Iran puts Trump ‘the gambler' on notice as US warns against choking crucial oil shipping route
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' he said in a post on his social media platform Truth Social.
Loading
Vance said it was time for Iranian leaders to 'give peace a chance', arguing the strike gave Iran the opportunity to 'reset' its relationship with the US and restart negotiations, which, over recent months, had failed to put an end to the country's nuclear ambitions.
'The Iranians have a choice,' he told NBC's Meet the Press. 'They can go down the path of peace, or they can go down the path of this ridiculous brinksmanship of funding terrorism, of trying to build a nuclear weapon – and that's just not something the United States can accept.'
As the world braced for a response from Iran's weakened military, the US State Department issued a worldwide caution for American citizens, flagging the potential for travel disruptions and demonstrations against the US.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who reportedly flew to Moscow to seek support from ally Russia, said there would be no return to diplomacy until Tehran had retaliated.
'The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force,' he said.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has signalled that US military bases in the region, which house tens of thousands of troops, could be targeted, although experts say Israel's strikes since June 13 have severely damaged Iran's ability to mount attacks.
Security experts said Iran could turn to strikes against US embassies and consulates or energy infrastructure in the region, or cyber or terrorist attacks within the US.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon unveiled details of what it called a focused and powerful strike – codenamed Operation Midnight Hammer – against Iran's nuclear facilities, involving 14 never-before-used 'bunker-buster' bombs among a total of 75 precision-guided weapons.
General Dan Caine, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said seven B-2 bombers, each with two crew, flew 18 hours from the continental United States to Iran, communicating minimally and refuelling multiple times during flight.
Over land, they linked up with escort and support aircraft, and dropped 14 GBU-57 bombs – called a Massive Ordnance Penetrator – on the Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites.
A US submarine also fired more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles at the Isfahan nuclear technology centre, which includes uranium enrichment facilities.
All three targets were struck between 6.40pm and 7.05pm on Saturday, Washington time, Caine said, or 2.10am to 2.35am Tehran time. The US was not aware of any shots fired at its planes on the way in or out of Iranian airspace.
Several of the B-2 bombers were seen returning to the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri early on Monday (AEST).
'Throughout the mission, we retained the element of surprise,' Caine said. 'Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface-to-air missile systems did not see us.'
The mission also involved deception tactics, including decoy flights west from the US over the Pacific Ocean.
However, it was not immediately clear how much damage the Iranian targets sustained. The International Atomic Energy Agency – the UN's nuclear watchdog – confirmed that entrances to tunnels used to store part of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile at the Isfahan complex were damaged.
Loading
'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!'
Caine also said the country's nuclear weapons infrastructure had been severely degraded. However, he noted damage assessment was still under way, 'and it would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there'.
The Fordow facility was struck again on Monday night (AEST), Iranian state television reported. Israel's Defence Ministry said it was striking Iranian government targets in Tehran, including the notorious Evin Prison in the Iranian capital.
US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said the US military operation, which he called bold and brilliant, showed the world that 'American deterrence is back'.
' Many presidents have dreamed of delivering the final blow to Iran's nuclear program, and none could until President Trump,' he said.
In remarks he directed at Iran's leaders, Vance said that with Iran's nuclear program destroyed, and its proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah severely degraded, it was evident 'the Iranians clearly are not very good at war'.
'Perhaps they should follow President Trump's lead and give peace a chance,' he said.
But speaking to an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council on Monday AEST, Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir-Saeid Iravani, said the US had 'decided to destroy diplomacy' with its strikes.
He said the Iranian military would now decide the 'timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response', and: 'We will take all measures necessary.'
General Abdolrahim Mousavi, the new chief of staff of the armed forces, warned that the strikes gave a 'free hand' to Iran's military to 'act against US interests and its army', while Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said any country used by the US to strike Iran would be 'a legitimate target'.
Israel's UN ambassador Danny Danon praised the US for taking action against Iran, and accused Iran of using negotiations over its nuclear program as camouflage to buy time to build missiles and enrich uranium.
'The cost of inaction would have been catastrophic. A nuclear Iran would have been a death sentence just as much for you as it would have been for us,' he told the council.
China 'strongly' condemned the attacks on Iran, saying the US action 'seriously violates the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law and exacerbates tensions in the Middle East'.
