logo
The uncomfortable truth about race and Englishness

The uncomfortable truth about race and Englishness

New European21-02-2025
'He's a brown Hindu, how is he English?' That's the moment, in a discussion about the former prime minister Rishi Sunak, which made a video clip from a YouTube show go viral.
The clip has racked up nearly 4 million views on X and its sentiment has been widely condemned, even by some surprising sources. But for black Britons like me, it has thrown up uncomfortable questions about race and nationality.
The prime movers in the video are Moscow-born British pundit Konstantin Kisin and Fraser Nelson, no stranger to controversy. In his old role as former editor of the Spectator , Nelson was happy to publish the work of Douglas Murray, the far right commentator who has been frequently accused of Islamophobia and who told the Dutch parliament in 2016: 'Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board'.
After stepping down (or being pushed out in favour of Michael Gove) last year, Nelson was the driving force behind a much-criticised Channel 4 Dispatches show about sickness benefits. It will have come as a surprise to some then, that Nelson found himself sounding like a voice of reason when he appeared on Kisin's 'free speech YouTube show and podcast' TriggerNometry, which he co-hosts with Francis Foster, on February 16
Towards the end comes the viral moment, which then was turned into a 20-second clip titled 'Can Immigrants Become English?'. Millions of views followed, Nelson stoking the fire by retweeting it with the quote 'Unexpected controversy!'
In a longer interview full of far right talking points on migration, Kisin questions at what point England ceases to be English when the native population is significantly outnumbered – even though this is far from the case in the UK. He says, 'my relatives from Russia or Ukraine or Armenia or whatever, they come to Heathrow, and they go, 'is this still England right now?''
He adds: 'For the vast majority of people in this country, their sense is that when the country ceases to be visually the same as it was, at some point, there is a level when it ceases to be that country.'
But the moment that has caused all the fuss comes when Kisin goes on to say that he doesn't consider himself or his English-born son to be English. Nelson counters that rather than colour, nationality should be defined by birthplace and upbringing. He uses as an example the former prime minister, prompting Kisin's 'how is he English?' moment.
The pushback since the interview clip went viral has been spectacular. Kisin has been criticised by everyone from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants to the Mail On Sunday commentator Dan Hodges the far right agitator Laurence Fox. But the funny thing is that someone like me – I was born in London to a mother and father both born in Ghana and all British citizens – can understand why he thinks he and his son are not English.
The truth is that lots of black and Asian Britons don't see ourselves as English. Rishi Sunak might call himself English, and it's his right to do so. But I have never heard another black Briton, including my family, say they are English – only British.Why is this? I think immigrants and their descendants feel firstly 'British' because of the British Empire, which invited us here to prop up the NHS and other industries.But English? We don't fit into the way 'Englishness' looks and we have had years of being told – overtly or subliminally – that we don't qualify.
Racism is alive and well in the UK. I keep coming back to a report commissioned by the Guardian in 2018 that found 38% of people from minority ethnic backgrounds said they had been wrongly suspected of shoplifting in the last five years, compared with 14% of white people. Another 43% said they had been overlooked for a work promotion in a way that felt unfair in the last five years – more than twice the proportion of white people (18%) who reported the same experience.
As a Black Briton, I have privileges that my Ghanaian cousins do not. A passport pre-Brexit that allowed me entry to most countries with little or no fuss. A health service that I don't need private insurance for.
But as a black person, my Britishness also rubs up against institutional bias. The Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which built the British Nationality Act 1981, makes clear that as British citizens with parents or grandparents who were not born in England, we are subject to different rules than our white English peers.
Since 2006, the government has been able to withdraw citizenship from dual nationals who act in a manner deemed 'seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the UK'. In 2014, these powers were extended to foreign-born British citizens without dual nationality. The 2022 Act extended the powers still further.
In early December 2022, the New Statesman crunched the numbers and found that the Nationality and Borders Bill could potentially deprive half of British Asians and 39% of Black Britons of their citizenship rights without warning. Governnments might that stripping someone of their citizenship happens only in a very limited numbers of cases, but that is not the point. It is that this punishment exists for some Britons but not others.
The Act applies to Britons who have dual citizenship or a migrant background. That's pretty much every person who is not White English. It includes the Jewish community and even dual British-Russian citizens such as Kisin. I wonder if he is aware of this?
Not only are Black people, Asians and others not deemed to be English by, as Kisin says, 'millions and millions and millions and millions' of people, but we are also deemed second-class citizens by our own government.
Non-white Britons find themselves being pushed down a decidedly steep and slippery slope. We've been on it for years – it was as long ago as 1978 that Margaret Thatcher talked about how 'people are really rather afraid that this country might be rather swamped by people with a different culture… if there is any fear that it might be swamped people are going to react and be rather hostile to those coming in.'
That's why Kisin has stumbled on an uncomfortable and distressing truth, and why I'm forced to agree with him.
English as an ethnicity is seen as white and maybe there's nothing wrong with that.
But what happens when people born in England who consider themselves British are told with increasing volume that they are neither English or British? Unfortunately, it seems like we are about to find out.
Samantha Asumadu is an investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker. She has written for the Guardian, the Telegraph, Open Democracy, New Statesman.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My grandparents fled Hitler, today in London someone screamed 'filth' in my face
My grandparents fled Hitler, today in London someone screamed 'filth' in my face

