
Italy plan to process migrants in Albania dealt blow by EU Court
But the ECJ has ruled that a nation can only be included on the government's list if the entire population there is safe, which means Italy will have to revise its procedure.It currently identifies Egypt and Bangladesh, for example, as safe, whilst accepting that certain groups there require protection.
The ruling brought an angry reaction from the government in Rome which said the European court was overstepping its role, adding that the decision would weaken the ability of countries to "defend national borders".The European court also said that the government must make public any evidence and sources it uses in reaching its conclusions on safe countries, so that asylum seekers can challenge the decision in their cases."Today, the court makes clear that a country cannot be designated as safe unless it offers effective, generalised protection, for everyone and everywhere, and unless that claim can be independently verified and challenged," Katia Scannavini of ActionAid Italy explained."The so-called Albania model collapses at its legal core," she argued.The fate of Italy's Albania project is being watched closely by other governments including in the UK which are keen on handling asylum applications offshore as they try to reduce the number of irregular migrants arriving in their countries.Meant as the centrepiece of Meloni's tough approach to immigration, the Albania deal has hit legal obstacles from the very start. The handful of migrants who were sent there were all eventually returned to Italy after the intervention of lawyers.Many times over budget, the centres that were built have never yet been used as intended.
'This puts significant halt to Albania plan'
In its ruling, the European Court did not object in principle to a fast-track procedure for migrants from safe countries, but it made clear that the implementation of that policy must change."It's fundamental: the 'safe country of origin' concept can no longer be used to carry out transfers to Albania until Italian law is changed to be in line with EU legislation," Amnesty International migration researcher Adriana Tidona told the BBC."This puts a significant halt to Italy's plans in Albania."Amnesty, like others, considers the Albania deal a violation of human rights more fundamentally. "That isn't to do with the safe countries of origin, but with the fact that it's based on an automatic detention system," Adriana Tidona said. "That's unlawful."It is not clear what impact today's ruling may have on the new EU migration pact which enters into force next year and introduces a common list of safe countries for returns – including Egypt and Bangladesh.But the decision does make clear that the definition of safe countries does not ultimately lie with politicians."The court says it's the judge who has the power to make assessments about safe countries," Daniele Gallo, professor of EU law at Rome's Luiss University explains. "Whatever the government says, every judge in Italy now has a duty to set aside Italian legislation and apply EU law."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Lithuania asks NATO for more air defences after drones land on its territory
VILNIUS, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Lithuania's foreign ministry has written to the NATO military alliance asking it to strengthen its air defences, it said on Tuesday, after two military drones have crossed into its territory from Belarus in less than a month. "This must not be only Lithuania's responsibility, because we are defending the eastern NATO flank," Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys told reporters. NATO and European Union member Lithuania borders Russia and Moscow's ally, Belarus. The letter from Lithuania's foreign and defence ministers to NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte said the alliance must show it is ready to defend "every centimetre of its territory". In the most recent incident, a drone crossed into Lithuania on July 28, which Lithuania suspects was directed by Russia at Ukraine, but that it was disoriented by Ukraine's defences, Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Tuesday. The drone was found crashed in a military training area about 100 kilometres (62.14 miles) from the border with Belarus and contained 2 kg (4 lb) of explosives, the chief of staff of the Lithuanian army, Dainius Paskevicius, told reporters. Sakaliene had earlier identified the object as a Gerbera drone, a wooden copy of an Iranian-designed Shahed kamikaze drone, which Russian military is known to use. Another Gerbera drone entered Lithuania from Belarus on July 10, causing alarm before authorities determined it was not dangerous. Then-prime minister Gintautas Paluckas and Speaker of Parliament Saulius Skvernelis were briefly taken to bomb shelters in response to the drone entering Lithuanian airspace, according to their spokespersons. NATO was not immediately available for comment.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump envoy to land in Moscow as US 'peace or sanctions' deadline looms over Putin
