
SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: UK cash meant to combat climate change in Malawi funds loan sharks and helps men to dump their wives
About 8,800 villagers around Chikwawa in Malawi are receiving the equivalent of £433 each – and the Foreign Office insists the best way to send the money is directly to each of them. They even give each recipient a mobile phone to facilitate the online transfer.
The hope is they will use the windfall to 'reduce the impact of climate extremes' through stronger homes, better farming practices and improved communications. Officials claim financial and business training will help 'beneficiaries make informed choices on what is likely to be the largest amount of cash they have ever seen'.
But the Foreign Office explicitly leaves it up to them to decide how to spend the windfall, which is distributed through its partner GiveDirectly – known to villagers as 'Givie'. It is a fabulous sum in a poverty-stricken country where 70 per cent live on just £1.60 a day – and the MoS can reveal much of the money is squandered.
The two-year Chikwawa project is part of a ramping-up of UK overseas aid for climate resilience with 'at least £1.5 billion' spent in 2024-25, according to the Foreign Office. It defends the cash transfers, and says it monitors all programmes to ensure 'value for money for the British taxpayer'.
In the village of Mwanaakula, Henry Maliko, 26, said he was buying iron sheets for his small mud hut as part of the scheme. But he has also found 'a creative way of investing the rest of the money by becoming a money lender'.
Mr Maliko explained: 'Some people who are yet to receive their money have been coming to ask for loans and offering to pay me back double the amount.
'People here lack many things. They have no patience to wait for their money to arrive so they go to those who have received theirs and ask for loans.'
Madame Mwanaakula, the female 'headman', who by tradition takes the name of the village, told the MoS: 'There's been plenty of young men who have gone to South Africa after receiving money from Givie.
'It helps them get a passport quickly, throw backhanders to government agents, pay for transport and accommodation and find a job on the black economy so as to send money home.'
The trend has left 21-year-old Triza Piterson to await the birth of her first child alone. She confirmed her husband used his money to bribe officials, obtain a passport and travel to South Africa in search of work.
Without a visa – unlikely to be granted to an unskilled foreigner – he is there as an illegal immigrant. She says she is confident he will come back eventually.
And Ruth Harold, 32, said her husband Essau walked out on her and their two children, aged five and four, within days of receiving his cash. He has since set up home with another woman.
Essau says he left because she got her payment before him, and her personality changed.
He said: 'She became rude after she got her money'.
Last night, Tory MPs called for an urgent investigation into the project. Sir John Hayes, chairman of the Tories' Common Sense Group at Westminster, said: 'A great nation should have a big heart and helping those in the greatest need has been a characteristic of our great nation.
'However, making sure that money that is spent delivers on the objectives requires proper oversight and management.
'The reason so many people have doubts about overseas aid is that money is misspent and wasted.
'This project needs to be investigated very quickly as a result of The Mail on Sunday's investigation.' The Malawi project was approved under the last Conservative government in April last year.
It took effect after Labour came to power with the first cash payments made six months later.
The Foreign Office's 'business case', signed off by the British High Commissioner to Malawi, Fiona Ritchie, argues that there is 'a large amount of evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of cash transfers'.
A spokesman for GiveDirectly said: 'Anecdotes are a poor way to judge the effectiveness of aid programmes. Independently run randomised control trials objectively prove direct cash assistance reduces extreme poverty and builds long-term resilience.'
