel flagged concerns that potential perjury had been committed by the couple - and subornation of perjury by Conor McGregor himself for attempting to introduce the now withdrawn 'evidence.' He now claims he is 'happy this is still ongoing' - despite now being liable for a staggering €2M legal bill he has to pay Nikita Hand - and the remainder of the €250,000 award. Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Court steps in after man gives €350,000 to poor to get to heaven
The High Court has stepped in to protect the interests of a farmer who has already given €350,000 cash to homeless and poor people on the basis God has promised him a seat in heaven. Mr Justice Michael Twomey on Friday appointed a guardian to represent the best interests of the farmer, aged in his forties, who, the court heard, only last week gave €1,000 cash to a homeless woman he met. Solicitor Katherine Kelleher, speaking on behalf of the Health Service Executive (HSE), told Judge Twomey the man had recently sold his farm for around €600,000 and by May last had been left with just €288,000 in two bank accounts. A medical report was handed into court. READ MORE 'The situation is that in a short number of weeks he has again given away added sums in the region of €38,000,' Ms Kelleher said. 'His bank accounts are literally haemorrhaging cash. I have received a phone call just this morning revealing that in one of the accounts there is now an overdraft of €65,000.' She told Judge Twomey the man claimed he had been told by God to give away all of his money and if he did so he would get to heaven. Ms Kellleher said she was applying to the court on behalf of the HSE for the appointment of a guardian ad litem to look after the best interests of the man. His total funds now stand at €250,000. Judge Twomey said he would appoint a guardian ad litem in light of the evidence that had been presented to the court. He said he would also make an order in the extended terms sought by the HSE directing the two banks concerned be directed to permit all inquiries be made regarding the man's accounts and allowing the guardian ad litem take all steps considered necessary. The proceedings were returned into early September. The man concerned cannot be identified by order of the court.
