India kills three terrorists involved in April Kashmir attack
'I want to tell the parliament and the nation that those who murdered our citizens in Baisaran Valley, these three were among them and they were killed,' Shah said. 'The NIA [National Investigation Agency] earlier arrested those who sheltered these terrorists. When their bodies were brought to Srinagar, we got them to identify the bodies.'
One M9 carbine and two AK-47s recovered from the terrorists were the same weapons used in the Kashmir killings, the Indian home minister said, citing tests conducted at the Forensic Science Laboratory in the city of Chandigarh.
⚡️ India Confirms Three Pahalgam Terrorists Killed During Monday Op In J&K - Home Minister Amit ShahThe bodies of the three suspects, named as Suleman, Jibran and Afghan, had their identifies confirmed by four witnesses. The NIA had also previously detained those who gave the… pic.twitter.com/Rx4GY94F1K
'The IB [Intelligence Bureau] and the army's soldiers continuously worked on capturing signals of the ultra system [a Chinese encrypted communication system]. Finally, on July 22, the sensors established their exact location, and then the Indian armed forces finally killed them on Monday,' Shah said.
The armed forces recovered two Pakistani voter identity cards and packets of chocolates made in Pakistan from the terrorists, he added.
The Resistance Front, believed to be linked to LeT, initially claimed responsibility for the April attack that claimed 26 lives, but later denied it.
The Pakistani government has officially denied any involvement.
India responded to the attack by striking suspected terror facilities in Pakistan-controlled territory in the early hours of May 7. This led to a Pakistani retaliation and a military exchange that ended with a ceasefire three days later.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
India-US ties have weathered many challenges
The India-US relationship has 'weathered many transitions and challenges' in the past and is based on mutual respect, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said on Friday. The comments come in response to the US imposing 25% tariffs on imports from India and Donald Trump's threatening to add penalties over and above those due to New Delhi's trade and defense ties with Moscow. 'India and the US share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, robust people-to-people ties,' Jaiswal said. He also spoke of the potential for the defense partnership with Washington. 'We have strong defense ties with the US which have been strengthening over the last several years,' he said. ❗️🇮🇳 Relationships With Other Countries Should Not Be Seen Through Prism Of A Third Country - Russia & India Have A Steady & Time-Tested Partnership- MEA Reacts To Trump's Secondary Tariffs A day after Trump said India and Russia 'could take their dead economies down together,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil 'a point of irritation.' In a response to these comments at the Friday press briefing, Jaiswal said bilateral relationships between two countries should not be viewed in the context of a third nation. 'Our ties with any country are based on their own merit and should not be judged through the lens of our relationship with another country,' he said. Jaiswal also highlighted that India and Russia enjoy a long-standing and robust partnership. The spokesman said India's decisions on defense purchases are driven solely by national security needs and strategic considerations, adding that the country's energy sourcing is guided by market availability and global circumstances.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump's onslaught: Why India and BRICS will not bend
US President Trump has rattled Washington's ties with New Delhi to an unexpected degree. Countries, including, India were prepared for rough diplomatic weather after Trump won his second term, but did not anticipate the kind of onslaught he has unleashed on the global system and diplomatic norms. Trump's latest attack on India and the BRICS countries explains this underlying dynamic. The BRICS aspire to play a greater political, economic and financial role in global affairs. This aspiration is based on shifts of economic and concomitant political and financial power towards the so-called emerging powers or middle-income countries. BRICS countries have already begun to use their national currencies in trading with each other as much as possible. The use of draconian financial sanctions on Russia by the West has accelerated this process. Today, almost all trade operations between Russia and China are conducted in rubles and yuan. India too is encouraging the use of its national currency in payment transactions with select countries. A significant portion of the trade between India and Russia is now settled using a rupee-ruble mechanism. Washington cannot use secondary sanctions to prevent countries, including India, from using the US dollar to trade with Russia and then oppose de-dollarization if these countries are compelled to use alternative payment mechanisms. If the US continues to weaponize the dollar, it will inevitably lead to the very 'de-dollarization' that Trump is concerned about. India has officially disowned any de-dollarization agenda – not the least because the US is its biggest trade partner in goods and services. India seeks more investments and technology transfers from the US. In many ways, New Delhi's ties with Washington are the most important for achieving its growth and developmental goals. But that does not