But John O'Connell, chief executive at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'This is a damning example of UK taxpayers' money being sprayed abroad with no accountability and little to show for it. Ministers need to get a grip.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rising food prices driven by climate crisis threaten world's poorest, report finds
Climate change-induced food price shocks are on the rise and could lead to more malnutrition, political upheaval and social unrest as the world's poorest are hit by shortages of food staples. New research links last year's surges in the price of potatoes in the UK, cabbages in South Korea, onions in India, and cocoa in Ghana to weather extremes that 'exceeded all historical precedent prior to 2020'. Such price jumps not only affect local food security and health, particularly for the poorest in society, but have knock-on effects around the world. Unprecedented monthly temperatures in February 2024 after drought in late 2023 and early 2024 across Ghana and Ivory Coast, where 60% of the world's cocoa is grown, led to global prices for the commodity spiking by 300%. The high price of staples can have an impact on public health as low-income households cut back on expensive fruit and vegetables, according to the report from a team including the UK's Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), the European Central Bank (ECB), the Food Foundation, the Barcelona Supercomputing Center and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. The study investigated examples across 18 countries between 2022 and 2024 where price spikes were associated with heat, drought and heavy precipitation. It found food price spikes can have a wider economic impact, making it harder for economies to keep down overall inflation and so, for example, bring interest rates down. A hot dry spring in the UK this year, for example, partly drove unexpectedly high UK inflation figures published last week, dampening expectations for further interest rate cuts this summer. The report also suggests 'high rates of inflation can directly alter election outcomes in modern democracies'. Maximilian Kotz, a Marie Curie postdoctoral research fellow at Barcelona Supercomputing Center and the lead author of the report, said: 'It is clear the cost of living played a role in last year's election in the US.' He added: 'These effects are going to continue to become worse in the future. Until we get to net zero emissions extreme weather will only get worse, but it's already damaging crops and pushing up the price of food all over the world. 'People are noticing, with rising food prices No 2 on the list of climate impacts they see in their lives, second only to extreme heat itself. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'Sadly, when the price of food shoots up, low-income families often have to resort to less nutritious, cheaper foods. Diets like this have been linked to a range of health conditions like cancer, diabetes and heart disease.' Raj Patel, a research professor in the Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, said: 'Food price inflation is always political.' For example, people in Mozambique took to the streets when the price of bread shot up after extreme heat in Russia, a big wheat producer, prompted the country to block exports to protect meagre supplies in 2010 meaning the price of wheat soared globally. The research is published ahead of the UN Food Systems Summit Stocktake on 27 July, where world leaders will meet to discuss threats to the global food system.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
BHP exits $2.5 billion Tanzania nickel project, partner Lifezone says
MELBOURNE, July 21 (Reuters) - BHP Group ( opens new tab has opted to sell its interest in the $2.5 billion Kabanga nickel project in Tanzania to its partner Lifezone Metals (LZM.N), opens new tab for as much as $83 million, Lifezone said. The NYSE-listed company will acquire BHP's 17% equity interest in Kabanga Nickel Limited (KNL), the majority owner of the Kabanga Nickel Project in northwestern Tanzania, Lifezone said in a filing late on Friday. The company issued a report on Friday that put development costs for the project at $2.49 billion. It is expected to produce around 50,000 metric tons of nickel annually once fully ramped up, a process that will take six years including construction. A final investment decision on the project is due next year. BHP had agreed in 2022 to make an investment of as much as $100 million in the nickel mine and processing facilities if certain conditions were met. BHP did not respond immediately to a request for comment on why it had sold its stake in the project. The divestment comes as BHP has since shifted its view on nickel on the back of a boom in output from Indonesia in recent years. It put its Australian Nickel West operations on care and maintenance last year due to a poor outlook for nickel prices and a decision on the future of those operations is due by early 2027. As a result the transaction, Lifezone now owns 100% of KNL, which in turn holds an 84% interest in Tembo Nickel Corporation Limited (TNCL), the Tanzanian operating company for the Kabanga Nickel Project. The remaining 16% of TNCL is held by Tanzania's government. All existing agreements with BHP have been terminated and Lifezone has also assumed full control of 100% of the offtake from the Kabanga Nickel Project, it said.


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Today's workers ‘at greater risk of poverty in old age than their parents'
Today's workers are at a greater risk of poverty in old age than their parents, experts warned, as the UK looks to revive a government body to tackle the crisis. People looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners, according to Age UK. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will resurrect the Pensions Commission, which last met in 2006, to 'tackle the barriers that stop too many from saving in the first place'. At least 45 per cent of working-age adults are putting nothing into their pensions, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said. The previous commission recommended automatically enrolling people in workplace pensions, which has seen the number of eligible employees saving rise from 55 per cent in 2012 to 88 per cent. DWP analysis suggested 15 million people were undersaving for retirement, with the self-employed, lower paid and some ethnic minorities particularly affected. Around three million self-employed people are said to be saving nothing for their retirement, while only a quarter of people on low pay in the private sector, and the same proportion from Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds, are saving. Women face a significant gender pensions gap, with those approaching retirement in line to receive barely half the income that men can expect. Pensions minister Torsten Bell said: 'The original Pensions Commission helped get pension saving up and pensioner poverty down. 'But if we carry on as we are, tomorrow's retirees risk being poorer than today's. So we are reviving the Pensions Commission to finish the job and give today's workers secure retirements to look forward to.' The commission will be led by Baroness Jeannie Drake, a member of the previous commission, and report in 2027 with proposals that stretch beyond the next election. Age UK's Caroline Abrahams said the commission needed to address the state pension, which provides the bulk of retirement income for most pensioners. She said: 'If we're to avoid future generations of pensioners experiencing financial hardship, we need reforms that enable more people to build a decent standard of living, and we need them sooner rather than later to maximise the numbers who can be helped.' Ministers hope the Pensions Commission will build a consensus around changes, as its predecessor did, working with businesses and trade unions.