
Italy's referendum fails on poor turnout
Key government ministers had encouraged their supporters to boycott the referendum while the opposition had hoped that a strong turnout could help build momentum in favour of political change and challenge Meloni's domination of Italian politics. "It has been a big defeat for the left, that strengthens the government," said Antonio Tajani, the deputy prime minister and leader of Forza Italia party, one of the coalition parties.
Meloni, who took office in October 2022 at the head of a right-wing coalition, remains popular. A poll from SWG institute on Tuesday put her Brothers of Italy party at just above 30%, up from the 26% it won in a 2022 national election, while the main opposition centre-left Democratic Party (PD) was on 23%. "This was an attempt to deal a blow (to the government) and it seems to me that it has failed. I think there was hope among the promoters of a stronger anti-Meloni mobilisation," said Lorenzo Pregliasco, from YouTrend polling agency.
YouTrend figures showed an average 12.9 million electors voted 'Yes' on the labour questions — slightly more than those who backed the centre-right coalition in 2022 - which the opposition hailed as the first building block of an alternative. Italy's next national election is not scheduled until 2027.
Tallies showed differences in voting between the labour-related measures and the question about easing citizenship rules, which was far more contentious given Meloni's hard line against mass migration. More than 85% of those who took part in the two-day vote backed stronger protection for workers but roughly a third opposed speeding up the procedures for gaining citizenship, indicating divisions also among progressive voters on the issue, informed Reuters.
"There is a part of the more moderate left-wing electorate that does not share the (progressive) parties' positions on migrants. They are not against them, but they want laws that can limit entry and citizenship," said polling expert Antonio Noto. Noto added that the data suggested some of Italy's right-leaning voters had defied calls from their parties' leaders to boycott the referendum and had likely helped boost the "No" vote on citizenship. Pollsters say the wealthy centres of cities including Milan and Turin strongly backed reforming the citizenship rules, while the number decreased in the suburbs, indicating that lower-income voters are more conservative on the issue. The failure of the referendum has dealt a major setback for groups fighting for the integration of migrants. Promoters complained of confusion and overlap with other issues, including the management of migratory flows and illegal arrivals.
"The lack of information and misinformation on the citizenship question certainly affected the result, in terms of abstentions and votes against," said Anna Lisa Mandorino, who heads civil rights group Cittadinanzattiva.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
31 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
US House Green‑Lights First Stablecoin Regulation
The U. S. House of Representatives has approved the GENIUS Act, the inaugural federal regulatory framework targeting fiat‑backed stablecoins, with a decisive 308–122 bipartisan vote on 17 July 2025. With Senate approval secured in June by a 68–30 margin, the legislation now advances to President Trump's desk for signature, anticipated as early as tomorrow. The GENIUS Act mandates that issuers—including banks, credit unions, fintech firms, and select non‑bank entities—maintain one‑to‑one reserves in cash or low‑risk assets such as U. S. Treasury bills, with mandatory monthly public disclosures of reserve composition. It also institutes anti‑money laundering controls, requires issuance organisations to obtain licences from federal or state financial regulators, and prohibits paying interest directly to stablecoin holders. The legislation forms part of a broader 'Crypto Week' effort in the House, which also included passage of the CLARITY Act—allocating oversight of digital asset classification between the SEC and CFTC—and the Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act, barring the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Both now await Senate consideration. ADVERTISEMENT Advocates argue that the GENIUS Act addresses long-standing regulatory uncertainty, providing market stability and consumer safeguards within a $260 billion-plus stablecoin ecosystem. Senior figures from institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, Walmart, and Amazon have reportedly expressed interest in issuing stablecoins under the new regime. Market sentiment reflects optimism: crypto‑linked equities and assets rose when the House vote was finalised, with Bitcoin nearing record highs above $119,000. Nonetheless, critics highlight significant concerns. Consumer advocates emphasise that stablecoins remain outside FDIC protection and could pose redemption risks or obscure hidden fees. Others express unease over potential weak guardrails: the SEC's Paul Atkins cautioned that regulatory innovation must still ensure sufficient market safeguards. Ethics debates spotlight former President Trump's extensive ties to the crypto industry, including investments in World Liberty Financial and a meme coin touted as generating over $300 million in related revenues. Opponents claim this raises conflict‑of‑interest questions and risks favouring Trump‑linked enterprises, though the White House has asserted asset segregation via a family trust. In Congress, both Democratic and Republican proponents defended the legislation for delivering much‑needed structure. Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer remarked that introducing 'some rules of the road' was preferable to having none. Opposing voices like Rep. Maxine Waters cautioned that the law might 'signal tolerance for corruption' without closing presidential exemptions from conflict‑of‑interest prohibitions. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats, including Richard Blumenthal, criticised the bill's failure to eliminate loopholes or demand stronger consumer protection standards. Beyond federal oversight, the GENIUS Act introduces a layered supervisory model: federal agencies will regulate larger issuers and interstate entities, while state regulators handle smaller players—those issuing under $10 billion annually. The legislation sets out implementation timelines, including one‑year deadlines for rule‑making and an 18‑month effective date, with a three‑year transition period before enforcement on custody and transaction restrictions. Industry stakeholders anticipate dramatic market growth. Scott Bessent, Treasury secretary, projected the stablecoin market could swell from around $195 billion to over $2 trillion following the GENIUS Act's implementation. Christian Catalini of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab predicted fierce competition as banks and fintechs join traditional issuers with consumer trust bolstered by regulation. The crypto sector, stung by past regulatory setbacks under the prior administration's enforcement actions, now views the GENIUS Act as a turning point. Major players like Circle and Coinbase backed the measure after directing substantial lobbying resources toward lawmakers. Jennifer Nolan, head of the Blockchain Association, described it as a 'defining moment in the evolution of U. S. digital asset policy'. With presidential signature expected imminently, the GENIUS Act is poised to redefine the U. S. approach to stablecoins—ushering in regulated issuance, enhanced transparency, and heightened institutional involvement. Its progress also spotlights ongoing debates about market oversight, political influence, and financial stability in an increasingly digital economy.


