logo
Obama stands by intelligence conclusion that Russia tried to influence 2016 election

Obama stands by intelligence conclusion that Russia tried to influence 2016 election

USA Today4 days ago
Former President Barack Obama on July 22 said he stood by the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election.
Obama was hitting back at a report released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on July 18, which claimed to demonstrate how the former president and his national security Cabinet had 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup' against Donald Trump after he had defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Trump earlier in the day also accused Obama of 'treason' during an Oval Office meeting with Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos, calling him a 'ringleader' and his actions 'seditious.'
Obama's office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant "nonsense and misinformation" that emanates out of the White House.
'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Obama's office said in a statement on July 22. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.'
Rubio currently serves as Trump's Secretary of State.
The U.S. intelligence community in 2017 said Russia had interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections and sought to hurt Clinton, who was Trump's Democratic opponent, while trying to help Trump.
Obama's office added: 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.'
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who released the report, said the intelligence community's assessment was "politicized intelligence that was used as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimize President Trump's victory."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is right to want to Powell out at the Federal Reserve — but not just because of interest rates
Trump is right to want to Powell out at the Federal Reserve — but not just because of interest rates

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump is right to want to Powell out at the Federal Reserve — but not just because of interest rates

In July 1988, Mike Dukakis was leading the presidential race versus George H.W. Bush — but not for long. A little later that summer, the Democratic nominee agreed to do a photo-op in a battle tank with an army helmet perched awkwardly on his head. GOP spin masters capitalized with the now infamous 'tank ad' that lost Dukakis the election — and rightfully so. President Trump touring the Federal Reserve's headquarters with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on July 24, 2025. Getty Images The public agreed that a pointy-headed dork who tried to pass himself off as a tough guy shouldn't be anywhere near the US presidency. That's how I felt Thursday, watching the odd spectacle of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell donning an ill-fitting helmet as he and President Trump toured the Fed's new unfinished and overindulgent $2.5 billion 'Taj Mahal' headquarters. Yes, Trump wants Powell out mainly because the Fed boss refuses to lower interest rates and juice the economy. But let's pause a moment to contemplate the construction-site fiasco. Trump chose to tour the facility because he wanted to make Powell look like a fool. And it worked. Like Powell, Trump, too, was wearing a helmet, but the president looked pretty comfortable as his hulking frame towered over the central banker's. Recall that Trump is a real estate developer. Powell, meanwhile, looked like an economist who had just landed on Mars. He stood by nervously as Trump took some shots at the project's well-publicized cost overruns. Powell did manage to point out that the president had mistakenly added a few hundred million dollars to the actual total, but the actual total was outrageous nonetheless. It's easy to shrug off the presser as just another day in our Trumpian soap opera. The president is a master at working the room. Powell is not — he can barely do his job setting interest rates. Yet as we debate Powell's future, the scene serves as a suitable Dukakis-like metaphor, and an indicator that maybe Trump is right, and Powell needs to go sooner rather than later. Independence is key It takes a lot for me to say that. I don't necessarily agree that we need to cut interest rates before we see the impact of Trump's possibly inflation-inducing tariffs. Plus, Fed independence from political forces is of fundamental importance. It's the reason people buy our debt and finance our standard of living. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 gives the central bank this large degree of autonomy because if it appears the chairman is a patsy of the president — lowering rates on his orders simply to stimulate growth — investors will see our debt as worthless paper prone to the rav­ages of inflation. If we can't sell our debt, we will get the mother of all financial crises, one that makes 2008 look like a cakewalk. But defending Fed independence on Powell's record is a loser's game. Trump in 2017 during his first term appointed Powell and the two butted heads immediately. Trump wanted lower rates while the economy — thanks to his tax policies — was roaring. Powell initially didn't give in and for good reason: The economy was too hot. But he ultimately caved to Trump and started slashing interest rates. It's reason No. 1 he should be fired: He's far from independent. The rate cuts left the Fed with fewer policy measures when it really needed to add liquidity during the COVID lockdowns. Kept printing money Here's reason No. 2: During COVID, Powell used whatever dry powder he had in the Fed's arsenal to print money like it grew on trees. Even after businesses opened and the pandemic ended, he kept printing. Interest rates remained at zero or near zero well into the Biden presidency. (He was re-appointed by Sleepy Joe to a four-year term that ends next year.) All this occurred as Biden spent trillions of dollars, exploding our debt and setting the stage for inflation. Powell then brushed off concerns that all this continued liquidity would do more harm than good. He seemed to be working with Biden's inept Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to spin the situation, calling the inflation 'transitory.' It wasn't. Inflation hit 9.1% before Powell began to raise rates. It was one of the worst policy mistakes ever made by a Fed chair; fighting inflation is part of his dual mandate and the most important part because it's a tax on working-class Americans who can't speculate around it in the markets. I know — I am arguing that Trump is right to get rid of Powell for the wrong reasons. Tariffs could cause higher prices and cutting rates might spike them further. And if Trump did ax Powell before his term ends, it could set up a constitutional battle royal. But it's hard to defend Powell's long track record of cluelessness on monetary policy — or his cluelessness at the construction site. The sooner he goes, the better.

