Investigation into illegal settlements gains momentum
Kleinfontein will however be held to comply with the metro's regulations for city planning and zoning as well as to be penalised for failure to pay rates and taxes.
This opinion was expressed by Aaron Maluleka, the MMC for Tshwane Human Settlements, in July.
Kleinfontein is expected to pay just over R2-million per month in taxes, a huge leap from its previous R126 000 per month.
The Kleinfontein community has appealed to the metro to fast-track its rezoning application in order to comply and pay fair rates and taxes.
Maluleka said the metro leadership will be in contact with the Kleinfontein leadership on compliance matters, the preservation of wetlands and other matters like the application for zoning pending since 2013 .
The Kleinfontein community welcomed the mayoral sub-committee proactive approach and commitment to resolving issues.
Spokesperson for the community, Danie de Beer, said, 'We do however disagree that Kleinfontein is grouped with 17 so called illegal settlements.
'As a community settlement, we differ fundamentally from a conventional profit driven development. Kleinfontein is a community settlement and not a development in the true sense of the word.
'In addition, we have an active and pending rezoning application with the metro.
'Kleinfontein is further different as it is mostly self sufficient and does not use nor requires any services from the city. Lastly, we gained cultural status in 2013 as a community.
'Clearly Kleinfontein is different and cannot just be labelled as just another illegal settlement.'
Issues around zoning and other metro matters concerning the development of Kleinfontein came to light again with the report that was tabled at a mayoral committee meeting in June and that will most likely finally be tabled at a meeting of the council later this month.
Metro spokesperson Lindela Mashigo said the report is the result of a decision in May 2025 by the mayoral committee to establish a subcommittee to develop a policy framework to address the growing issue of illegal developments within the metro.
In the report the metro has identified 17 such developments, some occurring on council-owned land and others on private property.
These developments were all initiated outside the legal frameworks governing township establishment.
'These developments typically bypass formal application processes, planning approvals, and infrastructure contributions, posing significant regulatory and infrastructural challenges,' said Mashigo.
He explained these developments fall into two broad categories.
The first involves individual property owners acting outside legal frameworks by using or developing their land without proper zoning approvals or building plans.
By sidestepping the compliance matters, they are contravening the Tshwane Land Use Scheme of 2024, and National Building Regulations.
The second category involves landowners knowingly allowing others to develop medium- to high-value housing or commercial structures on their land without legal permission from the metro.
In both cases, development occurs without metro oversight, or the legal contributions required to support infrastructure expansion.
'Understanding the impact of these 'illegal townships' requires distinguishing them from informal settlements.
'While informal areas may be identified for upgrading through transitional processes as per the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, illegal townships involve formal construction and land use that is entirely outside the legal framework.'
The metro's by-laws define 'illegal townships' in contrast to 'townships' and 'informal settlements', allowing for specific responses.
These 17 identified developments fit the criteria for illegal townships, where formal housing is erected without township establishment processes.
Mashigo confirmed, 'Illegal townships result in serious consequences, including lack of access to basic services, poor spatial planning, infrastructure strain, and safety risks from unregulated land occupation.
'The metro, therefore, seeks to respond decisively by developing and implementing a clear policy framework.
'The mayoral sub-committee will lead this effort, aligning with applicable legislation to prevent future illegal developments and address existing ones in a structured and sustainable manner.'
He added the committee's primary objective is to develop a comprehensive framework aligned with the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act and by-laws to address and prevent the proliferation of illegal townships and developments.
'This includes identifying and profiling all such settlements, recommending a unified policy response, and creating preventative mechanisms such as better enforcement, early detection, and raising public awareness,' said Mashigo.
The subcommittee's responsibilities focus on thoroughly reviewing the legal and planning aspects of 17 identified illegal townships.
The developments where these illegal land use activities have been identified include Kleinfontein and areas such as Leeuwfontein, Moshate Gardens, Marula View, Mooikloof (Tweefontein), Wallmannsthal, Haakdoringboom, Onderstepoort,Moshate Gardens,
The review involves consulting with affected residents and property owners, engaging government departments and enforcement agencies, and considering policy, legal, spatial, and infrastructure issues.
