logo
The ‘who next' challenge that washed out a rally

The ‘who next' challenge that washed out a rally

Malay Mail4 days ago
JULY 31 — A curious rally over the weekend, a wee fire doused by a single question, who replaces Anwar?
Which was, all sentimentalities and tribal pangs aside, right on the nose.
'Turun Anwar' protesters looked away sheepishly when confronted with the most obvious of asks.
It is, actually, a long time coming. This impossible quandary, self-inflicted upon an equally impossible country.
Protesters gather during the 'Turun Anwar' rally at Dataran Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur July 26, 2025. — Picture by Firdaus Latif
It's yesterday, once more
When Onn Jaffar left Umno in 1951, the party had to go looking for a replacement. No number two.
A barren leadership landscape emboldened Onn to set his terms. Razak Hussein was too young in 1951, 29-years-old then, by his own admission.
He was, however, certain to ascend, just a matter of when. Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid was slotted in as Umno's second president.
In the aftermath of Anwar Ibrahim's 1998 expulsion, there was reluctance to look at Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as a replacement.
In more recent times, newly-formed Bersatu felt 93-year-old chairman Mahathir Mohamad was a better fit in 2018 to head Pakatan Harapan despite president Muhyiddin Yassin with almost 30 years of executive office experience ready on the side.
It took a messy MP kerfuffle with direct palace adjudication to elevate Muhyiddin in 2020. That very same uneasy MP count passed the post to Ismail Sabri Yaakob. An Umno vice-president as PM was unprecedented.
While all the whimsical complaints continue since 2022, Anwar has been the closest to look PM worthy.
That's not a critique of the prime minister, but a realisation which slaps the country, slaps us.
We suck at growing leaders. We keep people in circulation in cynical permutations until they drop into leadership as a function of being around long enough.
Like Abdullah, Najib, Muhyiddin and Ismail Sabri. Been around, long enough.
Remember the lunch, Khairy Jamaluddin Abu Bakar, Nurul Izzah Anwar and Rafizi Ramli had back in 2018. Made the rounds. Many hoped they'd join that lazy, worn-out conveyor belt of becoming PM by being around, long enough.
Today, Khairy moonlights as a radio deejay when not hosting his podcasts, looking at power from the outside; Nurul Izzah encircled with nepotism gossip being her father's deputy after ousting Rafizi who plots sophisticated plays when he is clearly discord's blunt instrument.
We are clueless about growing future leadership, because of the obduracy to outcomes rather than respect for process or reason. Go about it like madmen and we are surprised to live in an asylum we built for ourselves?
Especially since inspiration is the most un-Malaysian thing.
Excalibur, not a DIY buy
The final action scene from A New Hope (Star Wars, Episode Four) was novice jedi Luke Skywalker aiming for the tiniest of tiniest targets on the Death Star while staving off the Empire's fighter planes led by his father Darth Vader.
The real story is not that he hit the mark, spoiler alert, but that several movies and TV shows had to be expanded to explain the roles of many, many other people chipping in. They can give a hand but the path to power is exclusive to a few.
Seemingly power can be exercised by the chosen few, regardless of success. In a parallel universe, the Empire won.
That sounds like Malaysia. Crudely fatalistic.
Let's examine the process.
We kick off by kicking out half the country. Independent women have no viable path to top office.
While by every measure — scholastic achievements, university entry, corporate success and stronger representation in the public, private and civil society sector — Malaysian women are kicking ass, they face a political ladder without notches or steps. Levitation is a prerequisite to climb it.
Them and other minorities.
They cannot prove their worth in local government, which is a common pathway in saner parts around the world, since our local governments are manipulated and disempowered.