Middle East Eye
6 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US officials do not want to sell advanced AI chips to company run by UAE spy chief: Report
The UAE's bid to buy hundreds of thousands of advanced AI chips from Nvidia is being held up by US officials concerned that China could gain access to advanced American technology, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. US officials are weighing whether or not to sell chips directly to a company owned by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the UAE's powerful national security advisor. Tech CEOs, diplomats, security officials and investors have all been waiting for clarity on whether the US would begin exporting Nvidia AI chips to the UAE as part of a much-hyped deal that President Donald Trump announced during a visit to the Gulf in May. Bloomberg reported earlier this month that neither Saudi Arabia nor the UAE have been approved to receive the chips by the Commerce Department. On Thursday, the WSJ reported that plans to export chips to the UAE have been delayed, as the US weighs new terms for a deal. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The original agreement envisioned the UAE purchasing up to 500,000 of Nvidia's most advanced AI chips annually, starting in 2025. Of that amount, 400,000 would go to US firms working on data centres and AI projects inside the oil-rich Gulf state. But a big slice - 100,000 chips - is supposed to go directly to G-42, the state-owned AI firm run by Sheikh Tahnoon, who is also the UAE's AI czar. Tahnoon, who sports aviator sunglasses because of an eye condition, manages the UAE's most ambitious tech investments and has personally overseen outreach to the US. His lobbying has been framed as a bet by the wealthy Gulf state on American technological prowess over China. He visited US President Donald Trump at the White House in March to lay the groundwork for the deals announced in May. White House AI czar David Sacks, who spearheaded the deal, is seen as an advocate for pushing the sales through. How BlackRock and an Italian shipping dynasty are upending Middle East's port business Read More » Supporters believe that if the US doesn't relax its restrictions, it could lose a valuable market in the Gulf to China. Huawei has approached both Saudi Arabia and the UAE to purchase AI chips, albeit not its most advanced ones, Bloomberg reported. But US suspicion over the UAE's commitment to safeguarding American technology hung over Trump's visit. Trump stopped in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE in May. His trip to the UAE was the shortest and did not include a dinner like in Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Middle East Eye revealed at the time that Trump's National Security Council pushed to downplay his stop in the UAE, in part due to frustration over the Emiratis' perceived economic and military ties to China, one source briefed by the NSC told MEE. Trump has since fired many of those NSC officials. Some US defence and intelligence officials were concerned that in his rush for deals, Trump overlooked concerns about how to secure the technology behind American weapons systems and AI from China. The WSJ has reported that US officials want to cut off direct access to chips for G42. The Commerce Department doesn't plan to approve any chips going to the Emirati state-owned group, the WSJ reported. Trump would have the final say on exports. Just this week, he lifted his ban on Nvidia selling H20 artificial intelligence chips in China after meeting Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. The decision lifted Nvidia's share price. The UAE is interested in H100 chips, the most advanced AI chips produced by Nvidia. A single chip costs an estimated $25,000. Clinching the sale of 500,000 to the UAE would be a boon to Nvidia. The sheer number of chips underscores the Gulf region's unrivalled buying power. The UAE's ambassador to the US, Yousef al-Otaiba, and Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the CEO and managing director of Mubadala, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, attended an energy and tech conference with senior US officials in Pittsburgh this week.


Dubai Eye
10 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Israeli strikes kill 22 in Gaza, two die in church
Israeli forces killed at least 22 people in attacks in the Gaza Strip on Thursday, including two people who died in a strike on a church that late Pope Francis used to speak to regularly, medics and church officials said. Eight men tasked with protecting aid trucks were reported among the dead in airstrikes that were carried out while mediators continued ceasefire talks in Doha. A US official said this week the talks were going well but two officials from the Palestinian group Hamas told Reuters there had been no breakthrough as the Israeli military continued to pummel Gaza. A man and a woman died, and several people were wounded in "an apparent strike by the Israeli army" on Gaza's Holy Family Church, the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem said in a statement. The Holy Family Church in Gaza spoke in a separate statement of "a number of injured, some in critical condition." In a telegram for the victims, Pope Leo said he was "deeply saddened" and called for "an immediate ceasefire." The pope expressed his "profound hope for dialogue, reconciliation and enduring peace in the region," according to the telegram which was signed by the Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said they were "aware of reports regarding damage caused to the Holy Family Church in Gaza City and casualties at the scene. The circumstances of the incident are under review." "The IDF makes every feasible effort to mitigate harm to civilians and civilian structures, including religious sites, and regrets any damage caused to them," the statement added. Israel's foreign ministry said in a statement on X that the results of the investigation would be published. It also said the country did not target churches or religious sites and regretted harm to them or civilians. The Patriarchate earlier said the parish priest, Father Gabriel Romanelli, was among those injured, and his church had sustained damage. Father Romanelli, an Argentine, used to regularly update the late Pope Francis about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict via calls and messages. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni blamed Israel for the strike on the religious compound. "The attacks against the civilian population that Israel has been carrying out for months are unacceptable. No military action can justify such an attitude," she said in a statement.