‘It can't just be a competition on price': Why Seaspan didn't bid on BC Ferries contract
It comes as BC Ferries faces public pressure over its recent decision to award a multi-billion-dollar contract to build four new major vessels to a Chinese shipyard.
No Canadian company bid on the contract, and while the decision will save the company $1.2 billion over going with a European yard, it has hit the choppy waters of growing nationalism and a global trade war.
B.C. shipyard Seaspan did not bid on the deal.
2:15
BC Ferries criticized over decision to award contract to Chinese-owned shipyard
Senior vice-president of strategy, business development and communications Dave Hargreaves told Global News that's in part because while it has the capability, it doesn't currently have the capacity.
Story continues below advertisement
The company is essentially fully booked through the end of the decade, building Coast Guard and Canadian Navy ships.
But the company said the BC Ferries procurement process — which was heavily tilted towards price — would have essentially ruled it out anyway.
'The fact of the matter is that their labour costs in their shipyards is probably seven to eight times cheaper than ours, so not like 10 per cent cheaper,' Hargreaves said.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'That labour cost differential is big. And so it's hard to see that we would ever get to cost-competitive with China, or for that matter like Korea, or some Eastern European countries, or places like that.'
Hargreaves compared the BC Ferries contract to its deals for major vessels with the federal government, which he said have a 100 per cent overall Canadian content requirement.
It's a political calculation, he said, that acknowledges a higher up-front cost, but comes with downstream benefits.
2:15
BC Ferries new vessel federal funding controversy
Those high-paying jobs return income taxes to the provincial and federal government and have indirect economic effects through consumer spending, he said.
Story continues below advertisement
Expanding the shipbuilding sector drives innovation, grows the skilled workforce and expands the wider marine ecosystem, he added.
'Some of our subcontractors are already exporting things,' he said. 'You don't get any of that if you go and build the ferries in China.'
And there is the strategic benefit of domestic control of shipbuilding capacity.
'Having a sovereign capability to do shipbuilding in Canada, I mean, we still are one of the world's longest coastline countries with huge maritime areas,' he said.
'So the ability to build ships kind of seems important.'
While Premier David Eby has said he wants to see vessels built in B.C., the province won't force BC Ferries to drop the China contract — citing the urgent need to get the vessels into service, and the desire to keep ferry fares down.
On Thursday, Deputy Premier Niki Sharma toured the Seaspan shipyard.
2:10
BC Building Trades expresses disappointment in BC Ferries decision
'This multi-billion-dollar success story is possible thanks to the key role Ottawa plays in supporting the national shipbuilding strategy,' she said of the Navy and Coast Guard work underway.
Story continues below advertisement
'We are determined to continue this work with the federal government to support Seaspan to do the same for civilian ships. Expanding B.C.'s capacity and getting B.C. shipyards ready to successfully bid on more Canadian ship contracts will create more good jobs in this community and the communities that supply them.'
That's the kind of talk Hargreaves said will be necessary if future ferries are to be built in B.C., adding the provincial government will need to be fully on board.
'That does have to include some much stronger preferences for B.C./Canadian content. It can't just be a competition on price, it has to take into account all the other benefits that accrue from building here … has to be seen as an investment for B.C.,' he said.
'BC Ferries doesn't really have that flexibility to make that decision by themselves, right? It has to be the province that comes to the table there.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Kelowna homeowner out $66K after strata repairs fell through
Susan Hisch grips a makeshift balcony railing made of 2-by-4s. As she gives it a shake, it wobbles noticeably. 'This isn't safe,' she said. In 2021, Hisch, like every other homeowner at Burtch Estates in Kelowna, B.C., was told she needed to pay a special levy of $66,000. The funds were supposed to go toward a full envelope restoration of the aging building — a major construction project intended to upgrade the exterior, fix balconies, and improve safety. Hisch paid her share, but three years later, much of the work remains unfinished. 'Each owner had to come up with that money to redo the full envelope of the building,' she said. 'And still — nothing's done.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Hisch says that while many residents paid the levy to the strata, progress stalled a year after construction began. The contractor, Team Construction, walked off the job. Then, she says, their strata management company, Lifestyles, also abandoned the project. Story continues below advertisement 'Here we are, stuck with nothing done,' Hisch said. 'The siding wasn't finished. The balconies weren't done. Winter was coming.' Team Construction told Global News they were forced to stop work after the strata council and their consultant, GTA, allegedly stopped making payments. In a statement, the company said, 'We filed a lien, initiating a two-year dispute that resulted in the Strata Council finally accepting responsibility. It's unfortunate the membership wasn't kept informed.' Now, Hisch's home is surrounded by signs of incomplete work: cracked balcony foundations, temporary wood supports in place of real railings, a second balcony without a railing, and siding that was never installed. The situation hasn't just affected Hisch's safety, it's changed her quality of life. 'Balconies are our outdoor living space. And we haven't been able to go out there,' she said 'I haven't had company over. I've been working seven days a week just to pay off that $66,000.' In a phone call with Global News, the strata said construction could restart — if owners vote in favour of continuing the project. But Hisch isn't optimistic. 'I call it a stalling tactic,' she said. 'I'd like to be a glass-half-full kind of person, but at this point, I no longer have faith.' For now, Hisch is left with no railing, no repairs and no end in sight.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Energy minister leans on oil industry talking points in carbon capture announcement