Civil servants run the show in a Malaysia where paranoid politicians centralise everything including our buses and farces in fear of losing power.
Minorities cannot rise up through parties since the parties are tiered. Women's wings are subsidiaries, not parallel leadership tracks.
Female success stories to the political top do not exist, if those with familial affiliations are removed.
Borneo accepts its auxiliary status. Ever since Shafie Apdal was pistol-whipped in Umno, and later light-sabred when his Warisan dreamt of Putrajaya, the terms of engagement are clear. Borneo, stay in your lane.
And if the candidate pre-qualifies — Malay male graduate from a major Semenanjung state certified bipolar, as he must display outright xenophobia and race love one minute and the grace of inclusivity the next minute — he fights on as party member in Umno, Bersatu or PKR. Constantly defends his preset identity to protect his chances.
One thing he does not need to do is present an original idea. Ideas, thoughts on development and how to reconstruct the labour market under threat from trade tariffs and artificial intelligence, are completely unnecessary.
Thinking is a distraction in this space. They compromise principles to fit the scheme.
Just look at who makes it through. How underwhelming they are. They are as much victims as graduates of the political system.
PAS supporters say Kedah Mentri Besar Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor can be the exception. The Universiti Sains Malaysia graduate is many things, but a thinker he is not.
Nor is Terengganu MB Ahmad Shamsuri Mokhtar, though I understand the party's faithful are ecstatic a scientifically trained man is in their stable. Reminder, Donald Trump graduated from the famed Northwestern University, and he is no intellectual, let's posit that.
Pakatan does not have a leg up on this. Selangor MB Amirudin Shari can be described as someone pleasant enough. The Johor MB managed to be born in the right Johor family, as his resume should read.
It is not the bottom of the barrel, but it is nowhere near the top.
The system which excludes most from the start and only targets the Skywalkers, gets what it deserves, mediocrity.
No downs, just ups
So, to last weekend's blindsided protesters.
The feudal nature of our political system means there is no answer — to who after Anwar.
Our fidelity to tribalism and self-sabotage has come full circle, and now the country cries out for a reboot. Do not worry, all movie franchises do it.
Who's next is not a Perikatan Nasional problem, or Pakatan's. The country owns the problem.
Malaysia has had and continues to have remarkable people, they just cannot catch a break in the situation.
Reminds me of three people I taught before. Absolute gems.
One, the smartest one thinks while the rest sleep. A machine just like Mahathir. Articulate and steadfast. Sits in Singapore as a CTO for a regional start-up whose services Malaysians use daily.
The second one is rare, deeply introspective and drips with charm. Strangers worldwide constantly want to adopt this pup, and he now lives further south than Singapore.
And the last one is the slickest. Like premium oil which cannot be ignored. Gets the job done, without fuss. This one remains in Malaysia.
Those mentri besar characters would be petrified to sit with them at the same table.
But that is the Malaysia we live in. Talent does not get an invite. That's a disservice to call them talents. Absolute stars with sterling records are ignored.
I should know. I brought the three to work and help my old party PKR for free 13 years ago. The appreciation certificate they never received was exemplary.
If we have too few with quality to step in today, we can completely thank ourselves for it.
Stop looking at the personalities for answers. If they believed in answers more than their futures, they'd have stood up long ago.
Champion change when it is not to their advantage. They did not, because they also like succeeding without having to try as hard.
Why do we have no one else? Because we are great at celebrating pretenders.
* This is the personal opinion of the columnist.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Creating Anwar's legacy — ending ‘gomenshud'
Creating Anwar's legacy — ending ‘gomenshud'