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

My grandparents fled Hitler, today in London someone screamed 'filth' in my face

Barrister, author and London Islington resident David Renton, 52, attended the counter-demo outside London's Thistle City Barbican Hotel organised by Islington Community Independents, today. Yesterday, I was part of the 1500-strong crowd in Islington, which gathered to defend the refugees living in the Thistle City Barbican hotel in north London against protesters. ‌ I went because, although I'm white and British. I'm also the grandchild of refugees: people who had to hide their documents beneath the railway seats as they fled from Hitler. I talked to other people there. Paul Murphy brought his two choirs, The Mixed Up Chorus and Sing For Freedom. Both choirs have included singers that were refugees staying at this hotel. Paul says he came 'To defend refugees. To stop the far right.' ‌ It comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told MPs that asylum hotel use will end by the end of this Parliament. ‌ Cathy Bird, a minister for Union Chapel, said, 'Britain is a welcoming country. The people who come here are fleeing from wars. In their position, we'd do the same thing.' Another supporter who didn't want to give her name said, 'This has always been a union area, for people who worked in the print shops at Fleet Street. Generations of people have settled here, Italians in Clerkenwell, the Bangladeshis more recently. We won't let the racists divide us.' ‌ While on our peaceful march, one angry woman on the other side screamed in my face, 'You're Filth, You're Filth.' I wasn't shocked by her clear rage-filled hate, but I am at a loss understanding why you would shout at someone just because they disagree with you? I tried speaking to one Far Right protester. Michael, told me, 'the refugees aren't law abiding.' I said I thought his fears were exaggerated. We didn't agree. ‌ One concession Michael made was that he could understand that it must be awful for the men being made to stay in the hotels, often for years, while the home office decides how to process their refugee applications. Some media outlets have reported that people who are living in hotels waiting for their asylum claims to be processed, who are banned from working, have been working as delivery drivers. This rhetoric plays exactly into the hands of Far Right agitators. ‌ Migrants want to work but the government – both Tories and Labour – have insisted that asylum seekers can't. 'I don't mind if they do Uber Eats,' Michael told me. What he means is that, in any sensible system, we'd be welcoming refugees' desire to work, finding them jobs. He's right on that. But it goes further than he realises. Michael could accept refugees if they'd do hard, low-paid jobs. I respect anyone who does that work, but it shouldn't be the limit. Many of the refugees are skilled people. If we did let them work, soon we'd realise that many of them have spent years back home training as doctors, nurses, teachers. They aren't just grunt labour, they're desperate to show us their talents, if only we'd let them. The real danger isn't the people in this hotel; it's racist outsiders coming to my town to stir up hate. David is author of The New Authoritarians Convergence on the Right published by Pluto Press. Available at and

Windrush hero trapped in limbo for 26 years finally allowed home to Britain
Windrush hero trapped in limbo for 26 years finally allowed home to Britain

