Steve Rosenberg: Russia is staying quiet on Trump's nuclear move
Russian news outlets have been rather dismissive of Trump's announcement.Speaking to the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper, a military commentator concluded that Trump was "throwing a temper tantrum".A retired lieutenant-general told Kommersant that the US president's talk of submarines was "meaningless blather. It's how he gets his kicks"."I'm sure Trump didn't really give any orders [about submarines]," a Russian security expert suggested to the same paper.Kommersant also mentions that in 2017, Trump said that he'd despatched two nuclear submarines to the Korean peninsula as a warning to North Korea.Yet not long after, Trump held a meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.So, bizarrely, might Donald Trump's latest submarine deployment be a precursor to a US-Russia summit?I wouldn't go that far.But the reaction from the Russian authorities has been interesting.At time of writing, there hasn't been any. Not from the Kremlin. Not from the Russian foreign ministry. Nor the defence ministry.And I've seen no announcement about Russian nuclear submarines being positioned closer to America.Which suggests that either Moscow is still studying the situation and working out what to do, or that Moscow doesn't feel the need to react.The Russian press reaction I mentioned earlier suggests it's the latter.
Trump had been sparring with Medvedev on social media for several days.After the US president had reduced his 50-day deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine to less than two weeks, Medvedev posted that Trump was "playing the ultimatum game with Russia…Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war".Trump responded: "Tell Medvedev, the failed former Russian president who thinks he is still in power, to be careful what he says. He is entering very dangerous territory."Medvedev's next post contained a reference to "Dead Hand", the automatic nuclear retaliation system developed in the Soviet Union.Clearly, that did not go down well with the White House chief.When he was Russia's president, between 2008 and 2012, Medvedev was seen as a relatively liberal figure."Freedom is better than no freedom" he was famously quoted as saying.But he has grown increasingly hawkish. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine he has gained a reputation for bombastic, anti-Western social media posts. Most of them have passed unnoticed, since he is not viewed as the voice of the Kremlin.Suddenly he has been noticed: by the President of the United States.And not just noticed. He's got right under Trump's skin.It's one thing to dislike a social media post. We've all been there.But to dislike it so much you deploy nuclear submarines feels like overkill.So why has Trump done it?Here's Trump's own explanation from his interview with Newsmax: "Medvedev said some things that are very bad, talking about nuclear. When you mention the word nuclear my eyes light up and I say we better be careful, because it's the ultimate threat."But Medvedev has long been accused of nuclear sabre-rattling via social media. It's nothing new.What is clear is that Trump took the recent Medvedev posts very personally, and reacted accordingly.Might there also be a strategy at play? Unpredictability feels like a big part of Trump's way of doing things, in business and in politics; taking unexpected decisions that can put rivals and opponents off balance before talks or during a negotiation.On ending the war in Ukraine, for example.Surprise submarine deployments may well fall into that category.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain planning attack on shadow fleet, Kremlin claims
The Kremlin has accused Britain of preparing 'mass raids' to sink ships in the Russian 'shadow fleet'. The SVR, Moscow's foreign intelligence service, claimed that London was plotting attacks on the fleet of old tankers used to avoid sanctions on oil exports. The attacks would be designed to look like accidents, the SVR said, so that Britain and the West could claim that the ships were a danger, and move to restrict their movement. 'British intelligence services are planning to use Nato allies to launch a mass raid on the 'shadow fleet'; for this purpose, an ecological catastrophe in international waters is being prepared,' the SVR report claimed. The report suggested that Britain planned to commission Ukrainian special forces to sink a vessel in 'one of the bottlenecks of sea communication'. However, the report is likely to raise concerns that Russia is preparing its own ' false flag ' – an operation designed to look like an attack on them – to justify an act of war. Western governments have previously been accused of planning attacks on Russia's liquefied natural gas ports or ageing fleet of tankers, in what could be considered an attempt to widen its war with Ukraine to Nato nations. Britain is often on the receiving end of such allegations as Moscow seeks to deter its support for Kyiv. It is also understood that the Kremlin uses this narrative to potentially shift the blame of any oil leaks that may be caused by any one of its ill-maintained vessels. The US and EU sanctions regime against Russia's shadow fleet has started to seriously affect its operations. According to the Brookings Institute, a Washington-based think tank, the volume of oil carried on its vessels has fallen from more than 50 million barrels a month to