Russia's Vladimir Putin has condemned the Israeli strikes. He told Iran's Araghchi on Monday that there was no justification for the US bombing of his country and that Moscow was trying to help the Iranian people.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
44 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese knew US would strike Iran but not when, Sky News Sunday Agenda can reveal
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was aware the US was planning strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities but did not know the exact timing, Sky News Sunday Agenda can reveal. The US strikes hit key Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan last weekend, before President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Mr Albanese then waited more than 24 hours to issue an explicit statement of support for the strikes, after initially calling for 'dialogue' and 'de-escalation'. It was not until after a meeting of the National Security Committee of Cabinet that Mr Albanese fronted the media and confirmed Australia backed the US action. Critics have seized on the delay as evidence of hesitancy and weakness in Canberra's alliance with Washington. Shadow defence minister Angus Taylor said the government was exhibiting 'anti-US alliance' sentiments, due to lacklustre support for the strikes. 'This was the right thing for the United States to do, Israel was entirely entitled to take action against Iran,' Mr Taylor told Sky News on Thursday. 'It was well within the rights of Israel to do what it did … the United States has played a very deft hand in the approach it's taken on this." Former prime ministers Scott Morrison and Tony Abbott also weighed in, arguing that Mr Albanese should have immediately and publicly endorsed the strike. 'If you're in the United States and you take an action like this… you'd want to know your allies were with you 100 per cent,' Mr Morrison said. Mr Albanese has defended the government's handling of the situation, noting that Australia is 'not a central player' in the Iran-Israel conflict. 'We run an orderly, stable government,' he told reporters, repeatedly declining to comment on intelligence matters. 'We are upfront, but we don't talk about intelligence, obviously. But we've made very clear this was unilateral action taken by the United States.' At the same time, the broader Australia–US relationship has come under renewed scrutiny, amid calls for the Albanese government to lift defence spending. The United States and NATO allies committed last week to increasing defence spending to five per cent of GDP by 2035. While Defence Minister Richard Marles attended the NATO summit, Mr Albanese stayed in Australia, declining to attend after rumours he may go in order to meet President Trump. Australia has committed to defence spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP - well below NATO's new target and the 3.5 per cent requested directly by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. 'Well, we have increased our defence investment,' Mr Albanese said on Friday. 'What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need - that's what we're investing in.' Government sources have privately expressed scepticism about the NATO targets, suggesting some countries inflate their defence figures by including roads and other infrastructure costs.

Sky News AU
44 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese holds fire on defence spending amid doubts about NATO's five per cent promise
The Albanese government has pushed back on US and NATO defence spending targets, with sources suggesting the commitments are overblown. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far dodged calls to increase defence investment after NATO promised to raise military spending to five per cent of economic outputs by 2035. NATO agreed to the significant uplift after many member countries had already failed to meet the previous two per cent target. Sources suggested to Sky News Sunday Agenda that some countries game their budget by including civilian projects, such as roads or bridges, to achieve the five per cent target. "We start with the capability. We don't start with the dollars," Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke told Sunday Agenda. "We make decisions on behalf of Australia's national interest... We have mature, decent, respectful conversations with the United States. "But as I say, the conversation doesn't start with the dollars at our end. It starts with the capability." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Friday if NATO allies could 'do it', then US allies in the Asia-Pacific could as well. Speaking in Sydney on Friday, Mr Albanese was asked if he was worried about a potential backlash from President Donald Trump for not increasing the defence budget. 'What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need - that's what we're investing in,' Mr Albanese told reporters. 'We'll continue to do that, invest in our capability and invest in our relationships … I have said very clearly, we will invest in the capability that Australia needs.' The Albanese government - noting that Australia is not a NATO member but closely allied with the organisation - has committed to a more modest target of 2.3 per cent by 2033. Mr Albanese has left the door open to increasing defence spending, but insists any decision will be based on national interest, not external pressure. The opposition, in contrast, has pledged to increase spending to three per cent, while US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to reach 3.5 per cent. 'The real problem we've got at the moment is we're just way short of the mark,' shadow defence minister Angus Taylor told Sky News on Thursday. 'The government's own plan is not properly funded … it's there, and very clear that there needs to be significant additional funding.' The debate comes amid heightened global instability following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Iran.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump terminates trade talks with Canada over new ‘egregious tax'
US President Donald Trump has abruptly suspended trade negotiations with Canada over plans to continue with its digital technology tax. 'Based on this egregious tax, we are hereby terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately,' President Trump said in a Truth Social post. 'We will let Canada know the tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven-day period.'