logo
This Minnesota recycled aluminum plant will help stem tariff costs

This Minnesota recycled aluminum plant will help stem tariff costs

Miami Herald09-07-2025
ROSEMOUNT, Minnesota - With its new $71 million expansion, EGA Spectro Alloys in this southern suburb of the Twin Cities becomes one of only about 40 plants in the U.S. that can make recycled aluminum billets.
Think 25-foot-long poles of solid aluminum.
The 90,000-square-foot plant gives companies a needed domestic source for the much-in-demand billets at a time when most aluminum in the U.S. is imported and faces a 50% tariff set in June by President Donald Trump.
At the same time, it becomes a much bigger buyer of industrial metal scrap, a new buyer in Minnesota for recycled beer and pop cans and gives Spectro Alloys its first new product line in 53 years.
"So there's a lot of demand. We are in a really good position," said EGA Spectro Alloys President Luke Palen.
Because aluminum is used in everything from cars and fighter jets to food containers and America's ever-expanding energy grid, U.S. demand "approached near record levels in 2024," said Aluminum Association spokesperson Katie Rosebrook.
Spectro Alloy employs about 150 workers in its original aluminum recycling plant, which makes 28-pound bricks, called ingots, that eventually become parts for Harley-Davidson motorcycles, Polaris ATVs and products made by companies like General Motors, Tesla, Black & Decker and Caterpillar.
The company, which is majority owned by Emirates Global Aluminum in the United Arab Emirates, now is scrambling to add 50 new workers and expects the new billet operation to boost business by 50%, Palen said.
"Their investment (of) $71 million and creating 50 new jobs for the area is a huge impact for us," said Adam Kienberger, community development director for Rosemount.
Last week, the first molten metal glided from one new three-story furnace, oozed down chutes and spilled into 26-foot casting cylinders, deep in the floor of the expansion.
Three new rumbling furnaces came from Austria.
Once they had cooled, crane operator Lorenzo Martinez gingerly hoisted 10 billets from the "vertical casting pit" and onto a giant conveyor belt. The load weighed nearly 18,000 pounds.
The billets will be marketed under the RevivAL brand name, a nod to the fact the aluminum came from 250 recyclers.
"With this expansion, we will make 120 million pounds a year of high-quality, recycled billet," said Palen, who said it also helps companies meet environmental goals. "It will ... contribute to a circular economy in our region and throughout the U.S."
Customers are already lined up for the billets, which will be used to build door frames, stair railings and boat docks besides auto parts and more.
Last week, the first truck load shipped to Crown Extrusions in Chaska, which is working with a dock maker.
The company plans to add more equipment so it can produce other products such as sheet metal alloys.
Since selling 80% of the company to EGA last year, the Palens have sent engineers, technicians, chemists and metallurgists to Abu Dhabi for billet training.
With the new billet plant, Minnesota will no longer have to send all of its curbside-collected aluminum-can scrap to other states for processing. Some of Spectro's billet alloy recipes will allow for some old cans, in addition to the usual industrial aluminum scrap.
"This is exciting, because it's not only going to increase the aluminum that's recycled overall, but it's the first local outlet for aluminum cans in Minnesota, at least that I'm aware of," said Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) spokesman Mark Rust. "It is critically important that people understand there's a reason to recycle. These products really do have value. The more material that enters the market, that adds value to Minnesota's economy."
Gwen Jenkins, MPCA's recycling and organics specialist, said she hopes Spectro's ability to use additional types of aluminum scrap will remind and encourage Minnesotans to recycle more.
Right now, Minnesotans recycle just 51% of aluminum beverage cans or about 14,000 tons a year, she said.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump goes golfing as protesters speak out against his visit to Scotland
Donald Trump goes golfing as protesters speak out against his visit to Scotland

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump goes golfing as protesters speak out against his visit to Scotland

