Indian courts burdened with backlog of 5.29 crore cases: Official data
The maximum number of 4.65 crore cases are pending in district and subordinate courts, followed by 63.30 lakh cases in High Courts and 86,742 cases in the Supreme Court, the data showed.
Apart from the burgeoning case backlog, the district and subordinate courts appear to have struggled to work at full strength.
According to the Department of Justice, as against a sanctioned strength of 25,843 judicial officers as on July 21, 2015, the lower courts are working with a strength of 21,122.
'Filling up of vacancies in District and Subordinate judiciary falls within the domain of the State/UT governments and High Courts concerned,' according to a statement by the Law and Justice Ministry.
As a measure to reduce backlog, arrears committees have been set up in all 25 High Courts to clear cases pending for more than five years, and similar arrears committees have now been set up under District Courts as well, the Ministry said.
Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal, in a recent reply in Parliament, shared details of government measures taken to fill vacancies in the Supreme Court and the High Courts.
'From May 1, 2014, to July 21, 2025, 70 Judges have been appointed in the Supreme Court. Apart from this, 1,058 new judges were appointed, and 794 Additional Judges were made permanent in the High Courts during the same period. The sanctioned strength of judges of the High Courts has increased from 906 in May 2014 to 1,122 till date,' said Meghwal.
He also informed that Fast Track Courts have been established for dealing with cases of heinous crimes, cases involving senior citizens, women and children. As of June 30, 2025, 865 Fast Track Courts are functional across the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation Launches Three Landmark Social Initiatives to Drive Empowerment, Dignity and Cultural Revival
NewsVoir Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], July 28: The Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation (MKB), established on May 10, 2019, by noted philanthropist and social activist Mohit Kamboj, has announced three transformative social initiatives aimed at bringing meaningful change to Indian society. Guided by the philosophy of Bharatiya, which stands for unity, dignity, and empowerment, the Foundation remains committed to eliminating social discrimination and uplifting communities that have been historically marginalized. The newly launched initiatives focus on three key areas: empowering the transgender community, ensuring dignity for the unclaimed deceased, and restoring culturally significant temples across the country. As part of its Transgender Upliftment initiative, the Foundation is launching postgraduate education opportunities, skill development programs, and incubation support to prepare individuals for meaningful participation in the workforce. Complemented by dignity-led awareness campaigns, the initiative is designed to promote true inclusion and economic self-reliance for the transgender community, one of the most underserved and marginalized groups in the country. In a deeply humanitarian gesture, the Foundation's Dignified Dead Bodies initiative ensures that unclaimed or neglected deceased individuals are given respectful last rites. With this effort, the MKB Foundation strengthens its belief that every human life, regardless of status, identity, or circumstance, deserves dignity, even in death. To implement this initiative effectively, the Foundation is collaborating with municipal corporations, the police department, and trusted NGOs across cities. With its third initiative, the Foundation is working to restore temples of spiritual and cultural significance. This effort not only aims to preserve India's rich heritage but also to promote communal harmony and reawaken pride in shared traditions. Speaking about the social initiatives, Mr. Mohit Kamboj, Founder of Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation, said, "True nation-building begins when every citizen feels seen, respected, and empowered, regardless of background, identity, or circumstance. These initiatives move us beyond short-term aid toward lasting pathways for inclusion, dignified livelihoods, and cultural pride. By enabling the transgender community to gain skills and earn meaningful work, honouring the unclaimed deceased with respectful last rites, and restoring our ancient temples so heritage can inspire future generations, we are embedding dignity, equality, and cultural confidence at the heart of India's progress." With a relentless focus on grassroots impact and community transformation, the Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation continues to serve as a beacon of hope, driving positive change across India. The Mohit Kamboj Foundation (MKB), founded on May 10, 2019, by philanthropist and social activist Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya, is committed to creating lasting social impact across India. Inspired by the spirit of Bharatiya, the Foundation promotes equality, dignity, and unity by empowering the transgender community, offering respectful last rites for unclaimed deceased individuals, and restoring culturally significant temples, preserving heritage while fostering inclusion and pride. For further details, please visit Instagram Facebook:
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Supreme Court refuses to stay publication of draft electoral rolls in Bihar
