logo
How revered charity leader groomed and raped a 12-year-old boy then told twisted pal it was ‘naughty and kinky'

How revered charity leader groomed and raped a 12-year-old boy then told twisted pal it was ‘naughty and kinky'

Scottish Suna day ago
It is clear that Ireland, who co-founded Surrey Pride in 2018, used his position to gain access to young people and children
THE PRIDE PAEDO How revered charity leader groomed and raped a 12-year-old boy then told twisted pal it was 'naughty and kinky'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
STEPHEN IRELAND was a popular LGBT activist, who co-founded Surrey Pride and held the important position of its head of safeguarding.
But he will now spend the next 24 years in prison after raping an 'extremely vulnerable' 12-year-old boy in April 2024.
8
Stephen Ireland, who co-founded Pride in Surrey in 2018, raped a 12-year-old boy he met on dating app Grindr
Credit: X
8
Ireland was sentenced to 24 years in prison
Credit: Surrey Police
I was in Guildford Crown Court on Monday to watch Judge Patricia Lees hand Ireland, 42, his sentence, which included a further six years on extended licence.
His 27-year-old boyfriend and flatmate, David Sutton, was jailed for four and half years for his part in the sickening ordeal.
The boy — referred to in court as Child A — who had been reported missing at the time, had been lured to Ireland's home in Surrey after meeting him on the popular gay dating app Grindr.
In a carefully calculated move, Ireland provided the boy with a set of instructions and a key code to his flat, to avoid being seen together in public.
The boy, tired and hungry, was given a bong to smoke, which was later found to be laced with methamphetamine, while pornography played on a laptop.
Then he was raped by Ireland and the assault filmed, for the sadistic enjoyment of their cohorts.
The four-week trial followed an extensive investigation by Surrey Police's Complex Abuse Unit.
'Keep it a secret'
It began following the reported rape, which led to Ireland's arrest in April 2024.
A search of a phone hidden in his flat revealed indecent images of children.
Ireland and Sutton were both arrested on June 11, 2024, for distribution and possession of indecent images of children, and on August 14, 2024, charges were authorised for 44 offences (later increased to 45) relating to both, covering the period between August 2022 and July 2024.
Ireland's full list of crimes is horrifying.
He was also convicted of three counts of causing a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault, conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child, facilitating a child sexual offence, six counts of making child abuse imagery, distributing pornographic images of children, and possession of one of the most serious child abuse images, involving a toddler.
Sutton, who was a Surrey Pride volunteer, was sentenced for offences including voyeurism and possession and distribution of prohibited images of children.
He was also sentenced for perverting the course of justice for disposing of a phone owned by Surrey Pride (supposedly used for Pride business only).
On a separate device, police found a message from Ireland to Sutton, telling him to wipe all the images and messages off the Pride handset.
That device has never been found.
Child A had originally told Ireland he was 17, but when he later claimed in a message that he was 13, Ireland replied: 'OK — we just have to keep it a secret.'
Sickeningly, he later told the boy he found his young age 'naughty and kinky'.
Other messages between Ireland and Sutton described the child as a '14-year-old baby . . . who wants to play with men's bodies'.
8
Ireland's 27-year-old boyfriend and accomplice, David Sutton, was jailed for four and half years for his part in the sickening ordeal
Credit: Facebook
8
Judge Patricia Lees said Ireland and Sutton, pictured, 'fed off one another' and had supported one another in their 'perversions'
Credit: Surrey Police
Judge Patricia Lees said Ireland and Sutton 'fed off one another' and had supported one another in their 'perversions'.
She said: 'Stephen Ireland is a man who prided himself on being versed in and highly alive to the vulnerabilities of young people linked to the Surrey Pride organisation he was at the time pivotal to.
''A' was quite obviously to any adult an extremely vulnerable child who was highly sexualised.
'Any responsible adult would have quickly appreciated that there was a high likelihood 'A' is a young man who had been the subject of sexual grooming by adult men at a very early age and been concerned for him instead of taking advantage.'
It is clear that Ireland, who co-founded Surrey Pride in 2018, used his position to gain access to young people and children.
He was once so revered by the community, he was chauffeured around by Surrey Police in its 'Pride Car'.
But some volunteers had complained after feeling uneasy about the young age of his then boyfriend.
8
I was in Guildford Crown Court on Monday to watch Judge Patricia Lees hand Ireland, 42, his sentence
Credit: Facebook
8
So militant were Ireland's views on trans rights he targeted gender critical feminists, including the author JK Rowling
Credit: Facebook
One of those, Eve — not her real name — told me: 'There were some volunteers that raised concerns and there was a full safeguarding investigation, which was also escalated up to Surrey County Council.
'They had a huge issue about the fact that Ireland had a younger boyfriend, but he was above the age of 18, so that was that.'
Ireland was also involved in the Pride Hub, which encouraged young people to join in-person social events.
There is video footage of him sitting with an older 'trans woman' telling kids they could 'have sweets and popcorn' if they came along to a film screening.
He also gave talks to schools.
Throughout his time at the helm of Surrey Pride, Ireland waged a harassment campaign against Policing and Crime Commissioner Lisa Townsend, which included lobbying for her removal from office, and regularly referring to her as 'anti-trans' and 'exclusionary' in public.
So militant were his views on trans rights, he targeted gender critical feminists, including author JK Rowling, who had spoken out against transitioning children, and for the protection of women-only spaces.
8
Rowling posted on X about his sentence on Monday
Credit: X
8
Campaigner Maria Esposito believes Surrey Pride should now be shut down for 'safeguarding failures'
Credit: Alamy
In June 2020, Ireland tweeted: 'How to ruin a legacy . . . Become a TERF! Very disappointing JK!'
Rowling posted on X about his 30-year sentence on Monday.
Maria Esposito, an LGB campaigner since the 1980s and an attendee of the inaugural Surrey Pride, expressed unease about how quickly Ireland appeared to embed both himself and Pride within mainstream institutions.
She said: 'Watching them gain access to Surrey County Council, Surrey Police and local radio stations was deeply concerning.'
Esposito believes Surrey Pride should now be shut down.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man jailed after he was found in possession of two golden hatchets and large kitchen knife
Man jailed after he was found in possession of two golden hatchets and large kitchen knife