'Ultimately, the subcommittee is expected to propose a consolidated approach and draft policy for council approval.
'It should also advise on amendments to the city's spatial development framework and serve as a technical advisory body to the mayoral committee on illegal township matters,' said Mashigo.
In the interim, the council has approved the implementation of penalty rates on 713 property owners identified by the administration for illegal land use, and failure to take remedial action.
This includes some illegal developments as well as individual properties spread all over the city that are being used for purposes in contravention of the current zoning.
These properties will now be recategorised for rates purposes as 'unpermitted use' and the owners be compelled to pay penalty rates.
Do you have more information about the story?
Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114.
For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East
For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
11 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The writing is on the wall for ArcelorMittal long steel
With the 30 September deadline for winding down the long steel business looming and R1bn in headline losses bleeding from ArcelorMittal South Africa's balance sheet, CEO Kobus Verster is running out of patience with what he calls 'misguided policies' that have crippled the local steel industry. Speaking after the release of devastating interim results that showed a loss of R394-million despite a cash injection from the Industrial Development Corporation, Verster delivered a blunt message to the government: fix the structural problems strangling steel production or watch South Africa's last integrated steelmaker cannibalise itself to survive. 'If that's not on the cards and we can't get agreement on that, then I have to find an alternative to basically recapitalise the business from within,' Verster told Daily Maverick, outlining plans to sell off valuable assets including Saldanha Steel, which he described as being 'in very good condition' with potential for green direct reduced iron production. 'Saldanha Steel is a valuable asset. We had intent for it in terms of green DRI (direct reduced iron). The assets are in a very good condition, but I can't wait five or six or seven years. Maybe there's a partnership or another party that can give me value.' The warning comes as ArcelorMittal prepares to monetise what it calls 'non-core assets' – including Saldanha Steel, the Tubular Mill, Vereeniging Bar Mill, ArcelorMittal Rail and Structures, and various properties – in a desperate bid to shore up its balance sheet and keep the lights on at its remaining flat steel operations. What this means for you As I reported just a few weeks ago, the closure of the long steel business directly threatens about 3,500 jobs. However, as seen with the closure of the Saldanha Steel plant in 2020, the collateral damage goes far beyond that. At the time, management said about 900 direct jobs would be lost. The downstream impact has been far wider, forcing the closure of, among many other supplementary businesses, a local car wash that was used by Saldanha Steel employees. Steel businesses that relied on Saldanha Steel, such as Anderson & Kerr, as well as Duferco Steel Processing, have also taken knocks that resulted in retrenchments. Five years later, many of the employees who once worked at Saldanha Steel remain unemployed and at least one has taken on a job as a local petrol attendant to keep food on the table. 'Misguided policies' At the heart of ArcelorMittal's crisis lies what Verster characterises as a web of 'misguided policies' that have systematically undermined integrated steel production while inadvertently subsidising smaller scrap-based mills. The most contentious is the Price Preference System on scrap metal, which ArcelorMittal claims has transferred 'more than R60-billion over a decade from informal workers and recyclers to a handful of capital-intensive scrap-based mills.' But scrap policy is just one front in what has become an infrastructure war of attrition. Rail performance has 'deteriorated substantially,' forcing ArcelorMittal to transport 62% of raw materials by road – up from 20% – while rail transport dropped 30%. 'Our plants are designed to take a train, tip it into our conveyor system, and it takes everything to the relevant places,' Verster explained. 'Now you have to go and offload those big trucks in the yard, you have to get equipment and move that around, and you have to accommodate about 370 trucks per day into your operation. Those are the types of costs.' The combined impact of disruptive rail and electricity interruptions added R358-million in costs during the first half of 2025 alone. Import invasion While domestic infrastructure crumbles, imports have surged to more than 35% of local steel demand, prompting ArcelorMittal to seek protection through safeguard duties. The company achieved a partial victory in June when a provisional safeguard duty of 52.34% was imposed on corrosion-resistant steel coil for 200 days, based on findings of 'serious injury' to local industry and 'critical circumstances'. But Verster argues the government should go much further: 'The government should be much more aggressive in implementing more blanket protection against all steel, which all other