Protesters have insisted that Donald Trump is 'not welcome here' as the US president took to the golf course on the first full day of his visit to Scotland. Tight security around the Trump Turnberry course meant no demonstrators were seen when the president took to the greens on Saturday morning. Dressed in black, with a white cap that said USA on it, Mr Trump could be seen driving a golf buggy, flanked by a fleet of security personnel, as he played on the famous course which he bought in 2014. However hundreds gathered in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen – near the site of Mr Trump's other Scottish golf resort – to make their opposition to the president known. As the visit got under way Scottish First Minister John Swinney – who is due to hold talks with the president later in the trip – announced public money to support a tournament at the Trump International golf links in Aberdeenshire. The 2025 Nexo Championship – previously known as the Scottish Championship – is set to take place there next month, supported by £180,000 of public funding. Mr Swinney said: 'The Scottish Government recognises the importance and benefits of golf and golf events, including boosting tourism and our economy.' But Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie likened the awarding of public cash to the tournament to 'handing some pocket money to the school bully'. Mr Trump will head to his golf resort in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire later on in his five-day long private visit. As part of his trip he will also hold talks with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, where the two men will refine a trade deal between the UK and the US that was agreed earlier this year. The president is also expected to talk trade with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday. But with no talks apparently scheduled for Saturday, the president, who is well known for his love of golf, was free to take to the famous course at Turnberry. A major security operation surrounded him, with police officers and military personnel seen scouring the grounds ahead of Mr Trump teeing off. After touching down in Scotland in Air Force One on Friday night, the president was seen on the course at Turnberry on Saturday morning – although security fencing had also been erected around the resort, with road closures also in place to help protect Mr Trump, who last year survived an assassination attempt. Police Scotland has asked for support from other forces across the UK to bolster officer numbers for the high profile visit – with Mr Swinney appealing to people to protest 'peacefully and within the law'. In Aberdeen Green north east Scotland MSP Maggie Chapman told the crowd of hundreds: 'We stand in solidarity not only against Trump but against everything he and his politics stand for.' Speaking about the US president, Ms Chapman said: 'He believes that climate change isn't real, he believes that cutting services for those in the world with the least is the right thing to do. 'We say no to all of those things, not in our name, never in our name.' With Mr Trump having last year been convicted by a New York jury of falsifying business records, she said the president was a 'convicted felon'. And she told the PA news agency: 'He is not welcome in Scotland, he is certainly not welcome in Aberdeenshire. 'We know that he is a convicted felon. 'We also know that all of the promises he has repeatedly made to Scotland have come to nothing, there hasn't been the development of jobs or houses that he promised when he opened his course in Aberdeenshire a few years ago.' Mr Harvie was also critical of the president, telling the PA news agency: 'He's attacking our renewables industry once again, one of the success stories of Scotland, and he is trying to attack and undermine it. 'And that is after having trashed part of our natural environment on the Aberdeenshire coast to build his golf resort.'

DOGE builds AI tool to cut 50 percent of federal regulations
DOGE builds AI tool to cut 50 percent of federal regulations

