
All is not lost for Britain's stock market
This month, America's main stock market, the S&P 500, came within 2pc of surpassing its record highs set in February, accompanied by much fanfare on Wall Street after the period of sharp turbulence.
But while the US was celebrating playing catch-up after the president's tariffs onslaught, UK stock markets have been quietly steaming ahead.
Steven Fine, the chief executive of City stockbroker Peel Hunt, says investors from outside the UK are starting to take note of London's markets again after the Trump tariff turmoil.
He acknowledges that you might not notice the shift amid the 'relentless' wave of companies leaving UK stock markets for the deeper pockets of US investors, including British semiconductor company Alphawave and payments group Wise.
'We have got a bit of a lack of self-esteem here,' says Fine. 'Why do overseas markets think we're more interesting than we do?'
Here are five closely watched charts to show why all is not lost for Britain's stock market.
The main UK stock index, the FTSE 100, closed at a record high earlier this month and has climbed more than 8pc so far this year, vastly outperforming the S&P 500, which is up by less than 2pc over the same period.
Yet this year's performance on the FTSE 100 is in stark contrast to previous years, where the City lagged European and US peers.
UK equity markets have 'not been an easy hunting ground', according to Tom Peberdy, of investment manager Ninety One. He says Brexit, the pandemic and an inflation crisis had made it 'pretty tough' to be a UK-focused fund manager at the firm, which targets wealthy individuals and institutional investors.
'But it does feel like the tide is turning,' he says after years of watching outsized gains on Wall Street, primarily powered by the 'magnificent seven' group of technology giants such as Apple and Amazon.
'Investors ultimately will gravitate towards where the opportunity is.'
The tide of money ebbing out of UK companies in recent years has depressed their share prices – but also made them cheaper to buy.
Ninety One is positioning itself for a surge in London markets, putting it at odds with the ever-increasing flow of money out of UK businesses over the past three years.
In comparison, companies on the S&P 500 have grown in value by about 32pc over that time, while the Nasdaq Composite, popular with technology investors, has gained 38pc.
The FTSE 100 has gained more than 16pc since April 2022. However, Fine, of Peel Hunt, sees this as a sign of resilience during a period when investors contended with the Liz Truss mini-Budget crisis and the surge in inflation triggered by the Ukraine war.
'We seem to deal with these things,' he says. 'The resilience of the UK economy is something we don't really recognise because it's always about what's going to happen next and how bad it's going to be in the future.
'So can that buffer become a bit more of a springboard?'
Fund managers at Ninety One are convinced there are a series of arguments stacking up in favour of investing in British companies.
'We do think the UK gets mischaracterised still as energy and banks,' says fund manager Anna Farmbrough, who employs a strategy aimed at investing in 'quality' companies.
'We think it is worth pointing out that capital goods is the largest sector in the UK. That is full of exceptional businesses operating in very niche industries. We really do have incredible innovation and technology being produced over here. They are often mission-critical products.'
She pointed to the industrial group Spectris, which saw shares surge by 65pc this month after attracting takeover bids from US private equity firms Advent and KKR.
Those bids were at an 80pc premium to its share price at the time, which Farmbrough says 'gives some reassurance around where the valuations for some of these businesses are, and that they are worth a lot more'.
Aside from offering the chance to buy stocks cheaply, the comparatively low valuations of companies on London's markets also offers the opportunity for better returns.
'One thing that people don't quite appreciate is what a big component dividends are in the forward returns of your buying a stock,' says Alessandro Dicorrado, who looks after value investing strategy at Ninety One.
'If you're making an investment with a long-term return ... most of that is dividend increases.'
Compared with the US S&P 500 and the Stoxx 600, the main stock market benchmark in Europe, the FTSE 100 is relatively cheap to buy.
Dicorrado highlights the higher dividends and buyback yields offered by companies across the FTSE compared to the S&P 500 and the rest of the world.
One of the ironies of this is that if UK companies remain cheap, they will offer greater returns as it will be cheaper for them to buy back their own stock, increasing the dividend returns and value of the stocks owned by their current shareholders.
'The cheaper a company can buy back its own stock, the more durable income compounds over time,' says Dicorrado.
'Actually, what you want is for the stocks to stay cheap but we also don't want the market to die. So let's try to find a middle ground.'
Look under the bonnet and British companies are also humming along more efficiently than some of their global rivals, deploying their capital more effectively.
For Farmbrough, the 'real watershed moment' for London's stock market came during the pandemic.
Faced with the huge challenges of lockdown, working from home and disrupted supply chains, companies were forced to 'allocate capital much better'.
This is illustrated by the improvement in return on invested capital, known as Roic, of FTSE All Share companies over the last 10 years. The metric measures how effectively a company uses the money it has invested to generate profits.
