Fatwa against Donald Trump? Shia cleric's ‘red line' on US president for ‘threatening' Iran's Supreme leader Khamenei
According to Tehran Times, in a written note, Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi has declared, 'Any regime or individual threatening the leaders of the Islamic Ummah and acting on those threats qualifies as a Muharib.'
Under Shia Islamic jurisprudence, a 'Muharib' is defined as someone who wages armed rebellion, terrorism, violent crimes, or other unlawful acts that spread fear and disorder in society. The prescribed punishment for such offenses is death.
Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi's remarks are being interpreted as a "Fatwa," a religious edict, the Tehran Times report added. Iran's Ayatollah Nouri Hamedani and Iraq's Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani have published similar statements seen as Fatwas.
1. Accusation of Defeat and Denial of Iran's Victory Claims
Donald Trump publicly challenged Khamenei's claim that Iran had emerged victorious over Israel and the US, calling it a 'lie' and bluntly stating, 'You got beat to hell.' He accused Khamenei of spreading falsehoods about the war's outcome, insisting that Iran's military and nuclear capabilities were severely damaged by U.S. strikes.
Trump repeatedly asserted that US forces had 'obliterated' three key Iranian nuclear facilities (Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz) during the conflict. He insisted these strikes dealt a devastating blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions, despite some intelligence reports suggesting only a temporary setback.
In a striking admission, Donald Trump revealed that he knew exactly where Khamenei was sheltering during the conflict and deliberately prevented Israeli and US forces from killing him, stating, 'I saved him from a very ugly and ignominious death.' Trump lamented that Khamenei did not 'thank' him for sparing his life.
Donald Trump warned that the US would 'definitely' strike Iran again if Tehran resumed uranium enrichment or nuclear activities that posed a threat. He did not rule out future military action against Iran's nuclear sites if necessary.
Trump disclosed that he was working on removing sanctions against Iran to aid its recovery but immediately dropped all efforts after Khamenei's 'statement of anger, hatred, and disgust.' He criticised Khamenei's tone and called it 'blatant and foolish,' blaming it for the collapse of potential diplomatic progress.
Trump warned Iran that unless it 'gets back into the world order flow,' conditions would worsen for the country, describing it as 'a burned out, blown up country, with no future, a decimated military, a horrible economy and death all around them.' He urged the Iranian leadership to adopt a more conciliatory approach, saying, 'you often get more with honey than you do with vinegar.'
Trump revealed that he ordered Israeli planes to turn back from a planned 'biggest attack of the war,' which he said would have caused significant Iranian casualties. He claimed to have restrained Israel from delivering a 'final knockout' blow to Iran.
A Fatwa is an interpretation of Islamic law issued by a Marja. It is binding for all Muslims, meaning that even if Islamic governments are not able to act on it, individual Muslims should ensure its enforcement.
A well-known example of states failing to act on a Fatwa, prompting individual Muslims to take matters into their own hands, is the case of Salman Rushdie.
On February 14, 1989, Imam Khameini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, issued a historic Fatwa calling for the execution of Salman Rushdie, the British-Indian author of The Satanic Verses, a novel filled with blasphemy against Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).
The fatwa stated: "I inform the proud Muslim people of the world that the author of The Satanic Verses book, which is against Islam, the Prophet, and the Quran, and all those involved in its publication who were aware of its content, are sentenced to death. I call on all zealous Muslims to execute them quickly, wherever they find them."
Rushdie was forced into hiding immediately after the fatwa was issued. He was placed under 24/7 British police protection and lived in safe houses for nearly a decade. In 1989, a bomb exploded at a London hotel where Rushdie was scheduled to speak.
