South Korea investigators seek to arrest former president Yoon again
Yoon was formally stripped of office in April, after being impeached and suspended by lawmakers over his December 3 attempt to subvert civilian rule, which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament.
He has appeared in court on insurrection charges, and has been questioned by a special counsel investigating the martial law declaration.
'Today, the special counsel filed a request for a detention warrant with the Seoul Central District Court for former president Yoon Suk Yeol on charges including abuse of power and obstruction of special official duties,' Prosecutor Park Ji-young, a member of the counsel, told reporters.
Park said that Yoon had also been charged with 'falsification of official documents' over his martial law declaration.
'The warrant outlines why a detention is deemed necessary, but I cannot elaborate,' said Park, adding the details will be discussed in court.
The special counsel questioned Yoon yesterday over his resistance during a failed arrest attempt in January, as well as allegations that he authorised drones to fly to Pyongyang as a justification for declaring martial law.
Yoon's legal team slammed the warrant as 'excessive and unwarranted'.
'We have thoroughly refuted the allegations and demonstrated that, as a matter of law, no crime can be established,' his legal team said in a statement.
'The special counsel failed to present any objective evidence during the investigation, and even based on witness testimony, the charges do not hold,' they added.
Last week, the court dismissed an arrest warrant requested by the special counsel after Yoon initially refused to appear for questioning, citing that he had since expressed a willingness to comply with future summons. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Trump announces steeper tariffs for Japan, South Korea and others, but delays start to August
WASHINGTON, July 8 — President Donald Trump unveiled higher tariffs for Japan, South Korea and a dozen other countries in a push for new trade deals yesterday—but extended the deadline for the steeper levies to kick in until August. Trump issued similar letters to countries including Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, South Africa and Malaysia, saying he would slap duties on their products ranging from 25 per cent to 40 per cent. These mark a step up from the 10 per cent levy the president earlier imposed on almost all trading partners. But the starting date of August 1 marks a delay in Trump's reimposition of higher duties, originally due tomorrow. In near-identically worded letters to Japanese and South Korean leaders, Trump said US tariff hikes to 25 per cent came as their trading relationships with Washington were 'unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.' He warned of further escalation if there was retaliation against the levies. But the president said he was ready to lower the new levels if partners changed their trade policies: 'We will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter.' Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday that he 'won't easily compromise' in trade talks with Washington. Trump originally announced sweeping tariffs on world economies during what he called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, claiming the United States was being 'ripped off.' Amid market turmoil, he then suspended higher duties affecting dozens of economies for 90 days, a deadline that would have expired Wednesday. On Monday, Trump signed an order formally extending the Wednesday deadline, postponing it to August 1. With the delay, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that Trump would set out the 'reciprocal tariff rate' for partners in the coming month as negotiations continue. According to letters posted to Trump's Truth Social platform, products from Indonesia will face a 32 per cent tariff, while the level for Bangladesh is 35 per cent and Thailand, 36 per cent. Most countries receiving letters so far had duties similar or unchanged from threatened rates in April, although some like Laos and Cambodia see notably lower levels. While the Trump administration had signaled hopes of striking dozens of deals by July, there have been limited results so far. Washington has unveiled pacts with only Britain and Vietnam, while the United States and China agreed to temporarily lower tariff levels on each other's products that earlier reached three-digits. Change their tune Asked why Trump opted to start with South Korea, Leavitt said: 'It's the President's prerogative, and those are the countries he chose.' 'This announcement will send a chilling message to others,' said Asia Society Policy Institute Vice President Wendy Cutler, referring to Trump's initial letters to Tokyo and Seoul. 'Both have been close partners on economic security matters,' she said, adding that companies from Japan and South Korea have made 'significant manufacturing investments in the US in recent years.' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday that there would be more deals coming up: 'We are going to have several announcements in the next 48 hours.' 'We've had a lot of people change their tune in terms of negotiations. So my mailbox was full last night with a lot of new offers,' Bessent told CNBC. He added that he would meet with his Chinese counterpart in the coming weeks. Both sides have so far held high-level talks in Geneva and London. But Washington and Beijing's pause on higher tit-for-tat tariffs is due to expire in mid-August. Major US stock indexes fell from records Monday on Trump's fresh threats. The Nasdaq tumbled 0.9 per cent and the S&P 500 lost 0.8 per cent. Trump has also threatened another 10 per cent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of 'Anti-American policies' after they slammed his duties at a summit. But partners are still rushing to avert Trump's tariffs altogether. The European Commission said EU chief Ursula von der Leyen had a 'good exchange' with Trump on trade when the pair spoke Sunday. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump unveils 25% tariffs on Japan, S. Korea in letters to leaders