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Creating Anwar's legacy — ending ‘gomenshud'

One of the most common Malaysian words I hear is 'gomenshud'. This is used whenever an issue of concern arises and the 'government should' do something about it rather than the private sector or, heaven-forfend, that individuals should fix it for themselves. It is ironic that people complain of incompetence, systemic corruption and moral turpitude within the executive, legislature, judiciary and the permanent civil service at federal and state levels but still demand that more money, responsibility and interference opportunities should be handed to them. The economics of government and policy design, called 'public choice theory' tells us clearly that people in government are not driven by the 'greater good' or the 'public interest', they are, just like the rest of us, driven by personal and collective self-interest. This is not meant to be cynical or offensive but simply to help us understand those in public policy as human beings — they have hopes and dreams, they want to make life easy for themselves as far as possible and if there is a chance to make a few bucks they will take it. Each year the auditor-general reports hundreds of millions lost in wastage and leakages across the government sector. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) estimates RM277 billion lost to corruption between 2018 and 2023. The think tank Emir Research estimates that RM4.5 trillion was lost to corruption in the last 26 years. This is all identified after the fact and to stop this haemorrhage of resources we need to address the 'gomenshud mentality' which defaults to intervention from the start without proper evaluation of the costs and benefits and the likely losses due specifically to policy design. A common form of policy design in Malaysia is the 'patronage cascade' where projects, concessions and access routes to money are specifically built-in to benefit middlemen often through pre-allocated packages and contracts. With this in mind, the 13th Malaysia Plan which will be tabled this week should reduce the role and interference of government. We should be cautious if we see 'patronage cascades' where policies are specifically designed to pass projects to vested interests. Instead, broad-based universal programmes, available to everyone, with open and transparent access routes should be the emphasis. This can be achieved first by government exiting commercial activities which crowd out large businesses, SMEs and micro enterprises and leaving these activities to the private sector. Second by slashing regulations and focusing only on minimum standards of health and safety, anti-corruption, good governance and anti-trust issues. Finally, by focusing on the basic role of government in many areas where there are direct and legitimate concerns for public policy including public health, education and social protection. Economic mechanisms we hope to see in the 13MP include liberalisation of markets, reducing regulatory burdens, limiting government interference and promoting creative, innovative, agile, competitive businesses. The US tariff issue also sends us a lesson that protectionist policies come with a reciprocal cost. So removing restrictions to market access should also be a priority for the 13MP. Proper independent assessments have rarely been made of the targets of previous Malaysia plans and many have not been delivered, fully or at all. The main unfulfilled target of every Malaysia plan is to build in a mechanism to end the need for future plans. In other words, these are 'forever wars' against dreamed up economic challenges more typical of centrally planned economies. They are increasingly irrelevant in a modern technology-driven economic environment in which anything laid down in July 2025 will be obsolete by December 2025 let alone by 2030 — gomenshud recognise this and end it once and for all. The views expressed are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.

Puteri Umno steadfast backbone of Umno's struggle
Puteri Umno steadfast backbone of Umno's struggle

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Puteri Umno steadfast backbone of Umno's struggle

KUALA LUMPUR: Umno president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has expressed his appreciation to all Puteri Umno members in conjunction with the 24th anniversary of the Umno wing. The deputy prime minister said the wing has remained a steadfast backbone of the party's struggle for more than two decades. In a Facebook post, Ahmad Zahid said Puteri Umno is a dynamic wing representing the voice of young women that is bold in taking the lead, strategic in organising efforts and unwavering in defending Umno under any circumstances. "From the realm of social media to the grassroots in villages and cities, Puteri is always present, contributing energy and igniting the spirit of the (party's) struggle," he said. He said this anniversary comes at a very significant time, ahead of the Sabah State Election, which he described as both a testing ground and an opportunity to prove the maturity and capability of Puteri Umno as the voice of the future. "I believe, with strong solidarity and unyielding spirit, Puteri Umno will continue to chart success, not only within the party, but also in nation-building and driving the country forward. "Happy 24th Anniversary to Puteri Umno. – Bernama

Review 25km ‘straight-line' travel allowance for Sabah teachers, says union
Review 25km ‘straight-line' travel allowance for Sabah teachers, says union

Free Malaysia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Review 25km ‘straight-line' travel allowance for Sabah teachers, says union

The union said several teachers in Sabah were forced to pay back the travel allowances they had received. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The education ministry and public services department have been urged to review the implementation of a new 25km 'straight-line' travel allowance rule for teachers in Sabah. The allowance for teachers travelling from their home to their schools is capped at a travel distance of 25km, measured as a straight line on a map rather than the actual distance covered by road. The Sabah government teachers' union (KGKS) said this rule cannot be implemented rigidly in Sabah given the state's hilly terrain and lack of infrastructure, like roads. KGKS president Gundohing Murkam Hussien cited the example of teachers working at SK Penimbawan Tuaran, which can be reached by boat or road, The Borneo Post reported. 'The first way is by boat along the river, which takes between 10 and 15 minutes, depending on weather conditions. The second is to use a car and drive for 78km. 'This means that strictly enforcing the 25km requirement is not appropriate. After considering the views of all KGKS members, the union has agreed to appeal to the ministry to review this issue,' he said. Gundohing said several teachers under KGKS were taking home lower salaries now because of this rule. Previously, they were given the travel allowance after it had been verified by the district education office. Gundohing also said some teachers were ordered to repay the allowances they had 'wrongly' received, forcing a few of them to apply for bank loans or sell their cars to pay off the amount. 'Of course, the teachers involved have been badly affected, leading to a decrease in their enthusiasm for work. 'All those involved in the process (of approving the allowances for the teachers) should by right be held responsible and share the cost of these claims,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store