
Russia's summer offensive in Ukraine underwhelms – but Kyiv won't be celebrating
For months the talk in Kyiv was of a much-anticipated Russian offensive that would aim to gobble up more of the Ukraine's eastern regions. So far, it's been underwhelming – but the Russians have made some gains and vastly reinforced their troop numbers in some areas.
Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to pursue territorial gains as ceasefire talks take a back seat. Last week he restated what has long been one of his key ways of justifying his unprovoked invasion.
'I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people,' he said. 'In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours.'
Even so, the Ukrainians have launched counterattacks in some areas and are rapidly developing a domestic weapons industry. And Russia's wartime economy is facing stronger headwinds.
Russian troops are trying to advance in multiple areas of the 1,200-kilometer (746-mile) frontline. Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi said this week there are now 111,000 Russian troops in one part of the frontline alone – near the flashpoint city of Pokrovsk in Donetsk, where there are at least 50 clashes every day. That compares to about 70,000 Russian troops in the area last December, according to the Ukrainian General Staff.
Syrskyi also claimed that the Russian infiltration of the northern region of Sumy had been halted. The Institute for the Study of War – a Washington-based think-tank, says Ukrainian forces have regained some territory in Sumy and the pace of Russian advances there has slowed.
'We can say that the wave of attempts at a 'summer offensive' launched by the enemy from Russian territory is fizzling out,' Syrskyi claimed.
Residents walk at a street near a building damaged by Russian missile strikes, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Sumy, Ukraine June 13, 2025.
Sofiia Gatilova/Reuters
But it's a mixed picture. In recent days Russian infantry assaults have gained ground on the border of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk regions. The Russian defense ministry claimed on Saturday that another village, Zirka, had been taken.
DeepState, a Ukrainian open-source analyst, asserted that Ukrainian 'defenses continue to collapse rapidly, and the enemy is making significant advances … with constant assaults' in that area.
The Kremlin has long insisted its campaign will continue until it holds all of the eastern Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. (It already occupies all but a sliver of Luhansk).
At the current rate of progress that would take many years. But with the Trump administration apparently less committed to driving ceasefire negotiations, the conflict seems likely to drag on through the end of the year and into 2026.
The three-dimensional battlefield is now an unlikely combination of ingenious drone-led special operations and very basic infantry assaults.
At one end of the spectrum, Ukraine's audacious attacks at the beginning of June on Russian strategic bombers used drones operated from trucks deep inside Russian territory – a mission that took out about a dozen aircraft used to launch missiles against Ukraine.
Ukraine's Security Service reported another drone attack Saturday that it clamed had caused extensive damage to a Russian airbase in Crimea.
By contrast, Russian soldiers on foot and motorbikes – sometimes in groups of a dozen or less – push into abandoned villages in eastern Ukraine, with drones for cover but no armor in site. It's an approach that is forcing a change in Ukrainian tactics: to smaller fortified positions. Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said last week that defenses were being camouflaged to match the terrain and made smaller to avoid detection.
The Drone War
While infantry defend or take territory, drones continue to play a greater role in shaping the conflict. The Russians are churning out cheap, mass-produced drones designed to overwhelm air defenses and allow some of their missiles to get through. The Russians have increasingly used this tactic to hit Ukrainian cities, especially Kyiv, which has sustained considerable damage and higher civilian casualties in recent weeks.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday that overnight '477 drones were in our skies, most of them Russian-Iranian Shaheds, along with 60 missiles of various types. The Russians were targeting everything that sustains life.'
The Russians use 'up to 500 (Iranian designed) Shaheds per night, combining them with ballistic and cruise missiles — aiming to exhaust our air defenses,' says Umerov.
A woman reacts at the site of an apartment building hit during Russian drone and missile strikes, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine June 23, 2025.
Thomas Peter/Reuters
Zelensky has reiterated pleas for more Patriot missile batteries and other western systems, which Trump said last week that the US 'should consider' because of large-scale attacks on Ukrainian cities.
Zelensky has said Ukraine is prepared to buy Patriots directly or through the fund established by the US-Ukrainian minerals deal.
Both sides are producing drones of all types at an astonishing rate. Ukraine's Security Service reckons Russia is producing nearly 200 Iranian-designed Shahed drones every day, and has an inventory of some 6,000, in addition to about 6,000 decoy drones. Over the last week, the Russians have used more than 23,000 small 'kamikaze' drones on the frontlines, according to the Ukrainian military's General Staff.
It's a never-ending race in design and production. Syrskyi said recently that Russia had developed an edge in fiber-optic-controlled drones, which are more difficult to track and intercept.
Drone warfare is a 'constant intellectual struggle — the enemy regularly changed algorithms, and Ukraine adapted tactics in response,' Umerov said. 'Solutions that showed high effectiveness at the beginning of the war have lost it over time as the enemy changed tactics.'
For its part, Ukraine is stepping up production of the long-range drones it has used to attack Russian infrastructure, such as airfields, refineries and transport. Umerov said 'tens of thousands' would be produced, in addition to more than four million battlefield drones this year.