Man with mental health issues found naked in Minnesota Capitol, raising new security concerns
Man with mental health issues found naked in Minnesota Capitol, raising new security concerns

San Francisco Chronicle​

time13 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Man with mental health issues found naked in Minnesota Capitol, raising new security concerns

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A naked man with apparent mental health issues was found in the Minnesota State Capitol late at night, officials said Saturday, raising questions about security after the top Democrat in the state House was killed in what authorities have called a political assassination. The discovery just six weeks after the fatal shooting of Democratic former House Speaker Melissa Hortman prompted the top House and Senate Republican leaders to demand answers about how it happened and what steps might be taken to prevent it from happening again. The man was found in the Senate chamber around 11:30 p.m. Friday, the chief House sergeant-at-arms, Lori Hodapp, said in an email to representatives. 'The individual made statements indicating a belief that he was the Governor, among other remarks, and was found disrobed,' Hodapp said. Capitol Security responded promptly, she said, and the man was taken to a St. Paul hospital for evaluation. He was deemed not to be a threat to himself or others and was released, but he returned to the Capitol grounds at 7:30 a.m. Saturday. 'An investigation is currently underway to determine how the individual gained access to the Senate Chamber and Capitol facilities after hours," Hodapp wrote. "We are examining all aspects of this incident to address any security concerns.' The sergeant-at-arms also said the man had an active probation-violation warrant from Wisconsin on his record, but that it did not initially allow for his transfer. It has since been updated, she added 'and appropriate measures will be taken upon next contact.' 'It's frustrating that an individual with a criminal history was able to allegedly vandalize the Capitol and unlawfully trespass in the Senate chamber without being taken into custody,' Republican House Speaker Lisa Demuth, of Cold Spring, said in a statement. 'Anyone who trespasses in any building — let alone the State Capitol — should be arrested and prosecuted for breaking the law, and I look forward to learning why this did not take place in this highly disturbing incident.' GOP Senate Minority Leader Mark Johnson, of East Grand Forks, also expressed disappointment. 'We are living in a heightened threat environment,' Johnson said in a statement. "I expect the State Patrol and Capitol Security teams will thoroughly review what happened and give Capitol officials and staff, and the public, their assurances that this will not happen again.' The head of the State Patrol, Col. Christina Bogojevic, said there was no immediate indication that the man broke into the Capitol, which is open to the public during business hours. She said officials were reviewing security video to try to determine his exact whereabouts while he was inside. Bogojevic said the man was nonviolent when he was spotted on the Capitol grounds Saturday morning, and he was taken back to the same hospital for another evaluation. 'The safety and well-being of everyone who works at and visits the Capitol is our top priority,' Bogojevic said in a statement. 'We take this situation seriously and are committed to understanding how it occurred.' Legislative and administration leaders have begun discussions about whether security at the Capitol and for lawmakers should be tightened following the June 14 shootings that left Hortman and her husband dead, and a state senator and his wife seriously injured. Authorities say they were attacked at their homes by a man disguised as a police officer. The alleged gunman, Vance Boelter, 57, of Green Isle, is facing federal and state murder charges and other counts. His lawyer says he plans to plead not guilty at his federal arraignment, which has been rescheduled to Aug. 7 from Sept. 12.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store