countries are doing. Countries have 25% duties, and they enforce it – then you should not have less.' He pointed to Canada's quotas and additional duties to exclude Chinese products, while noting that even provisional duties already in place haven't shown their full impact, partly because imports are sometimes declared at '10% of the value'. The long steel endgame Despite the IDC's R1.683-billion lifeline – now fully utilised – the long steel business remains on death row. Verster confirmed that 'the timeline and our conditions are exactly the same' for the 30 September wind-down date. The IDC funding, he said, has 'largely neutralised' the losses from the long steel business, but ArcelorMittal 'cannot assume any further financial risks related to the Long Steel Business beyond the next few months'. The company is awaiting the outcome of the IDC's due diligence process, but appears to be preparing for the worst. Asset monetisation plans are already being finalised, with proceeds earmarked to 'reduce debt levels and invest in the core Flats Business for earnings and cashflow improvement'. Cautious optimism Despite the grim numbers, Verster detected signs of improvement in recent months. 'Recently, we perform[ed] a lot better on that front and it also appears the market is taking a bit more material in the last two months than previously, so hopefully that will be behind us.' The company is pursuing what it calls 'export replacement' strategies. Verster said, 'Our intent is not just to recover the 10%. Our intent is to recover the 10% but then move beyond that and replace more imports.' However, the outlook for the second half of 2025 remains cautious, with domestic demand expected to stay constrained despite modest improvements in global steel sentiment. The bottom line What emerges from ArcelorMittal's interim results is a portrait of an industry under siege – not just from global market forces, but from a perfect storm of policy failures, infrastructure collapse and regulatory inaction. Verster's message to the government is clear: 'You cannot have these expensive rail and electricity costs and think manufacturing organisations can survive. Once again, it's not a thing you see – you see the same issues in the smelters and ferro-alloys and others.' His frustration is palpable. 'This is not a crisis you can almost say is a South Africa steel issue. It's not a steel issue. It's an economic issue.' DM
Daily Maverick
11 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: How much is a business idea worth?
This may be an unpopular view, but I'm not convinced one person should get billions for one simple insight that would probably have been implemented anyway. Through all of the years I have been lucky enough to be a journalist, there is one fundamental dynamic that has become completely entrenched in our society, and most others. It is that the rich are getting richer while the poor are falling further and further behind. One of the big drivers of this seems to be the way in which salaries for CEOs have really increased in the past few years. Now, I fully expect and understand that someone who is able to create value for themselves and others should be paid well. And I do mean really well. It seems entirely moral to me that people should be paid for doing constructive things. I do wonder though about cases that really involve a rise in technology, or just one insight. So, Mark Zuckerberg has literally created an industry. But he did this as part of technological changes in society. He would not have been able to do it without being American, being at Harvard, and being there when he was. Something similar must have happened in 2022 when soaring platinum prices resulted in the CEO of Sibanye-Stillwater, Neal Froneman, getting paid about R300-million. Now, I could never do what Froneman does. He has a rare combination of skills and the ability to lead a group of people to enable others to make money. And, of course, much of his salary was in the form of shares, their value increased in line with platinum prices immediately after the Covid pandemic. This means that this money was not paid out directly by the company, but was the result of the increase in the value of shares he had been given before the rally. The case of The Foschini Group CEO Anthony Thunström is an interesting example. In 2024, he was paid 43% less than the year before because the group missed certain targets. This year, he was paid R45-million because he hit those targets. While he cannot control all of the variables around him, there is something about this that seems intrinsically fairer to me than Froneman's situation, where he benefited hugely from a historic dynamic that lifted platinum prices. That said, he could argue, perhaps, that only he could have ensured his company was able to take such full advantage of that increase. I was thinking about all of this watching the Constitutional Court's ruling in the Nkosana Makate case against Vodacom. He and Vodacom have been arguing for nearly 20 years over how much the network should be paying him for his insight that it should start a 'Please Call Me' service. I really thought today would be the day this case would finally end. I mean, really, how long can one case drag on? Instead, all of the judges found the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) had got the case hopelessly