Farmborough says: 'There was a real watershed moment in the pandemic particularly amongst the more commoditised industries, where they really woke up to allocating capital in a more accretive way.
'So we think this has been a structural and quite permanent change to the UK market and it has not been reflected in valuations whatsoever.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Concrete sales plunge to 62-year low as hopes for Labour's building boom fade
Demand for concrete has fallen to its lowest level since 1963 in a serious blow to Labour's hopes of building more houses. Sales of ready-mixed concrete fell by 11.5pc in the three months to June against the previous three months, according to data from the Mineral Products Association (MPA), which represents producers. The product is widely-used in housebuilding to lay foundations, and provide the base for flooring and driveways. The figures suggest that Labour will miss its target of building 1.5m new homes by the end of this Parliament 'by a significant margin', the MPA said. Concrete sales have fallen by a third in 10 years, and more than halved over the last 20 years. The drop means that annual sales have not been this low since 1963 – before the nationwide housing and infrastructure building boom that transformed Britain. The MPA said that sales of other building materials, such as mortar and sand, also fell, with demand for most products at 'historically low levels'.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Chelsea have spent eye-watering £360MILLION on defenders in three years – but how many of them were worth it?
THE arrival of £37million Jorrel Hato takes Chelsea's spending on defenders under their new owners past a record-shattering £360m. Yet the Blues back four which lines up against Crystal Palace on the opening weekend of the new season may well include just one player who cost a fee. Marc Cucurella, who came in from Brighton three years ago in a deal worth up to £62m, is the biggest success of Chelsea 's hit-and-miss defensive recruitment. The signing of Hato is a major coup for the Blues, with Liverpool and Arsenal among the other major clubs who wanted the talented and versatile teenager. The young Dutchman is the 12th defender brought in since the consortium led by Clearlake Capital and Todd Boehly took over the club in May 2022. But Cucurella, a Euro 2024 winner with Spain, is the only member of the current Chelsea back four that you would describe as world class. And if Chelsea are to win domestic and European titles, they will need more defenders to reach that level. To be fair, Enzo Maresca 's side can already claim to be world champions. To beat a flair-filled Paris Saint-Germain side 3-0, just weeks after they had spanked Inter Milan 5-0 in the Champions League final, was an impressive achievement. The back four which started the Club World Cup final was left back Cucurella, homegrown centre backs Levi Colwill and Trevoh Chalobah, and right back Malo Gusto. The Frenchman, now 22, could end up costing Chelsea £30.7m after signing from Lyon in January 2023 and spending the rest of that season on loan back at the French club. Gusto has done a decent, sometimes very good, job at right back. He covered for the long injury-related absences of Reece James over the last two seasons and kept his place when James was employed in midfield - as he was against PSG. 8 8 But if you believe Moises Caicedo and Enzo Fernandez will start the biggest games in front of the defence, and James will mostly play as an inverted right back when he is fit, then Gusto will not be in Enzo Maresca's strongest 11. Chalobah did well after returning from half a season on loan at Crystal Palace, but could yet find himself being sold this summer. As a product of the Chelsea Academy, he would generate pure profit for financial rules purposes and there could be clubs willing to pay £40m for him. If Chalobah left, his replacement as right-sided centre back at the start of the season would almost certainly be Tosin Adarabioyo. The free transfer from Fulham last summer has carved a niche for himself off the pitch as well as on it. At just 27 he is one of the senior members of the squad, and plays an 'Uncle Tosin' role to the youngsters, enjoying a particularly close relationship with fellow Mancunian Cole Palmer. But no-one, not even Tosin himself, would claim that he is one of Europe's best defenders. If Wesley Fofana is able to put his injury hell behind him and rediscover his previous form, he could yet meet those standards and become a Chelsea stalwart for years to come. Fofana, still just 24, has made only 34 appearances for the Blues since arriving from Leicester in the summer of 2022 in a deal worth up to £75m. He is the most expensive of all Chelsea's defensive signings and that means, through no fault of his own, he has also been the biggest let down. But only just. The Blues really have had trouble finding a settled and satisfactory centre back pairing. Within weeks of the 2022 takeover, Kalidou Koulibaly became the new regime's first defensive signing. The Napoli star's £35m fee felt a little steep for a player about to turn 31, but the Senegal international was highly-rated and on the radar of other big clubs. Koulibaly failed to live up to his billing, although he could point to the chaos of playing under three different managers and a hamstring injury as decent explanations. He was offloaded after just one season to Saudi Pro League side Al-Hilal - and played for them in this year's Club World Cup. When Chelsea set a new record for winter window spending in early 2023, Benoit Badiashile 's £35m arrival from Monaco went a little under the radar in the wake of massive deals for Enzo Fernandez and Mykhailo Mudryk. The Frenchman did fine in a struggling team in the remainder of the 22/23 season, but not well enough to seal his spot. And when injury kept Badiashile out of the start of the following campaign, Colwill took his chance after returning from loan at Brighton. 