preclude India from establishing other partnerships to reduce over-dependence on one country, balance its external relations and hedge against the excesses of US foreign policy. Trump has exacerbated the disruptions caused by Washington's frequent use of sanctions as a political weapon by also weaponizing tariffs. He is convinced that by imposing arbitrarily determined tariffs on imports from other countries he will compel them to enter into negotiations with the US to obtain relief by lowering their high tariffs on American products. But India on Wednesday sent a clear message: it is determined to protect the interests of its own businesses, farmers and people. Trump's use of tariffs as lever, like in the case of Brazil, where he has cited President Lula's treatment of his predecessor Bolsanaro as reason for imposing 50% levies, is being closely monitored by the world's governments. Trump has repeatedly targeted BRICS since his return to the Oval Office. He had threatened the countries with tariffs if they contonie to pledge to create a new common currency or support any alternative to the US dollar. Trump appeared to harbor the illusion that BRICS was 'dead' following his threats – which have now materialized into action. In reality, the BRICS summit held in Brazil this July showed no visible signs of intimidation. On the contrary, such overt displays of American economic coercion may well drive more countries toward alliances that seek to challenge the dominance of any single global power. The administration in Washington appears to lack realism in its assessment of global trends. Trump positions himself as a peacemaker and openly aspires to win a Nobel Peace Prize, while at the same time bombing Iran and assisting Israel in perpetuating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Similarly, threatening China as a BRICS member with 100% tariffs so casually – along with talk of bombing Beijing if the People's Republic were to invade Taiwan – makes little sense, especially given that an interim trade deal has already been reached and further negotiations are imminent. The US cannot reasonably claim that forums like BRICS have no right to determine their own agenda in pursuit of their shared interests. At the same time, the US has walked out of or subverted key international agreements and institutions. It has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Change agreement, the WHO, the UN Human Rights Commission and UNESCO. Trump seems to believe that these organizations cannot function or survive without the presence of the US and its financial contributions. In reality, the US will lose its voice and its leadership in these international forums. The space it vacates will be filled by others, especially China. Beijing has already carved out enormous influence in the UN institutions as it is now the second largest contributor to the UN. With Washington also bullying Europe and thereby damaging Western solidarity, the US absence from these organizations will have even less impact. The more the world learns to manage without the US in these international bodies, the more America's international influence will erode. These US decisions will also accelerate the dispersal of influence at the global level, as other centers of influence develop.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
India ‘not keen' on buying F-35s from US
India told the US in February that it is 'not keen' on buying F-35 stealth fighter jets, Bloomberg reported on Thursday, citing officials familiar with the matter. US President Donald Trump had offered to sell the aircraft to New Delhi when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the White House in February, according to the report. India is keener on a partnership that focuses on joint design and manufacturing, it added. The Indian Foreign Ministry, however, has downplayed the report by the news agency. 'The India-US joint statement following the meeting of the prime minister with the US president on 13 February 2025 mentions that the US will undertake a review of its policy on releasing fifth-generation fighters (such as the F-35) and undersea systems to India,' the minister of state for foreign affairs said in the lower house of parliament on Friday. 'No formal discussions have been held as yet on this issue.' The sale of fighter aircraft to India would reduce a $41.18 billion trade deficit that the US has with the South Asian nation. This week, the US imposed 25% tariffs on imports from India, as the two countries were unable to conclude a trade deal by an August 1 deadline. On Wednesday, Trump said in a post on Truth Social that India would pay an undisclosed penalty in addition to the tariffs for its trade and defense purchases from Russia. During Modi's visit to Washington in February, Trump said the US would like to increase weapons sales to India and would eventually offer its latest fighter jets. 'We'll be increasing military sales to India by many billions of dollars,' the US president told reporters. 'We're also paving the way to ultimately provide India with the F-35 stealth fighters.' In his April visit to India, US Vice President J.D. Vance said the F-35 could bolster the Indian Air Force's defense capabilities. The statement came days after the F-35 and Russia's Su-57 were showcased at the Aero India air show in Bangalore. Defense analysts say the Su-57 has clear advantages over its American rival, including lower cost and tech transfer opportunities, making it appealing to the Indian Air Force, which has long relied on Russian systems.