At a carbon capture funding announcement, Canada's energy minister was using rhetoric straight out of Big Oil's playbook. On Friday, the federal government announced $21.5 million for a handful of carbon capture projects in Alberta, and while the amount isn't going to move the needle, Energy and Natural Resource Minister Tim Hodgson's choice of words and tone signal how Prime Minister Mark Carney's government plans to engage with the fossil fuel industry. Hodgson billed this as 'an investment in the long-term future of the oil and gas industry' and highlighted other federal support for carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS). 'Every barrel of responsibly produced Canadian oil and every tonne of clean Canadian LNG can displace less clean, riskier energy elsewhere in the world,' Hodgson said at the announcement in Calgary. 'Our exports can help our allies break dependence on authoritarian regimes and help the world reduce our emissions. Canada will remain a reliable global supplier — not just today, but for decades to come. The real challenge is not whether we produce, but whether we can get the best products to market before someone else does.' The line that Canadian oil and gas is more ethical and more responsibly produced than in other parts of the world — and that it displaces dirtier fuels elsewhere — are tried-and-true industry talking points. Similarly, the idea that Canada will inevitably remain a major oil producer or be replaced in the market by other players is a familiar oilpatch argument. 'Is that Minister Hodgson saying that, or is that somebody from the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers?' Stephen Legault, senior manager of Alberta energy transition at Environmental Defence, asked in a phone interview with Canada's National Observer. 'Because the two, in that statement, sound indistinguishable.' On Friday, the federal government announced $21.5 million for a handful of carbon capture projects in Alberta. The minister's remarks signal that Carney's government is trying to find a way for Canada to continue on as a petro-state and is 'desperately' looking for ways to somehow make it socially acceptable, Legault said. Bitumen from Alberta's oil sands is among the dirtiest, most water- and carbon-intensive oil in the world. Communities downstream of the oil sands live with health and environmental impacts every day. Carbon capture and storage has become a major fixation of the oil and gas industry in recent years as it seeks social licence to continue producing despite its climate impacts. 'These are talking points that the Pathways Alliance uses to justify trying to extract billions of dollars in Canadian taxpayers' money to clean up a mess made by the most wealthy companies in the country, and some of them the most wealthy in the world,' Legault said. Export Canadian LNG to fight climate change Hodgson emphasized the need to 'make investments that fight climate change, so we can reduce carbon emissions and bring the lowest-cost, lowest-risk and lowest-carbon products to domestic and international markets — like we have just seen this week with the momentous opening of LNG Canada Phase 1.' Some of Hodgson's comments justifying Canada's export of fossil fuels to reduce global emissions could also be lifted right out of the Conservative Party of Canada's election campaign materials, which proposed lowering global greenhouse gas emissions by exporting more Canadian LNG to countries that currently burn a lot of coal. However, a growing body of evidence throws cold water on the notion LNG is a lower-emission fuel than coal. A study from Cornell University, published last October, found carbon emissions from American LNG are actually 33 per cent higher than coal, when processing and shipping the LNG are taken into account. There's also widespread skepticism about the business case for ramping up LNG production and export. In October, researchers from the U.K.-based Carbon Tracker found global markets for LNG are likely to be oversupplied by the end of the decade. 'This was not the tone of a minister of natural resources who takes climate change seriously,' Legault said. 'Two weeks ago or three weeks ago, people were terrified that their communities were going to burn down, and the fire season had barely begun. We've got record temperatures around the world right now, people are dying, and it would appear as though the Carney government is going down the same path that we might have gotten with a Poilievre government, which is to believe the rhetoric that these oil and gas companies are spewing and to believe the rhetoric that Danielle Smith is spewing.' Legault quipped that perhaps Stephen Harper's staff left his playbook for 'ethical oil' sitting around and one of Carney's people dusted it off. Government 'taking the temperature' for Pathways investment Hodgson delivered his remarks at Bow Valley Carbon Cochrane Ltd.'s facility, which is getting $10 million to design and install a system and pipeline to capture carbon from the Interpipeline Cochrane Natural Gas Extraction Plant, transport it and sequester it in a well. Enbridge Inc. and Enhance Energy Inc. are getting $4 million and $5 million, respectively, for work to support separate storage hubs in Central Alberta by identifying underground reservoirs to store the captured carbon. Half a million dollars will go to a company to improve measurement, monitoring and verification of CO2 stored underground. The remaining $2 million is to investigate using small-scale carbon capture technology on diesel engines. This $21.5 million comes from the Energy Innovation Program's $319-million funding stream for carbon capture. The funding was introduced in Budget 2021 and will span seven years. The federal government also has a CCUS investment tax credit worth more than $5.7-billion in its first six years, according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer's estimates. All of this is dwarfed by a multi-billion-dollar carbon capture megaproject proposed by a consortium of Canada's six largest oil sands producers called