wrong. But, being on the Constitutional Court, they also felt they should not have to sift through the arguments and the maths. Now the SCA must do it again, with a new Bench of judges. For me, at the heart of it is: How much can one idea be worth? I can see that, for Zuckerberg, perhaps that idea could be worth a huge amount – he did create something that changed the world. For Elon Musk, perhaps his ideas – around electric cars, rockets and goodness knows what else – will literally save the planet. That must be worth quite a lot. But like Musk and Zuckerberg and Froneman, there are other forces at work in the Makate case. Obviously on the one side is Vodacom, one of our biggest companies with huge resources. It will fight for many years to prevent having to pay out any amounts that go into the billions. While it can appear as if Makate is on his own, in fact at least part of his campaign has been financed through contingency fees with law firms and, during at least one stage, other groups. This means that both sides will fight forever. The stakes are that high. This may be an unpopular view, but I'm not convinced one person should get billions for one simple insight that would probably have been implemented anyway. It's true that the Please Call Me service is now old hat, but at the time it was revolutionary. But it was one simple insight into a technology that was evolving very quickly. And MTN already had their own Please Call Me service up and running before Vodacom was able to implement theirs. Should he receive compensation? Sure. Millions? Maybe. Billions? Surely not. Of course, no matter how rich or comfortable we may be, we all have our own financial hopes and dreams. Some of us just want to pay off our bond. Or our kids' school fees. These are all legitimate. And that's why our demands to be properly paid are also entirely legitimate. Even if your first name is Elon, and you are hoping and dreaming of going to Mars. DM
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
New school to open in Sheffield in 2027
New school to open in Sheffield in 2027 The new private school coming to Sheffield has officially been named Seaton House and will open for partial intake in January 2027. Originally confirmed last year, many more details about the school have been released following a media launch at the Manor House on Thursday afternoon (July 31). Situated off the P228 in Sheffield, the co-educational school is being built on a 25-hectare site that includes the old Seaton polo fields, which will be used for sports facilities. Construction is set to begin early next year, with development led by Collins Residential in conjunction with REACH-SA and Khanyisa Inanda Seminary Community Projects (KICP). The school plans to cater for Grades 0000-12, but will initially only open to pupils from Grades 0000-4 in the junior primary and Grades 8-10 in the high school, after which the grades will grow organically. High school pupils will follow the Independent Examinations Board (IEB) curriculum. 'Seaton House is a day-school for now, but there are plans for boarding in the future,' said project lead of the Seaton House project, Elwyn van den Aardweg – former headmaster of Kearsney College. 'We are going to be a value-driven Christian school, open to pupils of all faiths. 'We plan on being much like the Diocesan or Methodist schools in the Midlands that you are all familiar with.' The school plans to blend tradition with a forward-looking approach however, and Van den Aardweg says incorporating technology and artificial intelligence (AI) is a focus. 'We see AI not as an add-on but as a core strand of our curriculum.' 'We will recognise what AI is and what it is not, how it works at a high level and also its limitations. 'We believe AI should be taught methodically and with principle, starting off with AI literacy.' Teaching staff will be trained to model best practice in AI for their pupils and Van den Aardweg said a safety framework is already in place that aligns with global standards. 'Human oversight and human values will ensure that technology elevates rather than replaces the great teaching that we are going to offer,' he said. Outside of the classroom, dedicated facilities will support the school's 'core sports' of aquatics (swimming and water polo), athletics, hockey, netball, rugby, cricket, basketball, tennis, cross country and soccer. The site's past use for equestrian sports will also be considered, while a surrounding natural area will include cycling tracks and nature paths. Seaton House is a not-for-profit school and a fee structure published on their website puts it on the lower-end of equivalent independent options on the North Coast. Annual fees start at R42 000 for Grade 0000 and rise to R126 000 for matric, subject to annual increases. Looking into the wider North Coast community, the school's affiliation with KICP aims to upskill teachers in underprivileged surrounding schools with the goal of improving the standard of education across the coast, not only in its wealthy pockets. KICP executive director Judy Tate is part of Seaton House's leadership team to that end. For more information on Seaton House, visit the website at Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news. Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here, or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.