Over three decades after the Fatwa was issued, when Rushdie emerged from hiding and began living more openly, the threat had not faded, contrary to his and the police's expectations. In 2022, Rushdie was stabbed on stage in New York by an attacker allegedly acting on the Fatwa. He has since retreated back into seclusion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' heads for final vote — major relief for NRIs as India remittance tax cut to 1%
The US House of Representatives is expected to hold a final vote on President Donald Trump's flagship tax-and-spending legislation, known as the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' This comprehensive bill, central to Trump's second-term economic plans, has faced a challenging journey through Congress. Despite initial approval in May, the bill returns to the lower chamber after narrowly passing the Senate on Tuesday with a one-vote margin. Although introduced by the Republican president, the bill has attracted criticism from several lawmakers within his own party. Concerns raised include the projected $3 trillion increase in national debt and significant cuts to social welfare programs. Major relief for Indian remitters in final draft One of the most notable revisions in the final draft of the bill, released on June 27, involves a substantial reduction in the proposed tax on international remittances. Originally set at 5 percent, the tax was first reduced to 3.5 percent and now stands at just 1 percent. This change comes as a relief to many Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the US who regularly send money back home. The provision will benefit nearly 4.5 million Indians living in the US, including 3.2 million persons of Indian origin. It applies to US residents who are not citizens—such as Green Card holders, temporary visa holders like H-1B and H-2A workers, and international students. According to the latest version of the bill, 'There is hereby imposed on any remittance transfer a tax equal to 1 per cent of the amount of such transfer… paid by the sender.' Specific transfers exempt from tax The bill also outlines specific exemptions. Transfers made from accounts held by financial institutions and those funded via US-issued debit or credit cards will not be taxed under this provision. Cash transfers, money orders, and cashier's checks will fall under the 1 percent tax rate. This final version of the bill reflects efforts to balance domestic economic concerns with the financial realities of millions of immigrants working in the United States, particularly those from India. As the House prepares for a conclusive vote, all eyes remain on how this high-stakes legislation will shape Trump's economic legacy.
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After Trump's arrest threat, Zohran Mamdani fires back at the U.S. President
Published on Jul 03, 2025 05:05 PM IST New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani has fiercely condemned the U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to arrest, detain, and deport him for pledging to block ICE raids in the city. Mamdani, who recently won the Democratic primary in a major upset, accused Trump of trying to intimidate him and silence dissent, calling the president's threats "an attack on our democracy" and a warning to all New Yorkers who oppose federal immigration enforcement. Watch for more
Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Trump's ‘big beautiful' tax bill is hanging by a thread as House Republicans rebel
The US House of Representatives worked into the early hours of Thursday morning as President Donald Trump pushed to secure final passage of a sweeping tax and spending bill—his defining legislative priority of his second term. Despite his party's control over both chambers of Congress, Trump has struggled to unify Republicans behind the bill, which promises to extend his 2017 tax cuts while slashing Medicaid and expanding military and border spending. The legislation narrowly cleared the Senate in an overnight vote on Tuesday. But in the House, Trump has faced a sharper challenge. After nearly seven hours of procedural wrangling late Wednesday night, the bill cleared a key hurdle that allowed it to be brought to the House floor for a final vote. That vote, expected before Trump's July 4 deadline, remains uncertain. 'The House is ready to vote tonight,' Trump posted on social media Wednesday, insisting that Republicans were 'united' to deliver 'massive growth.' However, at least half a dozen Republican representatives have expressed serious concerns. Their complaints have ranged from warnings about the bill's ballooning effect on the national deficit to fears that it cuts too deeply into federal healthcare and food subsidy programs. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Senate's version of the bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade, compared to the $2.8 trillion projected under the earlier House version. That projection triggered outrage from fiscal conservatives in the powerful House Freedom Caucus, whose members have been among the bill's most vocal opponents. Texas Republican Chip Roy said the Senate version had pushed the odds of meeting Trump's deadline into doubt. Freedom Caucus chairman Andy Harris of Tennessee backed Elon Musk's criticism of the bill. 'He understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress,' Harris told Fox News. Other Republicans echoed the concern. Ohio's Warren Davidson posted on X: 'Promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending.' The spending in question centres in part on cuts to Medicaid, the government's health insurance program for low-income Americans. The House bill would result in 11 million people losing coverage. 'I've been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers,' said California Republican David Valadao, who represents a swing district. That concern is also shared by representatives from poorer districts worried about blowback in the 2026 midterms. According to The Hill, six Republicans at one point planned to vote the bill down due to fears over key healthcare provisions. If the bill passes, it would extend the 2017 tax cuts, originally set to expire, while funding two major planks of Trump's platform: border security and defence spending. But those measures are offset through controversial cuts. In addition to healthcare, the Senate version also reduces food subsidies and modifies the so-called SALT deduction—the amount taxpayers can deduct for state and local taxes.