8 8 8 Meanwhile the unfortunate Fofana had suffered the second major knee injury of his short Chelsea career in the summer of 2023. Within weeks, the Blues had gone back to Monaco to bring in Axel Disasi for another £38m. The France international was a first choice under Mauricio Pochettino for much of the 2023/4 season. But new boss Maresca did not fancy Disasi, and he was sent on loan to Aston Villa for the second half of last season. The signing of Hato, 19, fits Chelsea's current transfer philosophy of signing the best young players and trying to turn them into superstars. If they fail, they can usually be sold on for a profit, as is likely to be the case with Renato Veiga. The versatile Portuguese was signed only last summer, did well enough to earn a loan to Juventus for the second half of the season and could find himself joining Atletico Madrid for a chunky fee. In addition to Veiga, Chelsea signed two teenage defenders last summer in centre back Aaron Anselmino and left back Caleb Wiley. The latter has now returned to Watford for a second season on loan, while Anselmino may well also leave on a temporary deal after recovering from injury. Mamadou Sarr, 19, is likely to be loaned back to Strasbourg after the Blues paid £12m to their sister club. Hato is also 19 but at a fee of £37m, he will surely need to deliver for Chelsea this season. The Blues will probably ease him in, perhaps initially as cover for left back Cucurella. In the longer term, Hato should end up challenging Colwill for that left-sided centre back slot or forming a partnership with the England international. And finally, after spending more on defenders than any club, Chelsea could end up with a world-class back four to show for it. 8


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on car finance scandal redress: mis-sold loans demand action, not excuses or spin
With its ruling in the car finance case, the UK supreme court sent a clear message: some motorists purchased vehicles with deals that were indeed unfair, but it's not the judiciary's job to redraw the boundaries of consumer protection law. That burden, the justices suggested, rests with regulators and elected governments. This reasoning is in line with a major speech in June by the court's president, Lord Reed, who argued that judges aren't policymakers – and shouldn't be. He led a bench that nonetheless upheld a finding of unfairness in the case of the factory supervisor Marcus Johnson. The court flagged the danger, defined the threshold – but stopped short of imposing redress itself. Now, the baton has been passed. Millions could get payouts if the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) follows the court ruling with its proposed redress scheme, now out for consultation. The regulator admits what courts and campaigners have long suggested: that hidden commissions and opaque contracts were endemic, and that consumers were misled on a large scale. It may be 2025, but the roots of this scandal stretch back decades. More than 90% of new car purchases are financed, and for years, buyers weren't offered the best deal – just the one that earned the broker the biggest cut. Last October, the court of appeal saw hidden commissions as tantamount to bribes – secret incentives to push pricier loans. Banks had been on the hook for potentially £40bn in compensation had that view prevailed. But the supreme court disagreed. Dealers aren't fiduciaries, it said. They're not priests or doctors. They're salespeople and everyone knows it. The Treasury had tried, and failed, to intervene on behalf of banks that feared big payouts. The supreme court dismissed that petition with waspish brevity. Rachel Reeves may argue she was guarding financial stability, but it is not a good look to be siding with lenders over misled consumers, especially when there is a strong case to suggest regulators had been asleep at the wheel. The FCA now admits that many firms broke the rules. It plans a compensation scheme covering loans dating back to 2007, including both discretionary and some non-discretionary commission arrangements. The potential bill? At least £9bn, and possibly double that. Most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. The court's refusal to stretch the law to encompass issues of trust wasn't a shrug; it was a signal. The law allows unfairness to be addressed. But the heavy lifting must be done by the state. This episode lays bare a deeper malaise. Britain's credit system often runs on skewed incentives and asymmetric information. Brokers pose as advisers but act as commission-driven salespeople. In Mr Johnson's case a £1,650 hidden commission – a quarter of the car's price – went undisclosed. That's not a quirk; it's economics' classic lemons problem. In car finance, consumers didn't know how much brokers were pocketing or how that skewed the deal. Without trust or clarity, quality suffers – and everyone overpays for 'lemons' (duds). The court of appeal did focus minds; and failing to interpret the law robustly in the face of clear wrongdoing is itself a judicial choice. The supreme court smartly redirected the narrative. The regulator is stirring. Ministers must now support a consumer-facing system of redress and not shield the City from the consequences of its own mis‑selling. The public will be watching.