The longer term
Both sides continue to build defense industries that allow them to keep fighting – even if the scale of Russian production far outstrips that of Ukraine. Russia's huge military conglomerate Rostec is producing an estimated 80% of the equipment used against Ukraine.
Its CEO Sergey Chemezov claimed at a meeting with Putin this month that Rostec's production has grown tenfold since 2021, and its revenues rose last year to an eye-watering $46 billion.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (R) attends a meeting with Russia's state-owned defence corporation Rostec CEO Sergei Chemezov in Moscow on July 30, 2024.
Gavriil Grigorov/Pool/AFP/Getty Images
But there are darkening clouds on the horizon. Russia's military budget is some 40% of its total public spending – more than 6% of its GDP. That's stoked inflation, and Putin acknowledged last week that growth this year would be 'much more modest' to combat rising prices. He even suggested that defense spending would decline next year.
One senior Russian official, Maksim Reshetnikov, who is Economic Development minister, said that 'based on current business sentiment, it seems to me we are on the brink of transitioning into recession.'
The head of Russia's Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, disagreed with Reshetnikov but warned that financial buffers like the national reserve fund are nearly depleted.
'We must understand that many of these resources have been used up,' she told the St. Petersburg International Forum.
Putin himself acknowledged the risk, saying that while some experts predicted stagnation, it should 'not be allowed under any circumstances.'
While the longer-term prognosis for Russia may be gloomy – economically and demographically – it can continue in the short-term to fund an army of more than half-a-million men that's in Ukraine or close to its border, taking a few kilometers here and there. Despite hundreds of thousands of casualties, the Russian military can still generate forces far greater than Ukraine.
His eye still very much on the prize, Putin said last week: 'We have a saying … where the foot of a Russian soldier steps, that is ours.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
The Reality and Future of Ongoing Settlements for Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Crisis
Dr. Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelwahab The Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda signed a peace agreement brokered by the United States to help end the fighting that has persisted for decades in eastern Congo. Washington's mediation does not come under the banner of 'for God and for humanity' as much as it grants the US government and its companies competitive advantages in accessing vital minerals in the region. President Trump stated in a press conference that he managed to broker a deal for one of the worst wars ever, and secured for the United States many mineral rights from the DRC. Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the move as a significant moment after 30 years of war. This aligns with estimates suggesting that Washington is primarily focused on increasing its economic benefits in eastern Congo. Media expect the agreement to pave the way for major American investments in energy and mining sectors, especially as Washington seeks to reduce its dependence on supply chains controlled by China. Eastern Congo is a strategic region due to the possession of 80% of the world's coltan reserves which is a metal used in the production of nuclear reactors. The majority of this wealth is concentrated in the eastern part of the country. Erik Prince who is a supporter of President Trump and founder of Blackwater recently agreed with the Congolese government to join a partnership in the vital minerals sector. This comes in parallel with notable Russian interest in energy projects in regional countries. Moscow recently signed an agreement with the Republic of the Congo to construct a pipeline extending from Pointe-Noire port to the capital, Brazzaville. Regarding international and media expectations of the agreement signed in Washington, some quickly promoted it as a major step to peace. This was reflected in remarks by Bintou Keita, Head of the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC, who said that the signing of the peace agreement between Congo and Rwanda is a significant step forward toward ending the conflict. Others took a more cautious view, considering it a step within ongoing peace efforts in the region. Rwanda's ambassador to the UN Security Council stated that although the road ahead is still long, the path to lasting peace in the Great Lakes region is now clearer than ever. Regional media coverage was generally balanced. Mohamed Tourshan, a researcher specializing in conflict and security issues in Africa, told Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper that the agreement reached between Rwanda and the DRC in Washington represents a historic agreement that could end years-long conflict. The agreement may represent an opportunity to achieve peace and stability in a region suffering from conflicts. However, the success of this agreement fundamentally depends on the seriousness and commitment of all parties. The international community is watching closely to see whether a deal will be signed between the Congolese government and the M23 rebel movement—especially as Rwanda announced on June 7, 2025, its intention to withdraw from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS). The member states of this group account for 20.4% of Africa's area, and their proven oil reserves are estimated at about 31 billion barrels, 28% of Africa's total reserves. Former Congolese President Joseph Kabila adopted an opposing situation, describing the agreement as nothing more than a commercial deal and asserting that his country was not at war with the states appearing at the signing table. It can be said that this agreement did not prevent officials from several European countries, especially those interested in African affairs, from voicing concerns over the US administration's push to reach a peace deal hastily, in a manner resembling commercial transactions, without truly addressing the root causes of the conflict. This concern is pushing France to consider organizing a conference on the humanitarian situation in the Great Lakes region in the near future. Moreover, the agreement did not halt the ongoing exchange of accusations between the warring parties. The DRC's representative to the Security Council stated that the security situation in the east of the country continues to be characterized by Rwandan aggression. Civilians are still suffering massacres, the rape of women and young girls, the forced recruitment of youth, and other violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. The