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the publication of draft electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, but directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to continue accepting Aadhaar and voter identity cards as valid identity proofs for the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state, stating that they have 'some sanctity'. 'As far as ration cards are concerned, we can say they can be forged easily, but Aadhaar and voter cards have some sanctity and have a presumption of genuineness. You continue accepting these documents,' the bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the petitioners, urged the court not to allow finalisation of the electoral rolls in the interim. The bench, however, noted that the petitioners had not sought interim relief during the last hearing and, therefore, it could not be granted now. The court said it would take a final decision after hearing all parties in the case on Tuesday. The ECI can deal with cases of forgery on a case-to-case basis, as any document can be forged, the two-judge bench remarked. On 10 July, the court had told the ECI to consider Aadhaar cards, voter identity cards, and ration cards as acceptable documents for the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly election. It also clarified that this direction does not imply that the ECI must include a person's name in the roll solely on the basis of these documents. 'We have noted that, anyway, you have said your list is not exhaustive. If you have a good reason to discard Aadhaar, you do it, give reasons,' the court said. In a counter-affidavit, the ECI had stated that Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards cannot be considered as proof of voter eligibility under the ongoing exercise for electoral roll revision in Bihar. The commission said the three documents do not meet the required standards for verifying eligibility during the process. The court is hearing pleas challenging the ECI's 24 June directive ordering a special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The directive mandates that voters not listed in the 2003 electoral roll submit documents proving their citizenship. Those born after December 2004 must also furnish the citizenship documents of both parents, with additional requirements if a parent is a foreign national. On Monday, the court also observed that the petitions raised 'an important question which goes to the very root of the functioning of democracy in the country — the right to vote'.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Why wait until now to challenge inquiry in cash row: SC to Justice Varma
The Supreme Court on Monday asked Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma why he had waited until now to challenge the procedure adopted after half-burnt Indian currency notes were discovered in an outhouse of his residential premises. 'Did you take a chance of a favourable finding? You are a constitutional authority. You cannot say, 'I don't know',' the judges told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for Varma. Varma, who was a judge of the Delhi High Court when the cash was found, told the court that former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna's recommendation, based on a three-judge enquiry report, cannot form the basis for his removal. He also contended that a sitting judge's conduct cannot be part of public discourse before the legislative process begins—a constitutional mandate that was defied in his case. CJI Khanna had set up the three-member committee following the discovery of the cash at Justice Varma's official residence. The fact-finding committee was constituted under the in-house inquiry procedure to assist the CJI in acting on complaints against High Court or Supreme Court judges. The three-member panel, in its report, said the cash found at Justice Varma's residence was unaccounted for and that he was unable to explain its source—grounds that justified impeachment. This led CJI Khanna to advise Justice Varma to resign, which he refused to do. The CJI then forwarded the report to the President and the Prime Minister for further action. 'The entire case has become political,' Sibal told the court on Monday, adding that Justice Varma, a sitting judge, had been declared guilty even before the commencement of statutory proceedings—under which only Parliament can remove a sitting judge. During the hearing, the bench also asked Sibal why he believed that former CJI Khanna's decision to forward the report to the President and Prime Minister was not constitutionally valid. Sibal argued that the CJI, under the in-house procedure, was not authorised to recommend a judge's removal. The court reasoned: 'The President is the appointing authority and, therefore, the matter was placed before it (the President's office). Since the President acts as per the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and the Prime Minister is the leader of the Council of Ministers, forwarding to the Prime Minister is also not problematic.' The court also said that the former CJI's approach did not imply he was 'trying to persuade the House (Parliament) to act based on his recommendation.' Sibal, however, clarified that Justice Varma had not moved against the judgment but was aggrieved by how the entire investigation had unfolded. The bench then fixed Wednesday to hear the case again and asked Justice Varma to place the three-member in-house enquiry panel report on record for its perusal.