Washington Post

time43 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

DOGE builds AI tool to cut 50 percent of federal regulations

The U.S. DOGE Service is using a new artificial intelligence tool to slash federal regulations, with the goal of eliminating half of Washington's regulatory mandates by the first anniversary of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post and four government officials familiar with the plans. The tool, called the 'DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool,' is supposed to analyze roughly 200,000 federal regulations to determine which can be eliminated because they are no longer required by law, according to a PowerPoint presentation obtained by The Post that is dated July 1 and outlines DOGE's plans. Roughly 100,000 of those rules would be deemed worthy of trimming, the PowerPoint estimates — mostly through the automated tool with some staff feedback. The PowerPoint also suggests the AI tool will save the United States trillions of dollars by reducing compliance requirements, slashing the federal budget and unlocking unspecified 'external investment.' The tool has already been used to eliminated more than 1,000 'regulatory sections' at the Department of Housing and Urban Development in under two weeks, according to the PowerPoint, and to write '100% of deregulations' at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Three HUD employees — as well as documents obtained by The Post — confirmed that an AI tool was recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations at that agency and suggest edits or deletions. The tool was developed by engineers brought into government as part of Elon Musk's DOGE project, according to two federal officials directly familiar with DOGE's work, who, like others interviewed for this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations they were not authorized to discuss publicly. Conservatives have long argued that the federal government issues far too many regulations that constrain economic growth and hurt the private sector. Many liberals have emphasized that there are reasons federal regulations are in place, such as protecting the environment and ensuring food safety. Asked about the AI-fueled deregulation, White House spokesman Harrison Fields wrote in an email that 'all options are being explored' to achieve the president's goal of deregulating government. Fields noted that 'no single plan has been approved or green-lit,' cautioning that the work is 'in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House.' Fields added: 'The DOGE experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.' One former member of DOGE, which stands for Department of Government Efficiency, wrote in a text message that the team did everything it could to come up with legal and technological solutions to repeal as many regulations as possible within Trump's term. 'Creative deployment of artificial intelligence to advance the president's regulatory agenda is one logical strategy to make significant progress in that finite amount of time,' wrote James Burnham, who served as chief attorney for DOGE and is now managing partner at King Street Legal. The proposed use of AI to accomplish swift, massive deregulation expands upon the Trump administration's work to embed AI across the government — using it for everything from fighting wars to reviewing taxes. And it dovetails with the administration's aim to unwind regulations government-wide, even without AI. But it's unclear if a new, untested technology could make mistakes in its attempts to analyze federal regulations typically put in place for a reason. On Jan. 31, Trump issued an executive order to 'unleash prosperity through deregulation,' which required agencies to repeal 10 rules for every new rule issued. Since then, some departments have engaged in what almost appears to be a competition to cut. In May, the Transportation Department declared it had deleted 52 regulations and more than 73,000 words from the Federal Register. This month, the Labor Department announced plans to nix more than 60 regulations. Still, Republicans have grown frustrated by the relatively slow pace of deregulatory actions. During the first six months of Trump's first term, his administration cut costs by about $550 million and paperwork hours by 566,000, according to the American Action Forum, a center-right think tank that tracks regulations. Through July of this year, the Trump administration has achieved nearly all its cost reductions by repealing one rule regarding what businesses must report about their ownership ties. Without that, the Trump administration would have increased regulatory costs by $1.1 billion and paperwork hours by 3.3 million, according to the think tank. 'They're way behind where they were in 2017 on the numbers, no question about it,' said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and former director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'I thought this was going to be something they crushed because they did so in 2017. I've been baffled by this.' The AI tool is intended to massively accelerate the deregulation process, with every federal agency able to develop a list of regulations to eliminate in less than four weeks, according to the PowerPoint. The agencies are supposed to finish their lists by Sept. 1, and this month, DOGE is supposed to start training staff at agencies on how to use the AI tool, the PowerPoint states. Read the PowerPoint here. While DOGE had pushed earlier this year to take a larger role in the deregulatory effort, the Musk-led team was frequently rebuffed by agency employees who worried about outsourcing decisions and their authorities, according to three people who have participated in deregulatory conversations at the White House and the agency level who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share private conversations. Federal officials also questioned whether DOGE had the subject matter expertise to comb through highly technical regulations and find appropriate targets for cuts, the people said. As DOGE's influence waned following Musk's departure, the administration has remained focused on Trump's deregulatory order, the people said. White House staff are also using internal trackers to monitor how quickly agencies are paring regulations, while leaders at every major agency are meeting regularly to discuss how quickly they can meet Trump's ambitions and which cuts 'count' toward the president's order, according to the people. In some cases, DOGE's campaign to fire federal workers and dramatically shrink the federal workforce has hampered the deregulatory effort, the three people said. 