M23 rebels declared that the agreement would not be binding for their movement, as they did not directly participate in the peace deal—despite taking part in other ongoing peace talks. This suggests that positions remain far apart, even as the agreement's mediators voiced optimism. Yet, the challenges persist, as noted by Christian Mulyeka, a political expert at the Congolese Depol Research Center, who described the agreement as a 'major turning point' but stated that it will by no means resolve all conflict-related issues. In parallel, there is growing influence and operational capability of ISIS in eastern Congo. The organization is activating its dormant cells in eastern Congo through its regional branch known as 'Islamic State Central Africa Province' in Uganda. This represents a growing security threat to the African continent's regions already facing activity from the Islamic State in West Africa Province, the Islamic State in Somalia, and ISIS in the Greater Sahara, as well as other regional branches of the organization. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence"


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump says he has a TikTok buyer. Here are the players who have been vying to buy the app
New York CNN — After months of speculation and multiple bids from would-be American buyers, TikTok may finally be getting a new owner. President Donald Trump teased over the weekend that there is a buyer for TikTok, whom he will announce in two weeks, which could secure the app's long-term future in the United States. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it,' President Donald Trump said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo.' He added: 'It's a group of very wealthy people.' TikTok's parent company ByteDance is on the clock to spin off the popular short-form video app's US operations by September 17 or face a ban in the United States. Trump has repeatedly delayed enforcement of the TikTok sale-or-ban law signed by then-President Joe Biden last year — which was originally set to go into effect in January — in hopes of making a deal for an American owner to acquire the app. The app is used by about 170 million Americans to find news, entertainment, community and, in some cases, to make a living. It remains unclear whether the Chinese government would bless the sale of TikTok by its China-based owner. In April, a deal that would have transferred majority control of TikTok's US operations to American ownership was nearly finalized. But it fell apart after Trump announced additional tariffs on China, forcing the White House to announce another 75-day delay to keep the app operational in the United States. Trump extended the deadline again by 90 days earlier this month. 'Discussions with China regarding the sale of TikTok have been ongoing at the highest level, and they will continue,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a briefing Monday. 'As you know, we have another 90-day extension, and it's just to continue to work out this deal and make sure that TikTok stays on for the American people — that's the president's main goal in this, while protecting their privacy and their security.' ByteDance and TikTok did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday. Here's what we know about who could buy TikTok.


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Turkish police detain four cartoonists after image authorities say depicts the Prophet Mohammed sparks protests
CNN — Turkish police detained at least four cartoonists on Monday accused of drawing and distributing a cartoon that authorities and protesters say is a depiction of the Prophet Mohammed and Moses. The cartoon, published in a political satire magazine, shows what appears to be a Muslim and a Jewish man, both with wings and halos, shaking hands and greeting each other as bombs fall below. The cartoon went viral on social media four days after it was published. Hundreds of people took to Istanbul's main tourist street, chanting 'Allah is Great' and calling for sharia law in protest. Turkish authorities quickly condemned the magazine. Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya called the cartoon a provocation and said those 'who dare to do this will be held accountable before the law.' Yerlikaya said the cartoon was not protected by freedom of expression or freedom of speech. Fahrettin Altun, the head communications for the Turkish Presidency, called it a 'vile attack on our beliefs and values.' The country's Justice Ministry announced an investigation had been launched into the incident under Article 216 of the Turkish Penal Code for the crime of 'publicly insulting religious values.' LeMan, the weekly political satire magazine known for irreverent comics similar to French Charlie Hebdo, released a statement saying their cartoon was not depicting the Islamic prophet. 'This cartoon is not a caricature of the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh). In the work, the name Mohammed is fictionalized as belonging to a Muslim person killed in Israel's bombardments. There are more than 200 million people named Mohammed in the Islamic world. The work does not refer to the Prophet Mohammed in any way,' the magazine said. 'By highlighting a murdered Muslim, the aim was to highlight the righteousness of the oppressed Muslim people, with no intention whatsoever of belittling religious values. We reject the stigma imposed on us, as there is no depiction of our Prophet,' LeMan said. 'To interpret the cartoon in such a way requires extreme malice,' the magazine added, but also offered an apology to any readers who may have been offended. As protesters took to the streets, the Interior Ministry released videos of cartoonists being detained in their homes, barefoot and handcuffed by police with captions such as 'You will not escape from our security forces or from justice.' Protesters were seen kicking the doors of the magazine offices in central Istanbul. In one video a demonstrator shouts, 'For our Prophet, we would give our lives and take lives; no one can insult our Prophet.' The crowd also performed a nighttime prayer. Within hours, Istanbul's governor Davut Gul announced that all four people who were wanted for the cartoon were in police custody. Gul did not say if any demonstrators were detained but said in a statement, 'It has been determined that some individuals mingling among the protesters have engaged in provocative actions. It is of great importance that the protesting groups disperse to prevent harm to our citizens and to maintain public order.' Some groups have called for further protests against the magazine on Tuesday. This story has been corrected to make clear the cartoonists have been detained and have not been officially put under arrest. This is a developing story and will be updated.