the Pathways Alliance. The project, with an estimated $16.5-billion price tag, would capture carbon dioxide from more than a dozen oilsands sites in northern Alberta and transport it to an underground storage site south of Cold Lake, using approximately 600 kilometres of pipelines. Legault believes Hodsgon's remarks are 'taking the temperature' of the Canadian public to gauge what the reaction will be 'when the government makes an announcement that they want to support the Pathways Alliance.' At the news conference, Hodgson did not answer multiple questions about the Pathways Alliance's proposed multi-billion-dollar carbon capture megaproject and whether his government will put public money on the table, other than to say the discussions are 'active' and he will not 'negotiate in public.' A January 2025 study by The International Institute for Energy Economics and Financial found the Pathways project business model is shaky at best due to high costs and limited opportunities to generate revenue. The project is currently stalled awaiting an investment decision. A 'multi-billion-dollar CCUS industry' CCUS is widely criticized by climate advocates for its inefficiency, high cost and the fact it risks locking in oil and gas production despite the majority of the emissions created by burning fossil fuels. As Legault put it, these projects 'tend to leave an awful lot of carbon on the table, and that's not what we need right now.' 'If carbon capture was such a great idea, then the companies should pay for it themselves. It's not like they're cleaning up a mess that the Canadian public made. They're cleaning up a mess that they made.' Canada can develop 'a world-class, multi-billion-dollar CCUS industry' if governments move quickly and strategically, Hodgson said Friday, adding that Alberta is an 'MVP' in the federal government's game plan. New legislation grants the federal government broad powers to override environmental laws and regulations to build projects cabinet deems in the national interest, which could include a wide range of projects from ports, rail, electricity infrastructure, pipelines and carbon capture. The legislation has added fuel to conversations about new pipelines and Carney has name-dropped the Pathways carbon capture project as a possible contender. On Friday, Hodgson said, 'One of the criteria is that we honour our commitments to a clean economy and to fighting climate change, and that will be one of the key ways that we evaluate any project going forward.' The legislation does not force the federal government to treat this or any of its factors as criteria that must be met; it just suggests it as one of many to consider. 'I really hope that the prime minister has read his own book and is able to translate the value that he talks about in his book [ Value(s): Building a Better World for All ], into policy on the ground for Canada and its future, because right now, we're not getting many hopeful signs,' Legault said.
Montreal Gazette
2 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: Bilingual greetings shouldn't be shamed by CAQ government
Re: ' Language complaints soar in Quebec as English service eclipses concerns about signs ' (The Gazette, July 4) I often travel to Ottawa for work. When I stop in Casselman, a Franco-Ontarian bastion, I am greeted with 'Hello-Bonjour.' It's one thing to say everyone in Quebec is entitled to be greeted and served in French, as previous governments have, and quite another to attempt to shame businesses for also wanting to welcome clients in another language, as the Coalition Avenir Québec is doing. English is not a foreign language in Quebec, as much as some nationalists may like it to be. Jordan Black, Rosemont A caring response to an urgent need Re: ' 'I'm happy': From homeless to housed, tenants grateful for new Lachine facility ' (The Gazette, July 3) It was a pleasure to read about the Old Brewery Mission's Tenaquip Place. In a world where stories of hardship often dominate the headlines, it is deeply uplifting to see a project focused on compassion, community and hope. This complex is not just a structure — it's a sign we are capable of thoughtful, humane responses to urgent needs. We are at our best when we look out for one another. To those who made Tenaquip Place a reality, thank you for your vision and humanity. Elizabeth Bright, Côte-St-Luc Patriotism is a personal matter Re: ' Canadian pride isn't a betrayal of being a Quebecer ' (Robert Libman, June 28) It is infuriating that a nationalist commentator, as reported by Robert Libman, would try to negate what another person believes in by stating 'Canada is an artificial political structure.' The commentator also claims we can't be Canadian and Québécois at the same time. Perhaps they missed a recent Association for Canadian Studies poll that showed 82 per cent of Quebec respondents — believing a nation's 'members share a common culture, language and history' — felt 'they were part of the Canadian nation.' To harbour strong patriotic feelings for one's nation is fine, but to dismiss another's pride in a country you don't identify with is wrong-headed. Goldie Olszynko, Mile End NATO spending goal needs a rethink Re: ' Trump hedges on NATO pledge ' (NP Montreal, June 25); ' Ottawa pledges to ramp up NATO defence spending ' (NP Montreal, June 26) NATO's decision to raise member countries' defence spending to five per cent of GDP will pose serious difficulties for spending on domestic needs. The chief reasons given are the need to counter the increased threat posed by Russia and other hostile countries, and to match U.S. military expenditure in NATO. Yet according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Russia spent only US$149 billion on the military in 2024, while NATO countries collectively spent US$1,506 billion, with European NATO countries at US$454 billion. The U.S. spent only 3.38 per cent of GDP on defence in 2024. President Donald Trump has said the five per cent goal shouldn't apply to the U.S., but only to other NATO countries. For Canada to reach five per cent, it would have to increase its annual defence to $150 billion. This would probably result in significantly increased taxes, debt or severe cuts in domestic spending. Canada and other NATO countries should seriously reconsider this increase. Robert Hajaly, Montreal Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