Daily Mirror

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Windrush hero trapped in limbo for 26 years finally allowed home to Britain

Windrush hero George Lee left Britain to teach in Poland for two years in 1997. When he tried to enter Britain, his visa was rejected. Now 26 years later, he's finally back home. When Windrush hero George Lee touched down at Birmingham Airport last week, it marked the end of 26 years in exile – and the close of yet another heartbreaking chapter in the Windrush Scandal. ‌ For 26 years, George has been trying to get back to the UK after going to teach in Poland for two years in 1997. When he left the country John Major was still Prime Minister, the country was reeling from 'mad cow disease' and Princess Diana was still alive. ‌ He has been unable to visit his mother or his brother's graves and has lost touch with his sisers. And he has never been able to access the state pension he is entitled to. ‌ "When you're in this position, every single morning when you wake up you have a wrench in your gut," he says, speaking for the first time about his ordeal. "No matter how long it went on I had that feeling. It's about belonging nowhere. There's nothing you can do about it – your constitutional and human rights have been stripped away and that leaves you vulnerable. I started adopting Theresa May's epithet that I was a citizen of nowhere." Born a Commonwealth citizen in Kingston Jamaica, George was brought to the 'mother country' at the age of eight by his aunt, to start a new life in London. George spent 36 years in the UK before he went to Poland. He went to school here, got into grammar school, set up his own business, got married and eventually became a teacher, all in Britain. But after heading to Poland in 1997, he found himself locked out. He was told he'd need a special visa to re-enter the UK but when he tried to get it from the British embassy in Krakow he was refused. Instead, George, now 72, spent the next 26 years stuck in Poland. ‌ George is one of many Windrush heroes campaigners now believe may be trapped in third countries by Tory 'hostile environment' policies that endure long after Theresa May's government. Uncovered in 2017, the Windrush Scandal saw thousands like George – members of the 'Windrush Generation' who came here to build Britain – wrongly detained, deported and denied legal rights. Trapped in Poland, George made repeated attempts to access support. It was only when a Windrush campaign group heard about his plight that he was able to get help raising his case with the British Home Office. With their support, last week he finally made it home to the UK. ‌ "From the moment they refused to allow me to come home to the UK, everything changed," he says. "It's dehumanising, because you create a situation where people can't easily get a home, get a job… when you're in a third country that is hostile, that's very difficult. My landlord was terrible. I didn't have utilities for three months. There is no legislation that shows I'm not a British citizen. When I was 18, I was so proud of Great Britain, I would never have believed that the British government would do this to me. The British government took away our rights." He moved to Poland to take up a two-year contract teaching at a private English language school. "I got offered a job that I couldn't refuse," he explains. "I did really well, and got seconded to a university. When I decided to come back, I'd gone slightly over the two years I'd planned to be away, so I was told to go and get a visa for my re-entry back to the UK. But I went to the British Embassy, and they would not let me in the building." Desperate, he travelled to another Polish city, Warsaw, to try there. "I went to Warsaw and it was the same. I tested it by trying embassies in other places…Prague, Switzerland. I realised that any British embassy you go to, as a Windrush person, you always meet a block. I feel that when the British government were planning the Immigration Act 1971, they made the decision that they were going to get black people out of the United Kingdom. ‌ "That is the root of the scandal." George gave up. "I was resigned for many, many years. I was stuck." When he read about the emerging Windrush scandal, George hoped it might help. "It was a real knock when the Windrush scandal broke and I went back to the British Embassy, but they wouldn't let me in," he says. "They sent a Polish person out to see me on the pavement." Then, last year, George made contact with Bishop Desmond Jaddoo – chair of the Windrush National Organisation – who spoke to the Home Office on his behalf and started compiling evidence of George's life in the UK. "We are only just discovering people in these third countries – there will be more Georges," Bishop Desmond says. ‌ "The Immigration Act allowed people from the Commonwealth to go in to Europe and work which many people did. The problem was that then their status was called into question." Bishop Desmond's team were able to gather his school records, national insurance number, old passport and marriage certificate to build his case. "We were able to map his life from the day he arrived in the UK to when he went to Poland," he says. "No-one had bothered to look at George's case." Once they were made aware, Bishop Jaddoo says the Home Office was helpful, arranging George's flight home, temporary accommodation and to transport his few possessions. And the Labour government say the tide is turning with the appointment of senior pastor Reverend Clive Foster MBE as the first Windrush Commissioner – to fulfil a manifesto commitment to achieve justice for victims. A Home Office spokesperson said: "It is longstanding policy not to comment on individual cases. However, when this government arrived a year ago, it pledged to do things differently. For 77 years, the Windrush community has made an immense contribution to our country, weaving a vital thread in the fabric of British society. We have made a longstanding commitment to ensure victims of the Home Office Windrush scandal are heard, justice is sped up, and that the compensation scheme is run effectively." Since landing on British soil in Birmingham last week, George has begun the process of trying to access his state pension, find a GP and look for his two sisters. He also plans to visit his mum and younger brother's graves in north London. "I just want to get settled and I want to join the fight for our rights," George says. "I don't now have to work any more – which means I can spend my time trying to help others."