US President Donald Trump 's peace envoy is expected to travel to Moscow imminently ahead of Friday's deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire with Ukraine. Steve Witkoff is likely to hold urgent discussions with senior Kremlin officials as soon as Wednesday in a bid to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Russia could face economic sanctions from Friday, affecting itself and trading partners such as China and India, unless Vladimir Putin agrees to talks. President Trump initially gave President Putin 50 days to strike a peace deal then cut the time to '10 to 12 days'. Ahead of the deadline, Russia has pulled out of a nuclear missile agreement intended to limit numbers of short to medium range missiles in Europe. Witkoff has been criticised for the tone of his previous visits to Russia. At times he has appeared fawning in Putin's presence and has failed to secure any concessions. After one meeting earlier this year, Putin presented Witkoff with a portrait of President Trump to take back to the White House. This afternoon, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed on social media he has spoken President Trump. But he did not mention the deadline. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed today he and US President Donald Trump enjoyed a 'productive' conversation on Tuesday about ending the three-year conflict. President Zelensky described their conversation as 'productive' with the 'key focus of course being ending the war'. He added Ukraine and the United States have 'coordinated our positions' while the Russians have 'intensified the brutality of their attacks'. President Trump's plan is to hit Russia with 'secondary tariffs' in a bid to end the war. These will punish states that purchase Russian energy supplies, making it more expensive for these countries to sell goods into the United States. As a major importer of Russian oil, India is particularly vulnerable. Its government has protested the unfairness of the strategy, claiming India's critics also import Russian goods. Trump has accused of India of 'fuelling [Russia's] war machine'. India has called the 100 per cent secondary tariffs 'unjustified and unreasonable'. Ukraine claimed earlier this week that it has found Indian-made components inside Russian attack drones fired at its cities. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also said to be personally close to Putin. They appear to share a warm relationship and are economic allies. Putin is widely expected to ignore Trump's deadline. While the US President has repeatedly excused Putin's failure to agree peace terms. But with President Trump under pressure in the US over his connections to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, he may adopt a tougher stance towards Putin. President Trump signalled his intent last week by publicly stating he had repositioned a pair of US nuclear submarines closer to Russia to keep the Kremlin in check. Russia responded strongly declaring it was pulling out of a nuclear missile agreement due to 'destabilising actions' by Western powers. So far, the Kremlin's only step towards peace has been a pledge by Putin's spokesperson Dmitry Peskov that the Russian President will meet President Zelensky. But the offer was subject to caveats around Russia's demands for a negotiated end to the conflict. Witkoff is expected to outline economic sanctions the US is likely to impose on Russia. Peskov has said the Kremlin considers its contacts with US Special Envoy Witkoff 'important and useful'.


The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rwanda agrees to take up to 250 migrants from the US
The Rwandan government has said it would accept up to 250 migrants from the US under a deal agreed with Washington but gave no details on who could be included. The Trump administration's deportation drive has included negotiating arrangements to send people to third countries, among them South Sudan and Eswatini. The deal announced on Tuesday follows a cancelled agreement with Britain under which Rwanda would have received asylum seekers from the UK. That deal was scrapped after the Conservative government that negotiated it lost last year's general election. 'Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants,' government spokesperson Yolande Makolo told AFP. She said Kigali would maintain 'the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement'. Makolo said Kigali had agreed to the new scheme with Washington because 'nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement'. Those who arrive in Rwanda will be provided with training, healthcare and accommodation, she added. No further information was given, including any indication of a timeline, with Makolo saying that Rwanda 'will provide more details once these have been worked out'. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has taken a number of actions aimed at speeding up deportations of undocumented migrants to countries that are not their own. His administration has defended third-country deportations as necessary, since the home nations of some of those targeted for removal sometimes refuse to accept them. But rights experts have warned that the deportations risk breaking international law by sending people to countries where they face the risk of torture, abduction and other abuses. South Sudan – which is teetering on the edge of renewed conflict – accepted eight criminal migrants from the United States, with Juba saying in July they remained in government care. Only one is South Sudanese. Five other migrants labelled criminals by the US were flown to Eswatini in July and incarcerated. The government later said they will be repatriated to their own nations. Rwanda, which is in Africa's Great Lakes region, is home to 13 million people, and its government claims it is one of the most stable countries on the continent and it has drawn praise for its modern infrastructure. However, the migrant agreement with the UK government drew criticism from rights groups and faced a long-running legal challenge. President Paul Kagame's government has frequently been accused of rampant human rights violations and crushing political dissent and press freedoms. Kigali has also come under pressure over its role in the violence roiling the neighbouring eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In June, the DRC and Rwanda signed a peace agreement aimed at ending decades of conflict in eastern DRC, where there were fresh clashes this year when the M23 armed group, backed by Rwandan troops, captured two major cities.