BreakingNews.ie

time2 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Man jailed after he was found in possession of two golden hatchets and large kitchen knife

A man has been jailed after he was found in possession of two golden hatchets and a large kitchen knife. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard that Michael Cash (33) dropped a gold-coloured hatchet while attempting to evade gardaí. A second gold-coloured hatchet and a large kitchen knife were found when Cash was searched. Advertisement Cash, of Ashlawn Park, Ballybrack, Dublin, pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of two gold-coloured hatchets in Cherrywood, Co Dublin on August 10th, 2024. A local garda told Carol Doherty BL, prosecuting on Wednesday, that gardaí responded to reports of two men travelling up and down the Luas track at Cherrywood on an e-scrambler wearing balaclavas. When gardaí arrived, Cash unsuccessfully attempted to start the e-scrambler, then fled on foot along with the other man. Gardaí followed Cash and saw a golden hatchet drop out of his jacket. Cash was searched after being apprehended and gardaí found a second golden hatchet, a large kitchen knife and a balaclava. Advertisement After caution, Cash was asked why he had these items. He replied they were for his protection. The court heard that Cash could also not provide proof of ownership of the e-scrambler. Cash has 116 previous convictions, including for false imprisonment, assault, criminal damage and road traffic offences. The garda witness agreed with Marc Murphy BL, defending, that his client always indicated an intention to enter a guilty plea. Advertisement It was further accepted that Cash was initially charged in August 2024 and spent a brief period in custody, but these charges were struck out. Cash was later re-arrested, charged and has been in custody since last December, the court was told. The garda also agreed that Cash has a significant history of alcohol and drugs difficulties. Mr Murphy said his client's instructions were always that a guilty plea should be entered at the earliest opportunity. Advertisement He noted his client's history of offending and asked the court to accept it is consistent with someone who has addiction issues. Cash has been assessed as suitable for a residential treatment programme, and a letter from Tiglin was handed to the court. Mr Murphy said his client is aware he is facing a custodial sentence and has now realised that he must address his addiction issues. Cash has two young children and has missed milestones in their lives, counsel said. Mr Murphy asked the court to consider suspending part of any sentence imposed. Judge Sinéad Ní Chúlacháin said the court took the view in the circumstances that Cash intended to use the items in his possession. Advertisement 'You weren't chopping firewood with them,' the judge said. 'Clearly, you intended to cause some injury or commit some other offence." Judge Ní Chúlacháin said she took into account Cash's guilty pleas, his admissions at the scene and cooperation with gardaí. The judge said Cash's past record of convictions is 'appalling', and it appeared that the breaks in his offending relate to periods when Cash has been in custody. Judge Ní Chúlacháin noted Cash's history of addiction and that he has been assessed as suitable for a residential treatment programme. She said it appeared for the first time he was making 'a serious effort' to rehabilitate himself. The judge also noted the defence's submission that Cash has a young family, and the defence's submission that he was missing milestones in their lives. 'It's a terrible thing for them and a loss for you,' the judge added. Judge Ní Chúlacháin imposed a three-year sentence, with the final 12 months suspended for two years. She directed Cash to place himself under probation supervision for two years and to engage with any drugs treatment programme. The judge directed that Cash should be given credit for any time spent in custody on this offence alone. Addressing Cash, the judge noted that Cash could be out in time for his daughter's first day in school, but 'it's up to you'.