Unmasked: the man behind one of the fastest growing far-right YouTube channels
Unmasked: the man behind one of the fastest growing far-right YouTube channels

The Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Unmasked: the man behind one of the fastest growing far-right YouTube channels

The Guardian has identified the self-described 'national socialist' behind an openly extremist YouTube channel that in just over two months has accumulated 50,000 subscribers, seen more than 2.3m views, and likely made thousands of dollars from YouTube's revenue-sharing monetization program. Johnathan Christopher 'Chris' Booth, 37, lives in the unincorporated community of Coral, a part of Maple Valley Township in Michigan's Montcalm county and is married to a senior local Republican official. Booth has published more than 70 YouTube videos since May on his Shameless Sperg account, whose graphic design elements feature stylized SS bolts. Titles of his videos-generally a recording of him delivering his views direct to camera-include: 'Why I Dislike Jews. It's not complicated', 'Black Crimes Matter: Never Relax', and 'Jews and FBI hate you and your free speech'. Typically the videos attract hundreds of comments from like-minded YouTube users. His channel has seen such remarkable success that it has drawn apparently baseless allegations from other far-right creators that he is a 'fed'. On an X account that frequently advertises his videos, his posts include antisemitic comments and in one response to a post about actor Jim Carrey he writes: 'All of them deserve rope. I advocate for national socialism though, under which idiots like this would not fare too well.' Despite YouTube's stated policies against hate speech and content that promotes violence against individuals or groups based on race, religion, or other protected characteristics, Booth's channel appears to be monetized through the YouTube Partner Program. The channel displays ads and Booth has thanked subscribers for their financial support through the platform. YouTube's community guidelines explicitly prohibit content that 'promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization'. A YouTube spokesperson said: 'Upon review, we terminated the channel for violating our Community Guidelines. Content that promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on their ethnicity, nationality, race or religion is not allowed on YouTube.' According to YouTube, another account associated with Booth was terminated, and creators are no longer entitled to earn any revenue if their channel is terminated. The terminations happened after the Guardian reached out to YouTube with questions about Booth's activities. Also according to YouTube, content that promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on their ethnicity, nationality, race or religion is not allowed on the platform. In the wake of the ban, Booth took to X to say that he would move his content to 'alt-tech' platforms like Odysee. Booth is married to Meghyn 'Meg' Booth, the Republican treasurer of Maple Valley Township. Meg Booth has liked several posts with extremist themes on Chris Booth's Facebook account with her personal account. Chris Booth's Facebook page also features extensive racist propaganda along with iconography often employed by neo-Nazis. The revelations raise questions about the extent to which YouTube, whose parent company Alphabet also owns Google, Waymo, and other tech companies, has backslid on monitoring extremism on its platform. Jeff Tischauser, a senior research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said Booth's operation across YouTube, X, and merch platforms was a 'boilerplate Nazi grift'. 'He may be earning money from YouTube, as well as hawking these racist and antisemitic items on his website like cups and T-shirts,' Tischauser added. He said that YouTube is 'the premier site that these guys look to in order to expand their following and to make money off of that following'. The Guardian retrieved a Coral, Michigan, street address from EU-mandated General Product Safety Regulation compliance information on the Shameless Sperg merchandise page on the merchandising platform Printify. The property at that address is owned by Meg Booth, according to property records. Data brokers indicate that Chris Booth lives at the same address. Sites including show exterior views of the house at the property. The property's color and cladding match those visible in videos published to YouTube on 14 and 15 May. Chris Booth appears to have made some efforts to remove photographs of himself and other potentially identifying information from his own social media accounts and other online spaces. However, he is visible in 'shorts' style videos posted by Meg Booth to Facebook. This video of Chris Booth depicts the same person visible in Shameless Sperg videos. The Guardian emailed both Chris and Meg Booth for comment. In an email, Meg Booth appeared to repudiate her husband's views. 