Incoming MI6 boss' grandfather was Ukrainian Nazi ‘Butcher'
Metreweli's father, Constantine, was naturalized in British-administered Hong Kong in 1966. The London Gazette identified him at the time as Dobrowolski, known as Constantine Metreweli, of uncertain nationality.
In a story published Thursday, the Mail confirmed that Constantine was the son of a German-Polish Ukrainian man – also named Constantine – who worked for the Nazis and was implicated in the mass killing of Jews and other atrocities during World War II.
The newspaper said it had reviewed 'hundreds of pages of documents held in archives in Freiburg, Germany, detailing the extraordinary – and blood-soaked – life and times of Dobrowolski, which are themselves worthy of a spy thriller.'
According to the records, Dobrowolski Sr. was born into a family of noble landowners in what is now Ukraine's Chernigov Region. Following the Bolshevik Revolution, the estate was violently plundered, leading the younger Constantine to become a fierce enemy of the new authorities.
He was imprisoned in 1926 for anti-Soviet and anti-Semitic agitation. He joined the German occupiers at the first opportunity in 1941, and earned the nickname 'Butcher' for his brutal actions. He is believed to have been killed in 1943. His wife, Barbara (née Varvara Andreeva), married Georgian-born David Metreweli in Yorkshire in 1947.
The Mail alleged that the Russian government is attempting to exploit Metreweli's family history in an effort to discredit her appointment. While Russian media reported on the announcement of the first female MI6 chief and her family's ties to Ukraine and Hong Kong, the British media appears to be the first to make the Nazi connection.
'Ms. Metreweli cannot be judged for the sins of her grandfather,' the paper stated. 'One of our nation's most formidable intelligence operatives, she has served her country with distinction on dangerous operations for MI6 across Europe and the Middle East for two decades.'
Western nations sheltered thousands of Ukrainian Nazi collaborators after World War II. Many of them were recruited by the CIA to take part in covert operations against the Soviet Union, with a guerrilla war in western Ukraine continuing into the 1950s.
In 2023, Canadian lawmakers gave a standing ovation to SS veteran Yaroslav Hunka during a visit by Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky. In Kiev, historical figures associated with wartime nationalist movements, including war criminals, have been honored as national heroes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukrainian military recruit kills two instructors
A Ukrainian military recruit has fatally shot two instructors during a training exercise in the Chernigov region, police confirmed on Thursday, after details leaked about the case. The authorities said the suspect opened fire with an automatic weapon on a group of military personnel the day before. He faces a potential life sentence for premeditated murder, according to the statement. The shootings took place at a training range and were initially reported by Artyom Dmitruk, a fugitive member of parliament and outspoken critic of Kiev's mobilization policies. Dmitruk alleged that incidents like this are frequently covered up by military officials. In a post on social media, Dmitruk published what appeared to be an internal report naming the location, the suspect and the two deceased instructors. A third instructor was reportedly targeted but was not injured. All three were identified as sergeants participating in a live-ammunition drill, the document stated. The report was subsequently shared by other outlets before it was confirmed by law enforcement. Kiev has relied on mandatory conscription to offset battlefield losses in its ongoing conflict with Russia. The mobilization effort, however, has been hampered by widespread draft evasion. Earlier this month, Michael O'Flaherty, the Council of Europe's commissioner for human rights, raised concerns about 'allegations of torture and death during military recruitment' in Ukraine. Videos purportedly showing aggressive conscription tactics have circulated widely for months and sparked domestic unrest. The issue also escalated diplomatically this month after Hungary demanded an investigation into the death of one of its citizens who was allegedly beaten by Ukrainian recruitment officers. In August 2023, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky replaced the heads of all regional recruitment centers amid widespread allegations of corruption. Last year, Ukraine restructured its military conscription system, lowering the draft age and tightening enforcement. Moscow has accused Zelensky of prosecuting a war 'to the last Ukrainian,' claiming he is willing to sacrifice his population to retain power.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
German left criticizes Trump's Patriot plan
The US plan to funnel Patriot anti-aircraft systems to Ukraine through European NATO members may create 'strong profit prospects' for the American military-industrial complex but does nothing to pave the way to ending the conflict between Moscow and Kiev, the German Die Linke (The Left) party's parliamentary leader, Ulrich Thoden, has said. US President Donald Trump unveiled a plan to send American-made weapons to Ukraine during a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte on Monday, with European NATO members footing the bill. The US president also said 'several nations' were ready to dispatch Patriot anti-aircraft systems from their own arsenals. Thoden criticized the plan, suggesting that the US should supply Kiev with the systems on its own rather than force European NATO members to either pay for them or further deplete their own dwindling arsenals. 'The US military has a sufficient number of Patriot air defense systems, and a free-of-charge transfer of a limited number would be easily feasible without compromising its own defense capability,' Thoden stated. Delivering these weapons will neither end the war nor ensure a Ukrainian victory, the politician warned. It would be better for Kiev's backers to focus on providing Ukraine with debt relief, while imposing more sanctions on Russia, Thoden suggested. Moscow has condemned the flow of Western-made weaponry to Ukraine, arguing that military aid only prolongs the conflict without having any impact on its ultimate outcome. Russia is unfazed by Trump's new scheme, as the flow of American weaponry to Kiev never actually stopped, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated. 'Many words have been said… It is a fact that arms supplies from the US have continued and continue to be supplied to Ukraine,' Peskov has said.