less than 20 million a month since the start of the year. Moscow has previously signalled its anger at the growing restrictions on the vessels by escorting them with military jets, the first time it explicitly acknowledged the shadow fleet as linked to its national security. The SVR report says: 'The impetus for such a campaign, according to London's plan, should be given by a resonant incident with one or several tankers. The plan provides for the organisation of a major sabotage, the damage from which will make it possible to declare the transportation of Russian oil a threat to all international shipping. This will untie the West's hands in choosing methods of counteraction.' The report cites two possible plans that the Russian intelligence agency claims could result in shadow fleet vessels being targeted. One would involve attacking an 'unwanted' tanker while making it appear to look like an accident. In a second scenario, British operatives would set fire to a vessel while it was docked in a port of Russian soil. Each time the British, according to the SVR, would 'entrust the execution of both terrorist attacks to Ukrainian security forces'. The claimed attack plans could be a desperate attempt to deter Donald Trump from following through on his threat to enact 100 per cent tariffs on Russia and countries that buy fossil fuel from Moscow. According to the SVR report, Britain's goal was to force the United States to apply secondary sanctions on nations that buy Russian oil. 'The goal is to force Washington, contrary to national interests, to adopt the most severe secondary sanctions against buyers of Russian energy resources, who will appear to be the 'indirect culprits of the tragedy',' the statement says.
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Colombian mercenaries hired to fight for Sudan rebels
Colombian mercenaries are fighting for Sudanese paramilitary rebels in a famine-stricken refugee camp in Sudan. Fighters from the South American nation had been seen inside Darfur's Zamzam camp, which was captured by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in April, local authorities said. The camp, for hundreds of thousands displaced by the country's war, has been at the centre of the humanitarian crisis engulfing the country, and last year was subject to a rare international declaration of famine. Mohamed Khamis Douda, a spokesman for the Zamzam camp administration, told the Sudan Tribune: 'We have witnessed with our own eyes a dual crime: the displacement of our people last April at the hands of the RSF militia, and now the occupation of the camp by foreign mercenaries'. Mr Douda described seeing armed, Spanish-speaking groups moving freely 'among the rubble of homes and the unburied bodies of victims'. His remarks followed the broadcast of video clips by the Sudanese army, purportedly recovered from a dead fighter's phone, which appeared to show Spanish-speaking mercenaries inside the camp. Colombian media have reported that as many as 400 former soldiers have been employed in the African country, in a battalion known as the Desert Wolves. Whistleblowers have claimed they had signed up with an Emirati security company and been duped into believing they would be guarding oil facilities. Instead they found themselves on the front lines of a war which has been running for more than two years. The war between the Sudanese army and the RSF erupted in April 2023 when the former allies clashed over plans to integrate their forces. Zamzam is only seven miles from the city of El Fasher, the last army holdout in the Darfur region. The RSF made quick gains in central Sudan, including the capital Khartoum, at the start of the war, but the army pushed them westward this year. That has led to an intensification in fighting in El Fasher. The city's fall would give the RSF control over nearly all of Darfur - a vast region bordering Libya, Chad, Central African Republic and South Sudan – and pave the way for what analysts say could be Sudan's de facto division. The war has become a free-for-all of competing regional powers, with the United Arab Emirates accused of arming and backing the RSF, because it fears Islamism within the Sudanese army. The UAE denies supporting the RSF.
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Zelenskiy says 'mercenaries' from China, Pakistan and other countries fighting for Russia
KYIV, Aug 4 (Reuters) - President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Monday that Ukrainian troops in northeastern Ukraine were fighting foreign "mercenaries" from various countries including China, Pakistan and parts of Africa, and vowed a response. Zelenskiy has previously accused Moscow of recruiting Chinese fighters for its war effort against Ukraine, charges Beijing denied, while North Korea has also provided thousands of its own troops in Russia's Kursk region. "We spoke with commanders about the frontline situation, the defence of Vovchansk, and the dynamics of the battles," Zelenskiy wrote on X after visiting a frontline area in the northeastern Kharkiv region. "Our warriors in this sector are reporting the participation of mercenaries from China, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, and African countries in the war. We will respond." Reuters contacted the embassies of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Pakistan in Kyiv to request comment. Russia did not immediately comment publicly on Zelenskiy's comments.