'The White House wants us higher on the leader board,' said one of the three people. 'But you have to have staff and time to write the deregulatory notices, and we don't. That's a big reason for the holdup.' Trump officials have tried to use AI to roll back regulations before. At the Department of Health and Human Services, a 2020 'Regulatory Clean Up Initiative' drew on an AI tool to identify and remove archaic language, defunct federal provisions and outdated terms from federal rules. Trump has pushed the limits of the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs repealing federal regulations, most notably through an executive order ending a rule that restricted the water flow of showerheads. It is unclear if courts will allow the administration to void rules. Meanwhile, private-sector companies tend to be uncomfortable ignoring a rule that was illegally repealed, said Nicholas Bagley, an administrative law expert at the University of Michigan. 'There's been some flashy sideshow efforts to avoid the legal strictures, but in general, they don't stick,' Bagley said of Trump's unilateral efforts to cut regulations. DOGE officials may be concerned about the legality of the AI tool. One page of the slideshow says four people identified as 'DOGE lawyers' — Burnham, Austin Raynor, Jacob Altik and Ashley Boizelle — each 'vetted and endorsed' the AI deregulation tool. Raynor, Altik and Boizelle could not be reached for comment. Federal regulations, as they stand now, can be divided into three categories, the PowerPoint says: 50 percent are not required by law, 38 percent are statutorily mandated and 12 percent are 'Not Required but Agency Needs.' By ending the rules that are both unnecessary by law and to agency operations, the PowerPoint states, the government could recover $3.3 trillion a year. But the PowerPoint also suggests it would take 3.6 million 'man-hours' to nix 100,000 regulations under the current system. It is not clear how the PowerPoint's authors arrived at these figures. That's where the AI tool comes in, the PowerPoint proposes. The tool will save 93 percent of the human labor involved by reviewing up to 500,000 comments submitted by the public in response to proposed rule changes. By the end of the deregulation exercise, humans will have spent a grand total of 36 hours gutting half of all federal regulations, the PowerPoint claims. The PowerPoint lists two case studies as examples of how well its AI tool can work, detailing recent efforts to slash regulations at HUD and CFPB. Asked about the AI-driven regulation slashing, a HUD spokesperson wrote in a statement that the agency is having 'ongoing discussions' to consider how to make government more efficient. 'We are not disclosing specifics about how many regulations are being examined or where we are at in the broader process,' the spokesperson said, adding, 'the process is far from final.' The spokesperson continued: 'The intent of the developments is not to replace the judgement, discretion and expertise of staff but be additive to the process.' CFPB did not respond to questions. The Post was not able to independently confirm the use of AI at the agency. At HUD, efforts to use AI to kill regulations began three months ago, according to three employees familiar with the matter and emails obtained by The Post. A message sent to some of the agency's Public and Indian Housing staff on April 18 announced a 'DOGE team' would be 'learning how AI will be able to analyze all PIH regulations looking for and flagging discrepancies between them and the underlying statute.' 'This is a major effort,' the email continued. 'We are working with the lawyers to simplify the [Administrative Procedure Act] process … use AI for drafting, and use AI for complying notices in the future.' The overall goal, the email noted, was to deploy AI to reduce the time staff had to spend on deregulation. Another document, signed 'HUD DOGE Team' and sent to staff, detailed how DOGE team members wanted federal staffers to engage the AI tool. Staffers were supposed to look over the tool's recommendations for proposed regulatory eliminations and mark whether they agreed, disagreed or believed deletions should go further. One HUD employee who participated in this process said the AI tool made several errors. It delivered an analysis saying those who drafted various agency regulations had misunderstood the law in several places, said the employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to reveal internal conversations. But the AI tool was sometimes wrong, the employee said. 'There were a couple places where the AI said the language was outside of the statute,' the employee said, 'and actually, no — the AI read the language wrong, and it is actually correct.' After its tryout at HUD, the AI deregulation tool is supposed to deploy across the rest of government in coming months, according to the DOGE PowerPoint. Over the next five months, agencies will work with the AI tool to identify regulations to kill, respond to public comments about the proposed deletions and submit formal deregulation proposals, the PowerPoint says. The goal is to wrap everything up and 'Relaunch America on Jan. 20, 2026,' the PowerPoint states.