Russia Today
19 hours ago
- Russia Today
It's time, Ukraine: Kiev braces for a final reckoning
In our previous pieces, we examined Donald Trump's half-hearted attempts to cast himself as a deus ex machina, descending to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Peace did not follow. Trump, boxed in by political inertia, continued Biden's policy of disengagement while trying to dump the Ukrainian problem on Western Europe – just as we predicted back in January. Its leaders weren't prepared. While Macron and Starmer formed coalitions of the willing and delivered lofty speeches, Germany quietly picked up the tab. Berlin, under its new chancellor, has shown more flexibility, but the broader Western European strategy remains unchanged: keep Washington bankrolling Ukraine at all costs. That plan is now crumbling. Trump is slipping away, and without a dramatic turn of events, no new major aid packages should be expected from the US. This is not hard to understand. Other global crises are emerging, and the depleted American arsenal cannot serve everyone at once. In both Ukraine and across Western Europe, people are adjusting to what once seemed unthinkable: a slow but steady US withdrawal. These European leaders must now decide whether to carry the burden alone or accept a settlement on Moscow's terms – conceding Ukraine from their sphere of influence. But neither Kiev nor its immediate sponsors is ready for serious negotiations. Why would they be? Ukraine believes it can hold without American backing. Russian oil revenues have dipped, the ruble is under pressure, and Moscow has taken hits in the Middle East and Caucasus. Perhaps, they reason, Putin will come begging in another year or two. Let's fight, then. Amid this political theater, the war itself has faded into the background. For many observers, the front lines seem frozen in time – village names flicker in and out of headlines, lines shift, but the broader picture holds. It's a difficult situation for military analysts. They are forced to generate drama from attritional warfare. One day, headlines declare the Lugansk Peoples Republic fully liberated (a few villages remain contested). The next, we hear of Russian forces entering the Dnepropetrovsk region (true in a narrow sense – they crossed a small corner in a broader encirclement maneuver around Pokrovsk). None of this, however, alters the core dynamic. Both sides are largely following the same strategies as a year ago. For Russia, the aim remains clear: exhaust Ukrainian forces until they can no longer defend. The goal isn't to seize a specific line, but to break the enemy's army. Russia has pursued this with steady, grinding pressure. Last winter, Moscow shifted from large mechanized thrusts to small, flexible assault groups. Instead of smashing through defenses, these units infiltrate after prolonged bombardment from artillery, drones, and air power. The results aren't flashy, but the goal is cumulative. The summer campaign began in May; we'll see its full effect by late summer or even winter. This mirrors the pattern of 2024, when Russian forces made their biggest gains in October and November, capturing several cities in Donetsk with minimal resistance – Novogrodovka, Ugledar, Selidovo, Kurakhovo. The key question now is scale: can Russia turn these tactical wins into a full collapse of Ukrainian lines? The answer depends in part on the weakened state of Ukraine's forces. By spring, Kiev had fewer armored vehicles, fewer Western shipments, and fewer elite units. The best troops were spent in the failed Kursk push and are now stuck holding Sumy. But the gravest issue is manpower. The supply of volunteers has dried up. Ukraine's army now relies on forced conscription – the so-called 'busified.' And the results are telling. In just the first half of this year, Ukraine recorded over 107,000 criminal cases for desertion – 20% more than in all of 2024, and nearly half of the total since the war began. That's only the official count; the real number is undoubtedly higher. Desertion is now the Ukrainian army's leading cause of losses. Draft officers are hated, and civilians fear being dragged into vans and thrown to the front. Power outages have lessened, and life behind the lines is almost normal. But the threat of forced mobilization looms. In a telling detail, real soldiers now mark their cars with 'not TCR' to avoid attacks from angry civilians. So how does Ukraine still hold the line? The answer is drones. As we've reported before, the drone war is reshaping military doctrine. Both sides now operate in a battlefield dominated by constant aerial surveillance – Mavic or Matrice drones scouting every move, FPV drones striking within minutes. In such conditions, defense holds the upper hand. Any movement in the 'zero zone' or rear is dangerous. No one has yet found a reliable way to break through such defenses quickly. It's a slow war of attrition. While Russia refines its assault tactics, Ukraine has focused on entrenching its drone defenses. Its latest move is the introduction of 'kill zones' – defensive belts 10 to 15km deep, controlled primarily by UAVs, not artillery. The idea is to neutralize Russia's air and artillery superiority, turning Ukrainian defenses into no-go areas. This strategy requires fewer troops. All Ukraine needs is a small, motivated core and a huge stock of drones – and in this area, they've seen success. Defense Express reports Ukraine's domestic drone output has increased tenfold over the past year and may hit 2.4 million units in 2025. But there's a catch. For all their talk of modern warfare, Kiev still craves spectacle. What we call 'military actionism' has become a political necessity. To maintain Western support and boost public morale, Ukrainian leaders pursue headline-grabbing offensives. Last year's incursion into the Kursk region is a prime example – an operation that ultimately drained resources from the Donbass and weakened Ukraine's main front. If Kiev avoids such distractions this year and focuses on defense, it will strengthen its position. But that's a big 'if.' As of mid-July, the 2025 summer campaign is in full swing. Ukraine withstood the initial May assaults, but the front is still moving. Russian strikes on rear infrastructure have intensified. The rate of Ukrainian attrition is now estimated to be three times higher than a year ago. In the coming months, we'll see which model prevails: Russia's methodical offensive, or Ukraine's drone-based defense. If the front stalls, Kiev lives to fight another year. But if Russian forces punch through, 2025 may mark the end of Ukraine as we know article was first published by Russia in Global Affairs, translated and edited by the RT team