Members of South Korean civic groups hold a rally in Seoul opposing US President Donald Trump's aggressive new tariffs policy. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump on Monday began telling trade partners – from powerhouse suppliers like Japan and South Korea to minor players – that sharply higher US tariffs will start Aug 1, marking a new phase in the trade war he launched earlier this year. The 14 countries sent letters so far, which included smaller US exporters like Serbia, Thailand and Tunisia, hinted at opportunities for additional negotiations while at the same time warning that any reprisal steps would be met with a like-for-like response. 'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' Trump said in letters, released on his Truth Social platform, to Japan and South Korea. The higher tariffs take effect Aug 1, and notably will not combine with previously announced sector tariffs such as those on automobiles and steel and aluminum. That means, for instance, that Japanese vehicle tariffs will remain at 25%, rather than the existing 25% sector tariff climbing to 50% with the new reciprocal rate as has occurred with some of Trump's tariffs. The clock has been ticking for countries to conclude deals with the US after Trump in April unleashed a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies. Trading partners got another reprieve as the White House said Trump will sign an executive order on Monday extending the Wednesday deadline for negotiations to Aug 1. Trump has kept much of the world guessing on the outcome of months of talks with countries hoping to avoid the hefty tariff hikes he has threatened. The rate for South Korea is the same as Trump initially announced, while the rate for Japan is 1 point higher than first announced on April 2. A week later, he capped all of the so-called reciprocal tariffs at 10% until Wednesday. Only two agreements have so far been reached, with Britain and Vietnam. Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, said it was unfortunate Trump was hiking tariffs for two of the closest US allies, but there was still time for a breakthrough in negotiations. 'While the news is disappointing, it does not mean the game is over,' Cutler said. Trump said later Monday that the US would impose 25% tariffs on Tunisia, Malaysia and Kazakhstan; 30% on South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 35% on Serbia and Bangladesh; 36% on Cambodia and Thailand and 40% on Laos and Myanmar. There was no immediate response from the Japanese or South Korean embassies on the announcement. Market drop US stocks fell in response, the latest market turmoil as Trump's trade moves have repeatedly whipsawed financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies. US stocks were driven to near bear-market territory by his cascade of tariff announcements through the early spring but quickly rebounded to record highs in the weeks after he put the stiffest levies on hold on April 9. The S&P 500 closed down about 0.8%, its biggest drop in three weeks. US-listed shares of Japanese automotive companies fell, with Toyota Motor closing down 4.0% and Honda Motor off by 3.9%. The dollar surged against both the Japanese yen and the South Korean won. 'Tariff talk has sucked the wind out of the sails of the market,' said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management. Most of the announced tariff rates have been rounded down, he added, and the letters come across as 'take it or leave it' offers. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said earlier on Monday he expected several trade announcements in the next 48 hours, adding that his inbox was full of countries' last-ditch offers. Trading blocs The European Union will not be receiving a letter setting out higher tariffs, EU sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday. The European Union still aims to reach a trade deal by July 9 after European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Trump had a 'good exchange,' a commission spokesperson said. It was not clear, however, whether there had been a meaningful breakthrough in talks to stave off tariff hikes on the US largest trading partner. The EU has been torn over whether to push for a quick and light trade deal or leverage its economic clout to negotiate a better outcome. It had already given up hopes for a comprehensive trade agreement before the July deadline. Trump has also said he could impose a 17% tariff on EU food and agriculture exports. The president also threatened leaders of developing nations in the BRICS group, who are meeting in Brazil, with an additional 10% tariff if they adopt 'anti-American' policies. The group includes Brazil, Russia, India and China among others.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Neutrality difficult in unstable world, says Ukraine's acting ambassador
