logo
Feds Call On Minister Watts To Rule Out Yet Another Tax

Feds Call On Minister Watts To Rule Out Yet Another Tax

Scoop4 days ago

Federated Farmers is calling on the Revenue Minister to rule out yet another tax, this time a controversial Inland Revenue proposal hitting the not-for-profit sector.
Under the proposal, organisations like Federated Farmers would be taxed on their membership subscription income for the first time.
"We're calling on Simon Watts to move quickly and categorically take this off the table," Federated Farmers board member Richard McIntyre says.
"This is not a routine tax consultation - this is a significant new interpretation that overturns 20 years of settled practice."
Ideally, Inland Revenue would withdraw its draft interpretation but, failing that, the Minister must step in, McIntyre says.
"This isn't a minor tweak - it's a fundamental shift in how the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) interprets the law.
"It would have serious consequences for New Zealand's not-for-profit sector."
Under current practice, not-for-profits structured as mutual associations - organisations set up to serve their members rather than make a profit - aren't taxed on income they receive from members.
This principle, known as mutuality, is based on the idea that a group of people cannot make profit from dealing with themselves.
However, IRD is proposing that if a not-for-profit is constitutionally prohibited from distributing profits to members, as most are, its member income should be taxed.
"This would pull the rug out from under about 9000 not-for profits, advocacy groups, professional associations, unions, community organisations, and political parties who rely on membership fees to fund their operations," McIntyre says.
"This is not just about Federated Farmers - it's sector-wide and is creating huge concern."
The IRD's draft relies heavily on an Australian legal precedent - the Coleambally Irrigation case - which found mutuality does not apply when there is a legal bar on profit distribution.
But Federated Farmers argues this is a poor precedent to import into New Zealand, noting that Australia's Parliament had to step in and reverse it with legislation after significant backlash.
New Zealand's not-for-profit framework is different - but the harm from adopting this interpretation would create exactly the same confusion and harm, McIntyre says.
Federated Farmers' submission urges the IRD Commissioner to withdraw the proposal and reaffirm the non-taxable status of genuine mutual income.
"Ultimately, this is now a political question. The Government cannot allow the Inland Revenue to unilaterally rewrite tax policy that affects thousands of organisations," McIntyre says.
"This is why the Minister needs to rule this out publicly. Tax policy decisions of this magnitude belong with elected representatives, not faceless tax officials in Wellington."
Federated Farmers has submitted on this consultation draft.
The submission questions why IRD is pursuing the change now, after more than 20 years of consistent guidance and practice and ecosystem has been allowed to flourish under the existing rules.
"After two decades of stability, we have to ask: why now? This has the hallmarks of a desperate revenue grab dressed up as a legal interpretation," McIntyre says.
"That's why the Minister needs to make it clear this won't proceed."
Federated Farmers is not alone in its concerns.
"We're hearing from a growing coalition of not-for-profits across the country, who are just as alarmed as us about the proposed change and its implications," McIntyre says.
"From unions to professional bodies to political parties, the feedback is unanimous: this proposal would be devastating.
"The mutuality principle has served our country well for decades, and it should be preserved."
Federated Farmers' submission concludes with a stark warning: if the Commissioner proceeds with the reinterpretation, it will become a political issue - one that Ministers and MPs will need to address urgently.
"The public deserve to know where the Government stands on this. We're calling on Minister Watts to give that clarity now," McIntyre says.
The full submission is available here (https://fedfarm.org.nz/FFPublic/Policy2/National/250624-IRD-Submission-NFPs.aspx), and Federated Farmers will continue to engage with the Government, other affected organisations, and the wider public as the consultation process unfolds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt set to announce special development deal with one city
Govt set to announce special development deal with one city

Newsroom

time8 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Govt set to announce special development deal with one city