Murder accused acted in self defence when he fatally stabbed his aunt's partner, court told
Murder accused acted in self defence when he fatally stabbed his aunt's partner, court told

BreakingNews.ie

time3 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Murder accused acted in self defence when he fatally stabbed his aunt's partner, court told

A murder accused was acting in self defence when he fatally stabbed his aunt's partner, who was prone to "rage and violence" and who the defendant was "absolutely right" to call "a complete lunatic", a defence barrister has told a Central Criminal Court jury. Michael Bowman SC, defending, asked the jurors to return a verdict of not guilty of murder, submitting that his client had not been the aggressor and had done no more than he believed necessary in the circumstances to defend himself. Advertisement In his closing speech, Brendan Grehan SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, told the jury that the accused had "buried" the knife "to the hilt" in the fatal stabbing and that his account of giving "a few jabs to the stomach" in self defence did not accord with the pathology evidence. Mr Grehan said the deceased's remains were "the silent witness" in the case. Ryan Kearney (39), with an address at Loughnamona Drive, Leixlip, Co Kildare has pleaded not guilty to murdering Jeffrey Jackson (50) at The Lamps, School Street, Kilcock, Co Kildare on February 8th, 2024. Mr Jackson's partner, Breda Kearney, has given evidence that when she returned home after a brief trip to the shop she was met by her bloodied nephew Ryan Kearney, who told her he had stabbed her partner in the neck and thought he was dead. Advertisement In his Garda interviews, Mr Kearney said that he took a knife off his aunt's enraged partner after a scuffle and gave him "a few jabs with it", telling detectives that he had no intention to kill and was in fear for his life. The state pathologist gave evidence that Mr Jackson was more than eight times over the legal drink driving limit and died after sustaining 16 separate knife injuries, one of which was 17cm in depth. Defence counsel Michael Bowman SC began his closing speech on Tuesday by saying that "buried up to the hilt" was a "bold statement" divorced from the reality of the situation. Mr Bowman argued that those words created an image of someone "driving in with tremendous force as far as the blade would go" but that the pathologist's evidence was that other wounds to the deceased were superficial. Advertisement Counsel said the pathologist had acknowledged in any dynamic situation which unfolds, momentum can be coming two ways. He said a knife with a blade of 11.7cm had inflicted an injury of 16 or 17cm and not the image of a knife being "driven in" with tremendous force. Mr Bowman on Wednesday said the two fatal injuries to the chest could have been sustained from two momentums coming together but that the prosecution wanted the jurors to accept that this was "a full blooded murderous assault". The lawyer said the prosecution in its closing speech "went large" on lies told by Mr Kearney but beyond that it was difficult to ascertain what the State sought to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. He submitted that "the prosecution says as the accused breathes he lies". Mr Bowman said his client had told lies and accepted that himself. He said whatever the accused was guilty of, it was not murder. Advertisement Clearly, counsel said, Mr Kearney told gardai that Mr Jackson "came at" him in the apartment. He said the defendant's case is that Mr Jackson was capable of spontaneous violence with little or no trigger and uncontrolled aggression. Mr Bowman said the deceased's wife Emma Farrell was a critical and crucial witness in the case, who had got away from Mr Jackson in circumstances where she feared for her life. 'Constant state of fear' Ms Farrell told the trial that her husband Mr Jackson was an alcoholic who was physically abusive when drunk and that she had lived "in a constant state of fear" of being killed by him. Ms Farrell also gave evidence that her husband's violence could "erupt spontaneously without any provocation" on her part and the deceased was "the type of guy who had no fear". Advertisement Mr Bowman said Ms Farrell was necessary in the case not to put down a man who had passed away but to show jurors that Mr Jackson was capable of spontaneous violence with little or no provocation, which could be fatal. Counsel said Ms Farrell had told the jury Mr Jackson was "the type of guy who had no fear", which he asked the jury to reflect upon. "Although Mr Jackson has been stabbed or jabbed he keeps coming. He is the sort of guy who has no fear and just keeps coming". The lawyer told the jurors they would have to decide who was the aggressor in the case and, if they accepted it was Mr Jackson, it would be a matter of significance. Mr Bowman said a person is perfectly entitled to defend themselves with lethal force if they honestly believe it is necessary. Counsel said his client had acted in self defence as a consequence of the deceased's unprovoked aggression. He said Mr Jackson was prone to anger, rage and violence. He said the accused was absolutely right when he called Mr Jackson "a complete lunatic" in Garda interviews. He said Mr Kearney was an alcoholic and it was accepted that whatever difficulties he had, he was not given to behaving in a manner involving violence and knives. Ireland McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP ami... Read More He said the case boiled down to a poor decision made by an alcoholic who stabbed his friend to death and not anything close to justifying a murder conviction. He said Mr Jackson had kept coming and lunging at Mr Kearney despite the defendant having taken possession of the knife. He said the deceased continued to approach the accused until his body gave up and allowed no more. Mr Bowman suggested the appropriate verdict was not guilty of murder as the defendant was not the aggressor and did no more than he believed necessary in those circumstances to defend himself, which tragically took Mr Jackson's life. Mr Justice Paul Burns will continue charging the jury of three men and nine women on Wednesday.

McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP amid perjury concern
McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP amid perjury concern

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP amid perjury concern

An Irish court has said it will refer claims by witnesses Conor McGregor pulled from his appeal to the director of public prosecutions (DPP), after concerns about perjury arose. It came after a request by the lawyer of Nikita Hand, 35, who successfully sued McGregor in a civil court over an incident in which he was alleged to have 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018. McGregor, who told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand, launched an appeal after a jury of eight women and four men found him civilly liable for assault. That appeal was expected to contain fresh evidence following an affidavit from a former neighbour of Ms Hand, Samantha O'Reilly, who said she had witnessed a physical row between Ms Hand and her then-partner at about the same time of the incident at the Beacon hotel. Ms Hand denies any altercation with her former partner and the court heard she characterised the claims from Ms O'Reilly and Ms O'Reilly's partner Steven Cummins as 'lies'. On Tuesday, McGregor's legal team dramatically withdrew that ground of appeal, saying it would no longer be relying on the material. On Wednesday, Ms Hand's lawyer John Gordon SC said she had been disadvantaged by 'highly disparaging and unfair criticisms' in 'widely published' claims from the affidavits, adding that she did not have a chance to reply to them in court before they were withdrawn. Mr Gordon said the application to introduce the witnesses was not just to produce further evidence, but also to 'undermine my client's reputation', including by stating she had lied. Mark Mulholland KC, for McGregor, had raised concerns that the request was an attempt to get the matter on the record for the media, adding that this would be 'wholly inappropriate'. Mr Gordon said Ms Hand was 'put through the wringer yet again' and expressed a desire to cross examine Mr Cummins and Ms O'Reilly. He asked the Court of Appeal to use its powers to refer matters to the DPP, citing concerns around perjury. The three judges of the court, Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, said they would do so. After a day and a half of representations, they also said they would reserve their judgment on the appeal matters to a later date, adding that decisions relating to costs that arose during deliberations would be decided at that point also. Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, was awarded 248,603.60 euro in damages and McGregor was also ordered to pay about 1.3 million euro in legal costs following November's trial. McGregor's appeal proceeded on other grounds, largely relating to the circumstances under which his 'no comment' answers to gardai were allowed to enter the trial. Remy Farrell SC, also for McGregor, said on Tuesday that an 'enormous amount of no comment material' had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end. He said this occurred under cross-examination by Mr Gordon and was based on an 'entirely incorrect' paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said. Mr Farrell said his client had made a comment about wanting to seek the best advice from his solicitors and accused Ms Hand's side of incorrectly interpreting the same comments as a suggestion that McGregor had sought to present himself as someone who was being fully co-operative with gardai. Ray Boland SC, for Ms Hand, said it was clear from a holistic consideration of McGregor's evidence that he was putting forward that he wanted to be as co-operative as possible with the investigation. He said it was appropriate for the line of questioning on the no-comment answers to be admissible. Meanwhile, McGregor's co-defendant has also appealed against the trial judge's decision not to award him his legal costs. During the same trial in November, the jury did not find James Lawrence had assaulted Ms Hand at the hotel. However, trial judge Mr Justice Alexander Owens decided that Ms Hand would not have to pay Mr Lawrence's costs arising out of the proceedings. His legal team is challenging whether that decision was correct and reasonable, arguing that Ms Hand should have to pay as the jury did not find he had assaulted her. Mr Boland said the success of Mr Lawrence's appeal would present 'grubby realities' where McGregor would effectively 'snaffle' back money he had to pay in damages. He told the court that it had been confirmed that McGregor was paying Mr Lawrence's legal costs. He said that the legal bill for Mr Lawrence, which would be due to be paid by Ms Hand if his appeal is successful, is likely to exceed the award of damages to be paid by McGregor. Mr Boland said this would set the jury's verdict on damages 'at nought' when McGregor was 'preparing to pay over the balance' of all costs relating to the matters. He said that McGregor would 'snaffle' back the money he is paying for damages if the appeal of 'his avatar' meant that Ms Hand had to pay Mr Lawrence's costs instead. He said this would not be in the interests of justice. John Fitzgerald SC, for Mr Lawrence, said Mr Owens made the decision not to award costs based on an incorrect interpretation of the jury's verdict and that his client had an entitlement to costs. The Irish Court of Appeal has reserved its judgment in relation to the appeals of McGregor and Lawrence and will give its decisions at a later date.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store