Failed New Zealand scheme is cautionary tale for Carney's homebuilding agency: report
OTTAWA — Researchers with the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) say Canada's new federal homebuilding agency is likely to overpromise and underdeliver, drawing a cautionary tale from down under.
Article content
The free-market think tank argues in a new study that New Zealand's now-defunct homebuilding scheme KiwiBuild, a signature policy of Jacinda Ardern's Labour government, shows why government bureaucrats shouldn't try to play real estate developer.
Article content
Article content
Article content
'New Zealand's experience highlights the limits of government intervention in the real estate market, especially in terms of resource allocation,' write co-authors Gabriel Giguère, Yassine Benabid and Renaud Brossard.
Article content
Article content
Brossard told the National Post he was struck by the similarities between KiwiBuild and the Liberal government's Build Canada Homes.
Article content
'If you look at government programs that have been done through out the world, this is probably the closest thing to what (Prime Minister) Mark Carney's pitching,' said Brossard.
Article content
KiwiBuild launched in 2018 with the lofty goal of building 100,000 affordable housing units in a decade. It would never come anywhere near meeting this target, completing just 2,389 units by the end of its last full year of activity in 2024.
Article content
The program was slammed by both politicians and pundits as a 'complete disaster', contributing to Ardern's fall from global progressive darling to her abrupt resignation in early 2023.
Article content
Article content
By one estimate, KiwiBuild would have taken 436 years to hit the original target of 100,000 homes.
Article content
Brossard said that one critical mistake that KiwiBuild administrators made was relying too heavily on prefabricated homes.
Article content
'In some of the areas where they were hoping to build homes for (KiwiBuild), they found that shipping in a prefab home was actually more expensive than just building one in situ,' said Brossard.
Article content
Carney has promised billions in subsidies to prefabricated and modular home builders, as part of his plan to double the rate of housing construction and build 500,000 new homes a year within a decade.
Article content
Brossard and his co-authors report that KiwiBuild's prefab homes were often inferior to other housing options available to low and moderate-income families.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
UK leader Starmer waters down planned welfare cuts after revolt in his Labour Party
LONDON (AP) — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer gave way to political pressure on Friday, watering down planned welfare reforms to avoid defeat by his own party's lawmakers. It's the latest forced U-turn for a center-left government caught between conflicting goals of cutting spending and improving public services. The government planned to bring a bill to Parliament next week that would tighten eligibility for a key disability benefit, removing the Personal Independence Payment from hundreds of thousands of people with long-term physical or mental health conditions. Another health-related benefit received by people on low incomes would also be reduced under the plans. The government said the proposed changes would help people find jobs while preserving a safety net for those who can never work. It would also save an estimated 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. But many Labour lawmakers balked at the changes, which the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030. More than 120 of the 403 Labour legislators signed a motion that would effectively kill the bill if it were to be passed. Defeat at the hands of his own party in the vote planned for Tuesday would have seriously damaged Starmer's authority. To avoid that, the government said it would ensure no one who currently receives the PIP benefit will lose it. Starmer was elected a year ago in a landslide victory, winning a commanding majority of seats in the House of Commons. Since then his popularity has plunged as a sluggish economy and stubbornly high inflation resist efforts to raise living standards and ease a cost-of-living squeeze. Even as Starmer enjoyed success on the world stage – charming U.S. President Donald Trump and securing a trade deal to exempt Britain from some U.S. tariffs – Labour lawmakers have grown restive at the party's sagging poll ratings and the rise of the hard-right Reform U.K. party led by Nigel Farage. Starmer has been forced into several U-turns. In May the government dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk. The government insists that major changes to welfare are needed to deal with a 'broken' system inherited from the previous Conservative government. It says the spending cuts it is making will be balanced by new money and support to help people who are able to work find jobs. The government wants to reduce the number of working-age people who are economically inactive through long-term sickness, which it says stand at 2.8 million, the highest rate of any G7 nation. At a NATO summit on Wednesday, Starmer dismissed griping about the welfare plans as 'noises off.' But the next day, he insisted he was listening to party rebels. 'All colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' Starmer said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness,' he told lawmakers. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.'
Vancouver Sun
2 days ago
- Vancouver Sun
Failed New Zealand scheme is cautionary tale for Carney's homebuilding agency: report
OTTAWA — Researchers with the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) say Canada's new federal homebuilding agency is likely to overpromise and underdeliver, drawing a cautionary tale from down under. The free-market think tank argues in a new study that New Zealand's now-defunct homebuilding scheme KiwiBuild, a signature policy of Jacinda Ardern's Labour government, shows why government bureaucrats shouldn't try to play real estate developer. 'New Zealand's experience highlights the limits of government intervention in the real estate market, especially in terms of resource allocation,' write co-authors Gabriel Giguère, Yassine Benabid and Renaud Brossard. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Brossard told the National Post he was struck by the similarities between KiwiBuild and the Liberal government's Build Canada Homes. 'If you look at government programs that have been done through out the world, this is probably the closest thing to what (Prime Minister) Mark Carney's pitching,' said Brossard. KiwiBuild launched in 2018 with the lofty goal of building 100,000 affordable housing units in a decade. It would never come anywhere near meeting this target, completing just 2,389 units by the end of its last full year of activity in 2024. The program was slammed by both politicians and pundits as a 'complete disaster' , contributing to Ardern's fall from global progressive darling to her abrupt resignation in early 2023. By one estimate, KiwiBuild would have taken 436 years to hit the original target of 100,000 homes. Brossard said that one critical mistake that KiwiBuild administrators made was relying too heavily on prefabricated homes. 'In some of the areas where they were hoping to build homes for (KiwiBuild), they found that shipping in a prefab home was actually more expensive than just building one in situ,' said Brossard. Carney has promised billions in subsidies to prefabricated and modular home builders, as part of his plan to double the rate of housing construction and build 500,000 new homes a year within a decade. Brossard and his co-authors report that KiwiBuild's prefab homes were often inferior to other housing options available to low and moderate-income families. Some banks were even hesitant to approve mortgages for the prefab homes, given the 'flight risk' involved where delinquents could theoretically load the units onto a truck bed and skip town. Brossard says that the big lesson from KiwiBuild is that civil servants shouldn't moonlight as real estate developers. 'This is what tends to happen with top-down government programs that push one-size-fits-all solutions,' said Brossard. The study recommends that Carney scrap Build Canada Homes and instead focus on creating a friendlier regulatory environment for private real estate developers. Brossard also said that policymakers can stimulate homebuilders by harmonizing professional qualifications for workers in the building trades across provinces and territories. The office of federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson didn't respond when asked about KiwiBuild by the National Post. National Post Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Edmonton Journal
2 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Failed New Zealand scheme is cautionary tale for Carney's homebuilding agency: report
Article content OTTAWA — Researchers with the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) say Canada's new federal homebuilding agency is likely to overpromise and underdeliver, drawing a cautionary tale from down under. The free-market think tank argues in a new study that New Zealand's now-defunct homebuilding scheme KiwiBuild, a signature policy of Jacinda Ardern's Labour government, shows why government bureaucrats shouldn't try to play real estate developer.