The Government is on the cusp of declaring its first 'city and regional deal' to unlock growth potential around one major centre – most likely to be Tauranga. It hopes a deal can be a game-changer for the western Bay of Plenty region. Two other centres, almost certainly to include Auckland and possibly Queenstown, are likely to be announced as next off the rank, priority deals to be negotiated through 2026. Cabinet reportedly scrutinised on Monday officials' assessments of cities' so-called 'light-touch proposals', or applications for the unique central government-local government funding and planning deals for roads, housing and infrastructure. A first, signed memorandum of understanding, to underline the coalition Government's commitment to 'going for growth,' had been listed in its latest quarterly action plan ending June 30, next Monday. In February, cities and regions submitted their bids for the special government treatment, which could mimic some of the principles followed most famously by the UK government with Manchester. Applicants had been urged to put forward up to five priority projects in their area that would unlock economic growth. The expected deals would be long-term commitments by those cities, having consulted their private sector and local iwi, to pursue development that also meets central government goals. While guidelines from the Internal Affairs Department to potential applicants said deals should rely on existing resources, rather than new funding, they said the agreements would set out a framework of how new funding could be used when available. So Tauranga, which those close to the process expect to have made a compelling case for Wellington backing given its population, housing and transport growth, would not be in for an initial financial windfall In March, the two ministers leading the policy, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop and Local Government Minister Simon Watts, said it was 'designed to help reduce New Zealand's infrastructure deficit through unlocking productivity, attracting investment and improving connectivity across the country. 'Delivering a joint long-term vision for regions will ensure they remain focused on delivering what matters most to ratepayers, including critical infrastructure like housing and transport.' Watts said successful councils would need to show how each initiative would match other government priorities such as the Local Water Done Well reforms of water services. One of the features of the deals will be that central and local government budgets and investment strategies will be synchronised to maximise the impact of resources. Committee for Auckland director Mark Thomas wrote for Newsroom at the start of this government's term that more than 30 city deals were operating in the UK – some focused beyond infrastructure and housing. Edinburgh, for example, had struck a $600m innovation city deal with the Scottish and UK governments to accelerate productivity and growth by funding data-driven innovation, research, development and technology hubs. In Australia 12 city deals were already in operation when our coalition Government took office, covering urban priorities from transport infrastructure, entertainment centres and stadiums to workforce development. Thomas says 'city deals need guaranteed funding arrangements to be credible and innovative arrangements involving the private sector can play an important part.' The Internal Affairs guidelines required an initial 10-year strategic plan with 'clear outcomes and actions required to achieve them' and there had to be a 30-year vision for the region. Auckland councillors were tipped by their chief executive Phil Wilson at their monthly meeting on Thursday to expect to hear the Government's city deal news next week. Chris Bishop's office did not address Newsroom's questions over whether the Cabinet had considered the city and regional deal assessments last Monday, or if one would be announced next week. It offered seven timeless words of deflection: 'Ministers will make announcements in due course.' The Tauranga-based bid was in the name of three councils, Tauranga City, the Western Bay of Plenty District and the Bay of Plenty Region and developed with iwi and the area's economic development agency Priority One. Tauranga Mayor Mahe Drysdale said: 'Government has done a great job of signalling investment in the region through the Roads of National Significance programme, and now we want to build on that initiative to deliver growth in core infrastructure that will enable 40,000 additional homes and unleash jobs and economic growth.' Regional council chair Doug Leeder said another key component of the deal would be to enable increased exports and export income for New Zealand via the Port of Tauranga. The bid proposal listed three priorities: 1. Deliver the Western and Northern Corridors with major roading projects – Tauriko Network Connections and Takitimu North Stage 2, enabling housing and industrial land development. 2. Develop the Eastern Corridor by unlocking key land development projects; Te Tumu, Rangiuru and Te Kāinga. 3. Enable exports, resilience and decarbonisation of freight led by the Connecting Mount Maunganui project. The committee for Auckland's Mark Thomas told Newsroom the Auckland proposal was also strong. 'The Auckland deal has been put together with high-level private and public sector and iwi involvement and is a quality product. 'Two years of State of the City reports on Auckland have confirmed a long-term partnership, like a regional deal, between Auckland and Government is the only way to address the systemic and long-standing issues impacting Auckland's performance such as our low peer innovation performance, our skills deficits, and underinvestment in transport.'

Signing of build contract edges closer
Signing of build contract edges closer

Otago Daily Times

time15 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Signing of build contract edges closer

After years of delay, the government is finally edging closer to a contract with an Australian construction giant to build the new Dunedin hospital, the ODT understands. Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand (HNZ) is expected to send CPB Contractors a letter saying it plans to hire the firm to construct the inpatient building. Crown manager Evan Davies' role for the government requires him to negotiate a draft contract and present it to ministers for signing by mid-September. However, there are hurdles that mean the process could take longer, including getting an implementation business case through legally required Treasury approval. The re-employment of former programme director Tony Lloyd in Mr Davies' team raises the likelihood that the proposed contract will have fine print that shares at least some of any overspend risk between government and CPB, rather than HNZ paying a fixed price set in advance. Mr Davies, Mr Lloyd and senior CPB executives are known to have all favoured a shared-risk deal when discussing possible contracts three years ago. Responding on social media to a post by a CPB legal adviser about the problems of fixed-price contracts, Mr Lloyd said he "fully agreed". Fixed-price contracts are usually priced higher to protect the contractor against any rising costs but, depending on construction prices and other variables, are no guarantee that a project's costs will be contained. One independent construction expert — who did not wish to be named — said the type of contract would make little difference to the job's price compared with the cost of the lengthy delays to date. "It will be six of one and half a dozen of the other," they said. However, a shared-risk arrangement could prevent pricey legal pain down the track. CPB and the government have had various scuffles, including time in the High Court over escalating costs of a sports centre build in Christchurch. Meanwhile, the foundations of the inpatient building are likely to get under way. Health Minister Simeon Brown told the ODT that capping of the 324 piles already on the site would start soon, followed by work on the perimeter of the basement to form the base for the substructure. "The third part of the process will be installing the base isolators and then the frame of the main construction," he said. HNZ did not answer a question about the letter of intent to CPB but said that "commercial and delivery arrangements for the inpatient building are continuing to progress.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store