Should You Actually Invest Your Own Money in the Trump Baby Accounts?
Should You Actually Invest Your Own Money in the Trump Baby Accounts?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Actually Invest Your Own Money in the Trump Baby Accounts?

One of the key provisions of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' establishes so-called 'Trump Accounts,' designed to encourage savings for newborn children. In addition to receiving an initial deposit from the federal government, the accounts allow for additional contributions by parents or employers. Read Next: Check Out: The question is this: Should you actually invest your own money in these accounts? Or is there a better option among the other types of regular and tax-advantaged accounts that are already available? Here's a brief overview of the provisions of the Trump baby accounts and some recommendations as to whether or not you should invest. What Are the Parameters of the Trump Baby Accounts? The Trump Accounts are custodial, tax-deferred accounts that are somewhat like a hybrid of a traditional custodial account and an IRA account. They are registered in the name of the child, like a custodial account, and the money inside grows tax-deferred, like in an IRA. Money in a Trump Account cannot be withdrawn until age 18. After that, withdrawals can be made, but they are fully taxable and may be subject to a 10% penalty if withdrawn before age 59 1/2, as with IRAs and other tax-deferred retirement accounts. As with IRAs, there are some exceptions to the 10% penalty rule, including withdrawals for higher education and the purchase of a first home. One of the unique benefits of a Trump Account is that the government will fund the first $1,000 in each and every account. After that, parents or employers can contribute up to an additional $5,000 per year, with a limit of $2,500 coming from employers. Unlike investments in other tax-deferred accounts, like 529 plans, IRAs and 401(k) plans, investments within a Trump Account are strictly limited to a U.S. stock market index fund. Find Out: Comparison of Trump Accounts With 529 Plans Here's a side-by-side comparison of the basic provisions of a Trump Account with a 529 plan, which is a commonly used, tax-deferred college funding account. Trump Account 529 Plan Government Contribution $1,000 $0 Contribution Limit $5,000 annually Variable; typically in the $300,000 range over the lifetime of the account Investment Options A U.S. stock index fund Typically a range of mutual funds or ETFs Taxation of Withdrawals Fully taxable; 10% penalty before age 59 1/2, with some exceptions (first-time homebuyer, education, etc.) Tax-free if used for education; earnings are fully taxable otherwise, with a 10% early withdrawal penalty if not used for qualified purpose Account Ownership Child's name; could affect student aid Account owner's name (typically a parent); reduced FAFSA impact Tax Treatment of Contributions Funded with after-tax money Funded with after-tax money Withdrawal Time Frame Not allowed until after age 18; taxable upon withdrawal Anytime, but must be used for education to be tax-free Risk Level 100% equity portfolio; restricted withdrawals until 18 More diversified investment options Asset Management One investment option State investment plans or professional advisor; some DIY options So What's the Verdict? As Michael Reynolds, a certified financial planner at Elevation Financial in the Indianapolis area, told NPR, 'I'm going to take the thousand dollars, definitely. Nothing wrong with that.' But beyond that, most advisors suggest that 529 plans might be the better option. Here are some of the main advantages of a 529 plan over a Trump Account: Higher maximum contributions over life of account More diversified investment options Accounts count as parents' assets, not child's assets Money can be withdrawn at any time, instead of being locked in account until the child turns age 18 (taxes and penalties may apply). The main advantage of the Trump Account is the initial $1,000 in seed funding from the federal government. That, advisors agree, is something parents should take advantage of. But adding more money to these accounts — while better than not saving at all — may not be the optimal use of your child's investment funds. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Should You Actually Invest Your Own Money in the Trump Baby Accounts? Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store