logo
China's military says Japan ‘breaching pacifist constitution' with long-range missile tests

China's military says Japan ‘breaching pacifist constitution' with long-range missile tests

China's military has accused Japan of undermining regional security after it tested new long-range anti-ship and hypersonic missiles.
A commentary published by the military mouthpiece People's Liberation Army Daily on Wednesday said that the extended range of missiles would be 'a real deterrent to multiple surrounding areas'.
It also argued that the
increased ability to strike long-range targets was 'breaking the restrictions of the pacifist constitution that the Japanese Self-Defence Forces cannot possess offensive weapons'. The constitution was imposed after Japan's defeat in the second world war.
The missiles were tested as part of an annual live-fire drill near Mount Fuji on Sunday.
The upgraded
Type 12 surface-to-ship missiles and hypersonic
Hyper Velocity Gliding Projectile (HVGP) will be deployed in Kyushu, the southernmost of Japan's four main islands, while the HVGP may also be stationed in Hokkaido in the north, according to Japanese media reports.
PLA Daily said the choice of location, which avoided 'sensitive' segments of the
first island chain such as
Okinawa , was designed to minimise international criticism of Japan's military expansion.
'In fact, rather than enhancing its defence capabilities, Japan has been leaping toward 'first strike capabilities' in the name of building so-called 'counter strike capabilities',' the article said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong will benefit from recognising the rights of same-sex couples
Hong Kong will benefit from recognising the rights of same-sex couples

South China Morning Post

time38 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong will benefit from recognising the rights of same-sex couples

The landmark ruling by Hong Kong's top court requiring the government to recognise same-sex relationships was a defining moment for the city. Grounded in law, but also basic human decency, the court gave officials two years to put in place a framework protecting the core rights of such couples, who are not permitted to marry in the city. The government unveiled its proposals last week, just four months ahead of the deadline and no one is happy with them. Members of the LGBTQ community are disappointed because they do not go far enough. Lawmakers are also angry. They hit out at the government for leaving insufficient time for the legislative process and failing to launch a public consultation. Some claimed the proposals would undermine Hong Kong's traditional family values. There is a need for calm and clarity. Some legislators appear to want to roll back the ruling because they disagree with it. But the judgment must be implemented. That should be non-negotiable. Otherwise, there will be a continuing breach of the law. Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Erick Tsang Kwok-wai was spot on when he said: 'A decision of the Court of Final Appeal, whether you like it or not or agree with it or not, is part of our judicial system,' adding that it must be respected. The legislators are on firmer ground when they complain about the late submission of the proposals and lack of public consultation.

Hong Kong housing authorities quietly open door for same-sex couples
Hong Kong housing authorities quietly open door for same-sex couples

South China Morning Post

time43 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong housing authorities quietly open door for same-sex couples

Hong Kong's housing authorities have opened up applications for public rental and subsidised homes to same-sex couples as part of efforts to address a ruling from the city's top court last year, the Post has learned. The measures, including modifying the application form for seeking second-hand subsidised homes, were implemented without any public announcement. While lawmakers said the government had responded to the Court of Final Appeal's decision prudently and within a reasonable time frame, a concern group expressed hope that the changes could have been publicly announced. In a reply to the Post, the Housing Authority said: 'Upon receiving [public rental home] applications involving same-sex married spouses, we will handle the case in accordance with the practice adopted for the 'ordinary families' applicant category.' A spokesman added that the authority would continue to process such applications and those for buying subsidised flats from same-sex married couples. The authority had yet to receive any public rental housing applications from any same-sex couples as of Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store