Denys Mykhailiuk, Ukraine's acting ambassador to Malaysia, says 'neutrality' requires nations to take balanced, visible and consistent actions, including through condemnation when norms are violated. PETALING JAYA : In today's fractured geopolitical landscape, the idea of neutrality is facing unprecedented challenges. As the war in Ukraine drags on and tensions escalate in Asia, many smaller or non-aligned countries, including Malaysia, are left to confront an uncomfortable truth: neutrality may no longer be enough. 'To be really neutral is very difficult in the world, which is not stable,' says Denys Mykhailiuk, Ukraine's acting ambassador to Malaysia. 'Strategic neutrality is typically reserved for strong states that can defend their sovereignty. For many in the Global South, what is described as neutrality is more accurately a form of non-alignment,' he said. Malaysia, traditionally proud of its non-aligned foreign policy, continues to engage with all parties. Yet experts suggest this approach demands closer scrutiny in an era where global powers are increasingly acting outside international norms. Munira Mustaffa. 'Neutrality represents a deliberate political stance of impartiality,' says Munira Mustaffa, executive director of Chasseur Group. 'Silence, conversely, often reflects passive non-engagement.' ISIS foreign policy head Thomas Daniel echoed this sentiment, saying that 'many countries use 'neutrality' or 'non-alignment' to avoid taking positions on issues they perceive as harming their national interests.' Thomas Daniel. Malaysia has the right to stay neutral—but should it? According to Mykhailiuk, neutrality is not simply about not taking sides. It requires balance, visibility and consistent actions, including condemnation when norms are violated. Without this, what is referred to as 'neutrality' risks becoming 'complicity'. Mykhailiuk warns that failure to respond to Russia's war will send a global signal. 'If the aggressor comes out unpunished or rewarded by the new territorial requirements, it will definitely (provoke a) superpower to act on its own discretion, using the threat of force or force itself in relations with the smaller states,' he said. 'Imperial thinking' in the 21st century This concern is especially relevant in an age of rising imperial ambitions. While Russia's invasion of Ukraine and China's assertive stance in the South China Sea differ in method, both reflect a common mindset: historical entitlement as justification for modern-day dominance. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that China had no legal basis to claim historic rights within the so-called Nine-Dash Line. The ruling was labelled 'ill-founded' by China, and ignored. 'My perception is that China's actions involve sustained coercion and grey-zone tactics, while Russia's strategy is outright aggression,' says Munira. 'But for smaller post-colonial states like Malaysia or Ukraine, both present serious sovereignty challenges: they must navigate between protecting sovereignty and avoiding confrontation with powers that view international law as secondary to their historical claims.' Malaysia is no stranger to the consequences of great power impunity. The 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine, which killed 298 people including 43 Malaysians, remains a wound in the national memory. Russia's 2015 veto at the UN Security Council blocked efforts to establish an international tribunal. 'Deepening ties with Russia without addressing this tragedy sends a troubling signal,' says Munira. 'It suggests that such actions can be overlooked. Any perception that MH17 is being sidelined would undermine confidence in international accountability mechanisms.' This issue cuts deeper when viewed alongside Malaysia's expanding diplomatic and trade ties with Russia, including support for BRICS membership and a recent increase in direct cooperation. 'The balance becomes increasingly complex,' said Munira, pointing to contradictions between Malaysia's humanitarian support for Ukraine and its diplomatic silence on Russian aggression. This imperial logic, where great powers act as though smaller nations exist for absorption or domination, can be useful for some countries, and it is increasingly visible. Beyond Russia and China, other global powers are also demonstrating imperial tendencies. 'The risk of 'imperial thinking' is reinforced by the recent behaviour of—not just Russia—but also China, the United States and Israel,' says Daniel. These trends are particularly worrying for smaller nations that rely on international law as their first line of defence. Asean's role This makes not only the Malaysian position vital, but Asean's as well, being an organisation of countries that want to be important players in the region. The Asean Charter is clear about provisions like the peaceful settlements of disputes through dialogue and consultation, the renunciation of aggression, and upholding international law. However, as Munira explains, Asean's recent diplomatic record has been mixed. Only four of ten Asean members attended the 2024 Ukraine Peace Summit in Switzerland; with only two signing the communiqué. 'This reflects Asean's broader concern that peace efforts must consider multiple perspectives,' she says. Nevertheless, there is space for leadership. 'With over 600 million people and growing markets, Asean can become an important trade and investment partner for Ukraine,' says Mykhailiuk. Not all support has to come with weapons. Malaysia has provided humanitarian support to Ukraine, including medical supplies and essential equipment. In his recent interview with Bernama TV, Mykhailiuk called for more assistance, particularly for post-conflict demining, rescue operations, and energy infrastructure. For Malaysia and other middle powers, the war in Ukraine is not someone else's problem. It is a test of whether the rules that protect the weak from the strong still apply—and whether countries like Malaysia will help uphold them. 'Weakness is temptation,' Mykhailiuk warns. 'So be strong.' Anastasiya Yushchenko is an undergraduate at the City St George's, University of London, and an intern at FMT.