'I am not involved in my husband's content or political views, and I do not share or support any form of racism, antisemitism, or hate speech', she wrote, adding: 'My values are my own and are grounded in respect, inclusion, and service to the community.' Meg Booth concluded: 'As an elected official, I've always acted independently, with integrity, and in line with the expectations of my office. I respectfully decline further comment.' Chris Booth did not directly respond, but in the day after the email he took to X to reaffirm his views, including a post in which he wrote: 'I've come to believe fascists are born, not made. Discovering real fascism in my early thirties was like looking into a mirror and finally realizing why commies have called me a fascist for so long. They spotted it before I could, but then I wholeheartedly embraced it.' In his videos and on X, Booth explicitly embraces neo-Nazi ideology and promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories. On his Shameless Sperg X account, Booth writes: 'I am the Shameless Sperg, I am a National Socialist, and I do sperg rants here,' with a link to his YouTube channel. On the YouTube channel, he writes: 'This channel is a collection of sperg rants and commentary on the news & issues of the day, or whatever else is on my mind, from an autistically dissident and NS perspective.' 'Sperg', an abbreviation for Asperger syndrome, is used pejoratively in far-right circles for those whose obsessive and open extremism might put off normal people or draw unwanted attention. 'NS' is commonly used as an abbreviation for 'national socialist' in far-right circles. His videos almost all contain neo-Nazi perspectives, enunciating conspiratorial antisemitism, anti-Black racism, and claims that white people are superior to all other races. In a June video titled 'There is no Anti-Semitism without Semitism,' Booth states in relation to interwar Germany: 'Extreme sadism and humiliation towards Gentiles is a Jewish tradition … Now, you might begin to understand why, after 14 years of seeing their people tormented by the Jews, millions of Germans organized, gained political power, and broke the chains of Jewish tyranny in Germany.' The video continues with Booth arguing that antisemitism is a just response to the behavior of Jews, and sarcastically dismisses the idea that it is 'just some ancient mental pathogen in the minds of the goyim. It just springs to life for no reason just to make things harder for the Jews'. In a July video, Booth defended recent attempts to create a whites-only community in Arkansas. He said: 'White people are allowed to congregate together without being accompanied by some fucking Black person or some Jew.' In another July video Booth said: 'Black people oppress themselves. I don't do it. I have no interest in it. I, you know, I just want them away from me. You know, I want them away from me, my community, my state, my country. I don't know. Just I don't know, get the fuck away from me.' In a May video supporting Trump's program of allowing Afrikaner refugees into the country on the basis of a fictional 'white genocide' in South Africa, Booth said: 'You know, I'm hoping that they don't completely lose South Africa to the black plague, but um but in any event, uh things are going to fall apart for them and go shit sideways.' Tischauser, the SPLC analyst, said that the themes of Booth's videos mix 'crass racism, basic historic white power talking points' and 'pseudo-academic kind of takes on Black criminality or Black behavior'. Meg Booth, Chris Booth's wife, was in November elected as the treasurer of Maple Valley Township running as a Republican. Her public social media profile does not feature the kind of extremist messaging that Chris Booth offers on his platform, though she has interacted with posts on his Facebook account, which is also freighted with racist messaging and neo-Nazi imagery. Chris Booth also liked posts in which she discussed her candidacy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store